If Noah didn't, then how did these dragons repopulate the Earth afterwards? From Southern Africa through Europe and from the tip of South America to the frozen North we have cave paintings, Roman murals, stories of Knights, and rock carvings depicting dragons (1846 changed to dinosaurs) fighting with each other and mankind. Satan that great dragon suddenly has a new meaning when I read about him. The book of Job depicts their strength and sizes

Looking forward to the upcoming episodes to help clarify the dinosaur record. Always wondered about those huge creatures.

My science textbook just covered “did Noah bring dinosaurs on the ark?” Today! (I’m homeschooled) that’s such a “coincidence”

A Harvard-led study indicates that Earth’s early ocean could have been one to two times larger than the current ocean volume1. These calculations are based on the interior water storage capacity of the planet, which includes the water bound to minerals in the Earth’s mantle. Researchers compiled data from scientific literature on minerals that contain oxygen and hydrogen atoms (the chemical equivalents of water) and used these figures to estimate the mantle’s water storage capacity. Implications: In extreme scenarios, if the primordial ocean were two times larger than today’s ocean, it might have completely flooded the land masses on the early Earth. While modern Earth’s surface is approximately 70 percent water-covered, this research suggests that our planet was a true ocean world billions of years ago

Thank you for covering this topic so thoroughly in this series! Dinosaurs were a major topic when I homeschooled our sons in the 80s & 90s. The materials available to me at the time were crucial, and now there is this format for our grandchildren to benefit from! Praise God! (Hopefully we'll be able to get them to The Ark Encounter soon.)

Most all dinosaurs start off relatively small.

Interesting topic I've always wondered. If sin started at the moment Adam sinned. How was the serpent "sinful" to suggest to take the fruit?

There are about 65 million years between the last dinosaurs and modern humans. Edited 18th May: Except for birds who had already started to diversify before that time, and maybe a few species here and there for a couple of millions of years that managed to survive in ecological niches that suited them. The monster of Loch Ness? I don't know. Fuzzy pictures that can show anything isn't evidence. Anyhow whatever survived are the very rare exceptions. The era of dinosaurs is over. This is the era of mammals.

Coukd you do a short video breaking down family/kind vs species? I have used your videos before for homeschool, but kids have a short attention span

Fact: Everything would have died of methane gas poisoning or the ark would have exploded when the gas reached a candle flame used for light. There was 1 window up top and no ventilation.

1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated. 12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood. 13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions. a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded? b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb? c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost. Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018

Loved the video. Very great artwork it was captivating.

I appreciate your response and I appreciate your level head when responding. It’s very refreshing being able to talk intelligibly! I respect your point of view and appreciate you taking the time to voice your opinion. The above response sounds very much like you believe in Darwinian’s theory of evolution. The problem I have with that is there is no observable scientific proof that one “kind” of animal can evolve into another “kind” of animal. There is adaptation for species but no proof of any sort that one kind of animal evolving into another totally different kind of animal. No where in the fossil record has there been proof that shows any type of transitional evolution of any type of animal. Even “Lucy” has proven to be just an ape not proof of evolution existing…

It's so wonderful that God gave us a special book to tell us what we need to know. *The Bible 📖* is its name. Thy word is a lamp 🪔 unto my feet, and a light unto my path. (Psalm 119:105)

Just out of interest. How did Noah accommodate the 10 million individual species of insects in the world. More than 11,000 individual species of Birds, Around 6400 Mammal species, 10,000 species of Reptiles, 700 species of Dinosaurs? Plus how big was the Ark?

Like so many Christian apologetics, the answer to the very first question of whether there were dinos on the ark: Because the Bible (supposedly) says so. When your only evidence is the Bible, then you have to first show that the facts stated in the Bible are true and accurate. Otherwise you claim is invalid. His position is 1) based on an a prior belief, which 2) is based on an unsubstantiated source. Such an argument might be persuasive to those who "believe" the Bible is literally true and accurate, but not to people who don't start with those a priori assumptions. If you are going to start with those a priori assumptions, why pretend that you are making some kind of "scientific" explanation that is supposed to refute the scientific theory of evolution. It is not and therefore does not.

What an outstanding, well articulated and truthful account of our biblical history!! Placing dinosaurs on the Ark would have been done very easily. Noah could have taken eggs and juvenile dinosaurs on board the Ark. Fully grown dinosaurs would not of been taken on the Ark. I am thoroughly enjoying your videos and I really do hope that more people can watch them and learn!! God bless!! 😊✝️

i always appreciate your videos!

