The Do Everything Lens: Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD

No video

The Do Everything Lens: Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD

Рет қаралды 207,685

Күн бұрын

In this video I am reviewing the Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD lens for Sony APSC Mirrorless. You can buy your own here: geni.us/tamron...
-------------------
Gear That I Use & Recommend:
CAMERAS:
For Photo & Video
▸ Sony A6100 (My Favorite) - geni.us/MyFavo...
▸ Sony A6400 (Better) - geni.us/Better...
▸ Sony A6600 (Best) - geni.us/BestAPSC
▸ Sony A7C (Full Frame) - geni.us/FullFr...
For Video
▸ Sony ZV-E10 (Good) - geni.us/ZVE-10
▸ Sony FX30 (My Favorite) - geni.us/BeastASPC
APS-C LENSES:
▸ Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 (My Favorite) - geni.us/BestZoom
▸ Sony 11mm F1.8 (Best Ultrawide) - geni.us/BestUl...
▸ Sigma 16mm F1.4 (Best Wide Angle) - geni.us/Popular
▸ Sigma 30mm F1.4 (Affordable Street Lens) - geni.us/Street
▸ Sigma 56mm F1.4 (Best Portrait Lens) - geni.us/Portrait
FULL FRAME LENSES:
▸ Sigma 20mm F2 (My Favorite) - geni.us/FFSigm...
▸ Rokinon AF 14mm F2.8 (Best Ultrawide) - geni.us/Rokinon
▸ Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 G2 (Best Do-Everything Lens) - geni.us/TamronV2
▸ Sigma 85mm F1.4 ART (AMAZING Portrait Lens) - geni.us/SHARP85
▸ Sony 50mm Macro (The Only Macro I Own) - geni.us/SonyMacro
AUDIO:
▸ Zoom F3 (Love this Recorder) - geni.us/zoomf
▸ Audio-Technica AT875R Mic (What I Use) - geni.us/at875rmic
▸ DJI Mic (Best On-The-Go) - geni.us/djimice
▸ Acoustimac Sound Panels (Must-have) - geni.us/soundp...
LIGHTING:
▸ SmallRig RC220D (Great Value) - geni.us/rc220d...
▸ SmallRig RC220B (My Key Light) - geni.us/rc220
▸ Sofirn SP33 V3 (Best Mini Flashlight) - geni.us/bestfl...
NICE-TO-HAVE ACCESSORIES:
▸ Feiyu Scorp Pro (Big Gimbal) - geni.us/scorppro
▸ Zyihun Crane M2S (Travel Gimbal) - geni.us/cranem2s
▸ Atomos Ninja V (Recording Monitor) - geni.us/ninja5
▸ SanDisk SD Cards - geni.us/sandisksd
▸ Sony ECM-B10 (Camera Mic) - geni.us/ecmb10mic
Complete Gear List:
▸ kit.co/ArthurR
-------------------
Disclosure:
Most of the links above are affiliate links, which means at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a qualifying purchase. If you want to buy something else, you can also use this link to Amazon:
🛒 Amazon - geni.us/shopar...
-------------------
Supporting The Channel:
▸ If you wish to support the channel with a donation, you can donate via PayPal here: paypal.me/arth...
▸ Buy me a coffee here: www.buymeacoff...
▸ Follow me on Instagram: / arthur213
-------------------
Professional & Sponsorship Inquiries:
For professional and sponsorship inquiries, please email me at arthur2@live.com

Пікірлер: 381

@bondgabebond4907 Жыл бұрын

One year later. I have started using the Tamron 18-300 on my new a6700. Both new to me at the same time. After loosening up or smoothing out the zoom mechanism with daily messages, I got some incredible results shooting bees on my great leaf shrub. I set the camera to focus on insect and off I went firing away. I uses a variety of focal lengths depending on where I was standing. This is an amazing couple as if made for each other. When I could get a lock-on with a bee, very hard when they vanish from sight, I got relatively good to great images. Bees are not cooperative. I finally got one to pose for me and what a shot. The upside is that this is a great lens, a do-all for those working with moving subjects like insects. It's sharp and snaps into focus immediately. Of course I have to give a lot of credit to the best aps-c camera on the market, the Sony a6700.

@novikovgarage_SPB 9 ай бұрын

спасибо приятель ! я как раз присматриваю обьектив для своей а6700

@Albertoabrian 6 ай бұрын

So at 70mm.. the F still at 3,5?

@vibingwinetravel2294 2 ай бұрын

Post results on your yt bro

@Marlon5k 2 жыл бұрын

First NO-MUSIC review video and it wasn't an issue. Thanks Arthur

@SeeThrouMe 7 күн бұрын

Didn't even realize till I read this comment hah

@ArronPrescott 2 жыл бұрын

Variable aperture is always going to be an issue of a 300mm zoom at this price. As you say it'll make a great all one upgrade from the Sony 16-50 & 55-210. Great review as always 🙌

@gdjaybee742 Жыл бұрын

What a time in the photography world we are living in. I remember a super zoom in the DSLR days meant a lot of compromises. This was given and accepted. Sharpness takes a nose dive at most focal length especially wide open, vignetting, chromatic abberation, ultra slow focusing, etc. Variable aperture was always accepted. Variable aperture aside, it is amazing how Tamron nearly did away with most of the compromises on this lens.

@TheJaniable 2 жыл бұрын

We are in APS-C heaven. This + the Sigma 18-50 can cover almost anything the average person will ever need, and both are pretty cheap comparing to the competition. Hope there are more of such bargains coming out soon.

