Tbf the Valhalla trailer did not look like an assassins creed game, the cinematic trailer could have been any RPG and the "game play" trailer had no actual game play, hopefully they will give us something to be excited about soon.

@@LittleV179 Valhalla is going to be more assassins creed than you're ready for.

@@thewitcherscreed2305 hopefully

@@thewitcherscreed2305 well you were wrong lol, there were assassins but you didn’t really feel like an assassin. It’s very hard to feel like a proper assassin when you’re a big tough Viking.

@@3bbaas got that right

shownsiamac124 same

Believe it or not I have a pen and notepad analysing everything

Yup, me too

Keep in mind that the gameplay footage is actually from the alpha development stage. You should expect to see some improvements overall.

shownsiamac124 me too dude me too

I remember seeing the demo fist time, literally having chills.

That would be because AC was everything odessey could have been but way more

MADURITO Lmao the blue dude from Guardians of the galaxy?

Yes😂

MADURITO the arrow reminded me of Mary Poppins ;)

I liked it more when they didn't have accent like the first one. It's more realistic.

Very Nice How is Egyptians sounding like they're from London realistic in any way? The whole Animus thing was only a cop out. Accents are definitely better.

Fearless Rabbit Think of it like the babel fish from hitchhikers guide to the galaxy. Of course he can't speak his native language becuse first we wouldn't understand it and second no one knows what it sounded like anyway. But if he has an accent he sounds like a stranger. When he seaks his language he hasn't an accent. He is in his own land talking to his fellow countrymen. Why would he have an accent? That's just dumb. It makes it more realistic to just pretend he speaks his own language fluently, than to just accept he speaks a with an accent a language, that doesn't even exist yet.

There were a few good points, and that was one of them.

Very Nice I hate it, it breaks the immersion. I remember Ezio speaking Italian from time to time and it made the entire game feel much more realistic sure it doesn't cope well with the idea of the animus and whatever but not Everything needs to have some lore explanation (except a giant snake and controllable arrow)

Mitchell's game reviews even giant snakes and controllable arrows

That goes double for the AC formula, apparently. And just like the actual Creed, the deeper meaning is "there are consequences for your actions...Ubisoft".

Baroque Chevalier Noir So you probably take the fact that Shangri-La was real in Far Cry 4? Yeah, I might go there in ten minutes tbh, I fancy a change of scenery too.

Mitchell's game reviews stay your blade from the flesh of the inocent... hide in plain sight... never compromise the brotherhood

Prajiturel we work in the dark, to serve the light We are Assassins

Unfortunately yes

Zlengolann Especially at 27th, The game comes out, my birthday too.

+Al C dude only two days before mine, early present

+BumpOnALog ;)

Turns out It was pretty good.

Centurion XV It's a skill and as far as I got it right, limited to one bow type. So, as long as we don't use it we can treat it as if it doesn't exist at least.

Bass Lightyeah I certainly hope that you are right. If you are, then there is nothing for me to worry about :)

Centurion XV It's written like that in an article on Ubiblog. You guys should read it, clears up a lot.

Bass Lightyeah I'll have a look later.

Centurion XV I really think it was just to show the kill

Unfortunately not his melees which is basically my only complaint about taking photos

The Phenomenal One Hasn't it always been a part of Assassin's Creed? (Minerva, First Civs)

XHerobrine MC not sure weve always had giant animals...

Josh A Idk could be an illusion. Bunch of magical sh*t has already happened in Assassin's Creed. I think I can handle a giant snake.

The Phenomenal One he could've took some drugs or smoked some Hassish (I'm not even sure how you fucking spell that) and it could be an illusion for the enemy he faces. Maybe idk

The Phenomenal One I hope it is. When I started hearing that it was so far back I was hoping some mythology things from Egypt would be put into it

Kasra Azad means nothing

oxXBLADEZXxo It means that anything could be changed or added later on in the development.

No, that's not at all what Alpha traditionally means.