So were the dinosaurs on the ark or not? (I missed something here)

Are the Flintstones pre-flood, personally I think they were, Fred Flintstone had a pet dinosaur caller dino as recorded by Hanna- Barbera. I don't know if Fred, Wilma, Barney & Betty perished in the Flood, perhaps they passed away before that but no doubt Bedrock was comsumed by the waters of God's wrath, could you tell me what was the great sin of Bedrock ?

if science can be wrong about the order of creation i.e sea and earth before stars can't it be wrong about dinosaurs living on land? dragons unless supernatural in hebrew were described as water living.

For the record, Noah's "ark" was only big enough to hold his family and his own domestic livestock. He'd been measuring the water runoff each spring at the Euphrates River and saw it was getting higher each year, and he also knew about the occasional flooding that had occurred in the past and took measures to protect his own household in the event of an even worse flood.

There's a reason why these Ark believers will never debate a real scientist. It's because this story is just a fairytale, and that proves the Bible is just a fairytale as well.

Genesis 7:20 “Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.” So the flood was just over 8 metres deep.

Noah probably took young animals not adults

Maybe dinosaurs were part of the nephalim. Maybe the dinosaurs are just one of the products of strange flesh.

Why would he do that? Do we really understood what God's command meant about the Animals, Noah took in? A lot of Bible stories are contextual. Jonah, for example could have been swallowed by a "Great Fish" (Whales at this time were also considered fish) But being swallowed by a great fish was also a euphemism of that period, for falling into the Sea during the storm they were in. Do we know what was meant when it was written? If Dinosaurs still walked the Earth, at that time, they probably would have been called something rather unusual. They may have been excluded from Noah's list. That's not even getting into whether the time calculated by men, from the Bible, reflects reality. No where in the Bible, does it even define what is meant by the term, "Day" in the six days of Creation. Or what is meant by "Earth" Or "Seas". Try to explain chemistry, astronomy or physics to a hick farmer or shepherd, who has never had formal education? By Sea did he mean waters on this planet? Or waters, everywhere> Earth - same thing. What if "Day" was the only unit of measurement that was commonly understood, that could help indicate God created everything in six definitive steps? I feel Creationism, accepting a long dead man's interpretation of events and his attempts to calculate real dates from God's book may be arrogant and self-defeating. I also don't accept scientific dating premises, either. Scientists have often been flat out wrong, and science has needed to "re-calibrate" numerous times since it became a definitive field of study. Evolution is laughable. I have yet to see proof that a fish became anything other than a fish, a reptile, a reptile, a bird, a bird and so on. While I agree living things adapt and change (even humans) we don't have any evidence we become other living things - only pure conjecture, based on the premise that there is no God. I find that notion pitiful and requiring more blind faith than believing in God. And as I said, Whales used to be considered fish. Did that make them fish? NO! It revealed people didn't know what they were talking about. Bats were considered birds. What were octopuses thought of? The great Apes had several unfortunate labels, because they were man-like, but obviously no men. I believe the Bible is accurate, especially historically, but also contains teaching stories to help it's readers/listeners understand God's purpose and their own in God's plan. But I don't trust the theory of Creationism... I believe in God, not some stranger's weird 2nd hand account of his works.

By the very own size of the ark there is no way noah could had housed a sauroposeidon there, i consider irresponsable to spread such non-senses...

Fossilization takes millions of years. A fossil is a stone. Therefore, the dinosaurs did not live at the same time than humans.

I watch these videos because there is world class mental gymnastics in the comments.

The seventh day of the week beings at dusk of Friday and ends at dusk of Saturday. It was Constitine who changed the day of rest to Sunday, Passover to Easter December 25 to the day Jesus was born.

They disrespect the bible that tells that there were two creations.

Our ways are not God’s ways, His knowledge and power far exceeds the minuscule knowledge we have. And our little knowledge has made something as great as Wi-Fi ( which still amazes me). How much Greater does our Father in heaven Know. I chuckle at the people putting GOD in their box. Like he is the Creator, everything is possible for him even if our little minds can’t comprehend how. 😂

The food story is copied from the oldest writing. Every Coulter has flood story. The sq ft of ark is only 10 sq ft different. Thats incredible. So much more, Think of animals dna was on ark

I can't help but wonder, which is the more important: believing there's a God, or believing there was a world-wide flood? As the existence of God cannot be proven either way, one would think, that promoters of that belief would want to make belief as easy as possible. There are floods all the time, all over the planet, so the idea of a flood is an easy one. But the idea of a world-wide flood is disprovable. To believe that, one is tasked with supposing that the author was somehow able to know about the entire planet (if in fact, the author even had any concept of Earth being a sphere) was under water. The only way to know that is from above with weather satellites. (Did we used to have those but somehow never knew about them?) Since there is zero evidence there was ever a world-wide flood during man's existence, one might think that it would be worth having some humility around that idea, and not make it a core issue in any theological belief system so as to make belief in God a smoother ride. The same would be true of supposing how old the Earth is. Does believing the Earth is one age vs. another have any tangible relevance to a belief in God? And are dinosaurs even referenced at all in the Bible? The fact that it's even being attempted to align the knowledge that dinosaurs existed with Biblical theology, means one accepts the fact that they did exist, which creates a bit of a non-sequitur with all young earth concepts. You need to pick a side, God, or the dubious notion that the Bible is inerrant.