@valentinfrei6054 2 жыл бұрын

you're absolutely right. one light, small and bright, one that covers it all. i would say add a sigma 1.4 of your choice and you're done.

@the_lost_navigator7266 2 жыл бұрын

I alao suggest the Samsung 12mm f2, manual focus but great for astro or wide landscapes.

@sweatyalpaca 2 жыл бұрын

@@the_lost_navigator7266 You mean SAMYANG

@the_lost_navigator7266 2 жыл бұрын

@@sweatyalpaca yes, autocorrect often doesn't!

@deflowerseed3548 2 жыл бұрын

If you had to get only one of these 2 (Tamron 18-300 or Sigma 18-50), which one would you get? - Primarily for outdoor shooting in good light conditions

@magunciero 2 жыл бұрын

Your reviews are a must see for Sony APSC users, Arthur! Could you compare side by side this lens with the Sony 70-350?

@Memo12Delarge 2 жыл бұрын

Please, I would love to watch that comparison

@PatrickWithCamera 2 жыл бұрын

Indeed, would love to see that, can't decide between 18-300 and 70-350

@asbjrnhagennielsen6560 2 жыл бұрын

I had the Sony 70-350 and this Tamron 18-300. The Sony is very superior. I returned the 18-300.

@PatrickWithCamera 2 жыл бұрын

@@asbjrnhagennielsen6560 superior in image quality? Sharpness? Chromatic abberation? Bokeh? Stabilization? Or in every way?

@asbjrnhagennielsen6560 2 жыл бұрын

@@PatrickWithCamera Mainly sharpness at 300mm disappointing. Also grain (because of the f6.3 I belive). The 28-200 2.8-5.6 is so much better.

@dr.alanmarcus4741 6 ай бұрын

Thank you for your review. I have been using this lens on my A7RV when visiting New England in 2022, and when visiting Japan in 2023. I have been very satisfied with this all-in-one kit for traveling light for photographing landscapes, wildlife, and limited “macros”. The quality is very good especially at f5.6, around 300mm it’s a bit soft unless you use f8.0. Recently I toured the Western United States from the west coast to the National Parks including Yellowstone. I usually carried the Tamron 20-40mm on my A7RV and my brand new A6700 with the Tamron 18-300. This APSC combo was so successful that I utilized this for close to 80% of my photos and even tried clear image zoom at 2x ( 900mm equivalent) with pretty good results when needed. If I really need a heavier very high resolution set up, then I can use my Sony 70-200 GM II, but then again we are talking about a lens that is almost twice the weight and 4.3 times the price and less “all-in-one”

@luisbertola 2 жыл бұрын

Before the SonyA6000, my camera was a canon SX230. A compact with 28-394mm f/3.1-5.9. I still miss having all that focal lengh in one camera, but I just couldn't feel right to go back to a smaller sensor. This lens is a dream come true. It wouldn't be as compact as a compact camera, but way more compact than having to carry the kit lens, a 30mm 1.8 meike and a 135mm vivitar like I do now.

@kane4013 2 жыл бұрын

Keeping it to 620 grams is pretty impressive. Paired with an a6400, the total weight is about one kilogram. For me that still makes it a viable travel lens. I’ll be interesting to see how many they sell and for what use cases. 🤔

@h4m3dd 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks, A comparison with sony 18-135 plus sony 70-350 will be very appreciated 👍

@somchai3366 2 жыл бұрын

I'm so glad, I choose Sony apsc system, so many cheap and fantastic lens to buy😂💕

@maximfournier-giguere5780 2 жыл бұрын

Things changed a lot in the last few years.

@suzatlarge 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for this review. I'm not going to run out and buy this lens right now, but I'm thinking about getting it. My everyday lens on the a6600 is the Sony 18-135, and I've been very pleased with it in terms of compact size, light weight, and satisfactory performance. This new 18-300mm would be the ideal travel lens for the extra reach. I will now pay attention to how often I am in a situation where I want a longer lens than the 18-135.

@maviniii 2 жыл бұрын

I have the sigma 16 and 56 1.4, but I’m looking for long distance one, and I’m between the Sony 18-135 or Tamron 18-300, which one do you thing is a nice one?

@arvidjohansson3120 2 жыл бұрын

Get the 18-300mm, I currently have a fuji 50-230mm and the extra reach at the tele would be nice

@sarwita77 Жыл бұрын

Hi,i think that 18-135 is similar performer to 18-300, cost almost the same but tamron gives more reach. I recomend 18-300 no doubt

@schnubbel76 Жыл бұрын

@@sarwita77 I owned both, sony 18-135 and tamron 18-300. I sold sony and did half a year with the tamron. I was very disapointed with the results in terms of sharpness and it is annoyingly big compared to the sony. I re-bought the sony and sold tamron in the end. The size and quality of sony is more important to me than the longer telephoto range. I added the Sony 70-350 for tele quality and am very satisfied with it. Tamron is versatile but lacks quality.

@jayant5555 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing, my quest for affordable telephoto lens is now complete.. i will consider it and will buy soon. Thank you for lovely review

@AlexDunaykin 2 жыл бұрын

As was already mentioned, this lens is probably an alternative not to Sigma 18-50 2.8 or Tamron 17-70 2.8, as it's darker and bigger, but to Sony 70-350. With the same size and apertures we get much more in terms of the focal lengths. I usually walk through the park with my Tamron 11-20 2.8 for the wide-angle shots, Tamron 17-70 2.8 for midrange and Sony 70-350 for taking photos of birds. So I have to change 17-70 with 70-350 really often. This lens seems to replace both of them. Tamron 11-20 2.8 and Tamron 18-300 seem to be a really cool duo for travelling.

