Arado Ar 234 "Blitz"

  Рет қаралды 66,321

Sideprojects

Sideprojects

Күн бұрын

Check out Squarespace: squarespace.com/sideprojects for 10% off on your first purchase.
Got a beard? Good. I've got something for you: beardblaze.com
Simon's Social Media:
Twitter: / simonwhistler
Instagram: / simonwhistler
Love content? Check out Simon's other KZfaq Channels:
Biographics: / @biographics
Geographics: / @geographicstravel
MegaProjects: / @megaprojects9649
Casual Criminalist: / @thecasualcriminalist
TopTenz: / toptenznet
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
XPLRD: / @xplrd
Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526

Пікірлер: 164
@Sideprojects
@Sideprojects 2 жыл бұрын
Check out Squarespace: squarespace.com/sideprojects for 10% off on your first purchase.
@allangibson2408
@allangibson2408 2 жыл бұрын
Thrust is measured in pounds or kilos force. Ie lbf or kgf. Pound feet is a unit of torque - and utterly irrelevant in this application
@liamwilliams3409
@liamwilliams3409 11 ай бұрын
Please look into lieutenant Daniel Reid “DFC raf 41st squadron” shot down the first AR234 above Holland, march 1945. Spitfire! Aus! My great uncle.
@liamwilliams3409
@liamwilliams3409 11 ай бұрын
If you are interested, I can give you some references to information. :)
@Buddha_the_Pug
@Buddha_the_Pug 2 жыл бұрын
"They might have had more impact if more had been produced". So many german vehicles and technologies can be described this way. They were way ahead of us in a lot of ways, but one super advanced (whatever) vs 10 mediocre ones still isn't much of a fight
@randomotter6346
@randomotter6346 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Ww2 was a war of production, and a small amount of tiger 2s and me262s just can’t stand against thousands of m4 Shermans and p-51s
@andrewgause6971
@andrewgause6971 2 жыл бұрын
@@randomotter6346 it also didn't help that things like the 262 burned through its engines in about 8 to 10 hours of operation.
@jonhall2274
@jonhall2274 2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewgause6971 that could be fixed through metallurgy advanced, just like USA/Russia excel at today. Just needed more time/technology.
@paythepiper6283
@paythepiper6283 2 жыл бұрын
@@jonhall2274 No, their sources for the rarer metals used in the combustion chambers were over run by the Soviets. The lesser metals just did not last due to the temps. Technology can only do so much
@oscargrouch2194
@oscargrouch2194 2 жыл бұрын
They had plenty of planes, but no fuel and no pilots
@utubejdaniel8888
@utubejdaniel8888 2 жыл бұрын
Simon, great video! However, tell the writer(s) to stop using pound-feet as thrust. Pound-feet is a torque value. Tell them to just stick with "pounds" of thrust, just like kilograms of thrust.
@kennymackay4134
@kennymackay4134 Жыл бұрын
"Kilograms of thrust" is also wrong. Kg is a unit of MASS, not FORCE. Non-engineers should stay out of engineering discussions. Everyone else just gets more confused when the blind try to lead the blind.
@fenman1954
@fenman1954 2 жыл бұрын
Germany lacked the rare metals to build a reliable jet engine , engine life was 10 hours or less also fuel became scarce.
@dragonsword7370
@dragonsword7370 2 жыл бұрын
Also the throttle controlling by thy pilot had to be ridiculously meticulous and Slow. If a pilot jammed the throttle to fast it could blow the engine just because the fan blades metallurgy wasn't using molybdenum and other high temp tensile strength metals. Because of shortages and being rarer in Germany.
@Notacrime2023
@Notacrime2023 Жыл бұрын
Hess should have brought back some Scottish Chromium!
@dannynye1731
@dannynye1731 Жыл бұрын
F86 engines in Korea had the same 10 hour life. We just bought thousands.
