was about to comment on the same .... magic arrows tips

Yeahh.. I feel like they think people are dumb

@@deverdoo5228 you think they’re trying to trick you or something when it’s just mixed up footage in the edit?

@@braydentaylorIH61 Was about to say the same thing but my English lacked. Thanks lol

Why would u think they were doing that to trick you? That's a very weird way to see an obvious editing mistake.... Wtf??? What's the point of them doing that to what end? Fuckin weirdos

Damn, you're a lucky guy!

Forehead?? Bro, that other hunter had it out for you.

@@unrealutensil3054 yeah dude like wtf

Your so called buddy would have been convicted of murder. No one is that stupid.

@@saiyendemon5437 It was an accident, but then the person who shot me fled the scene. You are right, according to the sheriff, he could be facing potential charges of attempted murder or manslaughter. He should not have fled.

I was thinking the same thing lol

I was gonna say the same thing lol. Wonder how many takes it took lol

Im pretty sure they had ones that stay closed until shot but idk

@@caleblacy3012 no sir clearly field points then broadheads.

No way bro hahaha

BUOLLSHIOT

Hurt is an understatement, the dude nearly died :(

Same.

Couldn't agree more!

I was thinking the same. Probably would have severed the medulla oblongata, also known as "the off switch".

You get a broadhead through your skull you 99.9% its gonna switch you off no matter were it hits..

@@garethh6962 That's true, but people have survived things like that, or even if they die they might have time to pull a trigger or something. The medulla shot is like pulling the plug. Maybe I should have said "instant off". Isn't arguing semantics fun?! LOL!

@@angryginger791 it is but those folk you see with half a head still walking are the 0.01% they get a lot of coverage and so they should lol

Go big or go home! 💥

Looked like the spray paint molotov was heading straight for that pile of wood pallets holding up the backstop....

Thanks 🔥

Your joking right?

I bet that zombie will be feeling that one in the morning...

Why is it that when u pull back u have a field point in then when it slow mos to the head there is a brodhead?

Step 2 can become "lose ton of weight and get it!". david goggins is the prime example. the guy was obese and hunting cockroaches at the time he decided to go for the Seals. read his book, its amazing.

Its an expanding broad head dummy, so dummies like you don't cut themselves while loading the arrow. It expands in flight.

Since I refuse to edit any of my comments and KZfaq was stupid and didn't let me keep typing, my last statement was going to be there are different strokes for different folks. I can understand the advantages and enjoying shooting a compound bow I enjoy shooting them as well. I just think it would be neat to see some recurve stuff on the channel

Traditional bows are not about speed, they are about raw power. The inertia and force of a heavier arrow from a traditional bow has been shown to penetrate and pass through things, more specifically solid things, much deeper and efficiently than the extremely light, fast arrows used by compound archers. The compound bow, itself, has to compensate for this flaw. Fast can be a very bad thing. The faster an arrow, the easier it is to shatter on impact. This is also true about bullets, where a musket can shoot deeper into water than a 50 caliber, which obliterated the round on the surface without making any depth at all on Mythbusters. Another thing is the spin. You can see in the slow motion that the arrows didn't spin at all. I see so many test videos just like this and it's so totally different with a traditional bow. Traditional archery causes the arrow to spin and drill a massive hole through the target. Single bevel broadheads create a distinct S-shaped hole that causes severe blood loss and thus makes fantastic blood trails. Some 3-blade heads spread the wound so far that the animal can't even make it 10 yards before flopping over. Agree 100% that I want to see traditional bows added to the arsenal because compounds do not behave at all like traditional archery equipment.

@@Lycantis thanks for your super long explanation. But if you've ever taken a physics class, you would know that speed and power are directly related. Force equals mass times acceleration. So the faster your arrows going the more force it's hitting the target with. Not that any of what you said about aero shattering and stuff makes a bit of difference unless you're using a graphite arrow. If you use a heavy arrowhead relative to the shaft anyway and a light shaft and you shoot it and it goes quickly then whatever it hits is going to achieve more penetration or at least knock it backwards farther because it's exhibiting more force on it. This is the exact same reason that a 50 cal doesn't go as deep in the water as a 22. It's going faster and it spreads out and it's bigger so it releases all of its force onto the water because water is not compressible.