They had the same text when they showed off the demo for Syndicate. The game was unchanged. Do you even know what Alpha gameplay is actually supposed to look like? LMFAO

oxXBLADEZXxo A working alpha state game is the game itself with all the basic core concepts in place (and most likely some still being developed or drawn up) allowing players the base freedoms that allow the game to resolve gameplay issues, early exploits, small bugs, major bugs, early balancing and many other issues that you wont see in a fully released game that does not state that its an alpha or beta state game. This all being said, the best way to get thing that devs have as a tool is in my eyes the community or "us" putting it plainly. We are the force that drives them to make an outstanding product that we are all eager to enjoy. When developers see the forums exploding with issues like people saying that "the game is dying" or "this game sucks" then whats the point of them continuing on making this game for people that have already given up on them? Things like this in some extreme cases do have valid points but in very rare cases do they matter for Alpha state games that have literde playable for people. The best thing that you can do in the Alpha State of game development (especially with a working and released alpha state game) is to give constructive feedback to the devs so that they can interact with the community, sharing ideas or even allowing us to sometimes vote on different content that could be included in the game later on. For those that are alpha testers who stay around from this point forwards our word and feedback becomes very valued and wanted by the devs because we would have more experience than a fresh player at release. This in itself can create a much better and more fluid game for everyone to enjoy. RECAP Alpha state games are: -Incomplete basic forms of the game -Full of bugs -Unbalanced in some areas (or all) -Will have major changes at times (such as the removal of Station PvP which is being re-implimented and will not be removed from game0 -Graphics Artefacts - And a lot of other inconsistencies with the game that wont be in a full release or even beta state games Beta State Games Beta state games are in some cases a simple fine tuning of a 90% complete game, or could be another stage for the devs to add another round of content for the end product itself. There are a lot of different ways to see what beta state games are and normally they are categorized by the different numbers associated with them. a common way of seeing this (in most games but not all) are the 3 numbers in patch notes such as 0.1.9 (early beta phase) or 0.9.8 (late beta stage) different developers have different ways of doing this but the higher the number, the later in the creation it is. Now this is a time when its like going over a game with a fine tooth comb to find all the last existing bugs or balance changes. At this point more and more players will most likely take a stance on if the game is a good one or not as most of the time (not all) the future potential has been revealed and what the devs work ethic is and how it will be possibly during later development and release. But this stage is critical as well, because sometimes large bugs, exploits, glitches and other issues do pass over from the alpha state. But its also the time when a lot of new content can be added, tested and looked over. At this point in development keep an open mind, but keep active on the forums, look for issues and things that might need to be addressed by the devs. Or bring up new ideas and suggestions on in game stuff and mechanics Review -Less bugs and issues -Better balancing -quicker hotfixes or updates -more content (but not all) -game changes

Lol, iconic.

no it came from an eagle's skull

Didn't even consider that. But presenter-guy made Bayek sound like the founder. Goddamit, Ubisoft!

Darius was an assassin by the pure definition of the word, but I don't think the Assassins as a faction existed yet.

@@christianclyne4497 well i'm from the future and in the lore he is considered as just an assasin and is not related to the Brotherhood

Oh no don't worry this game did not do that, Odyssey however

Very Nice

Very Nice that's what I was thinking

Very Nice Personally, i will buy this game, no matter what. The hype is real :D

iCook Sheep

Treason. Yeah it makes a lot of sense actually :v

Uncle Jenkins not really. the arrow was going completely straight then down then up again. Its controllable sadly

looks like it is going straight then just curves down the stairs towards him

Uncle Jenkins we see the apple of Eden the sword of Eden and other precursor stuff and people are like oh it's fine soon as we have a controllable arrow everyone is mad 😂😂

dadedododadada that's all i want to say to you they already said there isn't any

Jack Mae do you mean combat?

Well, it suppose it will be quite cool then

now it even has its own diving system, it's perfect now:))))

sean k mirages are in deserts not in buildings, it's probably a hallucination of a piece of eden

Mirages inside a tomb? Nah, then Eden illusion is a better explanation. Though I frankly don't feel like giving Ubi that much credit at this point. They probably needed historical freedom to include the Monster Manual.

I mean the saved stream on KZfaq

pabbylink why? can't you watch the live stream anymore? anyways, I can't

dadedododadada that's all i want to say to you Yeah it says it has copyrighted content

Yep, same here

I'm glad I've seen ac origins

Ricardo Reinoso no

October

James Wesley Thanks!

Nick Watson It might be pre alpha but it's still indicative of the final version. Criticism is healthy for a genuinely great game at the end

pabbylink idk man we'll just have to see what else they do to the game before release date

It didn't say pre-alpha. It said Alpha. Which FYI means "the devs considers this game done". Ubi bragged about having a year of Alpha, which means pre-Alpha was last year.

Constructive criticism is one thing, BITCHING on the other hand is a whole different ball game.

Can you say it was indicative of the final version now? Best not to put too much into pre-alpha's, I hope this was a lesson for a lot of the community

spratlinj 730 no