Bro please go to real scholars. These 2 are not, I repeat are not going to bring to to jannah

​@@watluktwel6767shut up

Shabbir ally isn't a sunni scholar,rather he is a Wahhabi like Deobandis are who fake follow madhab

​@@watluktwel6767shush you bot. Why are you here if you say you shouldn't listen to shaykh asrar rashid.

​@@bhatbasit8614shabir Ali is a liberal b um

Seems to be edited out. Not sure why. Also elsewhere.

Yes I noticed that too the part where he mentioned the fat imams lol

ahlul sunnah is only the 4 madhabs and 3 creeds..ashari,maturidi and lastly atahri..go educate urslef pseudosalafi

@@konstantinosskordos8645 its you who needs to be educated on this matter brother you have taken what ever asharis claim instead of researching yourself. If this is the case according to you every sect is ahlul sunnah lol Please think again Ahlul sunnah are those who follow the Quran wa sunnah with the understanding of the salaf as saliheen

@@marsx2 ahlul sunna are the 4 madhabs and the 3 creeds..ashari,maturidi and athari..imagine how uneduvated u are calling ashari a sect🤦🏽‍♂️

@@marsx2 do u even know what a sect is??🤦🏽‍♂️do u even know what is the sunni orthodocx theology and what it contains?🤦🏽‍♂️

@@marsx2 do u even know that imam al maturidi and imam al ashari were the leaders of ahl ul sunnah?and u say they are not while they were the leaders..u pseudosalfis are the cancer of the ummah..educate urself...

ashari is a creed...most of the sunni muslims and scholars are ashari or maturidi...u dont know this???

Deobandi are disbelievers

𝐒𝐀𝐋𝐀𝐅 𝐔𝐒-𝐒𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐇𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐇𝐀𝐃 𝐀𝐍 𝐈𝐍𝐍𝐎𝐕𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐀𝐑 𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐀𝐖𝐋𝐈𝐃 𝐔𝐍-𝐍𝐀𝐁𝐈 What is al-Ta‘rīf bi Ghayr ‘Arafah? It is spending the night of ‘Arafah in the Masājid, worshipping Allāh ﷻ, in places other than ‘Arafah which was 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 done by the Prophet ﷺ. So who from Salaf did this? 𝗦𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗕𝗔 ► The first to do it in al-Baṣrah was Ḥabr al-Ummah and Turjumān al-Qur’ān, Sayyidunā ‘Abdullāh Ibn ‘Abbās. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14462] ► The first Ṣaḥābī to do it in al-Kūfa was Mus‘ab Ibn al-Zubayr. [Tārīkh Dimashq; 58/228] ► Another Ṣaḥābī, ‘Amr Ibn Ḥurayth, used to hold a Khutbah and people would gather around him. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14463] 𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗜’𝗜𝗡 ► Al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī used to sit after ‘Aṣr to pray and do Dhikr, then people would gather around him. [al-Sunan al-Kubrā; 9476] ► Sa‘īd Ibn al-Musayyib used to sit after ‘Aṣr facing al-Shām until the sun set. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14465] ► Muḥammad Ibn Sīrīn was asked about gatherings in the Masjid the night of ‘Arafāt, and he said: “I do not see any issue with it.” He also said: “We do not prohibit what is done in the night of ‘Arafah.” [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14467/14475] ► Al-Ḥakam and Ḥammād were asked about it and they said: “It is Muḥdath.” Calling it Muḥdath (innovated) is not necessarily prohibiting it, because not everything Muḥdath is rejected. It is possible they are only describing it. However, some like Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī said: “Ta‘rīf is only in Makkah.” [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14469/14470/14474] ► This was echoed by Ibn al-Ḥanafiyyah. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14473] ► Al-Imām al-Mubajjal Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal said: “There is NO issue with Ta‘rīf the night of ‘Arafah, for it is just Du‘ā and Dhikr of Allāh. The first to do so was Ibn ‘Abbās and ‘Amr Ibn Ḥurayth.“ [Tabaqāt al-Ḥanābila; 1/39] ► Yaḥyā Ibn Ma‘īn used to gather in the Masjid the night of ‘Arafah. [Tabaqāt al-Ḥanābila; 1/414] What is the difference between making the night of ‘Arafah an occasion for increased worship, and making the night of the Mawlid un-Nabī ﷺ an occasion for increased worship? - 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲. But do you know how the Wahhābīs addressed this issue? Their leading scholar Ibn ‘Uthaymīn directly responds to Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal: “What is correct: Is that there IS an issue with it, and it is an innovation.” [Al-Sharḥ al-Mumti‘; 5/171] Ibn ‘Uthaymīn claimed it was a Bid‘ah and blameworthy even if it is done by Ṣaḥāba! Another Wahhābī cleric named al-Barrāk stated: “Ta‘rīf was not done by the Prophet ﷺ, and a Muslim must not do it. And if someone says: ‘Ibn ‘Abbās did so’, we say: ‘But ‘Alī did not, and he is more accurate in verdicts.’” [See the source in the comment section] Do you see the excuses? Where is the lip service of, “Which of the Ṣaḥāba made a Mawlid"? Even if the Ṣaḥāba did Mawālid, they would still call it a Bid‘ah. Had the Ṣaḥāba made Mawālid, they would say: “The Prophet ﷺ did not do it”, because these Wahhābīs follow their desires. So much for “Salafīs”. Imagine if a non-Salafī brought the Fatwā of a major Imām of the Salaf (let alone Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal) saying there is no issue with something, then responding and saying: “Sorry, you're wrong, there IS an issue and it's a Bid‘ah.” Apparently, Ibn 'Uthaymīn knows more about innovations than Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal? It's time you people reconsider your tiny sect's views and positions. Absurdity such as this can only be accepted by blind-followers. Stop blind-following and wake up!