@asbjrnhagennielsen6560 2 жыл бұрын

Sony 70-350 is far better. I have had them. Now I am on Sony 70-200 f4 and Sony 18-105 f4 +50 1.8 - all oss lenses. Use at the a6500 that has Ibis as well - great solution 😁

@tanmaysakpalofficial Жыл бұрын

Have you compared Tamron 18-300 with Sony 70-350? Quality & reach on the long range ? Does the extra 50mm matter especially for wildlife?

@AlexDunaykin Жыл бұрын

@@tanmaysakpalofficial Hi! I have both Tamron 18-300 and Sony 70-350. I almost never use Sony 70-350 because I don't find these extra 50 mm to really matter. I didn't compare these lenses side to side (a good idea for the video, yes), but I think Sony has an edge in stabilization (approx 1 stop). Tamron is a very universal lens and ideal for bright day photography.

@tanmaysakpalofficial Жыл бұрын

@@AlexDunaykin thank you so much for the reply and your insights. Since you have both the lens, I think it'll be a good idea if you can do a detailed comparison between the 2 👍

@AlexDunaykin Жыл бұрын

@@tanmaysakpalofficial Thank you for your question! It inspires me to do videos. I didn't make videos for a long time, but now I see that you and other people in comments are interested in the comparison of Sony 70-350 and Tamron 18-300 and as long as I have these two lenses and I almost never use Sony it is a good idea to make a video about these two lenses and to decide what to do with them. I travel a lot now, but starting at September I plan to teach at school in Budva so I will stay for a long time in one place and be able to upack all my photo\video gear and to make reviews. Thank you for you inspiration again!

@qedljkn 2 жыл бұрын

Could you do a review on the Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III vs Sony 70-350 lens. Thank you.

@cinaciccio1 6 ай бұрын

@arthur I am interested to the same review, please could you do it?

@richbottarini86 2 жыл бұрын

Several months ago, one of the professional photographers KZfaq channels did a video on a single lens camera he took on a cruise. In that video, he showed how you can get quality images from a budget all in one lens ( a Tamron lens). We carry two cameras, my a7r3 and her a6600 (she like the size and weight of the a6600 and will not use the larger camera). I am going to see if she will carry the camera and this lens, if so, we will buy on. Weight is everything with lenses. This is a good choice for travel by boat or air.

@B9scrambler 2 жыл бұрын

This is exactly what I've been wanting for my X-E1. Thanks for the great vid!

@1971stretch 2 жыл бұрын

Definitely tempted by the 'all in one' prospect and that big focal range, especially for days when I don't want to carry a kit a bag. I have an A6000 and tend to use the Sony E 35mm and the Sony 70-350mm. However, given the overlap between this and the zoom I already have I'm not sure I can warrant the extra expenditure (given that the Sony was quite an investment). Do you have a view on the image quality of this Tamron with the Sony 70-350mm?

@jacksummers1736 2 жыл бұрын

I didn’t want to wait for B&H to get them in so I found that Procam in Laviona, MI had an “early release” batch (10) so I drove the fifty miles to pick one up. My purchase was at 4PM eastern just before your review was pushed. Thanks for your review as you nailed my reasons for getting it as an “all-in-one” and the performance in the few short hours I’ve had it look fantastic! My opinion is that if you want perfect shots in multiple situations than multiple lenses would be better, however if you want all-in-one OR you are going on vacation and can only bring ONE lens than this 18-300 is for you. In closing I’ll say that I have been waiting for this review as I place a high value on your testing/review but, I just couldn’t wait any longer when the opportunity came to pick one up. It all worked out as you confirmed my suspicions of the lens users like me. You are also one of the few English/non-Tamron reviews on KZfaq to date.

@takrad981 2 жыл бұрын

How much cost??

@jacksummers1736 2 жыл бұрын

@@takrad981 $699 like everywhere else .

@ALFIEEATS 11 ай бұрын

Hello! What is the best or not expensive Vnd filter for tamron 18-300mm sony for video. I bought a k&f concept nano-d but when I zoom out to 200-300 mm the video is very noisy. Thank you for your response.

@oddtechman 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for another awesome lens review @ArthurR :) gonna be a while before i decide on this lens though as I have just got my first ever full manual lens (Newer 35mm f/1.7 that you reviewed 5 years ago!!!!) and it inspired me to purchase it.

@SukhithaAmarakoon 2 жыл бұрын

I'd love to see a comparison between this and Sony 24-240 FE

@kennyg5326 2 жыл бұрын

a great vacation lens :O that way I dont have to take a bunch of different lenses. love it

@CheapCharlieChronicles 2 жыл бұрын

This lens has my curiosity for Fuji, I like the wide zoom range. Wonder how good the lens stabilization is for video?

@trevor9934 2 жыл бұрын

Much depends on what Fuji you have. I just got the X-T4, specifically as it has IBIS and works well with the OIS of the lens. However I am not a videographer. I would recommend checking out videos from trusted sources like: Justin Abbott kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eNiGdspmmp29h4E.html and Jake Sloan: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aMqbaJia17jUimQ.html

@brunonorberto9648 2 жыл бұрын

terrrible

@TheWildOutThere 2 жыл бұрын

I bought this lens just today. I work on a whale watching boat over the summer and that is what this lens is for. Otherwise I use Sigma 16mm, Samyang 12mm, and 7Artisans 7.5mm to make other videos for this KZfaq channel. Thank you very much for the review.

