Sola Scriptura does that.

So, why are they Lutherans?

@@Kitiwake Lutherans don’t deny that Peter was the pope or that the pope had successors. Luther just thought the pope in his time was the antipope, making him (Luther) a sedevacantist and a heretic. So after his excommunication he started his own church where he believed there was no need for a pope. Because they could just follow the Bible. Which everyone interpreted differently.

@@ModernLady, makes sense absolutely!❤🎉

Pandora’s box

Yes. I honestly believe that.

Well technically there was a great schism in 1054 where the Eastern Orthodox separated from Catholics before Martin Luther. But yeah it’s interesting to see people (even I’m guilty of this) thinking that they have it all figured out with their gotcha questions lol

Thats right Demi...its the modern Protest just asserting w/ lousy objections, long refuted....esp historically

When your tradition isn’t as old as ford motor company or some US. states you don’t exactly have a deep well of scholastic works to draw from.

@@artisdead2the schism didn’t end in 1054 that’s just a date that’s given. There was relations with Eastern Catholics up until the Council of Florence and that’s when the real schism took place and there was real separation

Do you think they really believe what they say? I can’t imagine how they could. It seems like they just try and justify Protestant beliefs bc they are in denial and don’t want to become Catholic bc it is seen as more difficult or something. I genuinely wonder

The basis of Sola Scriptura falls flat when you realize that Catholics created the Bible and Sola Scriptura implies the freedom to freely intetpet it

@@derekhandson351 catholics didn't create the Bible, they did put their lesser version together, but it's missing verses and has added apocrypha in it -- which contradicts Scripture. all one has to do is a simply read of Scripture to see catholicism isn't Christianity. let me know if you'd like to see this easy to prove information! thanks in advance, Sir.

​@@tony1685The Catholic Bible is based off the Codex Vaticanus Manuscript and the Septuagint. The ones the protestants use are a part of the Masoteric Text which are of Rabbi's who were against Christ

​@tony1685 You should simply read about the Council of Rome, which determined the original biblical canon.

Same for me!

Let's goooo! Blessed be the Lord. Keep fighting the Good Fight. You've got a brother right here.

That Prots position is absolutely pathetic

@@t.d6379I can’t understand why Protestants think they’re right unless they’re just in denial bc they don’t wanna become Catholic bc it’s seen as “harder”

If I were to be charitable, I think his point is that since John is not a synoptic gospel, it isn’t written with chronology in mind, so when Jesus greets Simon and calls him Peter then, it’s not saying that Jesus historically and precisely said to Simon “you will be called Peter” in that moment, but as a reminder to the readers that Peter = Simon. I think that’s his point.

Yup for us who are not really seeking truth or not knowing the scriptures it is easy to comment on anything that comes out from our mouth without a second thought.

​@@killianmiller6107 I don't think his point wasnt that John was saying this just as a reminder to readers, but rather I think his point was that John cares less for the chronological order of things.

The bible says that we are all living rocks..they kiss that one

@@cfG21 that doesn't cotradict that Peter is the rock .. yes the bible says we are the rocks but Jesus didn't say that we are the rock that He will build His church on, He said it to one and only one person and that is Peter 🤷🏻‍♀️

No. We have other reasons to reject peter as pope. Also it is pretty prideful to claim that people only disagree with you is because of pride.

@@razoredge6130 sorry but, disagreeing for no reasonable reason even after all the evidences put on the table is pride 🤷🏻‍♀️ ...

@@161989able We have reasonable arguments against the papacy. Browse protestant KZfaq, there are intellectual arguments on both sides.

Yes my brother

Exactly. Simon is renamed Rock as a reflection on who Christ is, Who is THE Rock.

@jonatasmachado7217 Beautifully said and amen...thank you.

It's pretty simple if it weren't religion everyone would agree.

AMEN AMEN!!!!! ST.PETER IS THE ROCK.... HE IS THE HEAD OF OUR LORDS CHURCH.

