I agree with you-absolutely amazing. This was arrogance and hypocrisy at an all time high. I'm so glad Diego paid them back in their own coin in 1986.

Statistically England committed more fouls than Argentina. Funny that.

What this video doesn't show is that the Argentinians kicked anything that moved, they were over physical. That is why they had so many free kicks awarded against them which led to Rattin constantly arguing with the ref and finally getting sent off. Even today the Argentinians are well known as playing physical football despite having some of the greatest footballers ever in Di Stefano, Maradona and Messi, amongst others. A referee is there to make sure that the game is played within the rules so don't blame the ref for holding dirty players to account for their fouls !!!

I am originally from Argentina: Never, ever call any Argentinian "animal," least of all their national team. If you do, there will be war: The Falklands War.

You lost that as well​@@RicardoMartinez-oh9sq

The following year (1967) Moore and Hurst moved with their families from their East End homes to the modest end of Chigwell where my family lived. It was nothing special: my father was a schoolteacher, so by winning the World Cup these footballers could afford a house which could be bought with a teacher's pay. They were certainly from ordinary working families, but a lot more "classy" than many of today's multi-millionaire players.

Thats because this was the decision of a referee not the actions of an idiot who cheated. Need any more lessons?

its not Maradonas fault if the referee didnt see the hand, in 66 wc the referees and the organization were clearly helping england to win the wc

You assume he did not see it. And no one helped England in 66. If some dumb Argentine Captain wants to keep pushing his face into the referee time after time then they can send you off. Its part of the rules - showing respect for officials. As for the 3rd goal in the final = that needed technology to see what the eye can not see. And even then there is doubt. And anyway Roger Hunt was on hand to tap it in if he wanted but did not as even in the 6 x yard box he saw it as over. No German could have beaten him to that ball if he wanted and the ref went to the linesman as a caution. The ref in 86 did not go to his linesman as he was as useless as fly screen door on a submarine and wanted Argentina to win because he was a biased Puerto Rican and all Central and South AMerican officials are corrupt.

in 1966 there was an english as president of the Fifa, Stanley Rous. England had 5 days to rest between the games, the other strongs teams didnt have this. Brazil that came from winning the two last world cups (1962, 1958) mysteriously was in the group of death and in his 3 games the organization put english referees haha. In Germany vs Uruguay with the game 0-0 the english referee didnt see a hand of Schenellinger that had to be penalty for Uruguay and he ejected 2 Uruguay players. In England vs Argentina the german.. yes german, coincidence? did his job by sending off Rattin because "he looked at him badly".. whos corrupt ? In the final the same linesman later said that "he didn't see enter the ball, but the referee throw it all the responsibility in his back"

1966 is the most fixed world cup ever, i'm glad for the divine justice that england never won anything again 😉

I love it. Three world cups to Argentina. One for England, in very dubious circumstances. Argentina world cup runners up on 3 occasions. England have never been runners up. Argentina have won the under 20 world cup a record 6 times. England have won it only once. Need I go any further to show how superior Argentina is to England in football? Argentina has produced the 2 greatest footballers of all time -Maradona and Messi. Is there any hope for England? Perhaps they could host another world cup, bribe a few referees, produce another Nobbie Stiles, get linesmen to say they have scored goals even when the ball hasn't crossed the line. With all those things in place, maybe, just maybe they could repeat the 'glory' of the sixty-six fix.

​@@nrm4754england would not win 1986 game against argentina lol

Typical ! Chip on the shoulder ?

Ibrahim Barry agree

Shows what an idiot you are given it was a German referee that was involved. Oh and in the 1970 QF vs Germany it was an Argentine ref who helped Germany out too with some very weird decisions no doubt based on pay back for this morons bad behavior. Seems that Argentine ref forgot who reffed this match.

Says the idiot who cant think.

Iago = the 2nd idiot who cant think.

Thats a conspiracy. Whereas everyone knows Argentina fixed the 1978 world cup. Just ask Brazil!!!

