@@CasamTheAnimator just a typo

true, the name الله is so exalted

it is not beautiful but it is devilish enough for not saved people to accept and exalt it

98. Al-Bayyina | 8 verses | The Evidence | Medinan 1. Those who disbelieve among the People of the Scripture and the idolaters could not have left off (erring) till the clear proof came unto them, 2. A messenger from Allah, reading purified pages 3. Containing correct scriptures. 4. Nor were the People of the Scripture divided until after the clear proof came unto them. 5. And they are ordered naught else than to serve Allah, keeping religion pure for Him, as men by nature upright, and to establish worship and to pay the poor-due. That is true religion. 6. Lo! those who disbelieve, among the People of the Scripture and the idolaters, will abide in fire of hell. They are the worst of created beings. 7. (And) lo! those who believe and do good works are the best of created beings. 8. Their reward is with their Lord: Gardens of Eden underneath which rivers flow, wherein they dwell for ever. Allah hath pleasure in them and they have pleasure in Him. This is (in store) for him who feareth his Lord.

@@kerbaj Its The Most Beautiful Word Ever

@@Free_Palestine323 طلاسيم و اسماء غريبة زرعها الشيطان في رؤوسكم . ملعون كل واحد يرتد عن الاله الحقيقي من خلال نطقه باسماء باطلة للرب الاله خالق الكون . توبوا عن شركم العظيم و ارجعوا الى الطريق والحق و الحياة لتمحى ذنوبكم و تتحرروا من عبودية ابليس الذي اسمه الله

@@kerbaj موت بغيظك

May Allah grant him Jannatul Firdous Aameen

*'Allāh* (اللَّه אֱלֹהַ ܐܰܠܳܠܳܗ) is a proper noun for The creator God. *Elah* (ܐܠܗ إله אלוה) is the Common noun for god. Al in Arabic is The, Ha in Hebrew is The Al-Elah الإله = The god (Common noun) Ha-Elah חאלוה = The god (Not even a word)

اللهم or ربِّ* Since Allah is always close to us so all prayers in Quran has started with اللهم ، ربِّ

*'Allāh* (اللَّه אֱלֹהַ ܐܰܠܳܠܳܗ) is a proper noun for The creator God. *Elah* (ܐܠܗ إله אלוה) is the Common noun for god. Al in Arabic is The, Ha in Hebrew is The Al-Elah الإله = The god (Common noun) Ha-Elah חאלוה = The god (Not even a word)

@@Leyla_Bat_Murrah The definite article in Hebrew is ה, not ח, so it would be, האלוהים, or אלהים, without the Vav in original Hebrew writing, or, האלוה

@@Edward-bm7vw Brother, What do you mean?? Are you an atheist ?

Are you a Taoist?

Yes! Do you know urdu or hindi?

@@DawahSky No

@@DawahSky Interesting! can I see it with English sub-titles?

@@DawahSky The reason why I want to know about Allahumma it’s because one muslim preacher did a video about Allahumma saying it’s shirk because Allahumma means Elohim like in the Bible and it’s plurial and it means multiple gods. So he pretends that if you make duas with Allahumma you will be curse by Allah. He tells people to only begin a dua by Rabbi or Rabbana. You see the problem? He says that muslims scholars say that the meaning of Allahumma is same as Elohim. I look in an Arabic Bible and Elohim is translated as Allah not Allahumma. I look in a Hebrew Quran and Allahumma is translate as Elohim. You see the problem? So I’m looking for more information, I need all the details about Allahumma. In written or videos. Thanks

@@DawahSky Thanks I will look at it!

Very structured and beautiful

Indeed, that appears to be an inconsistency. Given that "BiAllah" is written as ( بالله) and pronounced "bi-lah," one would logically expect "Li-Allah" to be written as "لالله" and pronounced as "Li-lah." However, it is perplexing to find it written as "لله" (li-lah). The emphatic prefix Alef and Lam AL (ال), typically associated with "Allah (اللَّهِ)," are notably absent in the term "Li-lah (لله)," further supporting the notion that the emphatic AL (ال) is *not an integral component of the word "Allah (اللَّهِ),* as evidenced by its absence in the term "Li-lah (لله)," implying the meaning "for or to Allah." written as: ( له) -(ال)- (ل) = "لله" Instead of (اللَّهِ) (ل) = "لالله"