Debunk this: Even if you disagree with a few of these you can not disagree with all of them. These events happened they can not and are not disputed. I dont know enough about the Eastern Orthodoxy Catholics, the Oriental Orthodoxy Catholics, or the Assyrian Church of the East Catholics, but it is clear through the lense of History that Jesus was talking about the Roman Catholics in Matthew 7:22-23. Let me explain: Matthew 7:15-20 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly, they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree can not bring forth evil fruit, and neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. So lets apply this Biblical test to the Roman Catholic Church and check their fruit. Bible literally demands it. Matthew 23:9 9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. 1 Timilothy 2:5 “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;” Deuteronomy 4:2 2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you. Revelation 22:18-19 18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. The Jewish Tora is the Old Testament. None of the Catholic Apocrypha is in the Old Testament. Vise versa with the New Testament. So where did those blasphemous books come from? Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. If you didn't know, iniquity means lawlessness. Exodus 20:3-10 3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me. 4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; 6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. 7 Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. 8 Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. 9 Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: 10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. 12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. 13 Thou shalt not kill. 14 Thou shalt not commit adultery. 15 Thou shalt not steal. 16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. 17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

The Roman Catholic church has violated most of them and encourages its members to do the same. Being unrepentant of sin will keep you from the Kingdom and the false prophets disguised as priests encourages their members to sin. They pray to Mary, putting her above God to have influence over him as if anyone could influence God. They even pray to Angels and Saints. Praying to anyone else other than God is praying to Demons and, by extension, putting them above God. Ecclesiastes 9:5-6 5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. 6 Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun. Is Mary or any of the saints alive here on Earth today? If no, then think heavy about this next question: Is there a big yellow ball in the sky and are we under it? If the answer is yes, then answer this next question: What is it called? If you answer "The Sun", then you know in your heart of hearts that you've been praying to Demons. Jesus himself rebuked a woman in the crowd who attempted to worship Mary directly in front of Jesus' face. Luke 11:27-28 27 And it came to pass, as he spake these things, a certain woman of the company lifted up her voice, and said unto him, Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps which thou hast sucked. 28 But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it. Jesus, God himself in the Flesh said: "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. (John 14:6) Revelation 19:6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth. (Omnipotent) 1 John 3:20 For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things. (omniscient) Psalms 139:7-10 7 Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence? 8 If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there. 9 If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far side of the sea, 10 even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast. (omnipresent) Mary, saints, and angels are not omnipresent, omniscient, or omnipotent. They can not hear your prayers. Especially if theres Billions of people praying to them. God is literally omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent. Therefore he literally heard you pray to an idol of Mary, Saints, or an Angel. You have them all over your church, your house, or your pocket (rosary). It is 100% idolatry. Remember the Sabith day and keep it Holy: The Sabith is and always will be Saturday. The Vadican has no authority to change it. Thou shalt not kill: Should I remind you about the Crusades? I get it, the Middle East started it. The Catholic church still "blesses" weapons of war today, in this modern age. They can bless a weapon for hunting, but not for war. Let the governments do the sinning. The church is to remain sinless. Thou shalt not commit adultery: Have you checked on the Catholic altar boys lately? Priests love them a little too much. Thou shalt not steal: The crusaders pillaged and robbed the people of the Middle East in the name of God. Which is also a violation of not taking Gods name in vain as the church sins in Gods name, and in accordance with Exodus 20:7, God will not hold them guiltless, which means they are not saved and have no salvation. Applying the biblical test of checking their fruits shows that Jesus was talking about the Roman Catholics in Matthew 23:9, Matthew 7:15-20, Matthew 7:22, and Exodus 20:7. Unfortunately he wasn't talking about them in Matthew 12:48-50 Matthew 12:48-50 48 But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49 And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother. Clearly, the Roman Catholics do not do the will of God as they won't even keep the basics of the 10 commandments. You guys will argue that it's okay because a priest, who is not God nor holds more authority than God, said that you can disobey God, and it'll be fine. They are who God was talking about in Matthew 7:15 Matthew 7:13-14 13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. There are 1.8 billion Catholics, but a whole lot less any other denominations. Lucifer wants to be God, so he persides over the Vatican. Molach is over the Abortion industry, and Baal is over the Middle East. Those are the three we know about. Babylon sinned against God, and out of Babylon came many nations. The Vatican sinned against God, and out of the Vatican came many denominations. In that time, what sin did the Vatican commit, you ask? We already discussed their other sins.... God wants everyone. Not some, not a few, not most, but everyone to be saved. The Catholics refused to have the Bible printed in multiple languages. Even executed those who printed 'pirated' copies. They were also selling spots into Heaven. They still continue to do that today. You can not pay for a soul to go to Heaven. That is 100% dependent on the souls choice. God doesn’t send anyone to Hell. People 100% send themselves. Lucifer perverted the church just as he did with the world. If your argument to be a Catholic is "it was the original church," then that's not good enough. If First means anything, then it means nothing. If First means anything, then why wasn't Babylon God's chosen people? Babylon was the first nation after the flood. If First means anything, then why don't the cannanites have control over the promised land? If First meant anything, then why don't indigenous people all over the world not have control over their own land? Jesus himself said the First shall be last, and the last shall be First. If First means anything, then it means nothing. I didn't judge your church. God already did. All I did was read the Bible and understood it. 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 New International Version 4. Love is patient, and love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, and it is not proud. God is love. Since God is love and can not contridict the Bible (his word), then, therefore, he can not boast. Catholics in ever Mass in their "Prayer" always say, "True God from True God." That is literally boasting as God has no need to say that. You either believe he is God or you don't. There's no need to boast about him being God. Matthew 7:15-20 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly, they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree can not bring forth evil fruit, and neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Even if you disagree with a few of these you can not disagree with all of them. The Catholic Church has bad fruit. They will be hewn down and cast into eternal fire. The church is to remain sinless. The individuals fight their sin, the church as an entity is to remain Holy. A concept foreign to the Catholic Church. With All of those Biblical Text proving the Roman Catholics to be a church of Blasphemy I can confidently say: your church is a complete mockery of Christ. To be fair, you can apply this test to the Mormons, Jahovah Witnesses, and a lot of Methodist church's. Don't want to forget about the TV Prosperity Gospel false church's. Their sins are different, some of them are the same, but the end result shows their fruit is bad too.

