Sounds amazing! I'm not literally jealous or envious as secularists define that, but through a Christian lens I'm totally jealous and envious of you (hope that makes sense!).

You are blessed to have experienced Heaven on Earth

Awww that's awesome!

@@VanessaHolguin I think Paul could identify with that since he was jealous over one of the churches. 2 Corinthians 11:2 ESV [2] For I feel a divine jealousy for you, since I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a pure virgin to Christ.

poor you. I pray you go beyond White and apologia and come to maturity.

Bless you brother, I'm down in London and we reach out to muslims here quite frequently, keep up the good work! God bless 🙏🏻

Thank you for your evangelism work, brother. I was born in a Muslim family. I'm now a believer in Yeshua Hamashiach. I feel so blessed that Lord Jesus came and rescued a lost sheep like me. 🙏🙌

Amen! Praise God. May he bless you sister.

My heart is full, sister!! May you know the love of Jesus more and more. We are so excited for you and gives us hope for our M friends!!

how many rakat in surah fatiha? 🤣

​​@@saqibux1058 Ex-muslims....exactly!! Smh ...I never met an ACTUAL Orthodox ex-muslim. Ive met many Arab Christians pretending to be Muslim...pathetic attempt...smh Ex-muslims are 1 in billion.... The Quran is perserved. Bible is not. Case closed!! Fake ex-muslims...smh

So would I. Unfortunately i live in South Africa

The Only way I see it is to get up early to visit 😅

Praise Amaterasu!

I praise God for your words of wisdom. You have embodied more understanding of what I have experienced in my 26 years as a Christian, as their pastors tickle their ears, telling them that they will be ruptured before anything bad starts to happen, all the while praising the destruction of those who believe in another god, thus, ushering in (like you pointed out) their Zionist view and the return of Christ. The problem is, the Anti Christ that will rise from this chaos, will be seen by the world, Christ's return. Nothing could be further from what Revelations says. God Bless you, and I want to thank you for your beautiful words.

He won't dare to! People like Dr White tend to believe their own method/perspective is the best...and CP is guilty of this, too. But having listened to CP for about 3 years, I will choose CP's method over Dr White's anyday...but as directed by the Holy Spirit.😊

@@kenid4144 Listening to a foul mouth for 3 years! How horrible must you be.

Of course God is not done with Israel… He made the new covenant with them. Go read Jeremiah 31:31 Another thing… today’s Jews are not descendants of the ancient Israelites. They are about 90% Ashkenazim…. They are Descendants of Japheth(keep in mind that true Israelites are descendants of Shem). The bulk of the remaining 10% of Jews today are a mix of Edomite, Canaanite, Berber, With some white European blood sprinkled in. The true Israelites are The white Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, Germanic, Celtic, and kindred peoples.

Wrong on all statements here.

If Mary and Joseph had *named Jesus* , "ROCK" , Christ would have been called *'Cephas"* by the Jews and Peter by the Greeks. But, Christ's name was Jesus and Jesus Christ reserved the NAME "ROCK" FOR CEPHAS (PETER).

​@@catholic4sure976...Why bring that here? We worship the Lord Jesus Christ here...Go see your RCC buddies....💥

@@michellecheriekjv4115 You despise Christ and the apostles don’t you?

If you owe someone $5 and your friend pays it for you, you go free while your friend bore the burden of paying your debt. Your friend is an example of substitutionary atonement. Your friend paid your debt so your debt could be forgiven. And that's what Jesus did for us. He paid the debt for your sins by dying on the cross in your place, taking the punishment you deserve so you can go free. Either you can bear the burden of your own sins and pay for your own, or you let Jesus pay for your sins by trusting alone in what He did on the cross for you. The wages of sin is death. If Jesus took 100 percent of your punishment, there is zero punishment left for you. Place your faith in Him alone to save you. It is by grace alone you are saved, not of works, so no one may boast. Ephesians 2:8-9

@@jessicaspencer1683 And how is that just? to punish a completely innocent person for the sins of the guilty? and what sin did i commit in the first place? i wasn’t there with Adam and Eve when they sinned.. so again, how is that just?

