Ljunberg = Gundogan 22/23 for city

@@warhammertwcontent5655 No.

​@@warhammertwcontent5655close, decent shout.

​@@warhammertwcontent5655 Freddie the super Swede was better

​@@warhammertwcontent5655gundogan was born yesterday if you have to compare him with Freddie

One thing I’m sure of is that history will repeat itself

Most definitely, fam coyg

Not to mention we’d have won it the season before the invincible season after blowing up a 12 point lead to you guys, we’d have definitely done the three peat in the Epl era!

​@@edokachukwuanugo2223Yep. Should've won it in 2002/03 comforably after we dominated for the most of the season. Our own fault, we let it slip away at the end.

Where you win it is more down to luck of the fixture scheduling it should NOT be included in the list of feats you say about the season. Arsenal always do that, "we won it at Anfield, we won it at OldTrafford, we won it at WhiteHartLane when we went invincible" it doesn't give them an extra 8 PL title's to go above ManUtd's overall number of league title's by saying those extra things. Technically ManUtd won at Highbury in 2002/03 when Arsenal failed to win despite ThierryHenry's offside brace he was given in such a game it put ManUtd in great position and they finished the job but I think the fact that ManUtd have won so many and they didn't often or ever mathematically confirm it at other big team's stadiums shows it's down to luck. 01/02 ManUtd had to win Arsenal could've drawn, ManUtd may not have lost the game if they didn't need to win plus ManUtd in ChampionsLeague again had an impact and helped Arsenal like it did in 97/98. It's like when Chelsea bragged about holding bot ChampionsLeague & EuropaLeague trophies at the same time for a few days because this year's ChampionsLeague still has 3 days before being handed elsewhere and you've gone backwards in a season from ChampionsLeague winners to Europa winners and you didn't win anything else you thought you'd push for the PL etc...lol Also Arsenal think their 97/98 PL was won more convincingly than ManUtd's in the following season when they won the treble. Because Arsenal got all their home games out of the way and their last 2 happened to both be sway games they'd usually lose anyway 😂 plus they needed to overtake a massive ManUtd lead that season where as 98/99 was always in ManUtd's hands.

Bergkamp, Wiltord, King Thierry, Kanu, Pires, freddie always ready Ljungberg. Attacking prowess was unreal. No team in the league's history come close.

I always thought pires was selfish

@@tracydoyle6 selfish when he was in the right place to score goals that's why he scored many goals from wing but otherwise he was an elite team player and passer of the ball

Absolutely! He was brilliant, much more than just a scorer, a complete attacker. Scored many vital goals that season.

Totally agree. The beginning of the end was when he left after the Invincibles season

He was better than Ole Gunnar soljkaer for man united but media always hype up United players. If Wiltord was a United player, media would have called him Premier league legend and what not. Sometimes the bias towards certain club is unreal ..glad united are in the mud.

No UCL tho

​@@pepguardiola3739can't have everything - still won a double

Respect from a United fan 2001-02 Arsenal the only side who scored in every game in the EPL 2003-04 Arsenal the only side who had not lost a game in the EPL This is a feat that not even the great Sir Alex Ferguson could accomplish with his strongest United team and his old enemy Arsene Wenger did.

​@@pepguardiola3739At least them and utd won the league without oil money. Cheats city fc

​@@despisesimps5997and here I thought city didn't have fans...😉

I think the 1998-1999 side. Our best ever. Even without winning anything. 1991, 1998 and 2002 are coming close second and third and forth. 2004....no chance.

This side was unreal but downplaying the quality of 2004 is silly and has become fashion. 1998 was unstoppable too. With overmars, Anelka, Petit, Wright ،Bergkamp . Just too much quality

@@goals27 I’m not downplaying them. They were a great team. I just thought the 2002 was better, played better football & was more dominant in games. 1998 team like you said probably was better aswell through their sheer toughness. I was only little with the 1991 team so I don’t remember but my dad has them down as the best ever Arsenal team. I put the amount of trophies won over record. Even though invincibles was a great achievement, I’d rather have an extra trophy in the cabinet.

@@seank135 But you can't say you don't rate them as high as 2002 because they were no as good in playing style then you also brought trophies argument to put them down as well. It feels like dishonesty and just want to diss their unbelievable achievement. So which one is it? Playing style ? Or trophies won? . Playing style wise 2004 wasn't poorer in anyway to this 2002 team. If anything 2004 was even more adventurous, more attacking and had more style. ( I rate 2002 team very highly and winning the double can't be downplayed at all but as I said it's more of a fashion to diss 2004 team because their achievement was unreal, unparalleled so opposition fans especially take digs at that team because they know no one can replicate that ever). I have heard alot about 91 team as well. That was legendary. But 1998 team was just too good. I am being totally honest 2004 and 1998 teams were two of the best teams and can beat any best united, Chelsea and city's teams of PL era.

@@goals27 no one’s dissing them. But they deff don’t beat Uniteds or City’s best teams. Thats just delusion.

So many moments you've never seen from anyone else, kids these days don't even know!

Was looking for this comment. Actually paused and searched! Wow! 🙆🏾‍♂️🤴🏾

What about 15:13 ? One of the most underrated goals in league's history and that by one of the most underrated players in the history of the league.

No. Maybe from 1998-2004.

​@@jeannotschumacher1024 you are salty.. 2004-06 arsenal was tremendous as well. Runners up in the league, Fa cup winners, CL finalists .. 1997-2006 arsenal were too good . Made PL what it's today.

I'm not salty. I'm a through and through gooner

Fifa has a debt of champions league title to Arsenal

And at liverpool also

This year hopefully at the Etihad.😊

Winning at anfield Is much more legendary than winning at small club's ground like white hart lane ... .89, 2002 are historic and legendary

Simply brilliant

Son and Kane are also runs. Nothing more nothing less.

What a goal by pires, he was a real genius

Diet my Friend! Wenger changed that

True

@thezanzibarbarian5729 Because it's to do with luck of the fixture scheduling and not a skill based achievement. Arsenal always brag about feats no one cares about 😆 If ManUtd have 10 more PL's and haven't officially confirmed it at those grounds that confirms it's just about LUCK (not that WhiteHartLane or even Arsenal away should have much significance to ManUtd, Stamford bridge likewise). But 2002/03 ManUtd did virtually win it at Highbury. Late in the season ManUtd were just above Arsenal going into the game so Arsenal needed to win to put it in their hands and despite 2 offside ThierryHenry goals they still failed to win then Campbell elbowed Solskjaer before the end got sent off & suspended for the rest of the season, ManUtd as expected finished the job last few games while Arsenal were hit&miss in them. Also ManUtd's record in general vs the Top5 teams was very good. Loads of goals as well 👌 Even better record than Arsenal vs Top8.

Lol, I wondered about that too😅 I started following the club right at the end of that season. Apparently it was Van Bronckhorst, although I think Parlour played there too.

It was mainly Van Bronkhorst at first but his place was usurped by Edu in the later part of the season. He dropped further down the line when Arsenal brought in Gilberto Sliva the next season .

Am surprised too