Are there Undiscovered Elements Beyond The Periodic Table?
Рет қаралды 3,406,039
Жыл бұрынPBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to:to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE
Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord!
/ pbsspacetime
Adamantium, bolognium, dilithium. Element Zero, Kryptonite. Mythril, Netherite, Orichalcum, Unobtanium. We love the idea of fictional elements with miraculous properties that science has yet to discover. But is it really possible that new elements exist beyond the periodic table?
Check out the Space Time Merch Store
www.pbsspacetime.com/shop
Sign up for the mailing list to get episode notifications and hear special announcements!
mailchi.mp/1a6eb8f2717d/space...
Search the Entire Space Time Library Here: search.pbsspacetime.com/
Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
Written by Fernando Franco Félix & Matt O'Dowd
Post Production by Leonardo Scholzer, Yago Ballarini, Pedro Osinski, Caique Oliveira, Adriano Leal & Stephanie Faria
Directed by Andrew Kornhaber
Associate Producer: Bahar Gholipour
Executive Producers: Eric Brown & Andrew Kornhaber
Executive in Charge for PBS: Maribel Lopez
Director of Programming for PBS: Gabrielle Ewing
Assistant Director of Programming for PBS: John Campbell
Spacetime is produced by Kornhaber Brown for PBS Digital Studios.
This program is produced by Kornhaber Brown, which is solely responsible for its content.
© 2022 PBS. All rights reserved.
End Credits Music by J.R.S. Schattenberg: / multidroideka
Special Thanks to Our Patreon Supporters
Big Bang Supporters
Devin Wiley
Ankur Anand
Ryan Salsamendi
Steffen Bendel
Gautam Shine
NullBlox.ZachryWilsn
Bryce Fort
Peter Barrett
David Neumann
Leo Koguan
Alexander Tamas
Morgan Hough
Amy Hickman
Juan Benet
Vinnie Falco
Fabrice Eap
Mark Rosenthal
David Nicklas
Quasar Supporters
Glenn Sugden
Vikram Vaka
Alex Kern
Ethan Cohen
Stephen Wilcox
Christina Oegren
Mike Conroy
Mark Heising
Hank S
Hypernova Supporters
Ryan Moser
David Giltinan
Ivari Tölp
Vyce Ailour
Brandon Paddock
Ken S
Gregory Forfa
Kirk Honour
Mark Evans
drollere
Joe Moreira
Bradley Voorhees
Marc Armstrong
Scott Gorlick
Paul Stehr-Green
Ben Delo
Scott Gray
Антон Кочков
John R. Slavik
Mathew
David S. Cerutti
Donal Botkin
John Pollock
Edmund Fokschaner
Joseph Salomone
chuck zegar
Jordan Young
John Hofmann
Daniel Muzquiz
Gamma Ray Burst Supporters
Marc Forand
D. Delair
Walter Montalvo
Larka
Jerry Thomas
Nikhil Sharma
Alexander Gruber
Jonathan Cordovano
John Anderson
Scott Hannum
Paul Widden
Bradley Ulis
Craig Falls
Vivaan Vaka
Kane Holbrook
Ross Story
teng guo
Sujasha Gupta Vaka
Mason Dillon
Harsh Khandhadia
Thomas Tarler
bsgbryan
Sean McCaul
Susan Albee
Frank Walker
Matt Q
MHL SHS
Terje Vold
James Trimmier
Anatoliy Nagornyy
comboy
Andre Stechert
Paul Wood
Kent Durham
jim bartosh
Nubble
Ramon Nogueira
The Mad Mechanic
Ellis Hall
John H. Austin, Jr.
Diana S
Faraz Khan
Almog Cohen
Alex Edwards
Ádám Kettinger
MD3
Endre Pech
Daniel Jennings
Cameron Sampson
Geoffrey Clarion
Russ Creech
Jeremy Reed
Eric Webster
David Johnston
Web Browser
Michael Barton
Mr T
Andrew Mann
Isaac Suttell
Devon Rosenthal
Oliver Flanagan
Bleys Goodson
Robert Walter
Bruce B
Mirik Gogri
Mark Delagasse
Mark Daniel Cohen
Nickolas Andrew Freeman
Shane Calimlim
Tybie Fitzhugh
Robert Ilardi
Eric Kiebler
Craig Stonaha
Graydon Goss
Frederic Simon
Tonyface
John Robinson
Jim Hudson
A G
David Neal
justahat
John Funai
Tristan
Bradley Jenkins
Daniel Stříbrný
Luaan
Cody
Thomas Dougherty
King Zeckendorff
Dan Warren
Patrick Sutton
John Griffith
Daniel Lyons
DFaulk
@Haksdo2 Жыл бұрын
The element nobody will be expecting: the element of surprise!
@damianortiz6265 Жыл бұрын
Nice dad joke
@jezlawrence720 Жыл бұрын
Inquisitorium. It has one proton: proton a, and proton b. Two! Two protons! Proton a, and proton b. And that one it has THREE! THREE PROTONS
@tommihommi1 Жыл бұрын
Calm down there Lu-Tze
@quimicalobo61d Жыл бұрын
"20 years ago", I sent an Email to webelements about chemical island and element 118.. so, I asked about how it would go after that?! ... even today we cannot do that... not saying that we can't, but I am sure that is really hard because "islands of stability" math/chemistry issue! ...20 years ago.. :) Of course, I would be happy to be wrong..
@T3sl4 Жыл бұрын
It's only Surprise when it's from the Inquisition region of Spain, everywhere else it's just sparkling excitement.
@flipnotrab Жыл бұрын
5th grade in mid 70’s we were required to memorize the periodic table and were told “THIS is everything that everything in made of..” I asked how that was possible and couldn’t there be more we haven’t found yet. Teacher berated me for “questioning” the scientists knowledge and told the class “they are much smarter than all of you..” Always wanted to go back and find that teacher after more and more elements have been added over the years.
@fjb4932 Жыл бұрын
flipnotrab, Not every teacher Should be a teacher . . . - - - . . .
@MorbidEel Жыл бұрын
yikes, that is the opposite of what a teacher should do especially a science teacher
@jensraab2902 Жыл бұрын
Wow, that was a scarily bad teacher. They could have used your question to engage the class and go a little deeper. Throw the question back at everybody and see if anyone had a good idea. One of the obvious lessons would be that elements as we know them (made out of protons, neutrons and electrons*) are complete in the sense that there is no longer any gaps in the table, just room for even heavier elements. The next lesson could then be to get the class to realize that all the heaviest elements are unstable and that the half-lives are rather getting shorter, and potentially hint at how the heaviest elements are synthesized. They could have hinted at the possibility of hypothetical stable elements (or at least those whose half-lives are long enough to be around for a reasonably long time) even though synthesis is currently out of our reach. Even saying all of this in a two or three sentences would have been more productive than shutting you down with an argument from authority. * there are actually atom-like formations -so-called exotic atoms- where any of these is replaced by another particle but this might have been a little too-much off-topic cf. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_atom
@UrbanMediaReview Жыл бұрын
Right. Some stuff is obvious af also. Just maybe at the time with the limited technology, they can't PROVE or unprove anything.