@JohannesvanderVelde 2 жыл бұрын

Wow, I think I'm going to buy this lens! Super cool lens for bird photography, and exactly in my price range

@igorvuk4454 Жыл бұрын

bought it for conference video production, paired with a6400, this is great lens. my other three a6300 are using sony 18-135. with that kind of setup I'm set for a looong time. image is IMHO a bit better than on 18-135, and that 300mm reach helps a lot

@HighContrast89 Жыл бұрын

So which one is your favorite? I'm looking for a travel lens and am in doubt between the 18-135 as it's nice and compact on my 5100 and this Tamron 18-300 but I'm afraid it might be too bulky.

@igorvuk4454 Жыл бұрын

@@HighContrast89 for travel 18-135 is better as its super compact, i use 18-135 for travel all the time. 18-300 is really bulky

@alexrowland 2 жыл бұрын

Tamron is on fire! Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I'll be picking one up for sure.

@trevor9934 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for this review. I appreciate your low-key presentation and excellent image examples - btw your models are both lovely (your family?). I have just bought a Fuji X-T4, and although I got the FX16-80 lens, I was looking at a one-solution unit that could come with me when travelling. I have checked several reviews and they all seem to be consistent in suggesting that this new Tamron unit is a worthy solution to my requirement - considering the vast zoom range, this unit is quite remarkable and most issues can be sorted easily in PP. Right now, my X-T4 has been stuck in the supply chain in Australia for three weeks (I live in NZ), so while I have got the Tamron unit, I shall have to patiently wait until the rest turns up to see how it performs!

@efficaciousuave 2 жыл бұрын

i think this completes what in my opinion is, the complete APSC Sony kit: - 1. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm f2 -- vlogging/landscape/astro 2. Sigma 56 f1.4 - portraits 3. Tamron 18-300 - travel Now all i need is money 😂

@amitkrupal1234 2 жыл бұрын

Perfect

@geopapa80 2 жыл бұрын

Good choices but you'll need something fast for indoors. Maybe the viltrox 23mm 1.4? More money...

@efficaciousuave 2 жыл бұрын

@@geopapa80 nah..23 mm is too much for my indoor needs...which is why i had to choose the 12mm. if i needed faster, i would have gone sigma 16 1.2. which is both wider and faster than the viltrox you mention. but i really need that 12mm. i also like taking pictures of skylines and building's facade..even 16mm, on an apsc doesn't do justice.

@krishnastock 2 жыл бұрын

@@efficaciousuave The Sigma lenses (16, 30, and 56) are f1.4, not f1.2!

@efficaciousuave 2 жыл бұрын

@@krishnastock corrected. Thanks! printing mistake! 😅

@mrsleakyshit 2 жыл бұрын

Been waiting for this review. I already purchased the lens, but it was enjoyable to watch either way!

@johngreiner3489 2 жыл бұрын

Just bought it--thanks for your review

@tom.allez2134 Жыл бұрын

All I needed to know. Going to order mine soon. Thanks AR🤜🏼

@soumodipsaha8167 2 жыл бұрын

I was waiting for this review. Thanks!

@Rohanhola 2 жыл бұрын

Dream lens for a traveller

@b3guy782 2 жыл бұрын

Will purchase for travel, replacing 18-200 Sony for a6600. Thorough review!

@neogod29 2 жыл бұрын

If you're looking for a cheaper alternative to the Sony 70-350, I'd say buy it. But for an everyday lens, get the Tamron 17-70 f2.8 or the Sigma 18-50 f2.8. Low light is pretty terrible with APS-C, so fast lenses are way more important on this platform than on FF.

@amitkrupal1234 2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely correct, just yesterday i tried shooting portraits with my D3300 55-200 at 70mm f/4.2, damn i had to keep shutter at 1/30 s ISO 400. I had ring light but it was not sufficient indoors.

@neogod29 2 жыл бұрын

@@amitkrupal1234 people seem to forget that 1.5x crop applies to everything. Which means that every stop of light you go down on FF is actually 1.5 stops on APS-C.

@Yougimpytube 2 жыл бұрын

@@neogod29 That is not correct. The 1.5x crop does not apply to the light gathering ability of a lens. You use identical settings to achieve proper exposure regardless of sensor size. But, [given the same focal length] an APS-C sensor must be physically positioned at a distance 1.5x further from the subject in order to achieve the same framing as a FF sensor. So, the APS-C sensor will require a focal ratio of f/1.2 to match the depth-of-field presentation of the FF sensor.

@neogod29 2 жыл бұрын

@@Yougimpytube I don't know if you own both APS-C and FF cameras, but I do. I can tell you from first hand experience that APS-C cameras DO NOT gather the same amount of light. It's physically impossible. Even the diffent focal length changes the amount of light the camera gathers. The reason they mark everything the same, is to cause less confusion.

@mapsreview1507 8 күн бұрын

Love your videos. Thank you.

@BrianTheCameraGuy 2 жыл бұрын

Nice little lens for the money. Definitely can see some flaws but for the money it really is your all in one lens.

@rebeccamoore4177 2 жыл бұрын

Well. As a travel lens this looks great but… the low light issue probably is a dealbreaker. I have the new Tamron 17-70, and paired with the Sony 70-350 on my a6600, it’s an excellent kit. Just that pesky lens swapping to deal with. But the Tamron 17-70 can do better in low light. So there you are. Very good review. THANKS!!!