@@zakadam154 barakallahu fik for the insight. But actually I meant something else. I don't mean dropping it in writing rather in pronounciation. The pronounciation of في الله is fillah not fī Allah. We drop the A because it is a hamza al-wasl. But we pronounce يا الله as yā Allah, not dropping the A. Why dont wie say yallah instead? It is still a hamza al-wasl

@@hduendvshis You have highlighted another inconsistency. However, I must emphasize that I do not regard the slang "Ya Allah" ( يا الله ) as an appropriate or accurate term to address God vocatively, as it is not mentioned in the Quran. The correct term, "Allahuma" (اللهم), is the one consistently used in the Quranic context. Similarly, the expression "fi Allah" ( في الله ) is not documented in the Quranic text. Hence, there is no substantial argument to address regarding these expression from a Quranic perspective.

Christian Prince (CP) he is an Arab and Arab is his first language. you may learn a lot from his channel too, base on what i learn from him, if you are muslim you may look at Quran verses 1 number 1 and 2, then u may see the spelling between this two number, the spelling allah is different.. including this, its already 3 different way of spelling…

@@KIKI-fj6nk his arabic is weaker than anybody i have ever seen, the words in question are الله and لله both are correct, when its mentioned in the first ayah, its mentioned as in the name of God, which is why the normal way is written, in the second ayah its written as in all praise to God, the "to God" part changes the word ands a ل to the word الله and since there is already a alef and lam the alef is dropped and you have the word which means "to god" Please don't spread misinformation from people who are not well versed in the quran nor arabic, and you are not good in English so improper use of English could lead people to think quran has mistake which it doesnt

@@AbdalrhmanYs English is not my first language and no one around me using english but me, so the way i learn it from media, movies n ext... Back to our topic, u can read 14:4 which mean your book is not suits to non arab speakers like myself… when it comes to name, how come you could change the spelling for the name?.. like if my mother give me my name KIKI then you change it into koko. from Jesus into Isa.. it truly strange, in your mindset or understanding u can change everyone name as easy as 1,2,3 even god name(your not translating the name) i mean ur still using arab.. im no place arguing with you, first u are arab speaker, and 2nd im just asking a question, i know i shouldn’t base on 5:101 but… since Christian Prince(CP) mention about the spelling Chapter 1 number 1&2 is different, then here i found there’s another different spelling, now it make 3 differences… when i saw your comment then i take the chance to ask you… anyhow its there any chance you would call him, CP?? to prove you are right? im not arguing its just a question..

@@KIKI-fj6nk i am supportive of the fact you are going out of your way to learn English arabic to understand the quran and asking questions but when we say something that we don't fully understand its our responsibility to convey it clearly, now back to the topic. I am not changing the name in arabic there are things like prefixes, this video addresses the name and its origin, and the way its written. The difference of having the vertical line or not is a matter of appearance, the line is still there its just not written so its not confused with the name of the god that pagans used to worship. The prefixes can be added to any word to make it meaningful, as an example the word مدرسة (school) we can add لل so it becomes للمدرسة (for/to school) this is not a different word its an addition to the original word in the video he spoke how nouns can derived, the word لله is a derived word from الله. I hope this clears everything up 🙏 Also the ayah you are quoting as "the quran is not for people who can't read arabic" this is very wrong, the quran is for everyone, what the verse is trying to say, And We sent not a Messenger except with the language of his people, in order that he might make (the Message) clear for them. Then Allah misleads whom He wills and guides whom He wills. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise, literally never says the quan is for Arabians only, it says every messenger comes with the language of his people, which is why Jesus (pbuh) came with the language of aramiac, he didn't come speaking the language of the zulus to Jews, he didn't speak Arabic to Jews he spoke in the language they understood so that they can see the message. This guy that you keep mentioning is misquoting the quran to spread misinformation, reconsider who you watch as that will be important in the afterlife, and everyone will get judged because God is just, he doesn't have to kill his only child to forgive mankind as the Christians say, we respect Jesus (pbuh) and we respect our God, and having children is not an attribute which is worthy of being given to god. He is the most merciful the strongest the almighty , that who he is. By the way you said I used the term God rather than saying الله, its fine because God mean the الإله which is meaning الله. Like for example, Christians say Yahweh and then I say the father, to the Jews that is the same thing, Yahweh is his name, the father is who he is. BTW when I give you an example of Christian I dont agree with them, dont think I believe that Jesus died on the cross or that Jesus is the son of God (astaghfirullah)

@@AbdalrhmanYs thanks for clarifying how writing in arabs words, works. now i kind getting some of it… anyhow wish can hear your voice n in his channel soon, so u can explain it to him what your guys believing in… once again thanks for your time n explanation 👍

Can you bring me a trusted scholar who reported this? Or did you get it from yourself?