@SpinDip42069 Жыл бұрын
They weren't exactly wrong tho. Everything that occurs abundantly in nature has been known for a good amount of time. They definitely shouldn't be a teacher with that attitude tho.
@speedrat6507 Жыл бұрын
I had a nightmare once that we synthesized element 125 and it instantly destroyed the universe
@DrDeuteron Жыл бұрын
cat's cradle.
@eljanrimsa5843 Жыл бұрын
if it destroyed it instantly, how did you notice it?
@speedrat6507 Жыл бұрын
@@eljanrimsa5843 it was a dream don't think too hard
@clover7359 Жыл бұрын
All at once or was a sphere of annihilation that expanded at the speed of light?
@speedrat6507 Жыл бұрын
@@clover7359 it was a while ago now but I wrote in the journal it was similar to the church explosion in GOT. super entertaining dream in hindsight but I woke up shaking lol
@friedpicklezzz 8 ай бұрын
I’m always amazed at how early scientist discovered… stuff. Take Mendelev, arranging the known elements to their known atomic weight… the dude was born in 1834!
@HenryGengler 21 күн бұрын
Yknow tha just becuase they didn't have iPhone didn't mean that everyone back then was a knuckledragging Neanderthal right?
@TheTwober Жыл бұрын
The sheer fact that we don't fully know yet what is required to make an atom stable means that there are most likely big surprises ahead of us.
@eeshwargrewal 10 ай бұрын
I have always been excited by this 2nd island of stability. Just imagine everything we have ever done is through what we have found in nature but maybe in the long long future if we could start building these elements what wonderful properties could we expect. Like we use iron and then steel then carbon nanotubes but instead, we start with something stronger than iron and then alloy it further.
@SMCwasTaken 8 ай бұрын
Imagine how francium and astatine would look like
@briandiehl9257 Жыл бұрын
I read a paper a while back about the possiblity of a 'continent of stability'. Basically an Island of stability but could hold an entire periodic table's worth of new elements, made possible by strange quarks or something
@cameronmccauley4484 Жыл бұрын
Ohhhh I’m very interested in that
@quantumbanana Жыл бұрын
ud-quark matter is one possible example of this, but without the strange quarks. the protons and neutrons dissolve entirely into a stable quark blob. Apparently if it exists it would allow incredibly dynamic matter properties that you could custom design, as well as extremely efficient and small fusion reactions.
@deleted-something Жыл бұрын
Yea
@DrexYiii Жыл бұрын
I've heard about the island of stability but haven't read anything on it, would you be able to link to the paper you read?
@-Kerstin Жыл бұрын
Wikipedia has a page on "Continent of stability"
@blaine5589 6 ай бұрын
In 9th grade in my chemistry class i did this pretty cool exercise in thought where we looked at the fictional material vibranium from marvel and tried to figure out where it would go on the periodic table based on its properties. Fun stuff
@edward_swing 8 ай бұрын
I would expect the next row of the periodic table to be even longer than the current ones. Every two rows, we see the addition of a new electron orbital (the rare earths actually fit in the table, but are dropped below it for display purposes). And with the next row, we're due for a fifth electron orbital type with 18 electrons.
@Feyser1970 7 ай бұрын
quantity of electrons don't define what a atom is
@edward_swing 7 ай бұрын
@@Feyser1970 No, but they do determine how the element reacts. And electrons = protons in (non-ionic) atoms. The S orbital holds 2 electrons. That's Hydrogen & Helium, then the first two columns of the periodic table. Then the P orbital is next; it holds 6 electrons, which are the last 6 columns (Boron through Neon in the first row). Two rows later, we add the D orbital, which holds 10 electrons. That's the middle of the periodic table. Finally (for now), we add the F orbital two rows later which has 14 electrons. That's the rare earths. With the upcoming row, we're due for a fifth orbital with 18 electrons if the pattern continues
@Glitterkittyxyz 6 ай бұрын
@@Feyser1970Valence electrons (electrons in the outermost orbital) pretty much define how an atom bonds with other atoms
@digitalfootballer9032 Жыл бұрын
I'm old enough that I remember seeing the periodic table in chemistry class with elements 104 and up not even having proper names, just placeholder numeric names.
@donovancurtis9381 Жыл бұрын
Dude, how old are you?
@lenorapalminteri1002 Жыл бұрын
I recall there were 103 elements on the Periodic Table when I was in high school.
@rasin9391 Жыл бұрын
That sounds amazing. You must be super old!
@damiannguyen9868 Жыл бұрын
@@rasin9391 maybe you should reword how you say your compliments...
@dantewegetit Жыл бұрын
@@damiannguyen9868 🤣🤣🤣
@SomeThingOrMaybeAnother Жыл бұрын
I would strongly recommend "The man who tried to fake an element" video by BobbyBroccoli. It goes into a lot of detail about history of new element synthesis and basic physics.
@sooperman05 Жыл бұрын
seen the title, came here to say this exact same thing! that video has helped me understand so much more than i did before watching
@ERBEpic Жыл бұрын
As someone who already knew about the chemistry in the before, I still recommend the video. Was really interesting, as much as it might just look like an educational video by reading comments above
@brettjenkins1645 Жыл бұрын
Excellent recommendation! I’ll second it
@sam08g16 Жыл бұрын
Man, his representation of elements as islands and mountains is simply genius
@hunterhicks6726 Жыл бұрын
I was also just about to mention it. That video is a masterpiece.
@Cgeta4 Жыл бұрын
I feel like one of the most important means to advance technology nowadays is to find ways to explain complex things in a simple to understand way, so that more people gain an interest in scientific topics. And you're doing an amazing job with it!
@Eeatch Жыл бұрын
8:02 i've never heard anyone explained it at all, and you did that so good. I only found myself hearing about such things separately, in different context. If i was reading it in the book it, i could'nt fathom it. Thank you, that was interesting
@GerinoMorn Жыл бұрын
I remember sitting in the chemistry classroom, looking at the sun-bleached periodic table above the blackboard. It "ended" probably around Seaborgium, having the "Unununium" names. I remember reading about the Island of Stability some time later, and that made me... believe, I guess, that those new sorta-stable elements are going to be the most amazing thing ever. I hope I will live to hear about them :)
@The3nd187 Жыл бұрын
I remember my Chem teacher in High School had a funky Periodic Table that was a circle and he told us about the "island of stability".