@user-my5jf3yd9q 2 жыл бұрын

We rock the same gear. Not just the pesky swapping to have in mind though. Our lenses are considerably sharper. Several reviewers confirmed this. For an unpretentious traveller, however, this lens is heaven.

@damonluvisi 2 жыл бұрын

We are rookies and just got the 11-20mm Tamron and have the 17-70. Thinking the next one would be the Sony 70-350. I wonder how annoying it really will be switching lenses

@DennisMeetsWorld 2 жыл бұрын

@@damonluvisi How are you liking your 11-20? I have it and although the weather sealing & f2.8 are great features, I find myself using my 10-18 f4 more often due to the OSS (shooting on A6100 & A6400: no ibis).

@plgl76 Жыл бұрын

@@damonluvisi do you think is a goof combination to have 11-20mm and the 17.70 mm? would you purchase again both?Thanks

@damonluvisi Жыл бұрын

@@plgl76 so looks like it’s been a year already, honestly this camera is for my wife and she never uses the 11-20.

@Xyzzxy123 Жыл бұрын

Great review. Would love to see this compared to Sony 70-350m apsc lens. Especially on the telephoto end.

@TheLemon22 2 жыл бұрын

Please compare this with the Sony 70-350G!

@jg_jgjg 2 жыл бұрын

Not really my cup of tea, but it is cool to see Tamron rounding out their trifecta with the 11-20 2.8, 17-70 2.8, and now this. All at a 67mm filter size. Pretty satisfying. Personally still freaking out about Sigmas 18-50mm f2.8. Can’t wait for it to ship.

@DennisMeetsWorld 2 жыл бұрын

I have the 17-70mm f2.8 and it’s amazing. What made you go for the Sigma 18-50?

@lennymo9088 2 жыл бұрын

Just bought a Sony 70-350 mm this summer for a trip. Wish this one had been out then. Another great review.

@asbjrnhagennielsen6560 2 жыл бұрын

The Sony 70-350 is much better, and has oss. The oss is really important up beyond 200mm. I had bought at the same time, and kept the Sony.

@shastasteve 2 жыл бұрын

I am going to buy this lens but it won't spend a ton of time on the camera. I have the 17-70 and I think it is just about perfect for an everyday carry lens. I would really miss the 2.8. There are times the added range will come in handy for wildlife and the such.

@ZakiArab 2 жыл бұрын

Trueeeee

@trym2121 2 жыл бұрын

70-350 is a better choice when coupled with your 17-70.

@ZakiArab 2 жыл бұрын

@@trym2121 maybe for outdoor, but for indoor 17 is a must have

@bobnason4147 2 жыл бұрын

My EDC or close to hand kit in the car is 16-50mm and 55-210mm with close up lens and teleconverter. Seems this lens will be a more practical, improved option whilst keeping weight compromise to an acceptable level.

@notmyname8527 11 ай бұрын

Just bought this. Will have to see how it does on my A6700 and events.

@slow.r1518 2 жыл бұрын

4:26 in the corners the little stains. Looks like your sensor picked up some dust or dirt. Its only visible when shooting with narrow aperture.

@Remmerboy 2 жыл бұрын

any plans on comparing tamron 18-300 with sony 18-105/18-135 and 70-350?

@gaosan 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you. Very good review and good len. I love it. Waiting for my len coming...

@gabithemagyar 2 жыл бұрын

I am considering this lens. My favourite travel lens for outdoor daytime shots is my old silver Sony 18-200 f3.5 - 6.3 (SEL18200).The Tamron would give me an extra 100mm range (200 mm extra if I use Clear Image Zoom). I mostly only take stills so the video drawbacks you mentioned are not very significant for me. I do like the image quality I get from my old lens though (even compared to my 18-105) so I would not want to move down in that regard. I suppose my other option would be to take the Tamron 17-70 f2.8 lens paired with a Sony 70-350mm zoom. This would have the advantage of having a useable medium zoom lens for indoors and general walkabouts together with an even longer zoom range than using the Tamron 18-300mm. Of course this would also be at a much higher cost and more weight to lug around when sightseeing plus more need to change lenses. Decisions ... decisions .... :-)

@asbjrnhagennielsen6560 2 жыл бұрын

Don't. I did and regret. It's not good from 200-300mm. The 28-200 2.8-5.6 is way better. I got the Sony 70-200 f4 now and the Sony 18-105 f4. Much better.

@dgross2009 2 жыл бұрын

I have the Tamron 17 - 70 and Sony 70 - 350. Obviously there was not this option at the time but generally I use each for different situations so having separate lenses is really not a hassle. I wouldn't want the slower speeds either as that limits you to outdoor use only. Not a problem with the long zoom since that is used strictly outside

@gabithemagyar 2 жыл бұрын

@@asbjrnhagennielsen6560 I have the 18-105 f4 but use it only for video. The 28-200 focal range does not appeal to me (more suitable for full frame - I shoot APSC ). The 70-200 F4 is out of my price range. I am looking for increased range (greater than 200mm) over what I have now with OSS and at a price within my budget (max 1500 CAD for a lens) and not too heavy to lug around all day when travelling.