@dallesamllhals9161
@dallesamllhals9161 4 ай бұрын
SR-71 made by CCCP RARE metal ;-P
@PORRRIDGE_GUN
@PORRRIDGE_GUN 18 күн бұрын
And of lower quality, mixed with turpentine or ethanol. This badly affected piston engines, but less so turbojets. Also the metals, engineering and labour time required to build a DB605, could produce 3 or 4 JJ004s or BMW003s. So the shortages pushed them towards turbojet production, which was still an immature technology, even though the Germans were leading that revolution
@AtheistOrphan
@AtheistOrphan 2 жыл бұрын
One of my all-time favourite aircraft. Read Captain Eric ‘Winkle’ Brown’s accounts of flying them from Germany to England immediately post-war. Fascinating.
@rixxroxxk1620
@rixxroxxk1620 2 жыл бұрын
There is one in the Udvar-Hazy Air and Space museum in Sterling, VA. Beautiful aircraft! I have plenty of pictures of her. ALLEGEDLY, all of the aircraft on display are in perfect flying condition. PS-I have a still picture that almost matches the picture you used of the cockpit.
@twocvbloke
@twocvbloke 2 жыл бұрын
The part about them having periscopes rather tickled me, like they're a submarine, but in the sky... :P
@Eric-kn4yn
@Eric-kn4yn Жыл бұрын
ww2 a/c was common
@ignitionfrn2223
@ignitionfrn2223 2 жыл бұрын
1:05 - Chapter 1 - History 3:55 - Chapter 2 - Design features & specs 8:35 - Mid roll ads 10:05 - Chapter 3 - Variants 13:00 - Chapter 4 - Noteworthy missions 15:05 - Chapter 5 - The end of the blitz
@Joze1090
@Joze1090 2 жыл бұрын
Idk why he doesn't do this himself. Anyway, thank YOU for doing it for him
@classunknown
@classunknown 2 жыл бұрын
Legend
@padawanmage71
@padawanmage71 2 жыл бұрын
Always loved this plane and tried to find models of it to build
@ripsumrall8018
@ripsumrall8018 2 жыл бұрын
Google "arado ar 234 model"
@padawanmage71
@padawanmage71 2 жыл бұрын
@@ripsumrall8018 Thanks wouldn’t have thought of that
@Palinghufter
@Palinghufter 2 жыл бұрын
I just ran out of videos to watch. Thank you, Simon for the rescue!
@timengineman2nd714
@timengineman2nd714 2 жыл бұрын
@ 14:45 that is a P-51A with the Allison engine hence the different nose than all the other Mustangs which had Packard built Merlin engines.
@jjones6606
@jjones6606 2 жыл бұрын
It has the old style canopy too, instead of a 360• canopy
@timengineman2nd714
@timengineman2nd714 2 жыл бұрын
@@jjones6606 So did the P-51 B & C. (Razorback). Although the Official Difference between the P-51B & P-51C was where they were built, almost all P-51C's had the fuselage fuel tank and only the last of the P-51b's did....
@cassandrab4080
@cassandrab4080 2 жыл бұрын
After the war, the US began production of the B-45, a light jet bomber virtually identical to the Ar-234. It even had engine problems, like the Arado. The Russian Ilyushin-22 was a much larger copy of the Arado, but it never entered service. The British developed the B-57 Canberra, which had a generally similar layout: engines mounted on straight wings (not swept-back). However the Canberra's wings were mounted mid-fuselage with an internal bomb bay. It was a direct descendent of the de Havilland Mosquito, with which it shared many construction techniques. Canberra's served around the world until 2007.
@jasonkrantz3643
@jasonkrantz3643 2 жыл бұрын
The B-45 was hardly “virtually identical” to the AR-234. I’d say they share some moderate-to-strong similarities in layout, especially the version of the B-45 with the glassed-in nose. But “virtually identical?” No way. . The AR-234 and the B-45 are similar aircraft. The Tupolev Tu-4 was _virtually identical_ to the B-29.
