Netflix should do us a favor and reunite these two actors 😋

Underrated movie

One of my favourite movies! ❤️

@@lamadridista7 perhaps a Man from U.N.C.L.E sequel?

Did he??

Mate, I'm drunk on that 🥵🥵🥵

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f8-hndNlp8XYmJ8.html

The dictionary would not be enough...lol☺☺

He reads Call Me by your name on audible

❤

A million times yes

Absolutely.

Yes true. His voice is very relaxing though expressive enough and clear.

yes!

Oh yeah, love that book and movie!

I SECOND THIS MOTION!!!!!😍😍😍😍😍

THIS WOULD BE A DREAM COME TRUE

Better yet, make Armie and Henry a yearning couple in the sequel as well.

not only the gays... :)

NETFLIX PLEASE!!! Although Armie has said that a sequel is being talked about seriously.

I came to the comments looking for this.

Yes please

Alex Lo Yesssssss....

Same

be careful, he might eat you

You are not the only one

Elio..Elio...Elio...Elio...

@@clauuu52 Oliver... I remember everything

@@anavrin5054 🥺🥺

Me too!!!!!! Xx

Why do you miss him? He has been in other movies

@@luminit7367 I know he's been in other movies. What I'm trying to say is like new interviews,etc. something like that.

Yes, more than the one would be nice, I'd happily buy them, too.

Same. I think I will. :)

Also! The enola holmes and this set (Mandalay home) are same!!

It's a GREAT book! ❤

I love that book so much!

Read my cousin Rachel too.

If musicians followed similar logic we wouldn't have jazz. The same with painting - it would have ended centuries ago, because who in their right mind would want to try being a painter after Leonardo or Rafael?! I mean the amount of subjects was pretty limited - Bible or Greek and Roman myths. Should anyone become a writer? Every story in the world has been already written. Etc.

@@VeryStrict That's not particularly the logic I was following. The films already received harsh reviews to support what I was saying. You can remake a film if it wasn't done right in the first place. Artists are unique in their perspective and are celebrated for it, but if they're run of the mill, them remaking a masterpiece is futile.

@@usefamin Wheatley didn't remake a movie, he made a new movie adaptation of the novel. Great stories and literary works have been and will be adapted for stage and film again and again, regardless of what other versions there have been before. Anyone not interested can avoid them, but good stories deserve multiple interpretations, and we'd have less art if that didn't happen. Like... there were great filmed adaptations of Shakespeare's plays and Jane Austen's books decades ago, and so they shouldn't be filmed again? Why? Murnau's 1922 Dracula film (Nosferatu) was great, but why should it have been the only filmed version of the story? Sergio Leone's Fistful of Dollars used the story Kurosawa filmed before and Clint Eastwood even copied details from Toshiro Mifune's portrayal of the main character, but I don't think Leone was silly to touch the material. Not all (or any) versions of any story will be great, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't even exist, and opinions and tastes vary anyway. And decades and generations change... -- Though not the only other filmed adaption of Rebecca, I assume you must mean the 1940 movie - though I don't consider it a masterpiece myself; nice to look at as a movie, but watered down story-wise. That wasn't even anywhere near a faithful adaptation of the novel, so why should it be the definitive or only version? It changed a major plot-point, totally erased the crime and its effects and consequences on characters and events. The Production Code at the time didn't allow the story to be filmed as it was, and that alone would be a good enough reason for other adaptations. 80 years is a long time, too. New takes on this and other great stories make new people aware of the stories, and make some interested in other versions and original source material. Whether one likes a specific movie or not, on the whole we're better off having new adaptations and versions made rather than burying the stories after someone made one version.

@@tuuliamoors4134 I don't disagree with you that films and stories should be adapted, in fact I did mention that, especially if the director had a unique perspective. This version looks pretty, but it's oh so bland, which is insulting. Classics are a different story. Nosferatu was a silent German film and was made a hundred years ago, and while it's important historically, it's not the best. Remaking it would be ok until someone nails it. Which is what Hitchcock did with Rebecca. It won awards and was nominated for so many more, so while you don't consider it a masterpiece, I and others do. And even though I agree there should be new adaptations by actual artful directors, I think remakes have killed the creativity of the film and tv industry. Choose interesting films, badly done, like Plan 9 from Outer Space, that would be interesting. But remaking Gone with the Wind for instance. Why bother?

@@usefamin sorry but the argument about harsh reviews is moot. To me at least . Many works of art were subjected to bad/harsh/horrible/scathing reviews when first made. Think Impressionist paintings or Georges Bizet's opera Carmen. Writing a review on a piece of art is not an exact science like maths or physics and very much depends on a personal taste and mood of a writer.

and he was too old for the role in CMBYN, that character is a grad student, supposed to be in his very early 20s.

I just finished reading the book. I'm pretty sure he was only 42, so not quite that old. Lots of men still look pretty good in their early 40s, and he was also supposed to be very handsome.

@@alicetran9824 Yes I think he was 42 but many times throughout the book, he was described as old enough to be her father, twice her age etc. I’m aware people tended to marry young in old times, but the writer mentions there’s an obvious age gap between them two many times. Armie is only 34 btw. I’m not saying I found it weird to see him as Maxim in the movie though, just pointing out a difference between the novel and the movie. There seems to be a lot of criticisms out there but I quite enjoyed it after all.

@@rosehepworth3365 I guess I took the author's mentions of their age difference more as a way to emphasize her lack of experience, rather than Maxim's looks. Either way, I also didn't think the movie was that bad! I quite liked Armie as Maxim, but I'll admit, mostly because he does look nicely paired with Lily James haha.

Well, Maxim was 42 in the book and the second Mrs de Winter was 21, so the man was literally twice the age of the wife. However, there is no actual reason story-wise or character-wise for there to be a similar age difference in a movie adaptation. And also, it's not like there's any need for yet another case of a guy in a movie being old enough to be the woman's father. Still, for anyone wanting to see that, they're both "the wrong age" (and close to each other's ages). If one requires the similar ages and the similar age difference there was in the book then the woman should also be of different age - much younger (a decade or so). Since the story doesn't require the couple to have a massive age difference and be of different generations, I'm glad that bit was changed. In the important aspects the new adaptation was very faithful to the book, actually. (Unlike the 1940 movie.)

that's how sexy bitches hold books 😌

OMG, SAME!!!!! I hate seeing people bend/fold book covers 😫

@@Rai_S82 that's what I do when reading : )

@@valentinas.5630 Nooooo! 😭

If you're interested, you'll watch it anyway regardless of the reader's accent or who should have read it. You do you 👍

@@pacienciapaciencia9265Concordo com vc. ...Cada um que aparece. Qual o problema do sotaque do artista se a pessoa esta interessada no enredo do filme???