@gabithemagyar 2 жыл бұрын

@@dgross2009 Thanks. I am thinking that that sounds like a good combination. The 17-70 would be useful inside churches, castles and museums and as a general lens. The 70-350 would give me lots of reach when needed outside to capture architectural details, and distant objects. Having said that, the 18-300 long would cover everything I would need for outdoors so I would only need to switch when inside. Oh well, my travelling is still on hold for now because of the pandemic so I will have some time to think :-)

@weareallamericans7358 2 жыл бұрын

@@gabithemagyar Consider my setup which is the RX10iv as my all arounder and the a6500 paired with 10-18, 24 Zeiss and 18-105PZ.

@evil1knight 2 жыл бұрын

Wish they would make a crazy lens like this for full frame

@trinicortez2508 Жыл бұрын

Would you get this lens over the Sony 70-350mm? I’ve seen you have reviewed both but I’m curious if you would choose it over the Sony. I know this is an old video but not sure if you’re still commenting on this.

@MilanDH 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for that review. Any chance you could compare the lens to the 18-105 or 18-135? Thanks

@danlester7579 2 жыл бұрын

Got the lens...it is wonderful...thanks for the review

@simonharry9618 Жыл бұрын

nice video, great pictures, I am stuck in between of tamron 16-300mm and tamron 18-300mm one day soon will get one of them anyway

@Dynamiczz 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you Arthur for your review of this lens. This review was directly linked for me to purchase based on your full and unbiased review; the samples were very helpful. You are right, at this time there isn't an all-in-one like this lens for the price. I am moving on from the Sigma 16mm 1.4 to this lens since the a6000 will be doing more wildlife and nature shots. The Sigma will be missed though. Also, thanks for mentioning the student discount, it is very hard to find this lens at a discount or on sale.

@osvaldoverduzco3900 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the review. I am disappointed that it is not a parfocal and that zooming in and out during video is not smooth but I may still get it exclusively for photography since I don't do a lot of video anyway. I own the e70-350 but I always seem to find myself switching lenses or using two cameras to cover the wide viewing angles.

@brainfreeze1925 2 жыл бұрын

I've got the Sigma trio for my A6300 plus a newish Tamron 17-70. I'm looking to get a longer focal length zoom and can't decide between this lens (Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD) or the Sony E 70-350 mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS. I shoot video and stills (which I often print large) almost almost always on a tripod. Right now in Ontario, the Tamron lens is about $70 less than the Sony. I could sell my Tamron 17-70 i suppose and just have the one Tamron 18-300 or build on top of the 17-70 with the Sony 70-350. I'm just not sure which route I should go.

@jackthair8311 2 жыл бұрын

I have the Tamron 18 - 200 for my Canon 1200D. I love it.

@evilpigskin 2 жыл бұрын

I love this review, now I need to get it!!!

@MeAMuse 2 жыл бұрын

I think the better compromise is the Sony 18-135mm. It covers you from a full-frame equivalent of 27-200mm which effectively covers 2 of the lenses of the holy trinity (obviously not at F2.8 though... and not quite 24mm) and covers what most people need for an "all in one" zoom. The size and weight are also a really good balance on a crop body. 300mm on a crop body is equivilant of 450mm... I don't think most people need that - especially at F6.3 (which is effectively like shooting at F8 on a full-frame body in terms of FOV, bokeh and noise performance). That would be my advice anyway. Obviously, if you think that will work for you - great! But most people would be better suited with the 18-135.

@davidpp33 2 жыл бұрын

I'm also perfectly content with my 18-135mm and would prefer not to lug around this much larger and heavier Tamron. I'm actually waiting for the complete opposite, an updated and sharper replacement to Sony's ultra compact 16-50mm, so that I can tuck my Sony aps-c into a large jacket pocket. Tamron, Sigma, Sony, any takers?

@MeAMuse 2 жыл бұрын

@@davidpp33 I stopped buying the original 16-50mm because it breaks to easily. My only suggestion is to do what I have.... Get yourself the 20mm F2.8 pancake lens. It limits your range but gives you good pocketability - and at 35mm is a pretty good focal length to work with most the time.

@Volvo745T 2 жыл бұрын

The portraits are stunning ... normally would pass on a catch-all focal range, but the images are excellent. I wouldn't buy because I already have 24-70 and 70-200mm

@linofoliveira 2 жыл бұрын

I am looking for an upgrade to my XC50-230mmF4.5-6.7 and Fuji recently launched the XF70-300mmF4-5.6 which costs more and does not let in all that much more light at 300mm. I gotta give it to Tamron on this amazing release!

@arvidjohansson3120 2 жыл бұрын

I own the 50-230mm, I can personally see no reason not to replace it with the 18-300 except cost. It will provide better macro, longer reach, WR, higher IQ, almost the same size in camera bag. Will be a perfect compliment to my 23 f2 and 50 f2.

@angelsantos1810 2 жыл бұрын

I will get this lens

@damasovi_travels1244 Жыл бұрын

this is like a great lense if I had a ZV-E10 this would be great fit!

@jasonsu3560 2 жыл бұрын

Looking for a comparasion between Sony 18135 and the Tamron 18300!

@avavaviv1 2 жыл бұрын

It seems like the optimal tourist lens, my only concern is the size and heft. 620 grams isnt too bad but isn't it front heavy? I would also appreciate a case made exactly for the lens + camera or the benefit of having only a single lens is lost by having to have some non fitting large bag.

@MeAMuse 2 жыл бұрын

I think tourists would be happier with the Sony 18-135mm.

@thesidewaysstudio7758 2 жыл бұрын

I use Tamrons 18-400mm option. I love it. Available for canon & Nikon.