@@whysoserious0God is justice but He is also mercy. Someone has to pay for your sins, and it can either be you, or it can be Jesus. If it is Jesus, you are guaranteed eternal life, the moment you believe you are justified before God and you cannot lose your salvation. Eternal life is a promise if you trust Christ alone to save you and it is a free gift, you do not have to earn it. If it is you who has to pay for your sins, then you will have to face eternal torment in hell. And me saying this is loving you enough to tell you the truth, I don't want you to go to hell. If you have ever lied, or stolen something, looked at someone with lust (Jesus says that is the same as committing adultery) you have sinned against God. And that is just looking at 3 of the 10 commandments. Breaking just one commandment is falling short of God's glory and is enough to send you to hell. A just judge does not overlook crimes committed because of all the good a person has done. There is no good deeds outweighing the bad or vice versa. But someone can come along and bail you out of jail and pay your fine or your debt. And Jesus did that for you because He loves you. That is good news. Not only that, but Jesus is alive in Heaven today, seated at the right hand of the Father. Jesus was not unjustly killed on the cross. From before the foundation of the world, Jesus knew this was the plan for Him all along, and before the creation of the world, Jesus agreed with the Father to come and die to save sinners. Jesus says in John 10:18, "No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it up again. This charge I have received from my Father." I am telling you today, you can have hope, 100 percent assurance and confidence you will be in Heaven if you trust Christ alone as your Lord and Savior. That is the promise of Jesus in John 3:16, and Jesus cannot lie.

I just did a quick google and see he has one entitled “What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Quran”. I’ve not read it, but I’m sure that’s the one!

Muslims have lived quite peacefully with Christians for a long time. The Ashkenazi are the problem more than you seem to know. They don’t respect anyone unless it’s their own kind. Muslims have respect for Jesus as a prophet. The do have a reverence for God that Jews do not have. Jews are also NOT Israelites. Ashkenazis are white European “gentiles” aka goyim (which is what they call all non ashkenazis.

Most Christians I've seen evangelize to Muslim eventually revert to Islam. I welcome you my future brother. Step into the light of divine love and mercy.

@@omarelamri I don't know one sincere Christian who has converted to Islam, in fact we have many converts to Christianity from devout muslims who realise they're still in their sins and need a saviour! Repent and believe the Gospel Omar 🙏🏻

@harrisonclewes7457 That’s wishful thinking my friend. I studied the Bible at a Catholic seminary, with a specific focus on the Gospels of MMLJ. I wrote a thesis on the biblical Jesus vs. the historical Jesus. I’ve also studied Zen Buddhism at a seminary in California. I wrote a thesis on Zen mindfulness practice. And I did quite a bit of work on Vedantic Hinduism. On this journey, I’ve seen many Christian priests and pastors as well as Buddhists and yoga devotes become Muslim. These were very devout people. And that’s not to mention the countless laymen that come every week to take shahada at our local mosque in upstate New York.

@@omarelamri Omar with respect, there are many people who have studied a lot more than you have with much higher accolations than "studying the Bible at a Catholic seminary" which have which have converted from Islam to Christianity, I would direct you to Thabiti Anyabwile for one, also Nabeel Qureshi as-well as Ayaan Hirsi to name a few. I live in London and I minister in the city with a huge muslim population, and we see huge numbers both convert or just leave the Islamic faith altogether. Even though that is true, it is not an argument for Islam being false. Islam is false because it tells a different story about who Jesus is and what He came to do, which leaves everyone who follows Islam dying in their sins and entering eternal suffering for rejecting God's Own Son. I am always surprised by the way to hear muslims using atheist non-believing arguments focused on "the historical Jesus" which is thought up by people who presuppose that there is no God and so He could not have spoken. If the same atheistic arguments were presumed and applied to the Qur'an, then you would have to start with the rational of "finding the historical Muhammad", and focusing on the unreliability of the Hadith to show that Muslims actually have a very unstable worldview. But Muslims believe that there is a God who has spoken and so can preserve His word! Which is what Christians believe, so you have to start there and argue from what's already been revealed Omar, and use equal scales to judge them both.

Stephen (Acts 7:51-60) showed loved to his fellow Jews by telling them the truth about Jesus as we are commanded and got killed because they were angry and murderous hard hearted people. Was he supposed to ignore them? Every disciple except John has been killed in the ancient world for spreading the Gospel. Jesus Himself showed love to the people who hated Him and was crucified. We are not above persecution. Many religions back then and now are evil. The call still stands. Picking up your cross does not end in 2023.