@NeilJB
@NeilJB 2 жыл бұрын
The British designed and developed the English Electric Canberra. It was later license-built in the US by the Martin company and designated the B-57 Canberra.
@johnforsyth7987
@johnforsyth7987 2 жыл бұрын
I would like to suggest an idea for a new Sideproject for this channel. My suggestion is the Beechcraft Model 18. It was an aircraft that was in continuous production for total of 32 years. (1937 to 1969) Over 9,000 were built during this time. During WWII, it was used to train of 90% of all of the navigators and bombardiers of the USAAF. After WWII ended, it was used for everything from passenger travel and mail freight to fighting fires and movie productions. I hope you will consider making a video for this important historical aircraft for your channel.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Simon, how about a project on the Pilatus PC6 Porter, made famous (to me, anyway) by the movie Air America?
@ethannorton564
@ethannorton564 2 жыл бұрын
I think I've seen this mentioned before but LbF is pound force. Lbft is pound feet and it's used for torque. Ik it's confusing I'm american and I hate the imperial system.
@wilcovanwinden6581
@wilcovanwinden6581 2 жыл бұрын
There was exactly the same mistake in a video a few weeks ago.
@dave8599
@dave8599 2 жыл бұрын
I am American, I am not confused. go to europe if you want that euro unit junk.
@ethannorton564
@ethannorton564 2 жыл бұрын
@@wilcovanwinden6581 more than that. Usually the videos involving planes.
@NeilJB
@NeilJB 2 жыл бұрын
@@dave8599 the argument is over Simon's use of 'pounds-feet' in relation to thrust, where he should actually be saying 'pounds-force'. He or his script writers are misinterpreting 'lbf' to mean pounds-feet, whereas its actually pounds-force. Nothing to do with metric. Don't get me started on slugs and poundals (both Imperial units used in engineering and physics).
@AvB.83
@AvB.83 2 жыл бұрын
Besides the Do 335 Pfeil/Arrow, probably one of the most interesting operational german aircraft of WW2.
@brett4264
@brett4264 2 жыл бұрын
Side Project episode suggestion: Do a video on what it takes to make a Simon Whistler video from start to finish.
@o80y1
@o80y1 Жыл бұрын
“Waltuh, I’m not bombing The Allies with you, Waltuh.”
@andyyang3029
@andyyang3029 2 жыл бұрын
I've never heard of this plane, great video!
@patrickwentz8413
@patrickwentz8413 2 жыл бұрын
I really need to go back to the Smithsonian. I do not remember seeing the Arado 234 the last time I was there.
@rixxroxxk1620
@rixxroxxk1620 2 жыл бұрын
It’s in the Udvar-Hazy museum in Sterling, VA next to Dulles Airport
@SandrasSpicySpanishSalami
@SandrasSpicySpanishSalami 2 жыл бұрын
*They also used this airframe as a carrier for the world's first airborne radar plane, the forerunner to today's AWAKS*
@jasonkrantz3643
@jasonkrantz3643 2 жыл бұрын
I’m a fan and a subscriber. But I’m also an aerospace engineer. For the love of God, it’s not “pound-feet of thrust.” It’s pounds *force* of thrust. Pounds*feet is torque, not thrust. You’re making the understandable, common mistake of confusing the abbreviation “lbf (pounds force) with lb-ft (pounds times feet). Like I said, this is clearly an honest mistake. But it’s also an existential question: are you Fact Boy, or “I feel like this is true” boy? And yes, I believe I *am* fun at parties! Why do you ask?
@andersjjensen
@andersjjensen 2 жыл бұрын
It's no use. We've been trying to tell him this since the very first episode about a jet powered engine. He does the same for rocket engines too. Perhaps we should just get him to use Newtons instead...
@Anaguma79
@Anaguma79 2 жыл бұрын
Simon's pretty much guaranteed to make at least one unit mistake in every episode. But it's better than the one where he referred to "propeller-driven jet fighters."