@einsteinone5380

@@einsteinone5380 u spew nothing but lies

@@einsteinone5380 i dont care did u discover this yourself by reading through hadiths or is it copy and paste genius?

@@einsteinone5380 bring your proof buddy

I agree that these languages use the same roots to describe a monotheistic god, but the god of the Qur'an is contradictory to the God of the Bible. While the same word is used to describe this God, they are very different from each other. It is interesting to see a Muslim quoting from the gospel accounts of Jesus' disciples, Matthew and John, when Muslims say that Jesus' message was changed by these people. How do you depend so heavily on these verses then, and yet deny when Matthew, John, and Luke tell you that Jesus was crucified on the cross for our sins and resurrected and appeared to Matthew and John again after His death?

@@dirtdiv3r The reason that us Muslims still depend on these verses sometimes even though they have been changed throughout humanity, is because we still have to believe that the Torah and Bible are books sent down from Allah by his messengers (peace be upon them all). The verses used in the original post being so similar to those in the Qu'ran (greeting eachother with "Peace be with you.", etc.) is to show how even though they are 3 completely different religions, we still worship the same God and are one humanity under Him (and even if those verses from the Torah/Bible may have been changed, it's nice seeing all 3 Abrahamic religions agree on something once in a while). As you asked, the reason that we do not believe in Prophet Isa/Jesus (Peace be upon him) was crucified is because the Qu'ran tells us that it is false. The original message was just to show the similarities between these 3 religions when it comes to greeting people. (Sorry if none of this makes sense lol, I don't know that much about Christianity besides the fact that you guys believe that Prophet Isa/Jesus (Peace be upon him) was the son of God and was crucified. I really don't know anything else about your religion beyond that.)

@@W1LL1AM_SOLACE Thank you for your response. I really do appreciate it. I want to point out that I do know that you are taught that Jesus was not crucified. I have to say this is refuted from a number of standpoints but that's not what I want to reply to. What I want to reply to is the part where you said that Muslims believe that the Torah and the Christian Bible are books sent down from God, even if they were changed by humanity. I can appreciate that from your perspective, you would immediately be suspicious of the writings in these books if they contradicted Islam. The main problem in the Islamic belief on this that, by the way, has not been addressed by any Muslim friend of mine, is that the Christian Bible is simply a collection of letter and eye-witness accounts of people that followed Jesus. They are not prophesies sent by God, with the exception of Revelation, the last book written in the New Testament written by John in the year 96 AD. They are real stories written by real people who really died telling others about Jesus the son of God. That's what makes it so compelling. They had absolutely nothing to gain, and actually lost everything telling everybody the things that they witnessed with their own eyes. There is nothing to have been changed BY man, because it was written BY man. The one answer I have not been given by any Muslim friend of mine is this: If Jesus was a prophet, what did he prophesy? What was his message? Who was his audience? Lastly, what was his purpose? What did God accomplish through him? Not a single Muslim has provided an answer for me, but every Muslim believes he was a prophet. I know you think you believe in the same God. It is because much of Islam was borrowed from Judeo-Christian scriptures. But your god is not the same as my God.... he doesn't even talk the same in the Qur'an as my god speaks. One example, your god says, "Permission to fight is given to those against whom war is made, because they have been wronged", but my God says "But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." How can you believe we worship the same God when your god tells you violence in self-defense is okay, and my God tells us to forgive everyone, no matter the circumstance? You may believe your god is the same, but I can assure you it is not.

*'Allāh* (اللَّه אֱלֹהַ ܐܰܠܳܠܳܗ) is a proper noun for The creator God. *Elah* (ܐܠܗ إله אלוה) is the Common noun for god. Al in Arabic is The, Ha in Hebrew is The Al-Elah الإله = The god (Common noun) Ha-Elah חאלוה = The god (Not even a word)

@@dirtdiv3r your God of the Bible, what is His revealed name? It is not Jesus.

