I'm literally on Fire and burning 😢😢😢🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

He did a good teaching there, but the matter of Job was not totally true. Satan didn't attack Job because he didn't have representation because even though the bible didn't put it this way, the conversation was initiated by God himself -Job 1:8, so its not like satan brought accusation to God concerning Job, if this was the case, this would've been arguable. But it was God trying to prove to Satan about Job's faithfulness and that's why satan responded by saying "He's faithful to you because you've placed a hedge around him" - Job 1:9-11. Nice one but let's not forget to study our bibles ourselves with understanding and not totally reply on the knowledge of others

​@gjonahtech7278 trust me, you are already relying on what you were thought by others. If you have the spirit of God they is no way you can argue with what a genuine men of God teaches because they teachings comes as revelations. It means that every time you hear a genuine man of God teach, you will always hear a different revelations of what you have already thought you knew and even what you already knew will still remain applicable according to it context it was applied. From the beginning of his teaching you can see that where he was trying to arrive to is salvation. He was using a different concept to teach us what we thought we already knew and that is what revelation means. So they is nothing wrong with what he said.

@@Franklin-k6m you should go and study your bible so you can rightly divide the word of truth, and stop relying so much on your idols because they are humans and can also make mistake. You kept emphasising on "genuine man of God", no one is saying he's not genuine. I personally have high respect for Apostle Michael and his teachings have greatly blessed me; but that's not to say I'll always have to swallow every pill he dishes out without verifying it(1 John 4:1). If he says what's not correct according to the scriptures, he can also be corrected and I'm sure he'll appreciate any true correction because he's a very humble spirit-filled man. But the argument is not even about his personality. I showed you scriptures in my comment, considering that we are all learning and still growing in faith, please it will be beneficial for us all if you can also show scriptures to support your arguments and not argue blindly.

@gjonahtech7278 even if quote the bible, it will be very difficult for you to understand what I said initially. Sometimes these words and teachings for cana minded fellows who only listen to pick out faults. It takes a child of God to understand teachings like this. We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error. -1 John 4:6 Every body knows that Satan has always been the accuser of the children of God. He said Job was not present to defend him self . It doesn't take so much logic to know that if Job was present during the deliberation he would have made a case for himself. But then it's all in context like I earlier pointed out in my previous response. The message has already gotten to the ears that needed it and the holy spirit that gave him the utterance has a reason and it's not meant for you if you don't have the spirit of discernment.

@@Franklin-k6m Canal you said. haha, you that is spirit filled, have you not seen how you are responding to a simple comment that meant no harm, just because I pointed something out for you from the same bible you are claiming you know too well. Bro, It's not about picking out faults , its about rightly dividing the word of truth ( II Timothy 2:15). Well I'm not here to call you names like you're doing, but my argument is simple. Go back to the book of Job and read the entire chapter, then come back here and show us where the bible said "because Job was not present to defend himself which lead to his predicament" according to the last highlight of your first comment to this post. What you failed to meditate on is that, 'theres no way Job would've been present because the conversation wasn't for mortal men in the first place; even if Job was present, there's nothing he could do because God already knew how it will end because he initiated the conversation in the first place and that's why he later gave him back more than what he ever had. It's high time we stop all these unnecessary eisegesis and allow the Holy Spirit to help us in the appropriate exegesis. Please go and do your findings.