@purplecorde 2 жыл бұрын

I own Tamron 17-70 f2.8 and Sony 70-350. I don’t think I want to replace those two with this new tamron lens because of the variable aperture..🥲

@uthmanjimmy1377 2 жыл бұрын

Yo thats what I have! I’m really happy with it tbh. The 70-350 is super sharp at 350 mm and the 17-70 is the sharpest lens I own. But I do get irritated at switching out lenses, which is why I’m considering this. The variable aperture isn’t too bad because I never used the 2.8 in low light anyways. I just need a solid comparison between the 70-350 and the 18-300 at the telephoto side.

@networm64 2 жыл бұрын

Apart from that point your 70-350 is way more sharper at 200mm plus focals.

@purplecorde 2 жыл бұрын

@@uthmanjimmy1377 I used to carry those two lenses wherever I went but now I leave the 70-350 out because it’s a hassle to switch lenses when I’m shooting outside. Also, I don’t need those long focal length unless I’m in zoo or safari to shoot birds and animals.

@uthmanjimmy1377 2 жыл бұрын

@@networm64 I don’t doubt that. What is wondering is how much better is it? If the 70-350 is vastly sharper, I probably won’t be happy with the 18-300 since I got used to the sharpness of the 70-350. If they are close enough though… I think it a worthy sacrificing my 2 lens combination for a 1 lens solution

@uthmanjimmy1377 2 жыл бұрын

@@purplecorde haha I’m the opposite! I keep my 70-350 on my a6500 and use my iPhone for ultrawide shots and video. I enjoy the unique perspective that the 70-350 gives me.

@jacovanlith5082 2 жыл бұрын

Nice pictures, but you missed one very important item. Apparently nobody knows one of the most valuable items of this Tamron 18 - 300 mm: the zoom ratio. The 16,6 zoom ratio enables the photographer to select just one person from a group after making the shot of the whole group. Or during a photo safary selecting just one animal besides the second shot of the hirt. So from an overview to a "close-up"; two different shots from the the same spot, without moving.

@soumodipsaha8167 2 жыл бұрын

Which one would you recommend for Sony a6400. Tamron 18-300 or Sony 70-350?

@travelwithlenses 2 жыл бұрын

Everyone wants to know this! Please someone compare these two lenses!

@damonluvisi 2 жыл бұрын

I vote for this also!

@georgesmith3022 2 жыл бұрын

i would like to see how it compares to sony 18-135 in the same focal range

@dudeiusmannigast1543 2 жыл бұрын

Personally I would go with the tampon 17-70mm/f2.8 + the Sony 70-350mm g lens ✌✌

@daishum000 2 жыл бұрын

that is what i thought. but i got 55-210 already. still considering to exchange for 70-350

@dudeiusmannigast1543 2 жыл бұрын

@@daishum000 I also have the 55-210 😌 but it does not perform as good as the 70-350 nor have the same reach. I'm getting rid of some of my older lenses and my old a6300 soon... Going to donate my a6300, my Sony pancake 16mm f2.8, my 55-210 and my Samyang 35mm f2.8 (I ended up getting the samyang 35mm f1.8 a while age) to my sister since she wants a "real camera" instead of using her smartphone for photography. Since I already have tamrons 17-70mm f2.8 and the sony 70-350mm and are planing on getting the a6600 I figured she could use some of my lower quality lenses I got just laying around. ✌ the tamron 17-70 (at 17mm f2.8) also outperform sonys 16mm f2.8 pancake lens with ease.

@TheColourfulDragon 2 жыл бұрын

I am using Sony's 24 to 240mm and consider buying the Tamron 18 to 300.instead any comment? Are Tamron a better lens?

@ArthurR 2 жыл бұрын

I havent tested the 24-240mm, but from what ive read its a good lens. Would be an interesting comparo.

@akirahojo2 Жыл бұрын

Hi @Arthur is worth using the Tamron 18-300mm to replace Sony 16-55mm f2.8 + Sony 70-350mm for travel? I do take video from time to time and photos in forest, so it’s low lighting. I can see that I will be saving heaps on weight alone and time from not changing lens. But in practice it seems the sharpness will be hard to achieve in low light, not to mention the wider end is a bit too narrow for landscape.

@izack9191 2 жыл бұрын

The first one!!!!!!

@bonafidesimmons6237 2 жыл бұрын

Damn you lol

@efficaciousuave 2 жыл бұрын

Can you make a video comparing stabilization for video and photos found in this Tamron lens, with other Sony lenses with OSS? compare these once on a camera with no IBIS then again compare them with alphas with IBIS. This w=should tell us what is the best gimbal-free stabilization option for Sony apsc users. I am thinking something like a6600 with this Tamron lens would be excellent for telephoto as at that long focal length every little shake gets magnified so perhaps this Tamron works in that respect better with a6600 IBIS??? Would Love to hear your feedback in case you do make a video on this topic. Thanks! Have a great Day!

@robertdumon2202 2 жыл бұрын

It certainly helps when testing a new lens to have a stunningly beautiful supermodel available as your subject on which to test the lens!!! ; ) Good for you, sir!

@jackjack1819 2 жыл бұрын

How about a comparison between this and the SEL18200?

@filmvideocreations4516 2 жыл бұрын

Please make a comparison with 70-350mm

@travelwithlenses 2 жыл бұрын

It seems many of us want this comparison!

@Wyoutside 2 жыл бұрын

How does it stack up in your opinion to the Sony 70-350mm G?