Why

@@fatimaachy5764 For good education.

Allahumma اللھم where is this "debate" on its roots and what it actually means ? And wo is in the right mind going to assert that it is wrong to use it, what's their reason? when it is mentioned and used in the Quran

if you an arabic speaker you can find (Shiekh Saeed Al-Kemly) سعيد الكملي talk about (Allahumma اللهم) in youtube

I think you are mixing between two concepts (1) imalah (2) heavy/ light alif pronunciation. In the case of الله it is the case of heavy or light alif Applying imalah on the honored word الله is a mistake, which is usually caused by dialect. More about Imalah is found in this lesson: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y69ydLV4sdDNdKM.html

@@Arabic101 Thanks.

@@Arabic101 *'Allāh* (اللَّه אֱלֹהַ ܐܰܠܳܠܳܗ) is a proper noun for The creator God. *Elah* (ܐܠܗ إله אלוה) is the Common noun for god. Al in Arabic is The, Ha in Hebrew is The Al-Elah الإله = The god (Common noun) Ha-Elah חאלוה = The god (Not even a word)

@@Leyla_Bat_Murrah Elah in Arabic mean The God Allah is a name

@@PSYKSY_ الإله(Al-Elah) = The god

He already has videos on qiraat and ahruf. Please check out

Basically, The Quran was revealed in multiple readings as in Arabic peninsula were many dialects, then Uthman unified all these readings in one written book, and that's why that mushaf was undotted and unvowolled as most of differences occurred in dots and vowels. and if a word is written completely different then he wrote the first variation in a copy and the second in another copy.

@@save_sudan_and_palestine he didnt unify the readings (ahruf), he made a mushaf that accommodated different ahruf.

@@abucyrus101 That what I meant, you can read in every readings in Mushaf Uthman that means he unified them in one Mushaf.

what do you mean, care to elaborate?

Agreed 100%.

It is indeed one of the explanations, but it all goes under considering the honored word as a derived noun. There is also the opinion that it comes from أَلِه - يألَه which is to seek refuge, and so الله is the One we all seek refuge in. Allah knows best Asslamo alikom

I think he means that we cannot add the word Allah as an adjective. The names you mentioned have the word Allah as مضاف إليه i.e. a possessor or related to. أسد الله Asadullah = Asad + the word Allah It means the lion of Allah.

@@MohammedAliKhan-ru5tz thanks bro. That's a good answer and actually makes sense.

@@dr.muhammadraza You are welcome. 🤝

@@dr.muhammadraza Just report that creature's comment as "misinformation" or just delete it if you can!

Yes "ya Allah" is not written in the Quran but is it found written in Hadith the saying of the Prophet? Why is "ya Allah" pivotal to your understanding that the word "Allah" is derived from Elah as Alelah means The GOD? Do you hae any other evidence to support your claim for derivation?

you're right, the phrase "Ya Allah" is never mentioned in the Quran. It's not mentioned in 99% of authentic hadiths either. The only time you can see this in hadith compilations is in one authentic hadith, and even then there are other hadiths that speak of the same event that do not include the phrase "Ya Allah". It is also spoken by an UNKNOWN person. For all we know, even if he did say the phrase, this person could've been a foreigner who didnt understand arabic grammar well. So, the existence of the phrase "Ya Allah" there is very suspect considering those two facts.

And yes, the most logical conclusion is that the word "allah" is actually a contraction of "al-ilah" which is roughly translated into english as "the god".

However, let's just say that "Allah" is a proper noun and a unique name, and not at all a contraction of "al-ilah" which means "the god". If this was the case, we would certainly find at least one verse or hadith that says "Allah is God" or "God is Allah" or "Allah your God is God" in those exact forms. I'm not talking about "YOUR God is Allah" or "Allah is YOUR God" or "there is no God but Allah". We can actually find something like this in the Bible which proves that "Yahweh" is a name. For example, Deut 4:35 says "Yahweh is God". So, if you can find something like that, then "Allah" is CERTAINLY a proper noun and a unique name of God.