@@OldSchoolBoxing1 Show the evidence, my friend

@@SM-zm5xt Where's the evidence England WC was planned for them?

​@@user-ps6iz6bd9t England goal vs Germany that was non existent 😂😂😂

​@@ASAPHMARK germany had second goal wasn't free kick don't talking and crying about cheeted 😂😂

Do me a favour go and play with the fairies.

He should have been sent off a minute earlier for the foul. He'd already been booked. He looked up worried expecting to be sent off then.

Bookings (yellow and red cards) were not introduced until Mexico 1970. There is no rational explanation why Rattin was sent off.

Anthony - piss off you arse kissing moron.

Anthony cotton you're clearly not English as you don't know how apostrophes work.

It's kinda strange how many times the host nation always does at least REASONABLY well each time. I can't believe it's just playing in front a a predominantly home crowd each time that causes it.

@@GirGir183 Reasonably well?! Spain in 1982 were a shambles.

Everyone always forget that they say 1966 is cover in controversy. They may be right or wrong. But one thing is for sure 1966 is not the only tournament to the covered in controversy. I think of 1978, 2002 and 1934 where both host Nations won the World Cup. (Italy and Argentina). And South Korea beat Italy in very suspicious circumstances in 2002.

Man in 1978 we almost lose

@@callumhughes6448 an argentinian and agreed.!!!

Shounak Mitra,,, no one can stop he .. but we don't remember 1966 our problem is politic because 1982, the military gobvernement sends young boys and kids to the war on malvinas. and them was killed and destroyed so the people hates english but the military was guilty. they forced them to go

I THINK ARGENTINA CANT EVEN BEAT ICELAND WHAT ABUNCH OF FAKES THEIR THE POOR MANS BRAZIL

Argentina = Cheats of the game. And maradona is biggest cheat of all. In Argentina they applaud him for hand of god goal. So they approve of the cheating ways.

Vive Le France! Mbappe!

@@hellisla brazil cheat, foul and dive like no other team

Iso las 2 wet pero se entiende

He cheated

He cheated... he cheated pure and simple... he was a cheat... also a genius no question but also a dirty little cheat...he also cheated in 94 i might add

No he cheated and you have warped mentality to believe any different, nothing worse than a bad loser !!!

English football quite rightly criticized Italian clubs in the 80's and 90's for buying foreign players but ironically enough the premiereship itself is now full of foreigners. All countries should, although they probably never will, nationalize their leagues.

I don't know about Argentina, last time they won a world cup I wasn't even born.

@@LuciferTheDogKiller Messi is worth more than the entire English team combined.

@@LuciferTheDogKiller Now you are haha

@@LuciferTheDogKiller Now they have🤣🤣🤣

Great insight!

Now I think after the battle of Santiago in 1962 World Cup refs had to get rid of anyone bringing the game into disrepute I mean Argentina carried out a series of terrible fouls desperate to out man England and then banged up on the ref well that’s not gonna help you is it

@@gamestation9437 nobby stiles broke the leg of a french player in group stage, and you say argentina was violent?? england committed 34 fouls, argentina 19. but of course argentina are the thugs, and english are the innocent. your media is really great of make you believe this.

Angry Mike - I own the match, the English committed far more fouls than the Argentines. Also, there was so much confusion at the time of the send off, the commentators were perplexed as much as the players. No matter how one looks at it, it was a disgraceful decision to send off Rattin.

Yeah even for dissent you would get a warning not a sending off

A player should not get in a referees face for six minutes straight and certainly not whilst speaking words in a language not understood by him. The guy was and is disrespectful to the on pitch hierarchy set out in the rules of the game. Players should respect the referees decisions even if they do not agree with them and no matter how awful they are.

The decision was made by FIFA and it impacted England just the same !!!