That’s noahide laws. Do you even know what the Ashkenazi Talmud and Kabbalah teachings say???? You are grossly ignorant

I'm not a fan of Sam, but Dr White is not revealing the full picture. I agree that we should be kind and loving towards the general Muslims. But the kind of Muslims Sam mostly deals with are the combative types. Western politeness and civility is considered a sign of weakness and false-standing by combative Muslims. They will mock and deceive endlessly unless you know how to handle them. The question Dr White needs to ask himself is why have Yasir Qadhi, Shabbir Ally and Adnan Rashid not become Christians (or at least leave Islam) today, despite his kindness to them?

@@kenid4144we all know why they haven’t. The point wasn’t that love and kindness saves Muslims. It’s that our love and kindness drives us to share the gospel with them so that the power of God may save them if they believe. The same as it should for all people groups over the globe.

@@LucasJagneaux I get your point. But I doubt that point can be supported by the Bible. It seems like mere human reasoning or methodology based on personal experience or Western ethic of politeness. The Bible says "the love of Christ compels us"...NOT our love and kindness compels us. It is absolutely vital to love all humans, but if we want to exploit love as a tactic to reach out to Muslims, that is sheer scheming. In fact, Christian missionaries are mocked in some parts of India for their love kindness and charity because they see those acts as a stepping stones to unwarranted proselytizing. My point is, there are times when Christians need to take the bull by the horn and go hard on islam, especially when dealing with "bulls" i.e tough combative Muslims (see Matthew 12). And this should be done because Christ's love compels us to do so...not by thinking a sissified and humanistic kindness will make us want to share the gospel. That's delusional, to say the least.

@@kenid4144 Right. I can definitely agree with that statement. I suppose the word "love" has taken on some negative connotations in our western, post modern society. When I mentioned love, I absolutely mean the biblical love of Christ for His church. Not sissified, niceness. I mean the same love that caused Paul to oppose Peter to his face when he was being a hypocrite. Not a love that demands acceptance and compromise of truth, but a deep love and desire to see the lost saved, so their souls don't suffer in Hell for eternity. It goes beyond the muslim. Christians, above all others, should be the light of the world, the city set on the hill. Not in compromise of truth, but in covenant with the God who loved us, when we hated Him.

No

@@YTTraveler777 No??? If Mary and Joseph had *named Yashua (Jesus)* , "ROCK" , Christ would have been called *'Cephas"* by the Jews and *Peter by the Greeks.* Yet, Jesus Himself reserved the name: Cephas ("ROCK") for the one who is called, "Peter" (in the Greek). Mt. 16:16-18. There is no other way to call anyone Rock in the Greek language, except to call him "Peter" .

When Jesus said, "I will build My church upon this rock, He was not calling Peter, " the rock." Read the passage again. Peter had just stated that Jesus was / is "the Christ" ... it is THIS REVELATION (that Jesus alone is salvation) that is the foundation ROCK that Jesus would build His church upon. 🔥