@@abucyrus101Can you furnish evidence from an Islamic scholar that supports your argument? If not, your conclusion lacks validity and remains solely based on personal conjecture. The argument you've presented seems to hinge on the presence or absence of specific phrases in religious texts to determine whether a name is a proper noun or not. While it's an interesting point to consider, it may not fully capture the complexity of linguistic and theological aspects within religious texts. In the case of "Allah," within the Islamic tradition, the understanding is that "Allah" is indeed a proper noun, denoting the singular, unique God in Islam. The absence of specific phrases like "Allah is God" or "God is Allah" in a particular format as you've described doesn't necessarily invalidate the usage of "Allah" as a proper name. In Arabic, "Allah" is used consistently as the name of God, and the Quran refers to Allah using various descriptive phrases that emphasize His attributes and qualities. The absence of a specific phrase like "Allah is God" in the Quran doesn't negate the understanding that "Allah" functions as a proper noun. Language and theology are intricate, and interpretations can vary. While the presence of specific phrases can sometimes reinforce certain interpretations, their absence doesn't necessarily disprove a concept or name's validity.

Of course. The honored word was used before the message of Islam: 1. Our Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم .. His name was محمد بن عبد الله بن عبد المطلب His father was a kafir and his name was عبد الله - source (Muslim - 203) Also this is a verse from a poem by عنترة بن شداد before the time of Islam: لا أبعدَ الله عن عيني غطارفة ً * إنْساً إذَا نَزَلُوا جِنَّا إذَا رَكِبُوا 2. Arabic, like every other language there is, is derived from other languages. Not a revealed language or something. It is a Semitic language so it was affected by Hebrew and Aramaic. Some opinions state that it was also derived from Syriac. Allah knows best Asslamo alikom

@@Arabic101 Thanks

​​@@jackjill3205What have you benefited from it? Share your thoughts.

@@DawahSky Ghyts jshytg BB niuijhh Thynhg uo paao yah! Qpolj gytgs nanan?

​@@jackjill3205Try to write in English. *Don't waste time.*

definite

Wa alikom asslam, The ال in the word التفت is an intergral part of the word .. It is not added to it because it is a verb .. the entire word is a verb and has nothing added to its beginning. It starts with Hamzah al-wasl which is dropped, but the laam is normally pronounced. As for the words الساق it is a laam shamseyyah which is dropped, and since you are also dropping hamzing al-wasl because you are not starting at it, you skip ال but that happens because ال in that case is added to the word ساق which is a noun. Hope this makes sense. Asslamo alikom

@@Arabic101 jazakallahu khair

No brother, these words are added TO the Honored word, but the Honored word cannot BE added to anything else. So what you mentioned is no problem in shaa Allah

Asslamo alikom, brother. That is not the same as I explained, brother. Using Allah as an adjective is not possible. But saying استغفر الله means I ask forgiveness from Allah. عبد الله is the servant of Allah, and so on .. Hope this answers the question. Asslamo alikom

@@Arabic101 _"Using Allah as an adjective is not possible. "_ *Is this verse 6:3 not using the word Allah as an adjective a generic noun?* And He is Allah , *[the only deity]* in the heavens and the earth. He knows your secret and what you make public, and He knows that which you earn. وقد استدل بعضهم على كونه مشتقًا بقوله: ( وَهُوَ اللَّهُ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَفِي الأرْضِ ) [الأنعام: 3] أي: المعبود في السماوات والأرض، كما قال: ( وَهُوَ الَّذِي فِي السَّمَاءِ إِلَهٌ وَفِي الأرْضِ إِلَهٌ ) [الزخرف: 84] . Arabic 101 3 days ago Asslamo alikom, brother. That is not the same as I explained, brother. Using Allah as an adjective is not possible. But saying استغفر الله means I ask forgiveness from Allah. عبد الله is the servant of Allah, and so on .. Hope this answers the question. Asslamo alikom

@@Arabic101 Can you please give an answer to @theword7571 comment. It would be appreciated, Jazak Allah khairun

