cheyyen yep ur right

That’s pretty obvious

Get Origins. It's literally the same game as this without dialogue options.

It also has seafaring? I'll def look into it for sure!

just wait for skull and bones. It takes black flags gameplay and perfects it without it being assassins creed.

Yes but no single player story/adventure.

@@Teremei odyssey is better from origins: 1)biggest world in ac.. it combines a huge map of land and sea (for sea battle) 2)more interesting quests (you've not going to be bored easily) 3)rpg I suggest you to But now ac odyssey and later origins *origins is also good but not as odyssey.. (my opinion)

this is the last assassins creed for at least 2 years

You obviously ignored it when he said its been in development for 3 years

Yup so its release date is purely coincidental.

The next game is only in 2020

nani1962 Actually it's because you can make choices that alters your characters personal history like romance and relationships and how you decide things.

Terrence Spencer nope I LOVED the story. My main reason for playing

*Broken spear with magical powers

If you want to wear a regular spear and a shield... just do it?

I believe they stated in an interview that they ditched the shield for this game.

Merwanor Probably because you have a generic weapon on one hand and the broken spear on the other one.

Mercenary from Sparta, not a Spartan soldier.* There's a difference between the two.

Because dual protagonists rarely work, as Jacob and Evie demonstrated so well. Most of the time you get two mediocre characters or one who is good (Evie) and one who is extremely "meh" (Jacob). And why would each campaign have to be "significantly different from the other"? It's a gender choice they could have skipped entirely, giving you at least some choice in who you want to play as, and your first reaction is to bitch about it? Wow.

I m from small portion

lmao they showed an assassination at 5:45 you dolt. Thanks for proving you didn't watch the whole thing, funny how cry baby fans like you don't want series to evolve and just want the same thing over and over.

@@jct876 Right? I haven't touched an AC game since Black Flag for that reason.

@@davidparkes7741 no Unity and Syndicate had very interactive cities in the form of 18th century Paris and 19th century London , as for Origins and Odyssey Ubisoft has chosen the RPG path for the franchise so that means big empty worlds with boring side quests

@@jilha1122 Did you play either of the last two? I didn't personally play Origins so i can't talk on it but i'd HARDLY call Odyssey "empty."

@@davidparkes7741 having a gigantic world full of locations and quests that are all the same means empty to me

David Fakler .. It looks and plays NOTHING like the older AC games, wtf are you even on about, Origins already took the franchise in a completely new direction and this looks like it's diverting even further from the older AC games.

It actually follows Origins path. On the other side I dont think it has to be something bad necessarily. I mean Pokemon literally plays the same every game and they´re great games nontheless.

Steve Is it bad that I kinda preferred Unity over Origins in a lot of ways? I mean, I play AC more so to just feel badass than to have a rich expansive RPG, so I guess that explains it. Unity I feel was super underappreciated due to the bugs, but playing it for the first time recently it felt really good. The movement was so smooth and buttery. Anyways, this looks a lot more interesting than Origins world-wise.

Are u fucking dumb I am sorry but origins is ancient Egypt. Literally you can be a hater but seriously a fucking moron at the same time. Plz never play ac games. Fucking dumbass

Dan Bosca this. It looks beautiful and representation is great but stealth was already a third wheel in Origins and the blade in the crowd fantasy is just gone now.

Char Aznable they had a unique kind of stealth that was less about hiding behind objects and more about merging with the crowd and called it social stealth. That always worked just fine imho.

It's not necessarily the stealth element that is missing from the identity, it's everything. Instead of the team using resources to improve on crowd stealth and bring it to the current generation, they're shifting their focus on loot, magic combat and dialogue options. Origins was a good step in the right direction. It had the hidden blade and Assassin's robes but included RPG mechanics to change things up. This gameplay just shows an action RPG and that's it.

You should probably find out more about the story before coming to such ridiculous conclusions. This point in history predates Origins, it is likely that this isn't about the Assassin order (it can't be) but in fact the origin of the TEMPLARS. I find that to be very true to AC and a worthwhile story to tell.

I well aware this is set before Origins mate. About 400 years before origins. Which is why there isn't the Assassin's hood and the hidden blade (which was first introduced when used to assassinate Xerxes). I've been a die hard AC fan for a decade (less so after Unity) so I know the history and lore of the franchise. Never once, in my time loving the franchise, did I want a game set in Greece because it has none of the things that make the AC franchise what it is. Yet here we are with a game that has none of the identifiers of Assassin's Creed but has all the identifiers of The Witcher 3 and Horizon Zero Dawn. Sure burrow elements from other games but don't just change your own game completely. AC is trying too hard now to not be AC.

check your eyes you must be blind