@@michaelfrench3396 This may get a tad long because I cannot tell your tone and don't want a miscommunication. You have already figured out I give extensive explanations and my teachers got just as exhausted with my essays. Ahem. First off, I was coached by experienced traditional archers since I was 13 and I was a high score student in physics. In my wall of text, I was specifically using archery physics in practice, not on paper. My comparisons were on asserting speed in projectiles as a possible crippling effect. These experiments have been posted by KZfaqrs near and far, been on the History Channel, and the actual experiments negate some aspects of physics. This in particular: "Force equals mass times acceleration. So the faster your arrows going the more force it's hitting the target with." I was specifically talking about the raw inertia of the arrow and penetration, not the force of impact, which is negligible if the arrow can't make it through to begin with. The faster an arrow moves, the more inertia is lost on initial impact, releasing the force prematurely and allowing for error and failure to penetrate. The Mythbusters episode I used showed speed becoming a crippling effect, where the force was released all at once on the surface, negating the lethality of the shot. The 50 cal round was tapered to a fine point, meaning it did not have "spread", since that should have been negated by the shape of the round. The musket ball (not a 22 round), however, had the most surface area of the two and should have flattened on impact, but glided through easily. The statement of water being incompressible is false, and even professionals get that wrong so that can be waived due to misunderstanding the physics of water. Water is *relatively* incompressible. Forces of extreme pressure can compress it, turning the immediate surface into a solid barrier more powerful than concrete. Or, as seen in deep water compressing itself through extreme gravitational pressure, it can become dense enough to squish a submarine. Speed becomes crippling, in this regard. The faster the projectile, the less time water has to move out of the path, ergo compressing into a higher density, and thus shattering the faster, heavier, and pointier round while having almost no effect on the slow, lighter, completely spherical object. Now a physics lesson in archery: with relatively equal equipment, say a heavy bow and one heavy, slower arrow and one lighter, faster arrow. The heavier arrow will have more penetration because it keeps a majority of its inertia at impact, which is essential for hunters as bone is often hit because there is extreme margin for error on shooting something with a skeleton and thick fur that can almost act like a gambeson (ancient cloth armor designed to hinder arrow penetration). A second video has equal arrows, but the faster the arrow due to the force of the bow, the more easily it shattered on impact, negating higher speed as remotely effective. There was one middle ground speed, where the slower one had less damage inflicted and the highest speed caused the arrow to break in half and not penetrate as deep as it could have. I would need to go back to it but I am quite sure there was damage to the broadheads, with higher speed causing more damage. The archer in question didn't use equivalent nor appropriate equipment for the circumstances, so the speed is the only factor that will be used here because it was the only consistency along with the same arrows/tips used. The previous video used the same bow but different speed/weights for the arrows but also needs more of a control as a basis. The above paragraph was mostly aimed at this: "Not that any of what you said about aero shattering and stuff makes a bit of difference unless you're using a graphite arrow." The arrows weren't graphite, but the faster the projectile moved, the easier it shattered. Broadhead type may have made the difference. Bodkins are a special armor-piercing tip that's exaggeratedly pointy and release enough force at the tip to penetrate armor, then have enough weight in the heavier, slower arrow to make it continue moving. Failure to penetrate armor transfers the force through the armor, which will still cause serious pain and injury to the person wearing it. Higher speeds simply means the arrow makes it farther from the archer, enabling long-distance shooting. Extreme high-pound traditional bows are still obnoxiously slow compared to the faster arrows in an equal poundage compound of today shooting lighter arrows, but have been shown to be more deeply penetrating in field practice. "If you use a heavy arrowhead relative to the shaft anyway and a light shaft " Please, never, ever, use a light arrow shaft in a traditional bow unless it's a pansy stick around 30#. In my years with watching novices choose archery equipment, I have seen people get the strength to use a higher-pound bow, then thinking high speeds were the meta of all stats to arrow force, use light shafts and either heavy or light broadheads...then end up in the emergency room with shards of arrow shaft sticking out of their hand/arm, missing fingers, punctured eye(s), etc. Higher poundage requires a shaft with a heavier grain (meaning a lower number--these are not baseline uniform and you need to discuss grain need for a traditional bow with an expert at the dealership or with the maker you get them from) and the head is somewhat important, with heavier broadheads being a bit deeper-penetrating than lighter. Shape of the broadhead matters more. Aluminum shafts and other bound materials can tend to let people get away with using shoddy arrows, but they are crippling their potential with using improper equipment. "whatever it hits is going to achieve more penetration or at least knock it backwards farther because it's exhibiting more force on it" ...If your broadhead makes anything it hits move backward, you are using the wrong equipment. Force should never be expended into the target unless it's meant to stop an arrow, like archery butts and armor. Having a light shaft (which I explained is not a good idea) and a heavy head (which is negated because the light shaft has less inertia to push the broadhead forward after impact), does not mean better penetration; it will lose most of its force on impact. Apologies for the extrapolation text wall, but being challenged on physics--especially archery--will bring out every expert archery book lining my bookshelf, especially the physics ones. Even the material the bow is made from affects the physics of archery.

@@Lycantis I'm calling bullshit on your whole statement. I don't believe a thing you wrote. And don't use big words if you don't know what they mean. There is no way that an arrow loses inertia when it hits a target. Seeing as inertia is the tendency for something to remain still or unchanged. If you had actually taken a physics class in high school, you would know that it might lose momentum. It might lose some velocity, but it is getting closer and closer to it's point of inertia. As soon as it stops it's inert. Maybe instead of typing mile-long KZfaq comments, you could actually go to school and learn the things that you're claiming to know. Community college is pretty fun. You can work live at home with Mom and Dad and still go to school and learn things.