*The Arabic phonological rule known as "iqlab"* is a specific assimilation process that occurs when the letter "lam" (ل) is followed by the letter "alif" (ا) in certain linguistic contexts. This rule results in a change in pronunciation where the "lam" sound merges into the "alif" sound, creating a different sound. Here's a more detailed explanation of "iqlab": Assimilation of Sounds: Iqlab is a type of assimilation, a phonological phenomenon in which one sound becomes more like another sound that is adjacent to it. In the case of iqlab, the "lam" sound becomes more like the "alif" sound that follows it. 2. Specific Contexts: Iqlab occurs when the following conditions are met: ▪ The letter "lam" (ل) is followed by the letter "alif" (ا) within the same word. ▪The "lam" and "alif" are part of a particular grammatical structure, such as in the word "lillah" (لله), where "lam" is followed by "alif." 3. Phonetic Change: In words that meet the conditions for iqlab, the "lam" sound undergoes a phonetic change. Instead of being pronounced as a clear "l" sound, it merges with the "alif," resulting in a pronunciation that is closer to "Lah" than "Lilah." This is why you often hear "Allah" pronounced as "Lah" within words like "lillah." 4. Common in Arabic: Iqlab is a common phonological phenomenon in Arabic and is part of the natural evolution of the language. It simplifies pronunciation and makes speech flow more smoothly, as it avoids the abrupt transition between "lam" and "alif" sounds. 5. No Change in Spelling: It's important to note that iqlab affects pronunciation but does not change the spelling of words. In written Arabic, you will still see the "lam" and "alif" in their original forms. The change occurs in how these letters are pronounced when spoken. Iqlab is just one example of the many phonological rules in the Arabic language that dictate how sounds change in different linguistic contexts. Understanding these rules is essential for correctly pronouncing and comprehending Arabic words and phrases, especially when studying the language or delving into its intricacies

Speaking of _" _*_5. No Change in Spelling:_*_ It's important to note that iqlab affects pronunciation but does not change the spelling of words. In written Arabic, you will still see the "lam" and "alif" in their original forms. The change occurs in how these letters are pronounced when spoken."_ But clearly the word ( لله) dose not follow convention the of rule. The "alif" (ا) in the name Allah (الله) is omitted from the word "lillah" (لله) ( ل + له ). The rule suggests that the word translated as for Allah should be written as "لالله " _ ( ل + الله )and pronounced as "lillah" (لله)

@@zakadam154 Speaking of *_"5. No Change in Spelling:_*_ It's important to note that iqlab affects pronunciation but does not change the spelling of words. In written Arabic, you will still see the "lam" and "alif" in their original forms. The change occurs in how these letters are pronounced when spoken."_ But clearly the word ( لله) dose not follow convention of the rule. The "alif" (ا) in the name Allah (الله) is omitted from the word "lillah" (لله). The rule suggests that the word translated as "for Allah" should be written as "لالله " and pronounced as "lillah" (لله). What is at effect here?

@@TruthIsSalvation I understand the point you're making, and it's important to clarify that while the phonological rule of iqlab does indeed involve assimilation of sounds, there are exceptions and variations in the Arabic language due to historical and linguistic factors. *The phenomenon you mentioned regarding the word "lillah" (لله) is one such exception.* In standard Arabic, the "alif" (ا) from "Allah" is indeed omitted in the word "lillah" (لله), and it is commonly written and pronounced as "lillah" (لله) rather than "lallah" (لالله) following the strict iqlab rule you mentioned. The reason for this exception is historical and related to the fluidity of language evolution. Arabic has undergone changes and developments over time, and as a result, some words and phrases have evolved differently in pronunciation and spelling compared to the strict application of certain phonological rules. The omission of the "alif" in "lillah" is an example of this evolution. Language is not always rigidly bound by rules, and exceptions and variations can emerge for various reasons, including regional dialects, historical influences, and common usage patterns. In the case of "lillah," the omission of the "alif" has become the accepted and widespread pronunciation and spelling, even though it deviates from the strict iqlab rule. *So, while iqlab is a phonological rule that generally explains the assimilation of sounds in Arabic, there are instances where exceptions and variations exist, as seen in the word "lillah." These exceptions are important to recognize because they reflect the dynamic nature of language and its historical development.*

@@TruthIsSalvation Correcting you: *-"But clearly the word ( لله) dose not follow convention of the rule. The "alif" (ا) in the name Allah (الله) is omitted from the word "lillah" (لله)."-* In actual fact the word ( لله) dose not follow convention of the rule (5. No Change in Spelling), why? Because The "alif" (ا) and the Lam (ل ) in the name Allah (الله) are omitted > *-AL-* LAH < to form the word (لله) > L- LAH < pronounced as "Li-Lah"