@loupiscanis9449
@loupiscanis9449 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you , 🐺
@distinguishedcolleague2345
@distinguishedcolleague2345 11 ай бұрын
I love that, nothing more American than having a plane built by the Germans, stationed in Norway, surrendered to the British and yet some how is in Virginia.
@terryrogers6232
@terryrogers6232 2 жыл бұрын
The advantage of external (bomb) stores for a 'Blitz Bomber' is indeed that no internal room need be provided thus on the return (escape) trip, one is not flying with empty, drag producing compartments and is faster and has longer range. This is how fighter/bombers are designed today.
@petter5721
@petter5721 2 жыл бұрын
Both the britts and the swedes developed jet engines in the 30s. Never put in to production. The Swede Alf Lysholm had a working prototype in 1932…. You can see this engine at the Technical museum in Stockholm.
@TheEvilCommenter
@TheEvilCommenter 2 жыл бұрын
Good video 👍
@derptothemaxclearly
@derptothemaxclearly 2 жыл бұрын
Ooo do the Vought V-173 next! That thing was even more wacky.
@ProperLogicalDebate
@ProperLogicalDebate 2 жыл бұрын
1:03 There's a policeman's quote that applies but I don't think it was ever done mayby by a lack of coordination. "You can outrun me or my car. But can you outrun my Motorola?"
@dewiz9596
@dewiz9596 2 жыл бұрын
Pounds-feet of thrust? Never heard that term before for jets. . .
@ripsumrall8018
@ripsumrall8018 2 жыл бұрын
I can't say it's beautiful but it's damn fascinating!
@thomasbernecky2078
@thomasbernecky2078 2 жыл бұрын
I got to sit in the cockpit of this one just when it was rebuilt for the Air & Space Museum.
@Greywolfgrafix
@Greywolfgrafix 10 ай бұрын
Freeman field outside Seymour, Indiana, had captured Luftwaffe aircraft, including a Ar 234.
@midnightrambler8866
@midnightrambler8866 2 жыл бұрын
Simon Whistler talking about WWII aviation? Of course I clicked!
@andymouse
@andymouse 2 жыл бұрын
You don't land 'em ya crash 'em...cheers.
@vasilerogojan4520
@vasilerogojan4520 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting subject, before the only thing that I could associate with the word blitz was the tragedy of the bombing of the U.K. during WW2.
@Peppzy
@Peppzy 2 жыл бұрын
very nice
@andrefiset3569
@andrefiset3569 2 жыл бұрын
That's seems odd but starting these engines was done pulling a string like a landmover, via a small two stroke motor in the engine's bullet. Don't count on this after a flameout.
@dragonsword7370
@dragonsword7370 2 жыл бұрын
That's funny. Later when the British built the Canberra bomber this engines used a small black powder charge to spin up the engines. Sometimes new personnel who'd never seen it take off would think it was on fire and call or for services to "stop the fire". Port much all of these would end with the plane covered in retardant and a pissed off And covered pilot would be ready to chew out the poor person so called out for it. A small stroke engine starter used for the Arrado?!🤣
@Eric-kn4yn
@Eric-kn4yn Жыл бұрын
Flame out at altitude windmill effect on compressor not needed auxiliary engine
@JB-rt4mx
@JB-rt4mx 2 жыл бұрын
They also launched V2's at the Ludendorf Bruke aka Remagan Bridge.
@enrico3453453
@enrico3453453 2 жыл бұрын
What watch do you wear
@samz20001
@samz20001 2 жыл бұрын
Do something on the bq-7 aphrodite, would make a great side project!!
@Sniperboy5551
@Sniperboy5551 2 жыл бұрын
Just a small technicality, but lbf is pounds-force, rather than pound-feet. Great video, Fact Boy.