I don’t know that the animals that are extinct like teradactiles,, triceratops, T Rex were here after the great flood. I felt they were here before the flood. I don’t know everything so maybe the truth of the matter will be taught us when Jesus comes to the earth.

I used to believe that there was an enormous expanse of time between Gen 1:1 and Gen 1:2. That was where I thought the dinosaurs were. But that was debunked by Gen 1: 20-23. How could God have created all living things on day 5 if he had already created dinosaurs before day 1? Answer, he didn't.

He's wrong about that 24 hour day here's why he told Adam and Eve were told not to eat of the tree of knowledge good and evil if you do on that day you shall surely die if it was a twenty four hour day then none of us would be here but scripture says a day with the Lord is as a 1000 years and a 1000 years as one day

Where are the giants 😅 that road the dinosaurs....

This is wrong at every turn. There was no global flood 4,500 years ago as described in the bible, so there was no ark, so trying to crowbar dinosaurs into the narrative is just ridiculous.

I believe dinosaurs lived in the Pre-Adamite world

*Calling fairy tales history, doesn't give them or the teller credibility*

Everything before the Flood were vegetarians. We could all share the ark as carnivores didn't exist.

Of course Noah brought dinosaurs on the ark, he brought Iguanas, snakes and chicken didn't he? Lol.

This is a good video, and this is why nobody is going to heaven because it wasn't part of God's plan. If Adam and Eve hadn't sinned they would still be around alive and kicking. and Jesus Christ said it in John 5:28,29, Paul in Acts 24:15, and before that, David also said it in Psalms 37:29. Job too. but I'm not going to inundate this text with all of the Biblical God's Servants who believe in a resurrection here on earth waiting for Christ to come and show the world what's gonna happen in the future. Yes the Earth will become a paradise as it was intended from the very beginning

No as there was no Ark and no one with that name ever. And by the way there was no flood and they are the hardest facts you can get.

I just heard a KZfaq ad stating that " attention christians, there's a biblical reference to heal toe nail fungus "..., but my Ad blocker stopped it. Anyone else hear it?

Perfectly reported documentary. Atheists better swallow their pride and accept they have been lied to (just like we were) before it gets any harder for them

Just bring young ones.

Give me...a break....and you call this informative....

No he didn’t on two counts,firstly dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago,secondly,there was no flood

I disagree. I love the Bible and absolutely believe in the flood and a young Earth, but I take issue with the presumption that we MUST read things into the Bible that are simply not there. Ive come to many "Logical conclusions" of my own and they are NOT the same as yours. For instance, the assertion that the T-Rex used to be a herbivore. My "Logical conclusion" to that is that God's ability to create life did not end after the first 6 days, and that they, along with all other carnivores, were part of the thorns and thistles curse. Its only logical. But like yours, my "logical conclusion" is also an extra-Biblical assumption. The truth is we simply do not know! It is my belief that the account of the creation in Genesis is for our benefit and is specific to our world, our Solar System and the moon and the Sun. Never at any time does it state that God created the entire Universe in 6 days. It does say "and he created the Stars". That is precisely what the other planets in our Solar system are to us, stars. And all essential to the function of our world. Young Earth, Ancient Universe, Eternal God. There is no "distant starlight problem". Its only logical. And there are clearly far more things about the pre-flood world that the Bible does NOT cover than things that it does. I think we should take the Bible at face value, not take away from or add to it. If you think that Dinosaurs were on the Ark, fine. But don't act as if it is scriptural. It is NOT!

im a Christian but this is ridiculous. I wouldnt be shocked if this is parody

These arguments are like that of a 4 year old

Nope, no dinosaurs on the ark. Even better, no ark.

LOL

Yes, um, he did.

There is no 65 million years no one knows but that Bible knows and been accurate so far the Bible said earth is 6,000 years old

lol, no, no he did not😂😂😂

Dinosaurs is made made word for creatures that existed before the flood

The bible said kinds. From creation week. Its as likely there were very few original kinds. So these kinds led after the fall to great morphing within the kind and so many species. tHen at the ark rebooting back to kind and after the flood year more morphing from those kinds. so a option so called dinos were just species within kinds that now we know as bisons, deer, horses etc etc. so explaining why never are those creatures found with dinos etc or in those lower rock strata and no dinos above. likewise in the seas. there were no dinosaurs. The clue to me was theropod dinos are clearly just bioring flightless ground birds. AHA.

God already provides the answer, Book of Enoch and Book of Giants