False. Only those people who don't condemn Mohammed ibn Abdul Wahab are considered Wahabis by Barelwis

1 thing I've noticed, is that all the typical Pakistani mosques always talk about firqa and always causing division within the ummah. Some of them are worse than blatant enemies of Islam

@@AAZinvictowhy should he be condemned? Get to the point and don’t waffle

​@@clikclikboom123because he was the founder of the isis ideology undeniably

@@tamjidislam5558 okay where’s your source and what’s this ideology?

Don’t throw around accusations without proof like it’s halal. Bring forth proof that they where shia, if you are truthful.

𝐒𝐀𝐋𝐀𝐅 𝐔𝐒-𝐒𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐇𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐇𝐀𝐃 𝐀𝐍 𝐈𝐍𝐍𝐎𝐕𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐀𝐑 𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐀𝐖𝐋𝐈𝐃 𝐔𝐍-𝐍𝐀𝐁𝐈 What is al-Ta‘rīf bi Ghayr ‘Arafah? It is spending the night of ‘Arafah in the Masājid, worshipping Allāh ﷻ, in places other than ‘Arafah which was 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 done by the Prophet ﷺ. So who from Salaf did this? 𝗦𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗕𝗔 ► The first to do it in al-Baṣrah was Ḥabr al-Ummah and Turjumān al-Qur’ān, Sayyidunā ‘Abdullāh Ibn ‘Abbās. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14462] ► The first Ṣaḥābī to do it in al-Kūfa was Mus‘ab Ibn al-Zubayr. [Tārīkh Dimashq; 58/228] ► Another Ṣaḥābī, ‘Amr Ibn Ḥurayth, used to hold a Khutbah and people would gather around him. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14463] 𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗜’𝗜𝗡 ► Al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī used to sit after ‘Aṣr to pray and do Dhikr, then people would gather around him. [al-Sunan al-Kubrā; 9476] ► Sa‘īd Ibn al-Musayyib used to sit after ‘Aṣr facing al-Shām until the sun set. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14465] ► Muḥammad Ibn Sīrīn was asked about gatherings in the Masjid the night of ‘Arafāt, and he said: “I do not see any issue with it.” He also said: “We do not prohibit what is done in the night of ‘Arafah.” [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14467/14475] ► Al-Ḥakam and Ḥammād were asked about it and they said: “It is Muḥdath.” Calling it Muḥdath (innovated) is not necessarily prohibiting it, because not everything Muḥdath is rejected. It is possible they are only describing it. However, some like Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī said: “Ta‘rīf is only in Makkah.” [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14469/14470/14474] ► This was echoed by Ibn al-Ḥanafiyyah. [Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah; 14473] ► Al-Imām al-Mubajjal Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal said: “There is NO issue with Ta‘rīf the night of ‘Arafah, for it is just Du‘ā and Dhikr of Allāh. The first to do so was Ibn ‘Abbās and ‘Amr Ibn Ḥurayth.“ [Tabaqāt al-Ḥanābila; 1/39] ► Yaḥyā Ibn Ma‘īn used to gather in the Masjid the night of ‘Arafah. [Tabaqāt al-Ḥanābila; 1/414] What is the difference between making the night of ‘Arafah an occasion for increased worship, and making the night of the Mawlid un-Nabī ﷺ an occasion for increased worship? - 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲. But do you know how the Wahhābīs addressed this issue? Their leading scholar Ibn ‘Uthaymīn directly responds to Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal: “What is correct: Is that there IS an issue with it, and it is an innovation.” [Al-Sharḥ al-Mumti‘; 5/171] Ibn ‘Uthaymīn claimed it was a Bid‘ah and blameworthy even if it is done by Ṣaḥāba! Another Wahhābī cleric named al-Barrāk stated: “Ta‘rīf was not done by the Prophet ﷺ, and a Muslim must not do it. And if someone says: ‘Ibn ‘Abbās did so’, we say: ‘But ‘Alī did not, and he is more accurate in verdicts.’” [See the source in the comment section] Do you see the excuses? Where is the lip service of, “Which of the Ṣaḥāba made a Mawlid"? Even if the Ṣaḥāba did Mawālid, they would still call it a Bid‘ah. Had the Ṣaḥāba made Mawālid, they would say: “The Prophet ﷺ did not do it”, because these Wahhābīs follow their desires. So much for “Salafīs”. Imagine if a non-Salafī brought the Fatwā of a major Imām of the Salaf (let alone Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal) saying there is no issue with something, then responding and saying: “Sorry, you're wrong, there IS an issue and it's a Bid‘ah.” Apparently, Ibn 'Uthaymīn knows more about innovations than Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal? It's time you people reconsider your tiny sect's views and positions. Absurdity such as this can only be accepted by blind-followers. Stop blind-following and wake up!

😂😂Wahabi

Deobandi??

Deobandi are disbelievers

My friend plz refer to the history of Khilafah's especailly the last Khilafah i.e. Ottomans. The Ottomans had the same beliefs and practices like barelvis. It is the Wahabis and Deobandis, two sects created by Kufr, who destroyed the Ottomans, the Khilafah of Islam, with the help of Kufr in 1925. Now tell who did loss to Islam and Ummah with their misguided beliefs ?