@MrLunarlander
@MrLunarlander 2 жыл бұрын
It's a bit more than a technicality - pounds-feet is torque, pounds thrust is force. In horribly obsolete units, anyway.
@VulcanDriver1
@VulcanDriver1 2 жыл бұрын
They flew a recon version of Britain. Although we spotted it on radar nothing could catch it. It was before the Meteor was in service.
@thetankcommander3838
@thetankcommander3838 2 жыл бұрын
I have video of seeing the Arado Ar-234B in Chantilly. It’s actually a German WWII aircraft that I actually really like. . . . . Especially aesthetically.
@williamalbert290
@williamalbert290 Жыл бұрын
interesting that the arado broke the sound barrier in level flight the pilot noted that it shook quite badly
@dallesamllhals9161
@dallesamllhals9161 4 ай бұрын
11:08 What's that behind? Not a Fw 187...a Ju 188 the tail?
@terrafirma5327
@terrafirma5327 Жыл бұрын
That shirt is committing war crimes against my eyes.
@NeilJB
@NeilJB 2 жыл бұрын
Simon, pounds-feet is not a unit of force or thrust. If you are seeing 'lbf' as thrust units in your source data, it's pounds-force, not pounds-feet. Pounds-force or Newtons, please. Kilograms-force is sort of acceptable even though it's not an SI unit, but it's more understandable to people not familiar with Newtons.
@frednetherlands887
@frednetherlands887 2 жыл бұрын
I have a witness account in my archive from a forced labourer who was present on airfield Marx in northern Germany and saw this plane.
@jakethomson2991
@jakethomson2991 2 жыл бұрын
Pounds in this context refers to force and feet, well, feet. So pound-feet are units of energy. HTH
@moonypie5579
@moonypie5579 2 жыл бұрын
Bring back unhinged Simon on BB. Keep sane Simon here >:(
@beachboy0505
@beachboy0505 2 жыл бұрын
A sideproject definitely , excellent video 📹 Germany made many fabulous aircraft. The Germans should have made a direct copy of the British Lancaster and have an active fleet of 300. In the war, the Luftwaffe couldn't deliver a heavy punch at s single point. The Americans produced s copy of the Lancaster, the B29.
@Legion_Victrix
@Legion_Victrix 2 жыл бұрын
@Simon: Awesome video. I fly this thing in a game called War Thunder. Maybe you should partner with them next time you need 3d models.
@dave8599
@dave8599 2 жыл бұрын
pound feet of thrust?
@tgmccoy1556
@tgmccoy1556 2 жыл бұрын
My late Father in law was at Remagen when they were bombed by the Arado. They missed. Hitler threw everything at the bridge including V1/V2's. Didn't work.
@1pcfred
@1pcfred 2 жыл бұрын
The bridge collapsed anyways. Killed a bunch of engineers when it did too.
@tgmccoy1556
@tgmccoy1556 2 жыл бұрын
​@@1pcfred It was weakened and my FIL was amazed they made it across like they did. He was driving the third tank that night they crossed.
@1pcfred
@1pcfred 2 жыл бұрын
@@tgmccoy1556 The bridge lasted a good 10 days before it finally collapsed. But everyone was pretty amazed the bridge was captured intact.
@George_M_
@George_M_ 2 жыл бұрын
The ground quakes from the V2's landing helped destabalize the already weakened structure.
@willpresnell81
@willpresnell81 2 жыл бұрын
Coolest looking plane of the war
@George_M_
@George_M_ 2 жыл бұрын
Relatively small nothing, I've seen the one at the Air&Space museum, they're effing tiny, for a warplane.
@mikegwillis
@mikegwillis 3 ай бұрын
Simon talking about the Arado 234 Blitz ... wow am impressed! Hope he goes through every Nazi jet model ...
@jamesengland7461
@jamesengland7461 2 жыл бұрын
Ironically, the plywood Mosquito was nearly as fast and much better. A good early effort, though.