@@tripstar3563I will only look at one for now because this is important to talk about. One reason why Protestantism is so weak is because it’s literally based on “I’m filled with the Holy Spirit and I’m right and my opinion trumps someone else who is filled with the Holy Spirit.” It it based on interpretations and many wrong ones at that. The first example you give is the father one. That verse isn’t talking about humans fathers or even priests, it’s talking about a spiritual Father. You aren’t debating in good faith when you isolate scripture and interpret it to your own benefit. Also one question, are all the Catholics before the 1500’s in hell?

@@joshyvert4409 dude, Catholics don't even believe what the Bible says. You'll even add to it to keep your pagan traditions. Catholicism is blasphemy.

Now go play the lottery, (unless you have a gambling problem ignore my silly joke and please forgive me.)

Yes keep making latin statements when Jesus was a Jew, for 2000 years your catholic church(antichrist) are trying to remove the Jewish roots

Exactly. and Luther planned on ultimately gutting way more than he did, and it was only the protests (haha) of other reformers who went to him and were like “woah hey Martin, that’s like… a lot scripture. maybe let’s cool it back with the cutting out stuff”

Luther did not do this. I lean Roman Catholic and could become one but this is absolutely falsw

@@Iffmeister You make a fair point that Luther did not 'remove books' from the Bible and Catholics need to be careful with their words. I have some honest questions for you: 1) Did Luther alter the ordering of the Duterocanon out of the book order being used in the Catholic Church and instead placed these to the back end of the OT? 2) Did Luther use the term 'Apocrypha' to describe those books? 3) If the answers to Q1 and Q2 is 'yes', would you agree this led historically to a de-emphasisation of the Duterocanon? 4) Is it plausible that rebranding a set of writings from 'Duterocanon' (Second Canon) to 'Apocrypha' (which means hidden away, outside of cannon) would lead Christians to believe these writings are false or unacceptable, a belief that is widespread amongst Protestants today?

Absolutely 👏👏👌.Luther 🤦

He’s very arrogant. I watched a video of him debating Alex and he was snarky, scoffing, and interrupted Alex anytime Alex spoke. Needless to say, Alex won the debate without trying. People who have issues with the Catholic Church are usually insecure in their own belief system.

The truth fears no investigation.

for real, a demon wouldn’t warn us about things that are happening in the future, and they would instead try to teach a different gospel and deny Gods existence. My mom went to an apparition in Conyers, Georgia. She said it was such a beautiful thing, it was the last public apparition the Virgin Mary had.

Yeah a demon that converted billion of pagans to Christianity lmao

If they are saying that Jesus born of virgin mary is a demon😂😂funny

Catholics are free to say that also.