@@denisesmith3544 JESUS HIMSELF name Simon Bar Jona CEPHAS! It means ROCK!!! New Thayer's Greek - Engish Lexicon says concerning 2786 "Cephas" "A ROCK", the surname of Simon the Apostle: John 1:42, 1Cor. 1:12, 3:22; 4:5 (which reads, "the rock that followed them was Christ), 15:5, and also in Gal.1:18, 2:11, 14." The New Strongs Exhaustive Dictionary says this, "2786. Keµphas, kay-fas´; of Chald. or. [comp. 3710]; the Rock; Cephas (i.e. Kepha), a surname of Peter:- Cephas. Related to this word is the Kefa from the Hebrew which is #3710 which reads as follows: 3710.e keÆph, kafe; from 3721; a hollow rock:- rock." In every case when the word "Cephas" is used it only means "rock" not pebble or stone. The name Peter is the transliteration of the word "Cephas" from the Aramaic to the Greek. Cephas only means "rock". Harper Collins Bible Dictionary page 173 remarks on the name "Cephas" "From the Aramaic kay fa Rock, a surname equivalent to Peter, cf John1:42, Matt.16:17-18." The New Oxford Annotated Bible page 149 says concerning John 1:42, "In Aramaic Cephas (Grk Petros) means rock, cf Matt.16:18. "The gospel does not over look however, the eminence of Peter in early tradition. He receives from Jesus , at the same time of his calling the special name *"Rock"* at a critical moment in Jesus' ministry. Peter leads the other disciples in loyalty and confession of fait and Peter will assure his prominent role." (Interpreters One Volume Commentary pp 711) "Peter, personal name meaning, Rock. Cephas most frequently used by Paul. *Cephas and Peter both mean Rock."* (Hohman Bible Dictionary, pp 1098) Peter ("stone; rock"), a fisherman called to be an apostle of Christ. He became one of the leaders of the early church (Matt. 4:18-20; 16:15-19; Acts 2). *Christ changed this man's name from Simon to a name meaning* "rock" (Cephas in Aramaic, Peter in Greek). James I. Packer, Merrill C. Tenney and William White, Jr., editors, Nelson's illustrated manners and customs of the Bible [computer file], electronic ed., Logos Library System, (Nashville: Thomas Nelson) 1997, c1995. "Cephas [se fes] (Gr. Kephas, from Aram. Kepa "Rock")." The Errdmans Bible Dictionary pp 199. ^THE FACT IS THAT PETER WAS ALREADY KNOWN AS* *"ROCK"* LONG BEFORE MATT. 16. I could give volumes more that agree including A.T. Robertson, DA Carson and a host of others. *Not one of them think Peter or Cephas means* " a piece of a rock" or pebble NASB on John 1:42 says, "Cephas means rock" . NAB on Mt. 16: says, " You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, the Aramaic word kepa meaning rock and transliterated in the Greek as Kephas is the name by which Peter is called in the Pauline letters. It is translated as Petros (Peter) in John 1:42. The presumed original Aramaic of Jesus statement would have been in English, " You are Rock (Kepa) and up this (Kepa) I will build my church. The Greek text probably means the same thing, for the difference in gender between the masculine noun petros, the disciples new name and the feminine noun Petra (rock) may be due simply to the unsuitability of using a feminine noun as the proper name of a male." page 35 New American Bible. pg 1946 “Nothing give evidence of Peter’s Rock-like Character as does this Epistle (1Peter). King James Study Bible, Thomas Nelson Publishers John 1:42 Life Application Study Bible NIV, Tyndale House Publishing and Zondervan Publishing House Copyright. Pg 1873 “Jesus saw not only who Simon was, but who he would become. That is why he gave him a new name. Cehpas in Aramaic Peter in Greek, (means Rock). The NASB foot notes John 1:42 the word "Cephas" and says, Cephas means Rock. The New Revised Standard Version: John 1:42 The foot note at the word "Peter" reads From the word, "rock" ( "Cephas") and the Greek word, "Petra" (Peter) . The reason being that in Matt. 16: Petra and Petros MEAN THE SAME THING. IF CHRIST WANTED TO SAY PETER WAS A LITTLE STONE HE WOULD HAVE USED THE WORD "LITHO" NOT PETROS. If Christ wanted to call Peter a "stone" he would have used the word "LITHO" WHICH MEANS STONE NOT PETROS, WHICH IS A ROCK. The New Century Bible on John 1:42 (NCV) Footnote at the word "Cephas" says, "Peter, the Greek name Peter like the Aramaic Cephas means "rock" The Contemporary English Version footnote on John 1:42 "Peter: Aramaic name Cephas and the Greek name Peter means "rock" . New Living Translation foot note on John 1:42 says, "The names Cephas and Peter mean rock" .

Psalm 18.31 For who is God, except the LORD? And who is a rock, except our God?

You mean where it describes a specific group of people among the Jews?

@@TheSlaveofJesusChrist yeah most of whom modern jews descended from!

I don’t think there’s much that Dr White hasn’t read…

I'm sure Dr. White has read it (or at least knows what it says), and has rejected its hateful, vitriolic message. I'd read that it was written near the end of Luther's life, when he was sickly, in bitter conflicts with many he disagreed with, and was embittered toward the Jewish people over disappointment that his earlier philosemitic works (e.g. "That Jesus Christ was Born a Jew") didn't lead the Jews to convert to Christianity. Listen to Dr. White's excellent teaching on "Sacralism."

@@jeffreysnyder936 If Dr. White was an honest scholar he'd know that there's no such thing as a "jew". In the Bible we have: Hebrews, Isrealites and Judeans (jews) and they're not synonymous! Where the Bible speaks of "jews" it means Judeans and in a lot of cases, it's a location description, not someone who's from the line of Judah. Jesus was from the line of Judah, and he was of pure Israeli stock, unlike the "mixed multitude" the Bible talks about and reiterates in Romans 9 and Revelation 3. But Dr. White won't tell you this, because even though he claims to be postmillenial, he's still "Judeo Christian", which is an oxymoron!