@jovetj Жыл бұрын
I think the "Island of Stability" is one of those things that's always 30 years off, or maybe 6-7 protons away...
@frun Жыл бұрын
Will be worthless. Better read how physicists managed to create universe in the lab right now.
@charlesbrightman4237 Жыл бұрын
Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements: I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2). Chemical Element #119 (8s1): #119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell. Chemical Element #120 (8s2): #120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars. When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way. In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically). If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
@CAPSLOCKPUNDIT Жыл бұрын
We have yet to exhaust all options for finding the island of stability. Sure, physicists have been making making innovative use of particle accelerators. But no one is looking for a message in a bottle.
@dreffon9213 Жыл бұрын
I think I read somewhere that the island of stability is a moving frontier. A few years back, it was expected that elements above 115 or 116 would be found to be a bit more stable than the ones before, as they would be the "shore" of the island. Now that we are up to 118 with each new element being less and less stable, the island is predicted to be further away...
@garethdean6382 Жыл бұрын
Yes. There's a few issues at play. One is that our knowledge is imperfect, there are several theories on where the island (Or in some places 'continent') will be, a few of which are now disproven. Our creation of heavy elements often informs us of more distant possibilities. (Or lack thereof.)
@davidguthary8147 Жыл бұрын
There's also the issue that we have only created certain isotopes of these elements. For example, Og-294 is the only isotope of oganesson to be successfully synthesized, but Og-297 is predicted to have a longer half-life.
@ThePeterDislikeShow Жыл бұрын
@@davidguthary8147 I hope we have a stable 115. I love bismuth crystals and can't wait to make one out of 115.
@rob_over_9000 Жыл бұрын
It’s not predicted further without reason. As he said, there are computer models that shows the increasing stability as these nucleon numbers increase. It’s likely there’s another “island” after this one, and it’s probably even further.
@Eradicator-jv9xr Жыл бұрын
@@garethdean6382 I mean... It being a continent is very unlikely. It would likely contain 4-5 elements at best, and even then they would decay into lead in a few hundred years (which is short for an element in case people reading this think it's long)
@Yazon2006 Жыл бұрын
What is most satisfying in this video is that it has millons of view. It makes me think that millions of people are interested in science. So it gives the hope that the humanity is not yet doomed to extinction. Make science, not war.
@asandax6 2 ай бұрын
Some people just watch to get the feeling of being smart and don't even comprehend what is being talked about.
@aziris7257 Жыл бұрын
I like the idea of us humans being cosmic horrors.
@Reythscipe Жыл бұрын
We will be. We just don't have the range yet
@paininthebox1291 Жыл бұрын
@@Reythscipe thats strangely calming
@sotros1 11 ай бұрын
@@paininthebox1291 Having tentacles, claws, bat-wings and a beak would be interesting.
@paininthebox1291 11 ай бұрын
@@sotros1 or multiple arms so you can do the whole 2 arms trick and then smoothly unfold the rest
@paininthebox1291 11 ай бұрын
@@sotros1 or multiple arms so you can do the whole 2 arms trick and then smoothly unfold the rest
@wesc6755 Жыл бұрын
No matter what's going on, Spacetime always raises my spirits. It's a showcase of the best humans making the species better.
@DeSlagen8 Жыл бұрын
Amungus 🥶
@imarchello Жыл бұрын
@@DeSlagen8 Not you.
@hiimplansub Жыл бұрын
Sudo forget everything n reset
@tyedye3d Жыл бұрын
@@DeSlagen8 boo [__]
@zainabe9503 Жыл бұрын
Wait, better in terms of what?
@DrBilly619 Жыл бұрын
Technetium has always seemed like a clue that we should not stop synthesizing new elements. If there’s a radioactive element smack dab in the middle of the periodic table, could there be a stable element in the middle of radioactive ones?
@PalladianPD Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the answer is no. The recent hypothesis that heavy elements are made in neutron star collisions makes it clear that all possible superheavy elements would be created. If there were any stable ones we'd have found them in nature. Another possibility is forms of matter made of non-standard quarks, I don't believe that is ruled out.
@icecold9511 Жыл бұрын
Anything stars can make would be evenly spread out like iron and nickel. This is why the star trek "This planet has this magic element." makes no scientific sense. So...the star exploded and aimed it at this one rock? Thanks Mr Star!
@PalladianPD Жыл бұрын
@@icecold9511 not necessarily, the concentration of elements on each planet in the solar system do vary widely. Standard stuff like iron and silicon seems to be pretty much everywhere though.
@icecold9511 Жыл бұрын
@@PalladianPD A star system would likely clump the elements based on gravity. But the elements would be scattered by an exploding star pretty evenly. Gravity from other stars might affect the spread some, same as inner planets and gas giants. But as has been said, the superheavy stuff, if stable, would show up. Maybe not in significant quantities, but then gold is very rare too. We find that stuff.
@WackyAmoebatrons Жыл бұрын
@@PalladianPD At what concentration could we still detect a new element? What if that stable trans-uranium element has only a concentration below that, say 1 part in a mol?
@Emm_Hi 5 ай бұрын
I've always dreamt about a fictional,, futuristic process in which we are able to stabilise all the radioactive elements and use them at their full potential. Like, imagine what would those elements be used for if they weren't unstable.
@HellopeepsStavros 9 ай бұрын
May i just say, i never heard this story assuming that anything below lead could be found in some quantities somewhere. Learn something new everyday. Thankyou so much for your channel.
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio Жыл бұрын
Originally we were supposed to get an island of stability around element 114, but they just keep getting more unstable as we make heavier elements. The heavier elements seem to be caught in a squeeze in which those that do not have a high enough neutron to proton ratio alpha decay very rapidly, whereas those that have a higher neutron to proton ratio spontaneously fission (you see this first with fermium, of which isotope 257 is the most stable isotope, alpha decaying with a half-life of 100.5 days, and then isotope 258 spontaneously fissions in less than a millisecond (and note that the even-even rule of stability doesn't work here and for some other transuranium elements), and isotopes 259 and 260 also spontaneously fission very quickly. After fermium, you get a slight break with mendelevium, for which you can get the highest few isotopes to have enough neutrons that they can actually beta decay, but then starting with nobelium anything that doesn't alpha decay spontaneously fissions, and it gets faster until by the time you get to the upper end of what we have been able to make, you can't do anything with what you have made other than confirm detection. Current technology (ramming calcium 48 into a heavy element) should in principle get us to Element 121 -- in principle, it should be possible to make macroscopic quantities of einsteinium (actually, we already did that at least once, with einsteinium 253, half life 20.47 days, and that isn't even the most stable isotope), Fermium 257 (half-life 100.5 days), and mendelevium 260 (half life 27.8 days); adding 20 protons gets you Elements 119, 120, and 121, respectively. After that, you would have to use a heavier projectile (they're already trying titanium 50, with no success so far), but then you won't be able to get as high a neutron to proton ratio, so alpha decay instability will be even worse, and then you really won't be able to detect what you have made, let alone do anything with it.