@@Kitiwake but not like Protestants say stories about😜🤣🤣

😂😂😂

😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

🤣🤣🤣 Hilarious 🤣🤣🤣

Well I think you’d have to look into why they “came out of the Catholic Church” the church wasn’t just sitting there and people decided to question them.

If you read into what the church was doing then you would understand sola scriptura. Which is making the Bible “word of God” the ultimate authority. Or just making sure that if someone tells you “It’s okay to be a homosexual and engage in homosexual activity and claim Christ” it says the same thing in the Bible. If it doesn’t then there’s a problem.

@@juancontreras9745 thats just it...I have & the Protest was completely unwarranted & problematic, Luther even said "now there will be as many beliefs & doctrines as heads" knowing his error would be problematic....& look today at the fruit of sola scriptura. Btw, the Church per sacred scripture was given authority & the pillar & foundation of the truth....importantly & exclusively subservient to the sacred text

@@J-PLeigh8409 you do know that Catholicism wether you want to accept it or not has different sects right? Just because you guys don’t acknowledge it doesn’t mean y’all don’t do the same thing. I’m non denom but I’m just pointing it out

@@J-PLeigh8409 show me per scripture where the Catholic Church was given that authority

Abraham started papacy for Israel ? God has changed his name. Catholics likes comparisons but sometimes not 😂

@@jakubwawrzyczek886 he did’n’t change his name to Rock. We are not inconsistent at all. It was a big deal when God changed Abraham’s name. It just wasn’t the context that Christ was in when he changed Simon’s name to Cephas. The snarky and dismissive emojis aside, I appreciate the question.

Are you forgetting the Orthodox Church?!?!

@@7KRexCHAT Unfortunately,l the Orthodox churches does not recognize the rock(Peter) of Jesus...

​@@7KRexCHATorthodox church is schismatic

@@t.d6379 hahah the orthodox keeps to the early church traditions, catholics differentiated and introduced papal infallibility, sounds more schismatic hence more branching off from the Catholic church

@@7KRexCHAT Lil OrthoBros often say that

Whenever God renames an individual it show that he has given him a new mission in live. Renaming Simon to Cephas, rock, and THEN saying you are building your church on this cephas craters the Protestant objection to the church being built on Peter,.

@@bridgefinand the argument that “the rock” refers to his confession of faith and not Peter is some incredible hand waving and unmoored from biblical context (the naming of others). Like, no one questions when God gives Abraham a new name and tells him I will make you a great nation (Abraham is some derivation of “father”, right?) Maybe God meant something else…

@@vinciblegaming6817 Yea, I always get suggestions of what Jesus REALLY meant when he said something. They love Scripture....or at least they love how they can make Scripture say what they want it to say.

What does burqeno mean.

@@cjjabjulanjabjulan5819 Someone from Albuquerque, New Mexico in the United States.

@@cjjabjulanjabjulan5819 A resident of Albuquerque

@lupeloera oh oh okay I was like I didn't know it was like slang word or something lol 😅 😆

NM represent 😎

Facts. Just alone why did Jesus pray only for Peter should be enough to make any Protestant wonder, “why did Jesus do that?”

Infallibility relates to teaching truth and not to personal activity. All popes are men and therefore sinners. And the rebuke from Jesus was for acting like a human and not like God. No personal sin in that.

Similarly, Protestants will talk about "majorities of church fathers" as if popular opinions are automatically correct and less popular ones are automatically wrong. Democracy really is a brain rotting system.

Baptism does wash away original sin and other sins as well. Best thing is get in contact with a priest and he can help walk you through or help you get in contact with an RCIA program. There’s plenty of Saints and holy people who have sinned and were still welcomed into the Church once they handled everything. Pray that God strengthens you and be patient with yourself as you go through the process.

@@jendoe9436 thank you 🤝🏼

I’m going to catechism classes, tonight, in fact! I want to be baptized Catholic too 🥺

you baptize in the name of the Son the Father and the Holy spirit.. what do you mean baptize as catholic..? baptize is to wash away sins and to be born again as Jesus said to Nicodemus.. to do that you have to believe and repent

what?? why do you have to go to a program and not just to read what the bible has to say about it? just read the bible yourself and don't go to any ''program'' for that or any priest..@@jendoe9436