Rob Osborne Actually, FC Barcelona give us Leo Messi and not Argentina. He could have play for Spain but he made mistake to choose Argentina. And by the way, many other World Cup has been fixed. For example 78

The 1978 final certainly wasn't fixed. And no, Messi was born in Argentina and if Barcelona hired him was because they saw his potential. What Barcelona did could've been done by any other team their size.

There's only 2 other teams that size, but yes you are right.

@@hellisla pero callate envidioso, leonel messi nacio en argentina y no lo vas a cambiar

@@hellisla What mistake??? He just won 3 championships in a row with Argentina 🇦🇷

The England v. Portugal semi-final was very suspect as well, but not to this extent. Thankfully, history remembers. All three teams have gone on to be far more successful since

@@simgarfu Uruguay haven't as much, sure they got a few more Copa America's under their belt but they haven't won the WC for 72 years

@@EAMCFC true, but they’ve done more than England

@@simgarfu I guess, I mean you could argue copa america is just largely dominated by uruguay, Argentina and Brazil whereas the euros there's many different teams in the mix

@@EAMCFC I completely agree that the Euro’s offer a wider selection of elite teams, and is generally a much more entertaining affair (for me).

Yeah but the difference was, we weren't at home, we didn't payed the referee and maradona alone scored the greatest goal of football history by dribbling half of the english team.

You mean the hand of Satan!

Anthony cotton It was The Hand of God, but the football's one. And England has never been able to produce player that has even 60% of skill, talent or magic Maradona had. It's the reason why all english football fans are/were upset about Maradona, rather not one single act of cheating.

leonardoflorentin No, you did that in '78

CalcioEUnico Duncan Edwards. Enough said. Sadly he was killed. You may be right that the English have never really produced flair (magic) players, but "The Tank" could do anything. Same with Bobby Moore.

Pelé didn't play the 66 wc

+Jan Janner Pele played but got injured. He played against Portugal for sure.

+Jan Janner Pelé scored one goal in the 1966 WC against Bulgaria on a 2-0 win. I recall he did not play against Hungary when Brazil lost 1-3. And he played in the third match against Portugal, another 1-3 loss, but got injured due to some brutal tackling. That 1966 WC was brutal. Thank God for the introduction on yellow/red cards a few years later.

1966 had great players but it was fixed tournament and you know why.

Soooo France 98 was fixed to or do you just don't like England and wish that it were fixed?

It’s funny but before 66 England always beat Germany and Argentina in every game we played home or away we never lost to either Germany or Argentina in fact we beat them in the 1962 World Cup 3-1 so why they thought they had a chance at Wembley I don’t know nobody ever beat England there except Hungary in the 50s

@@gamestation9437 una pena q solo tengan una copita robada

@@fazzerAFA Y es la única que van a ganar en su vida...

Just like argentina in 1978 and south korea in 2002. Being the host has its perks

Which players were injured by the English, it was the dirty French that kicked Jimmy Greaves out of the world cup !!!. By the way modern technology has proven that Hurst's goal was at least 2 inches behind the line .... end of story !!!

it's very clear that they're unable to win a world cup without cheating, being that this is their sole title. it's only going to "come home" when they host it again

Bitter old man, a loser.

Actually Rattin was a very classy player in his time. His silky touches would have been welcomed in any English team.

HE COULDNT EVEN COUNT COUPE

@@tiltonroadbirmingham1153 are You talking about Shilton!!! Haha

1986: Karma.

20 years

Pero vamos los ingleses son unos tramposo , si no fuera por ese mundial robadisimo no tendrian nada

@@fazzerAFA That is not a valid counter argument.

Tell me the circumstances

You're basing that on a youtube interview with a bitter losing captain. I saw the match. Argentina were animals.

@@arthurlewis9193 and what the hooligans are??? Do You remember Heyssel, 1985? They were gentlemen? Animals? C'mon

@@naranjacrunch they're Scouse, not English. Mate

​@@naranjacrunchpathetic answer

​@@arthurlewis9193totally animal version english fan😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

❤️🇦🇷

Grow up Lucio. Brazil were finished before they arrived that WC and PEle getting kicked was nothing to do with England.

