its here.

Так игра же сама по себе дерьмо( по концепии). Я, конечно, люблю арму (Сижу в ней ещё с OFP), но это реально блядовысергская игра. Я всегда любил арму не за компанию, а за её универсальный редактор, а тут... А тут херь! Мало всего! Почти ничего нет... Херова Богемия.

С каких пор в серии армы главное это контент, блеять? Нам дали графон, ростки нормальной физики, новая переработанная система снаряжения, новая динамика боев, упрощенный редактор и много всякой всячины. Ведь теперь осталось дождаться аддон-мейкерское комьюнити и игра заживет. Например, RHS с AFRF для меня вообще отправит эту часть в новую эру.

Это да, но богемия засрала игру всяким калом. К примеру, они убрали возможность перетаскивания раненых, что , как мне кажется, хреново сказывается на реалистичности.

Sheogarat Sheese разве? В модулях нет? Анимации переноски и анимацию ранненого на спине я вроде видел.

***** можешь названия дать?

Still working on it?

Чувак, ты прикалываешься?!) Где ты видел, что она тормозит в видео? (Если я правильно тебя понял)

Поддерживаю! Мне тоже в некоторых местах казалось что он притормаживает.

Ахахха глобальный ОБОСРАМС бохемии!!

Не, это в арме камера тормозит. Для мувиков делаются специальные "микромиссии" в редакторе и это снимается камерой. Там любые движения - дрожжат, и "прыгают", даже при высоком FPS.

I have to agree. It's such an epic campaign and it's unfortunate that these trailers aren't up to standard. However, I'm impressed that they made this by only using in-game footage and a spectator camera.

It's just a trailer dude...

Arma 3 is still more similar to OFP than Arma 2.

In gamemodes like Altis Life, you have tons of scripts running on the server as well as alot of players on one server. They can't really fix it, arma always was very CPU heavy.

***** I think you're wrong there. That would only be true if the cpu was maxing at 100% but it never does, nor on the gpu. There is a problem with it not using all the power of any system at any price point. I get 50% useage on both my 4770k and 290x

***** I think you're wrong there. That would only be true if the cpu was maxing at 100% but it never does, nor on the gpu. There is a problem with it not using all the power of any system at any price point. I get 50% useage on both my 4770k and 290x

***** MP performance? Headless Client and spawn unit correctly could have barely impact on normal MP coop type of game. But Altis life? Too bad...there's just way too much scriptss...

Damn VBS3 looks damn good but 3.5k for the licence, crap way too much for me. For that money i could buy a PC with top of the line components and a good 144Hz monitor or something else.

Guess what, buddy?

I have the non-steam version if that helps any.

No it's not, its laggy and he runs over it (which you can with those walls) or they added a running vault

Stop ruining my jokes!

Arkadiy Riabinkin no

UmbreonTheDragonBorn if you both actually played the game then you would know you can simply walk over them small walls nothing to do with lag or jumping

Just tried. That's true. Thank you, good sir. (163 hours in game, didn't know about it...)

No shit

well people keep asking fucktards

***** People will keep asking that question and people will always repeat the same answer, whether you like it or not.

***** Nice job ignoring my comment, bet you ignore a lot of comments.

It's supposed to, hahaha. The concept is to "Improvise" and eliminate the enemy colonel yourself. It's a hard fucking mission, I'll give you that, but I love a challenge.

i steal it and when im on my way to next area it goes so dark. either a tank randomly appears and shoots me, i go full speed into a tree and blow up or i just give up coz of some other bloody reason lol

I give truck to the Scott and he kill colonel.

You do know that you can change your gear and your teammates gear before you launch the mission right? When the map shows, you just choose "Team" and click "Inventory on your own character and your squadmates.

I always had the same gear, even empty PCML.

er, no I didn't know that and I'm half way through the Win campaign haha. I'll try it thanks. Oh and . . . . doh.