@uthmanjimmy1377 2 жыл бұрын

Also wondering this!

@ArthurR 2 жыл бұрын

Thats a good question. The 70-350 has the same variable aperture shortcomings, but it has a better zoom ring and it feels better made. Optically, this 18-300 is just a touch better. Given the price difference, the Tamron makes a lot of sense.

@travelwithlenses 2 жыл бұрын

I am wondering the same, I am looking for a APS-C telescope lens and the Sony 70 - 350 G seems to be the best option, but since this one can go up to 300 mm, maybe it would be a good option. It would be nice to have a comparison ;)

@geopapa80 2 жыл бұрын

@@ArthurR The Tamron is better optically than the 70-350mm? Well I didnt expect this..

@tanman99 2 жыл бұрын

@@geopapa80 Oh my. That’s what I was going to say. Never thought an all in one 18-300 would be able to compete with, let alone beat a Sony G lens. Was thinking about picking the Sony up for a Zoo/birding lens but maybe I’ll have to consider this one.

@Princeton_James 2 жыл бұрын

Halfway though your vid and I purchased it. Obviously not 2.8 but I know that walking in to this purchase. For my zoo pictures this is perfect.

@BrettAhoPhotography 2 жыл бұрын

Long time viewer, great channel Arthur! Question (if you have time)... Do you think this is worth replacing my Sony 70-350? THX and have a great rest of your week :) - Brett

@titosanchez7847 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the good unbiased review, thank you for helping us do informed purchase decisions. I used your affiliate link, hope that helps you continue your good work.👍

@majorbien_ 2 жыл бұрын

Wow! Fantastic review. I don't plan to make videos, but I look for more universal lens. And this looks like an ideal choice. Thank you :)

@EdnilFilms 2 жыл бұрын

GREAT LENS! GREAT REVIEW!

@user-ib5xz1os8t 9 ай бұрын

Paired with the new Sigma 10-18 mm lens (or the Tamron 11-20 mm lens) this gives you a powerful two-lens setup to work with.

@gungravex1988 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the review. Would you recommend this as a replacement for the sony 18-135 and 55-210? I am using a Sony A6400

@brandonhimmelreich2379 2 жыл бұрын

I'd also like to know if this is a good replacment for the sony 18-135. I have the sigma 150-600 with MC-11 so this feels like the sweet spot lens to bridge the gap.

@gungravex1988 2 жыл бұрын

@@brandonhimmelreich2379 I went ahead and bought it and have been using it for a few months. It's been my go to lens when I'm heading out in the morning for a walk or nature photography.

@brandonhimmelreich2379 2 жыл бұрын

@@gungravex1988 so the lens works with the MC-11 Adapter on a A6400?

@mytube2013 Жыл бұрын

@@brandonhimmelreich2379 don’t need converter

@somewheredifferent 5 ай бұрын

Sony A7 iv, 20mm 1.8 for vlogging, DJI min 3 gimble, this lens for street and when you want to be anonymous, strapped into a monopod that sits into the top of a plastic bottle head hanging around my neck for stability yet total mobility. DJI Osmo Pocket 3 for when you go semi-under cover and DJI 4 mini pro. That's the plan. Just for KZfaq work only. 40 years of being a Nikon guy. Will sell all my Nikons once I have this new set-up all working, all in one carry-on bag on the plane. Autofocus and one lens for in the battle as such is the key need for me and this lens seems to have it.

@vicentvanmole 2 жыл бұрын

Good review.own one did very well for travel ,macro/close up is this lens strong point though not the best but for the weight &size.

@e-chy3220 2 жыл бұрын

Your son grownup so much 😍

@ChristopherKretz 2 жыл бұрын

Would you recommend this for a walkaround lens for personal shots while hiking and traveling?

@MixiMera 2 жыл бұрын

A micro four third version would be really nice. I suppose a bit too similar to Panasonic’s 14-140 (28-280) mm

@AgnostosGnostos 2 жыл бұрын

Tamron is producing the 18-400mm for APS-C dSLR cameras too. Sadly there is no a-mount versions of this lens and no chance of using an LA-EA3 adapter on e-mount cameras with this lens. The autofocus EF metabones and Sigma adapters for e-mount cameras don't offer autofocus. I hoped of a Tamron e-mount version of 18-400mm. Instead the 18-300mm version appeared which is much better than the 55-200mm or the 70-350mm lenses by Sony. The Tamron 18-300mm has an equivalent 35mm focal length range of 27-450mm. The Sony full frame e-mount 24-240mm lens on APS-C cameras becomes 36-360mm but it is much heavier, larger than the Tamron 18-240.

@xquisite22 2 жыл бұрын

Definitely would like this so I could drop the weight of my kit but is it me… or all these companies now doing pre-orders but it comes off as a “goFundme” … basically “let’s raise the initial money and then release it” lol

@imranchaudhry9699 Ай бұрын

Hi Arthur, love your videos. I need a little help choosing between Tamron 18-300mm or Sigma 18-50mm. I know they are different use cases probably but if I had option to choose just one, what do you suggest based on sharpness and practicality .. I must had, I have a Sigma 16mm separately so this zoom lens doesn’t need to be used in low lights. Thank you Adding my camera is a6600

@rodgerslininger 2 жыл бұрын

I am planning on purchasing the Tamron lens. The other reviews were positive for outdoor work. Which is where I will be using it mounted to a Sony a7R IV. It should make up for any grainieness.