Unlike Argentina they can win on any soil................ oh no wait 78!

@Rubén Tano Mexico? Jes all of next door

Or the Euro right now, how the cheated Denmark out with a penalty which wasn’t even one…

Payback in 2018 with Kylian Mbappe. The ghost of 1966 also ensured France won in 2018

Hurst's goal was over the line by two inches, this has been proven by modern goal line technology ... You'd have thought it would finally shut up all the idiots, who are still crying over this correct goal, 57 years later but apparently there are still some NERDS who believe the hype !!!

El torneo de 1978 por Argentina también

@@James-jl4jt pero nada comparado a esto

@@James-jl4jt Argentina estuvo a un tiro al travesaño de perder la final, aca hasta inventaron un gol para ganar con tal de satisfacer a su reina

Argentina 6 Peru 0, 1978...🤔

@@imgoingtocountdownfromthir4580 A Argentina no le dieron ningún gol falso en ese torneo, ni le expulsaron jugadores a sus rivales. La sospecha de corrupción queda tras bambalinas. En 1966 estuvo a la luz del día bien clara.

Yes according to the losers

No podemos festejar un gol con LA MANO, eso habla mucho de nosotros como pueblo. Decadentes y mediocres a más no poder.

@@luciano2003. así que todo un pueblo es decadente en solo unos instantes y por el hecho de gritar un gol.. mira vos jajajaja creo que tenés muchos problemitas.

@@Der-Henker Y sí, gritamos más fuerte un gol que una injusticia... Y mirá cómo estamos.

everything you said is true but you should also consider that this 'error' was a HUGE help for the host team, all your arguments turn into excuses if you don't start by saying there was a local team that got profit from this mistake, like that goaln't at the final...

Very primitive, indeed. Today lots of people speak English in my native Argentina, but back then pretty much only English teachers did.

Nonsense !!!

He did, terrorise the referee !!!

Tell me, for which fouls should Nobby Stiles have been sent off?

UK 1 - Argentina 0 (played at home on the Falklands)

Pirata

Las Malvinas son argentinas. Ladron. Diego Armando Maradona ;) 100 años de perdon quien roba a un ladron.

Gastón joel Cariaga las Islas Falklands son nuestras 🇬🇧

Yes, but did the fouls happen before or after the penalty Schellinger (?) earned but that wasn't judged? No excuse for their behavior, it was barbaric. And latin american footballers do seem to be more violent and dirty minded players (I remember Argentina Croatia from 2018). But if what Rattin says is true about German and English judges being intentionally picked for each other match (plus, Rattin being sent off for arguing alone), it casts a darker shadow. Not unlike one commited against Algeria in 1986 (Iirc).

@@beorntwit711 The Hungarian national team was very unlucky with the English ref in 1954. In the first Hungary-Germany game the English ref couldn't see anything wrong with a brutal tackle on Puskas which made him injured. He had to miss the next two crucial matches. In the World Cup final in Bern, 1954, the same English ref (William Ling) was given the leading role again, what a surprise! The second German goal shouldn't have counted for a clear foul on the Hungarian goalkeeper in the six-yard box. The ref could have given at least one penalty for Hungary but he did not. Then the English ref (with the 'help' of a Welsh linesman) disallowed Puskas' equalizing goal for offside near the end of the World Cup final. Quite unlikely it was offside but the original film clip of that key moment is 'strangely' missing from all the video footages shown even today. You may wonder why... The German-English link benefited Germany that time. In 1966 their refereeing collaboration also worked in their mutual interest or so it seems.

I saw the fouls of Nobby Stiles during that world cup and I can't understand why he was never sent off.

​@@beorntwit711 Los europeos se creen dueños de la moral y tambien son salvajes para jugar, sobre todos los que estan cerca del Mediterráneo. Argentina es un latino que si le pegas te devuelve la patada.