Use the Simple Single Player Cheat Menu, and use its Virtual Arsenal feature at the start of each mission to load in your chosen loudout. Easy.

That wouldn't work out very well, the controls are way to complex, the graphics would still not be as great. There would just be a whole bunch of issues. Also console players aren't as understanding of bugs, and other issues that come along with games as complex like this.

Yo, no.

***** dumb ass ...

HameD SamaDi Yo. I'm a dumb ass? I'm not the one suggesting to bring Arma3 to console. You, sir, win the dumb ass competition.

Plus you couldn't use modprograms or anymods at all, because some mods like ACRE requires you to go into the userconfig folder and set some stuff there. It's simply not a good idea to do that because of all the restrictions that arma would have on a console.

Then make your own mission.

oxis77gas Uh, what would that solve? Why would I do that? Is this supposed to be another "show us how you can do it, if you criticize it" comment?

Arma 3 is more tool than game and you can find more mission in workshope.

oxis77gas Yes, I know that. Who doesn't actually? But how does this information solves not exactly playable and enjoyable campaign? Why are you mixing two different things?

No.

Panimala No reason to migrate from Arma 2 then

The Cheshire Cat None of which is in Arma 2...

TraumaAU Besides a fairly realistic damage model, medics that actually have a purpose because magical faks that heal everything doesn't exist, being able to drag and carry wounded soldiers, you don't go from standstill to terminal velocity instantly and the online play is massively more stable? The only thing that I wish was removed was the context menu. Sequels are supposed to improve on their precursors, not take away features and dumb things down.

***** There is a small amount, mainly when slowing down, but there's still more than Arma 3. And the damage model meant that if you got hit in the leg, you couldn't walk. If you got hit in the arm, you were less accurate. If you got hit in the chest/head? you probably died. Not sure if this is because I play with ACE, but I'm assuming it was in the base game. In Arma 3, even with extended armour off, most noticeably with ai, the person you're shooting will tank 2-3 rounds to the chest and be able to fire back perfectly fine, then use one of their magical FAKs to fix themselves. Being shot has seemingly no consequence in arma 3. And don't even get me started on all the reused assets etc. Massive disappointment.

It's unluckly that a PS4 could get a good performance in this game with a good optic. Plus, I can't imagine mods being released on a console, or what about programs like the sixupdater or playwithsix that makes easy downloading very easy? Even the editor would be restricted if you don't have a keyboard. And you don't have one with a console.

It will have good performance but they will have to lower the distance viewer by alot and the resolution to 720p. Other then that it will preformed good on the ps4. I can't see the game with out mods either.

U can use a ps4 a controller in the editor on ARMA 2, but u can't do most of the stuff with the controller. I should know cause I tried it on arma 2.

derrick deloach I cannot see ARMA 3 performing good on ANY console

***** It would run on PS4. My pc is way crappier than one (Not sure if CPU is better though) and I run it at high (tweaked) with 40 fps at 1080p. It would preform fine, just not enough controls.

And bf4 campaign is utterly boring. I would rather play ArmA campaign at 25 fps, it's actually still enjoyable.

who said anything about campaing i play multi if its better in arma idk the game does not even work probably. i am tired on that game 1000 upfdates and fixes and stil not working

colonicrobin Works fine for me, if you can't make it 100% ultra details you can lower them, won't hurt you. And bf 4 multi is a fail comparing to what can arma 3 do. ( actually every arma is better )

colonicrobin Next time don't compere that shit of COD DNA to Arma 3. With i5 4670K and Gtx 560ti i have 55 avg fps on Low-Standard settings, multiplayer and singleplayer. But on 40+ player server i noticed a fps drop. "doesn't even work probably" ? And BF4 is like without problems ? Yeah sure it is, just a broken netcode, more bugs/glitches than ever, massive server lags, crashes and so on. There is no game on a market today that is working flawlessly.