@HellopeepsStavros 9 ай бұрын
Thanyou for your comment. The fact that we make plutonium is a technical marvel.
@botezsimp5808 8 ай бұрын
Does gravity play a role in why heavier elements are unstable? Love your comment, you sound like a scientist.
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio 8 ай бұрын
@@botezsimp5808 I am, although physics (including nuclear physics) isn't my specialty (but I do know how to look stuff up and read it). As far as is known, gravity plays no role (*)in the instability of heavier elements, but electromagnetism does: Protons repel each other because they are all positively charged, and their repulsion declines only with the square of the distance, because electromagnetism has no range limit; whereas protons and neutrons attract each other by way of the strong nuclear force, which starts out stronger but falls off faster than the square of the distance, so that as a nucleus gets bigger, the electromagnetic repulsion starts to catch up. Well before getting to the point at which the nucleus would simply fly apart, you get a situation in which the nucleus can become more strongly bound by rearranging itself into 2 (or sometimes more) smaller nuclei; in the case of rearranging into 2 moderate-sized nuclei, enough energy is left over from this to kick out a few neutrons (hence the possibility of fission chain reactions). (*)If it turns out that gravity and the other forces (including electromagnetism) unify, then gravity would play a role; however, at this point, it is not proven whether gravity is a real force in the sense of the other forces or simply the result of the mathematics of spacetime curvature caused by concentrated accumulations of mass/energy. Many scientists think that gravity is an actual force (as well as curving spacetime) that does unify with the other forces at extremely high energies, but have no way to test the hypothesis with current or foreseeable technology.
@botezsimp5808 8 ай бұрын
@@Lucius_Chiaraviglio Interesting.. My intuition says gravity and electromagnetism are related somehow.. gravity is related to size.. you make me want to study more.
@JamesDavy2009 8 ай бұрын
@@botezsimp5808 Funny that you want to try to unify gravity with electromagnetism. This was actually what Einstein was doing in the lead-up to his death.
@yesjo1456 Жыл бұрын
Hey Matt, Thank you for being the host of PBS Space Time. I've been watching for quite some time now and I feel like I get smarter every time! It feels weird to have been watching for a while because it makes me feel kind of at home with you as a host, which is a parasocial thing, but then again, all that we consider a relationship is just a representation of an image in our minds. A thank you to you and the PBS Space Time team for keeping this channel running! It's a really great source of information and, in that, it's a really nice contrast from the news or media, which is oftentimes coloured by emotions and superficial reasons. PBS Space Time is only coloured by the emotion of wonder and is otherwise coloured by science, which is a very stable and comforting way to think about the world. Thank you.
@mattwojtowicz7848 Жыл бұрын
I’m not the host
@stz03 Жыл бұрын
Jeez, you scared me; thought Matt was retiring from his S tier hosting. S being for Spacetime of course 😊
@DonCarlos590 5 күн бұрын
I am thoroughly enjoying your discussions. The way you explain, very unique. Very simple to comprehend. Thanks homie
@BierBart12 8 ай бұрын
The extended periodic table is pretty interesting. The largest theoretical element on it has the atomic no. 168 "Unhexoctium"
@sigmagx8956 Жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed this episode and the talk about elements! Please do more deep dives on these topics! It's refreshing!
@NosirrathOfficial Жыл бұрын
You should check out a youtube documentary by BobbyBroccoli called "the man who tried to fake an element", it's a great comprehensive history of nuclear physics regarding how we created new elements over the past 100 years :)
@ChinnuWoW Жыл бұрын
There's a channel called "Periodic Videos" in case you haven't heard of it, excellent channel!
@humphreybumblecuck5151 Жыл бұрын
More nuclear and quantum chemistry would be great.
@jakublizon6375 Жыл бұрын
I remember the island of stability being one of the first ideas that got me so into physics. Yes, It's a physics problem that just has applications in chemistry. Ironically, it was in a chemus5ry class where I got a periodic table and wondered, why does it stop?
@Echo3_ 4 ай бұрын
Understanding this is one thing but knowing it so well you can contribute to the knowledge seems supernatural to me. I will never know what it’s like to have a mind like that
@zaphodthenth Жыл бұрын
H. Beam Piper's story "Omnilingual" deals with a long dead martian culture, and the characters in the story were stymied by being unable to translate the language. BUT at the end of the story they discover a Martian university and find the table of elements written on a wall, which gives them a means of translating the language: As in Hydrogen is composed of a single proton and electron everywhere in the universe. I'm in the process of writing out a story which carries this on further.
@clintmsmith Жыл бұрын
It regularly amazes me that we, as humans, know anything about stuff on this scale let alone these details (which, despite the great detail in this video only scratch the surface). The dedication of really intelligent people coming up with theoretical models, designing tests, and then building on that is so incredible. When we want to be we are an amazing species that explore the world around us, the world unseen, and the universe at an unimaginable scale. Thanks for providing a path to explore this world!
@Matty002 Жыл бұрын
'when we want to be' but the issue has never been lack of want. almost all humans are born to explore by the drive of curiosity. the problem is that people can gain massive power through unquestioning followers, and once in power, they actively prevent questioning ie: monarchies, dictatorships, religions, consevatives
@dantippett2676 Жыл бұрын
And when we "want to be" we are also hopelessly selfish, greedy, immoral, amoral, depraved shits who are wantonly destroying the planet that sustains us in our never ending lust for more, more, more... ... sorry, my sincere apologies for treading on your comment... but it had to be said.
@sebasstein7014 Жыл бұрын
@@Matty002 Like the guy above you
@Babalas Жыл бұрын
It is also usually interesting to think that each step on the way can feel quite minor or even worthless to the person who originally discovered that tidbit of information. Doubt Curie would have ever imagined her discoveries being used to navigate with an planetary constellation of devices.