I think it's available somewhere on youtube.

martynh good managers and different techniques

Cesar Luis Menotti

How brilliant was Maradona in that second goal! As the english commentator said, " There is no debate about that goal! That was just pure football genius".

Yes but what we must remember was England had never lost to Argentina we beat them every time we played them and we beat them 3-1 in the 1962 World Cup so maybe you should change your tune, Because we beat them again in 1966 and they cheat to win two world cups

Italy's 2 first cups under Mussolini.

David Western The Argentina game when we won 1-0 (check out the video 'At the start of the Eng-Arg rivalry') and Geoff Hurst's famous third goal in the Final wasn't exactly conclusive, was it? Not as dodgy as the tournaments I've mentioned, but, still...

guillezorro it's sad u may have to chose ur words again

That’s ridiculous Italy won in France in 38. France was the host nation not Italy. And France was enemy of Italy at that time. How is that a host nation??

Sirio Martins malvinas

🇦🇷 Malvinas 🇦🇷

because England and Germany are in Europe whereas Argentina and Uruguay are in South America. Europe winning benefits Euro futbol, money, etc.

Fact is back in 1966 I don’t think Argentina had ever beat England not at home we beat Germany like 26 times I don’t think we lost to the Germans until 1970

These fools Don’t understand how hard was to beat England at Wembley only Hungary did it in the 1950s after that we never lost at Wembley pretty much we didn’t need to cheat we had the best GK best defender and the European football player of the year

Turn it up then

He uses "conspiracy theories," which barely ever prove true, not here for sure.

Yes at least this guy knows history England beat this team in 1962 anyway 3-1 Charlton scored so they had no chance 4 years later at Wembley England hardly lost there to anyone , Plus a German ref getting fed up with being bullied by Argentina has nothing to do with Maradona being the biggest cheat of all time he even cheated himself by not winning the World Cup fairy which he could of done

@@gamestation9437 Viva Argentina!! Tenemos 2 copas del mundo y 15 copas continentales Inglaterra solo una copa del mundo y 0 copas continentales.... Argentina es mejor que Inglaterra historicamente

@@gamestation9437 Maradona > England

@@lapsiquisarcaica1Por siempre y para siempre💙🤍💙

@@gamestation9437 Passarella= 2 world cups, England= 1 world cup

British MADE football tho

I know right? WTF do they think goes on? We secretly adore the Germans? WTF?

And in 1986, the Tunisian ref was biased in favour of Argentina

I

Of course they should've fired Capello, he took the blame for England's abysmal World Cup in 2010 and rightly so. He wasn't the right man for the job and neither was Hodgson, both negative managers in my opinion. They never should've fired Sven Goran Eriksson, people say he was a mediocre coach at best but his record is actually pretty good compared to the more recent debacles.

Apart from a war? Scotland is no where near England's level but England-Scotland is a massive rivalry

England can't be considered a rival to Germany and Argentina now, but about 8-10 years ago they were still rivals. Also, I know we're talking about a WC final here but Argentina played shitty all tournament.

Rivalries aren't always about what happens on the pitch, but what happens off it.

sam pafc that sounds like an excuse you would make if your team was getting their ass kicked every tournament by their rival oh wait that's England never mind

que fue el mejor gol de todos los tiempos

What the hell does that have to do?

Bostero Soy JAJA! Soy Ingles, pero admito esta respuesta es muy astuto!

Cause there both cheating bastards

Probably he applaud this kind of disgusting cheat behavior, because is coming from an Argentina player.

Now now don't be calling that German referee dogshit. Completely biased yes. Blatantly unfair yes. But he was still a human being. Calling him dogshit is going a little bit too far. In any case the Argentinians aren't crying any more. The English have been doing that since the quarter final of 1986. The Argentinians have had 3 world cups to celebrate since the fix of sixty-six. What has England won in all that time? Oh yes they won an under 20 World Cup in 2017. With another 5 wins in this competition they will equal Argentina's record of 6. but for now, just pass them the tissues so they can dry their eyes.