Thank you sir

I don't think you mean cocaine, but close.

You can email me directly as long as you're a serious buyer ;)

Yep

What's your setup?

Hang on, you're telling me audiophile recording and mastering makes music sound better than standard attempts?

You're confused or maybe just inarticulate.

the proof is in the pudding

​@@martinjohnson2381 Yes audiophile recordings usually sounds better because of many factors statistically. (type of music, not recording quality) They have usually less harshness, and more dynamic contrast with a certain load on the system. Look at the channel Sound Sommelier. All of those tracks he uses sounds best on that type of gear and on top of that it has a very stable power load on the system, meaning that there is a certain amount of traffic going that only makes the power stay at around the same level when you measure it, these other types of channels use the easiest tracks to play music that praises the gear. Because they are in the business of selling gear. Same with AVshowrooms. That is why the same 100 tracks are almost always used. Also they know that sounds best on their recording devices, because of long experience. With a phone, it is very random what sounds good/bad. The closest you can maybe get to a good sound recording is maybe the Neuman in EAR dummy head microphone, I guess that is around 10k USD. Then on top of that you can take 16bit or 24 bit vs of the same track, which sounds different from system to system. Then there is the room. And the system. Then there is the time of day that could affect the smoothness/timing, which a few days a year actually makes a very noticable difference, especially at Jay's high level. It's actually an art filming a sound, and getting it just right so people can enjoy it at home. Because the same sound reacts also in maybe 1000 different ways on people speakers/laptops/ear phones or whatever device. And then on those devices you can also change the sound setting there. Plus there is also several other factors like burn in, distance which is maybe varied from recording to recording, hitting the microphone differently, and then smaller stuff like if it's an Nordost Odin power cable or Dragonfly. Just those 2 cable changes alone on a preamp can change the tonality/harshness a lot. I would also say that timing/ease/crispness of the music type selected, accounts for a lot on how therecording device will be happy about the recording. Small devices usually don't like fast/hectic music that changes pace a lot.

@@carlosoliveira-rc2xt who are you referring to?

Much appreciated Alan

They help with magnetism.

I agree. There is a lack of warmth in the low mid / mid bass, that takes away from that liquidity too. I think the Boulder mono's with Wilson in his room are the best so far... But thats what it sounds like on our side

Agree, but I think the room is slightly overdamped now.

Not at all.

You have your opinion and i have mine? I'm not challenging your opinion. You have your right

@@jaysaudiolab, yes, I agree, it’s just my opinion. And I respect your opinion as well. But this demo sounded horrible to me. 2110 and any amp and Pandora and any amp sounded better than this. I used to own Soulutions and they are great when paired together but this pairing was not good.