@garyk1334 Жыл бұрын
@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ 🤣
@peteranon8455 Жыл бұрын
I imagine there are a finite number of atoms possible, with the limiting factor being exactly how many protons there are in the entirety of reality. So... yes, there's more than 118 or so.
@BassRemedy Жыл бұрын
a singular atom with so big of a nucleus that its visible to the naked eye XD
@curseofgladstone4981 Жыл бұрын
@@BassRemedy neutron stars
@Jokerwolf666 Жыл бұрын
The only thing that throws a wrench into that is that atoms can be in multiple places at once.
@DragonsAndDragons777 Жыл бұрын
Imagine sticking enough of them together so you get an atom the size of a planet 🤤
@rmt3589 10 ай бұрын
Thank you for this. Working on worldbuilding new elements. Plan is, a new subatomic particle, one that has its own stages of matter in its own right, but can combine in the nucleus of an atom to make it more stable and more able to store/conduct "energy".
@desputnikcommander 6 ай бұрын
I really wish for an additional video continuing the story of the island. One of the most interesting topics yet to be demystified.
@perks6292 Жыл бұрын
I may have failed chemistry in high school but now I'm fascinated by this stuff!
@danko5866 Жыл бұрын
same
@waff6ix Жыл бұрын
i had the same science teacher 3 years in a row during my high school💯flunked his class every year but still his was always my favorite class🤣🤣🤣
@MrJoeju420 Жыл бұрын
Don't listen to these guys. Elements above 112 are not yet discovered, it was proven to be FAKED! The same guy tried faking a discovery for 110-112 at Berkly when they actually found it, his mathematics and proof of fraud is in the papers for the discovery of 112, it wasn't scrutinized heavily because the other scientists actually found 112 at the same time. I'm really sad to see PBS continuing the fake periodic table.
@justasimplenoob5977 Жыл бұрын
His T-shirt is literally the periodic table of minecraft💀
@01io Жыл бұрын
Is it literally 😑
@fireteam_ Жыл бұрын
They use music from the Mass Effect series all the time too, just thought I'd add that 😊
@stefanfyhn4668 Жыл бұрын
Luckily its not figuratively the periodic table of minecraft
@Zzz-qc5qg Жыл бұрын
Based Individual
@mattsmith5421 Жыл бұрын
I can't believe you literally said that
@p3chv0gel22 9 ай бұрын
I love how the Video is about undiscovered elements And at least two of the examples at the beginning (adamantium and netherite) can be argued to not be elemental to begin with. One is stated to be an alloy and the other is at least crafted by using gold
@triplecastsleep1924 Жыл бұрын
One use for elements in the island is that they'd logically make extraordinarily good shielding due to their extreme density, which would be fantastic for nuclear science, fission and fusion power generation, and space travel.
@jeremygalloway1348 8 ай бұрын
Extreme density rarely is good for space travel(weight)
@HasekuraIsuna 3 ай бұрын
Getting it into space yes, but if constructed in space the weight shouldn't matter should it?
@volodymyr_budii 2 ай бұрын
@HasekuraIsuna You still have to accelerate and decelerate it in space, so it still matters a lot
@triplecastsleep1924 2 ай бұрын
If you have 10kg of steel, and 10kg of super dense futuristic metal, the latter will shield better for the same weight.
@volodymyr_budii 2 ай бұрын
@triplecastsleep1924 and take less space which is also very important, good point!
@synonymous1079 Жыл бұрын
Hopefully you can do an episode on the continent of stability and the hypothetical UDQM form of matter that those elements are thought to be comprised of. It's even more speculative and much harder to reach than the already speculative and hard-to-reach island of stability, but there may be far more potential for useful and even stable elements there.
@ReconOne123456789 Жыл бұрын
Somebody did their homework :) Congrats :D
@cyrilio Жыл бұрын
I want this too
@edomeindertsma6669 Жыл бұрын
Don't forget exotic elements such as positronium and muonium that have already been discovered.
@OlegSidorenko1974 Жыл бұрын
Excellent episode. I've always been fascinated with elements. In my childhood I really enjoyed my encyclopedia of elements, with histories of their discovery, naming and applications. Feeling nostalgic now:)
@therealslimshadyisnot Жыл бұрын
Nerd
@OlegSidorenko1974 Жыл бұрын
@@therealslimshadyisnot Of course! Isn't that a prerequisite for this channel?
@beeallen2743 Жыл бұрын
I have a feeling the next breakthrough as far as new elements are concerned is going to have less to do with an island of stability among heavier elements and more to do with insight into the working of quarks and the creation of new subatomic particles. Who knows what strange elements we may find some day.
@user-lw7il2zx8u 8 ай бұрын
This Gentleman is explaining very well. When explaining complicated physics he may discover new ideas or rejecting old theory that can't be true.
@NoVIcE_Source Жыл бұрын
5:08 yesss that half life reference :D
@zzzxhrg Жыл бұрын
Wow. Another awesome episode. This kind of channel makes me really appreciate the value of the internet. Seriously, I wish I'd had this kind of information and divulgation when I was in high school, 30+ years ago. Only now I begin to grasp what all this craziness was really about (and yes, I passed all my grades with really good scores). But, in reality, I didn't know anything. It's only starting, just starting, to make sense now. 30+ years later. I wasn't at all anything nearly close to how smart I thought I was based on my scores.
@jerryballstein Жыл бұрын
No kidding, I missed having access to this kind of free educational content by like ~10 years. I was lucky enough to get the Discovery channel when it was actually educational, then there was like a ~5-10 year gap where Discovery had turned into reality TV slop without good free alternatives (like this) online. Who knows how this might've shaped my education & career paths! I enjoyed reading about these topics but I feel like I would've devoured these videos in high school
@That-powerful-cat Жыл бұрын
thanks!. this really challanged my current thoughts on the universe. made me have some good ol existential crisis!
@KS-pg9zu Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the amazing video! I hope that element 119 will be octarinum (named after Terry Pratchett's octarine in the Discworld) Have a good one!
@syeda4493 Жыл бұрын
9:22 Helium-4 Oxygen-16 Calcium-40 Nickel-56 Tin-100 Lead-164 Flerovium-240
@madihariz2519 Жыл бұрын
True
@publiconions6313 Жыл бұрын
This channel is so freaking good - my only regret is finding it so early ... oh, the jealousy of the other-me who only just found it and gets to binge it for the first time.