@jonathanmatthews4774
@jonathanmatthews4774 2 жыл бұрын
Hitler wanted to make the ME-262 into a bomber. Surprised he didn't want to make this into a fighter...
@AtheistOrphan
@AtheistOrphan 2 жыл бұрын
They did, and it’s discussed in this very video.
@brucefelger4015
@brucefelger4015 2 жыл бұрын
Nothing wrong with the design of the Jumo 004, it's failure was material, lack critical alloys doomed them to the recorded short TBF.
@SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands
@SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands 2 жыл бұрын
Liège not leash to sounds, not one, or in Dutch Luik.
@davidtrindle6473
@davidtrindle6473 Жыл бұрын
The allies had been testing jets for several years. However they weren’t so desperate as the Nazis who were forced to put their jets into service even though they weren’t really ready.
@dave8599
@dave8599 2 жыл бұрын
" more advanced than anything the Allies had." I think the atom bomb is a heck of a lot more advanced
@CaptHollister
@CaptHollister 2 жыл бұрын
And the allies also had the Gloster Meteor.
@juicedfetus6063
@juicedfetus6063 Жыл бұрын
@@CaptHollister which was no where superior lol otherwise it would have been mass produced instead of the p51 and upgraded spit-fire
@CaptHollister
@CaptHollister Жыл бұрын
@@juicedfetus6063 Notice that the Germans did not stop producing the Bf109 even after launching production of their own jets.
@wilcovanwinden6581
@wilcovanwinden6581 2 жыл бұрын
@sideprojects : Simon, please tell your writer that pound-feet is a measurement of torque, not of thrust.
@jimsnee1878
@jimsnee1878 2 жыл бұрын
Wtf is a pound-foot of thrust?
@hanglee5586
@hanglee5586 2 жыл бұрын
Looks like the B-29.
@owenshebbeare2999
@owenshebbeare2999 2 жыл бұрын
Only to you.
@hanglee5586
@hanglee5586 2 жыл бұрын
@@owenshebbeare2999 ok 👍
@Eric-kn4yn
@Eric-kn4yn Жыл бұрын
Get Ur eyes checked
@hanglee5586
@hanglee5586 Жыл бұрын
@@Eric-kn4yn why loser?
@danieldestree3235
@danieldestree3235 2 жыл бұрын
i really like simons side projects. but can you do longer videos?
@nikolaiboogaloo4592
@nikolaiboogaloo4592 2 жыл бұрын
He does long videos on his other channels go watch those the man already stresses how over worked he his with all the other channels and people like yourself don’t help saying things like that
@greaseman01
@greaseman01 2 жыл бұрын
No
@danieldestree3235
@danieldestree3235 2 жыл бұрын
@@nikolaiboogaloo4592 i do look at his other videos. i watch all his channels
@nikolaiboogaloo4592
@nikolaiboogaloo4592 2 жыл бұрын
@@danieldestree3235 so then over hour long episodes of casual criminalist aren’t good enough? I’m lost? Deserves days to and yah know things like sleep
@danieldestree3235
@danieldestree3235 2 жыл бұрын
@@nikolaiboogaloo4592 sorry not what i meant. these videos are long enough. never mind i'll shut up now
@comentedonakeyboard
@comentedonakeyboard 2 жыл бұрын
Unreliable engines and no landing gear are a logical combination (sort of)
@CAP198462
@CAP198462 2 жыл бұрын
Ahh, but the Junkers Jumo engines and the BMW 002 engines were not all bad, it was poor materials and deliberate sabotage that did them in.
@SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands
@SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands 2 жыл бұрын
Ray - mah- gen....please
@owenshebbeare2999
@owenshebbeare2999 2 жыл бұрын
Er, what?
@michaelpipkin9942
@michaelpipkin9942 2 жыл бұрын
That is not a handsome aircraft.....
@flycatchful
@flycatchful Жыл бұрын
Too little too late to make a difference. Same applies to the ME262.