I think if the BIS level/mission designers starting tinkering with the engine things would get irreversibly broke. The assumption that everyone who works at any studio is capable of everything needs to stop. If your system doesn't run the game as well as you think it should; then you need to figure it out. There's a very knowledgeable, enthusiastic and helpful community supporting this game - ask us for help. Nicely.

Greig Pil yeah i do apprieciate the offer good sir, thanks for replying in an un-hostile manner, but when you buy an i7 3770k, overclock it to 4.2 Ghz and beyond... upgrade from a 670 to a780ti and still get disgraceful fps, its kinda the games fault. dont believe me? have a nice splash out on some new top end hardware and get some first hand results

Hariskillsstuff I think the only mistake that Bohemia made when it comes to this problem, was telling people a 'not so accurate' minimum requirement. Other than that there's nothing they can do now. You gotta do what I did and overkill the recommended requirements for ultra graphics for 30+ FPS. Some servers, low end computers cannot join. Are you having these problems on single player? If you are, and you meet recommended requirements (because that's what they are for "Single Player") you should basically format your C: drive and start over with all your drivers etc.

There are a few start-up parameters you can define and some changes you can make to the config that drastically improved performance for me. Also, understanding exactly what each of the graphical settings actually does will help in squeezing those frames through. I've got an i5 3570k and a gtx670 - play with most things on very high, few on ultra and average around 50fps. There will be a way to get the performance you want with your set up. The RV engine is a fickle beast.

Hariskillsstuff I do want to add... I upgraded my computer from AMD 3.0MHz CPU / 16GBs RAM PCIe 2.0 Mobo to i5 4670k 3.4Mhz (OC 4.4MHz) / 32GBs RAM / PCIe 3.0 Mobo / GTX 770 Windforce 4GB GPU (OC Base 1232 / Boost 1284 / Memory Clock 7130) Maybe on normal settings I get about 25 to 45 FPS on some POS servers. and 60+ (give or take) FPS on Ultra on decent servers. What you're experiencing could be just the server you're testing on. You have to test in a good server or base everything off Single Player.

The reason they took out Greece shit was because the Greek government would probably sue BIS

There are tons of addons for the game, what are you talking about?

Jorge Suarez Addons, or mods? I want on official DLC, we haven't seen many changes to the game since the release (disregarding zues, and patches) I want a huge expansion pack, with new vehicles maps, and a new campaign. If you think about it, they did the same thing with Arma 2. Arma 2 was a shit game at launch, then they released operation Arrowhead, that implemented new features, vehicles, weapons, and so many other things. I want them to do something similar with this game, except maybe take more advantage of the tools that they now have.

MyGdoggy it is all about time, money and menpower. Everythings is possible.

Petr Král Not really, they also need support, and reason to release these DLC's if they have no audience, and no proof hints of money on release, then what is the point of the company hiring people to make useless content. It's about us letting them know what we want, and them making it. But you are right, those are major factors. I just hope they roll out a DLC soon, I don't care how much it costs.

MyGdoggy Well, they did and people hate it for some reason, no idea why they hate jungle and forest either

Eh I'd say VA was mediocre. Could've been worse...

Play Cold War Rearmed 2 for ArmA II? It's a literal remake of Flashpoint.

What do you mean? This is Operation Flashpoint, or what, do you mean cold war assault?

***** I know, but OFP brand is a legend :)

HoodsCZ The brand has one good game, though. Cold War Assault was good, Dragon Rising and Red River were...well, poo poo.

+OrNoir Yeah, I have to say my favorite was definitely Survive with Adapt not too far behind it. The overall theme of Survive was really well written as the invasion led to the wiping of practically everyone on the island.

Cool man

There have been multiple sales for the game when it was sliced to almost 50% of its regular price. And it was already discounted for months in the Alpha and Beta stages. Really, what more do you want?

I want see real cargo.

What do you mean by "cargo?"

Sorry, for my bad english. I'm about tanks, car and helicopters.

Im not rich, i have it. Worth every penny.