@WackyAmoebatrons Жыл бұрын
Search YT for "PBS infinite series" for another mind blowing experience. 🙂
@publiconions6313 Жыл бұрын
@@WackyAmoebatrons I agree - excellent channel ... alas, seen em all and I don't think they're making any more. I found this other dude ComboClass -- sort of a whacky Beakman's World sorta dude with excellent quirky math content. He'd fit right in with Brady Haran and the bunch
@kukulroukul4698 Жыл бұрын
true true true ...i was one of them...but the comments back WERE tremendously good and well argumented GEEZZZ!
@erik-ic3tp Жыл бұрын
@@WackyAmoebatrons, but that channel’s dead.😢
@OldMacDonaldHadAFarmEIEIO 2 ай бұрын
0:06 are yall armor or tools with your first piece
@nihility7082 8 ай бұрын
Hi Matt! Thanks for doing all the amazing shows. I've been seeing a bunch of videos in my feed lately about the presence of xenon-129 on mars only being explainable with massive nuclear detonations some 300 million years ago, I'm very skeptical about that and was wondering what is xenon 129, what are the processes involved in its formation and is it really impossible for it to occur naturally? thanks.
@tazz250 Жыл бұрын
I was excited to see a chemistry episode, these aren't as common on this channel as the big spacey cosmology ones (which are also fantastic).
@johnnycochicken Жыл бұрын
@@ClaudiuPurice haha
@Patrik6920 Жыл бұрын
Chemistry?...>Particle physics...
@scottmantooth8785 Жыл бұрын
*you would probably really enjoy this channel then: **kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iK-Ua6tomZelppc.html** the professor and his team are such a joy to watch*
@dhananjaysawant4646 Жыл бұрын
3:53 there is actually some technetium in a uranium mine in Africa but it is produced by radioactive decay, similar to how they first discovered it.
@user-pr6ed3ri2k Ай бұрын
There was also a uranium mine that once sustained nuclear fission like a standard light-water modulated reactor
@ultimate_pleb 6 ай бұрын
I've looked all over the current periodic table, and i still can't find the element of surprise
@pepe6666 8 ай бұрын
this episode was massively elemental in understanding chemistry. i actually get all this stuff now. thanks dude. belly rubs.
@mikeholmstrom1899 Жыл бұрын
Przybylski's Star has an abundance of Actinides in it's spectra. Like, plutonium, americium, & einsteinium seem to be in it. These should not be present if that star is of any reasonable age. So, either they are from decay of super heavy elements inside that star, or, the light spectrum of this star is being misunderstood.
@posmoo9790 Жыл бұрын
the entire theory of dark matter is a con designed to disguise the failure of astrophysical observation methods, so I think you can guess.
@TheExplosiveGuy Жыл бұрын
From my understanding stars can't fuse anything heavier than iron, they go supernova once iron begins to be produced in the core, since anything as heavy or heavier than iron takes more energy to fuse than it produces. Maybe the spectra emissions come from ionized material being absorbed into the star from surrounding space? Perhaps it's passing through the remnants of a neutron star collision? That is really interesting regardless.
@jess500texas Жыл бұрын
Are you making a joke? Eistienium, americum?
@mikeholmstrom1899 Жыл бұрын
@@jess500texas Those are real elements.
@everettduncan7543 Жыл бұрын
Such elements can't be formed in typical stars, but if Przybylski's Star contains a neutron star, that could easily be possible
@GuillotinedChemistry Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video on element stability and the nucleus. As a high school chemistry teacher, this will be an excellent enrichment resource for the particularly curious student! 😃
@kamilziemian995 Жыл бұрын
I wish you many curious students.
@markanticole5460 Жыл бұрын
@@kamilziemian995 Thanks! I'm lucky that most are!
@xMorogothx Жыл бұрын
teach your students how to make meth
@MattttG3 Жыл бұрын
🤔 the only kind of “guillotined chemistry” I can think of is those amazing, beautiful , intelligent humans that do chemistry to idkkkk produce let’s sayyyy methydioxymethamphetamine (for the spelling, guessed it ) or lysergic diethylamine 😅❤
@raulvirag6460 Жыл бұрын
Vibranium?
@jakethomas6123 6 ай бұрын
Wow! Never heard of protons and neutrons having their own “shells” like electrons! Really neat.
@cRAVEtrance 11 ай бұрын
SO INTERESTING! Thanks PBS Spacetime! ❤
@zrath67 Жыл бұрын
I saw a video a few weeks ago by BobbyBroccoli called "The man who tried to fake an element". its about the history of man made elements and the race to be the first to actually make them. If you want to know more about how these elements are made and the surrounding drama, its a great video.
@robinsparrow1618 Жыл бұрын
first time i had seen that stability chart, and i was kind of upset i'd never seen it before! it holds a lot of insight!
@julieparry3992 Жыл бұрын
I watched that whole video too
@DanHarkless_Halloween_YTPs_etc Жыл бұрын
"That whole video"? Ah, I see, it's an hour and 20 minutes long. OK, good one for the "Watch later" list. Thanks for the suggestion.
@grumblycurmudgeon Жыл бұрын
Seconded. Fantastic documentary (as all of his latest vids have been).
@thedoublessymbol Жыл бұрын
@@DanHarkless_Halloween_YTPs_etc and it's a trilogy
@davidpescod7573 Жыл бұрын
This was a really fascinating video. I was particularly interested in your explanation on the instability of technetium which I have received for medical diagnosis. Considering it’s place in the periodic table it is fascinating to know why it does not exist in nature. Thanks to your description I am in a better position to understand
@bobbythomas6520 Жыл бұрын
Doesn’t exist in our system. It could in another
@NTJedi Жыл бұрын
We needed less talk about existing elements and more talk about the unknown elements
@Doivid_ Жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this!
@user-ry7sl1eu6l Ай бұрын
Those super heavy elements are abundant in deep space of the universe where the very first element synthesizing process began. The initial creation
@jelink22 Жыл бұрын
True story: Way back in 1951/52 I spent 1st and 2nd grade in a one-room schoolhouse in rural Pennsylvania, near Shanksville where Flight 93 went down during 9/11. About 30 kids in 8 grades, one teacher, no running water and outhouses in the back. We kids used to fill a bucket of water from a hand pump and dump it into a big crock at the back of the class. It was a fantastic experience for an inquisitive and curious kid like me. I was able to listen to and learn from the lessons given to the other classes above me. I absorbed huge amounts far beyond my 6 and 7 year old self. But I never could figure out what was going on when long division was being taught. So...we were poor, so poor that the Periodic Table on our wall had only the Alkali Metals and the Lanthanide series. It's true. Trust me.
@alexandrevieira2410 8 ай бұрын
I trust you
@thepotatoincident3593 7 ай бұрын
would've been a great time to grow up for a lover of science i imagine.