@SMDoktorPepper
@SMDoktorPepper 2 жыл бұрын
If Germany had a leader who could actually focus, everything would have ended differently. But, Hitler couldn't, instead wanting bigger and better, then wrecking everything by wanting something completely different.
@thejackal5099
@thejackal5099 2 жыл бұрын
4:19 you forgot to mention V-2 rockets by the way
@narabdela
@narabdela 2 жыл бұрын
?
@owenshebbeare2999
@owenshebbeare2999 2 жыл бұрын
?
@Eric-kn4yn
@Eric-kn4yn Жыл бұрын
Arado 234 with undercarriage could manage 460mph carrying full bomb load speed was 50mph slower same speed as mustng P51. Simon is a amateur historian ok
@styx4947
@styx4947 2 жыл бұрын
This is an example of what I call the "machine-gun effect". By which I mean that these designs assume that 1 German-Arian master race pilot with better equipment could equal a dozen or more allied soldiers with inferior technology and lower morale/fanaticism. Just as one machine gun in a pillbox could kill hundreds of Allied soldiers going " over the top" and trying to get to an opposing trench through 'no man's land'. I think a lot of people forget that those top NAZI leadership were mostly still trying solutions to WW1 Era problems that were not applicable to the 1940's. The first world War was the defining experience of their generation and weather they knew it or not, their brains just weren't on the right page so to speak
@juicedfetus6063
@juicedfetus6063 Жыл бұрын
You sound like an angry jew but history cannot be erased at all with or without the Aryan bs Germany clapped everyone Germany lost when they ran out of supplies
@broesilov
@broesilov Жыл бұрын
Must admit that the Germans were technically very advanced, and I believe that they and the Americans were much more advanced than Britian Russia and Japan.
@Pepsi_Addicted
@Pepsi_Addicted 2 жыл бұрын
first
@lovefulfilsthelaw9013
@lovefulfilsthelaw9013 2 жыл бұрын
Trust in the LORD Jesus Christ Forever Amen.
@SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands
@SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands 2 жыл бұрын
Stah - WANG - 'er....PLEASE! First look up city names in wikipedia check out how to pronounce them... don't be a yank... there is no zzzyyy sound in Stavanger. IT IS NORWEGIAN.
@SkunkApe407
@SkunkApe407 2 жыл бұрын
The fact that you made three different comments complaining about pronunciations tells me you need a hobby.
@kennymackay4134
@kennymackay4134 Жыл бұрын
Hey Simon: the unit of jet thrust is "pound" not "pound-feet". Get this shit right, it looks bad on your otherwise decent vids.
@Tammy-un3ql
@Tammy-un3ql 2 жыл бұрын
Good video 👍
@Joze1090
@Joze1090 2 жыл бұрын
Are you a bot or something??
Forgotten Warbirds of the Early Jet Age
17:53
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 185 М.
The Most Unusual VTOL Vehicles of the Last 100 Years
18:37
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 113 М.
孩子多的烦恼?#火影忍者 #家庭 #佐助
00:31
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 52 МЛН
УГАДАЙ ГДЕ ПРАВИЛЬНЫЙ ЦВЕТ?😱
00:14
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
The Best Floatplane of WW2? | Arado Ar 196
22:18
Rex's Hangar
Рет қаралды 108 М.
Bizarre Military Inventions That Never Saw Service
15:43
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 180 М.
4 of the Worst Aircraft of All Time
13:56
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 365 М.
The YAK-41: The Soviet Attempt at a VTOL Aircraft
21:07
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 460 М.
The World's Most Powerful Non-Nuclear Weapons
14:01
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 225 М.
Myths Hollywood Taught You About Guns
14:39
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 468 М.
What Creates Consciousness?
45:45
World Science Festival
Рет қаралды 83 М.
THE BEST DIVE BOMBER IN THE GAME | JET BOMBER ARADO RAMPAGE
24:56