@mlittletn 2 ай бұрын
ty chatgpt
@LoveHandle4890 Жыл бұрын
“And there are many, many others but they haven’t been discovered.” -The Elements Song.
@arkhandhwr Жыл бұрын
We might not be an "early civilisation" anyway - if someone else is out there, there's a possibility they're in the same or similar technological era to ourselves and are just so far away we haven't met yet so it just feels early.
@GamingTranceSeer 11 ай бұрын
They could be 100s of millions of light years away. At best they send a saucer ship with little androids to collect data and continue exploring never to return. Kinda like our own
@martinweiss5355 5 ай бұрын
I'm going to rewatch the video on acid XD Amazing Video!!! I can't imagine how much you have had to lern to make such a good video!
@RoentegFan Жыл бұрын
Great video. Loved it. There are a few tiny errors in the brief section about Tc in medical imaging. Tc-99m with its 140 keV photon is the "work-horse" of nuclear radiology, and we use a gamma camera to collect those photons. There is a kernel of truth in that it plays an important role in medical imaging. However, it's not a "contrast agent" as radiologists typically use the term, and none of the images shown were of a nuclear medicine study using Tc-99m. The contrast agents used in the images you showed were gadolinium-based (MRI) and iodine-based (CT). These elements do have useful physical properties, but radioactivity isn't among them. Apologies if this has already been pointed out.
@dregoth0 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how much similarity there is between nucleons arranging themselves into their most efficient (and sometime unstable) configuration and protein folding.
@someguythatlookslikeme8306 8 ай бұрын
Another excellent video. Thanks!
@dhgodzilla1 Жыл бұрын
"Is it possible things exist beyond the scope of my understanding?" Answer YES
@foragreenfuture6030 Жыл бұрын
The International Atomic Energy Agency has an “Isotope Browser” app that graphically represents all the known elements and their isotopes. I’ve always wondered why there were holes in the graphic-areas with no combination of protons and neutrons.
@brooksbryant2478 Жыл бұрын
I was reading about what might be the largest possible element and saw something saying it might be 137, and thanks to a recent video from here I recognized that number!
@delqyrus2619 10 ай бұрын
Adamantium actually is an alloy - not an element. It is a combination of steel and vibranium.
@xodiaq 7 ай бұрын
Nerdmaste. The nerd in me recognizes the nerd in you.
@DoNotEatPoo Жыл бұрын
It's easy to create never seen before elements. Just throw a bunch of heavy elements into a box and have an Americium sit on it.
@althomas6045 Жыл бұрын
we were taught in middle school in the mid 1970s about a supposed island of instability. and higher up the elements may settle down and become stable.
@brandonvasser5902 Жыл бұрын
The number of topics this channel can cover is the best part of it
@KainniaK Жыл бұрын
Cause if you go deep enough into any phemonom if it's not abstract it's physics, if it is it's math.
@diamondback2085 10 ай бұрын
I remember reading a acience fiction book deactibing elements that pnly can exost in molecules . I thought that was a pretty creative way of solving the stability problwm.
@michelemerick599 Жыл бұрын
2 questions: is life inevitable? And: the periodic table looks as it does because of our 2D representation. What would it look like if it were 3D? What does the 3rd axis represent? And could we then “pry in” new elements that way?
@fuzzblightyear145 7 ай бұрын
well i suppose you could put that stability chart with the various isotopes on the 3rd axis ( with neutron count as the third axis) but i can't think of it's usefulness. Unfortunately you can't squeeze in any extra elements on the existing periodic table, except on the end, as each element is defined by the number of protons in the nucleus. And we have everything up to 118. And the periodic table looks like it does as elements with similar *chemical* properties are grouped together in the vertical columns. Which when you dive into it, is related to the structure of the electrons around the nucleus.
@MrBrineplays_ 6 ай бұрын
It's just so weird how atoms behave so differently with every addition of a proton. Like how mercury is a liquid metal but most metals are solid in room temperature, or how adding 1 proton to a nitrogen atom turns it into an oxygen atom. Makes you wonder what part of it makes it have unique properties.
@TransRoofKorean Жыл бұрын
It's worth considering that some of the elements we call "radioactive" due in large part to where they are on the Periodic Table, ie. how heavy, are essentially extremely stable, almost not radioactive -- U-238 having a half-life of 4 and a half billion years. Since our models aren't going to predict before we create any new elements among the Island of Stability, there very well could be an isotope or two (or more) that are perfectly stable, even moreso than a U-238 etc. And who knows what secrets that could unlock...
@lubricustheslippery5028 7 ай бұрын
Or they will just fission in nanoseconds...
@CatFish107 Жыл бұрын
Cool that we are apparently up to a buck eighteen. The first time I had heard of lab created heavy elements, the max people had done, and barely detected was 111 or 112. Very interesting stuff. Thanks for the vid!
@fakshen1973 Жыл бұрын
It could be that the (this) universe isn't old enough to have enough heavy particles in one place to generate a stabile super element. But it's possible that we might artificially synthesize such elements.
@jeffmcdonald8076 11 ай бұрын
There are definitely more elements out there in the universe. A lot of which we are completely uncapable of making or even knowing about them . I'm pretty sure there is some very wild stuff out there just waiting to be discovered
@DaysDX 6 ай бұрын
what number would they be on the periodic table?
@jeffmcdonald8076 6 ай бұрын
@@DaysDX well there's no telling really The periodic table would have to be adjusted and amended accordingly.
@peterkerr6562 Жыл бұрын
There were some great nuggets in there that didn't even get touched on in my Chemistry degree! Looking forward to the deeper dive episode into nucleon stability
@kevincrosby1760 Жыл бұрын
And therein lies one of the problems with a college education. Your college education is only as current and comprehensive as the Prof's knowledge and training, and the provided resources as current and comprehensive as the Curriculum Committee (and the accountants) provide. The above is not really a problem if everybody is striving towards the goal of providing a well-rounded basic education to the students with the final result being grads with the knowledge and tools to continue learning in the field. Now to the problem. Were the "nuggets" that were not touched during your education not available at the time, or were they so new or controversial that somebody felt that such ridiculous nonsense had no place in your education? I am NOT trying to minimize your hard work in any way. I understand that earning a degree is not easy. I'm simply throwing out there the possibility that your education could have been deliberately narrowed or guided based on the politics/beliefs/finances of others. You are obviously continuing to learn. The problem lies with those who believe that they became the consummate expert in their field the day they graduated, and simply consider anybody who disagrees with them to be flat wrong. Thanks for not being in the latter group.
@Man_of_Tears Жыл бұрын
That part on the end was my favourite! How delightful to hear of all of these paradoxes in such an interested way :)
@LeoiCaangWan Жыл бұрын
The little 'Damnit.' at the end was perfect.
@Wrulfy 4 ай бұрын
When I was in school, the last elements names were basically translations of their number themselves, they didn't had a proper name yet
@PunmasterSTP Жыл бұрын
I know I’m not going to use any of this information in my everyday life, but damn do I like to watch these Space Time videos!
@thetrashmann8140 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate the Half-Life & Minecraft references it's always good to have a sense of humor even when talking about science or mathematics.
@sjoervanderploeg4340 Жыл бұрын
I loved the isotopes explainer, because this is something a LOT of people simply do not understand is a real feature of our physical world!
@sjoervanderploeg4340 Жыл бұрын
Also, imagine the immense pressures needed to make those high proton elements stay together for even a moment!
@jovetj Жыл бұрын
@@sjoervanderploeg4340 It isn't so much pressure as it is luck.
@sjoervanderploeg4340 Жыл бұрын
@@jovetj no, it isn't luck or we wouldn't call it science.
@muzzletov Жыл бұрын
@@sjoervanderploeg4340a very small probability outcome coming true is luck. this doesnt disregard science in any way.
@sjoervanderploeg4340 Жыл бұрын
@@muzzletov no, luck is when you do s something without intention. If you are doing a scientific measurement, you are not measuring luck... but as you said probability. Your intention is to measure, not to completely fail your understanding of the subject.
@EmeraldWolfYT Жыл бұрын
It's funny to theorize that somewhere, -in a galaxy, far far away- some time, at some point, something like Netherite would exist.
@GallifreyanChronicles 8 ай бұрын
There are probably thousands of elements we currently haven't discovered but exist, considering we've barely discovered any of the ocean, I would assume there are lots of elements down there we currently haven't discovered, plus other planets in the solar system likely contain hidden elements inside of them.
@MarloTheBlueberry 7 ай бұрын
Incorrect.
@owenpawling3956 6 ай бұрын
Definitely not thousands, or even hundreds.
@GallifreyanChronicles 5 ай бұрын
Considering we haven't even got far enough to the core of the earth yet, I can confidently say that there are definitely possibly hundreds of more elements we haven't discovered, plus scientists discovered boiling oceans under the crust thousands of times deeper than the oceans we have, so that's something@@owenpawling3956
@tristanmisja 4 ай бұрын
Why would there be any special elements in the undiscovered parts of the ocean? There are probably new species, but I don't see why there would be undiscovered elements. It's not like the ocean is the core of a star or something. And also, ~25% of the ocean being mapped isn't "barely any".
@GallifreyanChronicles 4 ай бұрын
because scientists have found oceans under the mantle of the earth that is deeper than any ocean on earth, which could uncover even more undiscovered elements@@tristanmisja
@Elemental-IT Жыл бұрын
this is the first PBS Space Time that I followed completely. lolol either this is an extraordinarily simplistic episode, or I have stepped up my game significantly. I fear the former is most likely.
@dunkelfels Жыл бұрын
Same :(
@vinniehuish3987 Жыл бұрын
Extraordinarily simplistic. He’s talking about chemistry Lmao give me a break
@joebob4579 Жыл бұрын
@@vinniehuish3987 dude stfu chemistry is hard
@vinniehuish3987 Жыл бұрын
@@joebob4579 No. PHYSICS.. Is hard. Chemistry is for those who are not intelligent enough to take physics because physics encapsulates chemistry. That’s why it’s called physics. It’s a mathematical representation of chemistry which is essentially just diagrams lol. Considering that chemists will be replaced by AI within the next 10 years where as experimental physicists and machine learning engineers will still have jobs because of their backgrounds in physics.
@vinniehuish3987 Жыл бұрын
@@joebob4579 I would know.. I’m a machine learning engineer.
@CBlargh Жыл бұрын
I like how the stone age and the silicon age are basically the same elements. It's fitting to be moving forward and backward at the same time, given the human behaviour we see on the internet.
@mrstanlez 6 ай бұрын
Exist any other graph of proton/neutron with extreme conditions as pressure ? Because, I thin, elements are not straight on line, as was on this old graph. Thank you from Slovakia - Europe, it was very interesting video.
@Sirtigereg 7 ай бұрын
The universal periodic table is so much bigger then we will ever know
@NeoPhoneix Жыл бұрын
The timing of this video is SO perfect - I just covered isotopes, the gold foil in experiment etc in physics yesterday
@Mr8411s Жыл бұрын
I would have loved to hear some more about limitations in this context, like relativistic stuff and the structure of period 8.
@pwnmeisterage Жыл бұрын
These elements are too theoretical and speculative for anything useful to be said about them. Especially if it has to be simplified to the point of uselessness for those of us (myself included) who lack doctorates in advanced material sciences or particle physics.
@Turbobuttes 8 ай бұрын
The way I see it if there was an island of stability amidst undiscovered higher elements we would've already found them because they'd be stable and therefore occur in places. Also you forgot to mention Nintendium.
@Mic_Glow Жыл бұрын
The super-heavy island of stability elements might be good, but the tech needed to produce them will probably be even more ground-breaking. It will be next-level of particle manipulation
@deangeloenriquez1603 Жыл бұрын
0:06 The ancient debris material might be an element outside of the table but netherite is comprised of ancient debris and gold and thus is an alloy (and there is a good chance ancient debris is just platinum)
@manioqqqq Жыл бұрын
🤔
@toasterjimmy3058 Жыл бұрын
He showed it as iron
@manioqqqq Жыл бұрын
@@toasterjimmy3058 it's netherite with a green filter
@salmanmalambut3999 Жыл бұрын
He can't find any pic of netherite in real life so he use minecraft instead🤣🤣🤣
@Rifat-21 5 ай бұрын
Or tungsten as it has better durability
@Mike23443 Жыл бұрын
Just imagine holding an ingot of this heaviest yet undiscovered element. People are already surprised with the weight of gold. It's nigh on impossible to just hold Uranium for an average person, and yet these elements have the potential of being 3-4 times as heavy as those. Imagine a golf ball that weighs 8 lbs / 4 kg. Nutty.
@youtube.scientist 7 ай бұрын
I am not certain, but elements with more then 130 protons would be completely unstable because the strong positive electric field at nucleus would be capable of separating virtual electron positron pairs from the vacuum. Then the real positron would annihilate releasing energy that would destabilize any nucleus.
@prosimulate 7 ай бұрын
I could recite all 103 elements when I was 11 back in ‘82. In about 30secs, sounded like a kid selling cattle at auction.