yep, can confirm.

Yeah that’s me

Its like I ve read what his saying before and used to understand it but the second it starts im just entertained and watching.

I don’t necessarily understand everything but I do understand the concept of what he’s saying and what he’s doing make kinda of sense

Same

I’ve still never seen a octahedral or icosahedral puzzle

@@infiniteplanes5775 There are some, like the Skewb Diamond, the Face-Turning Octahedron, and the Dogic, the regular Skewb also counts as it has an octahedral core construction. I assume the reason is those shapes are just harder to make good twisty puzzles with, and the Dogic from what I can find only comes in 10-color, perhaps all 20 was too much for the average user.

@@TNTFour If they used stickers, then they could put each color twice, but with a dot in the middle. There also may be technical limitations, and I'll look at those later.

Trajbers octahedron and trajber 4x4

the more you know

JPern?

@@thevibingperson JPemm

@@thevibingperson YaySperm

Wynn Larga yperm

@@hey12yearsago21 E

Lol

you and me are same

@@tanmaymall9548 I'm too dumb for the tutorials lol

3x3 is the standard knowing how to solve it makes a really good base for solving other cubes he even mentioned in the video that he has already solved 5x5 so he pretty much has all the knowledge he needs considering megaminx isn’t even a difficult cube

I memorized all the algorithms and now I feel like a god

Higher order minxes (is that right plural word?) in a nutshell.

69 likes 😞

200 th like

correct my friend

@Capt Alpha ...

69 likes. Nice

@@chillboard4904 thanks!

Cat??

Same I also enjoyed coz of the same reasons XD

which he basically did but he ended up doing is differently

Nah you know what i mean Actually every jperm subscriber knows what i mean

@@user-ih5ed3fv3j yeah i know what you mean

@@user-ih5ed3fv3j i know what you mean

Solving a gigaminx like a megaminx... Like a kilominx... Like a pyraminx... Like a dodecahedron?

By that definition then I shouldn't be able to solve one

@@JPerm (Y) Same

If you read the beano then all is made clear

@@JPerm lmbo same

(Y) Same

Dodecahedron is an 3D shape. Megaminx has that shape.

@@shloksdd “is AN 3d shape”

It should really be a tri dodecahedron

Same

Imagine seeing you here. Hi :D

🥲🥲😵😵😵😵🥸😍🤪😍🤪🤨😛💕💕😎🤩😵🤢🤢🧐😘😁😁😋😊🤪😊😊

@@howtobeyouwantabiscuityesl1646 nice name

bruv, it's just for money :)

Money*

~~For money~~

@@pramay_21 well, this is basically his job, and everybody does their job for money

Yeah, but he also enjoys solving puzzles, and that is probably one reason why he started KZfaq, so I guess it is for money and because he enjoys ot

Absolutely 👌

yah

Yesss

Yessss we didddd!!!!!!

We're no strangers to love You know the rules and so do I A full commitment's what I'm thinking of You wouldn't get this from any other guy I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling Gotta make you understand Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you We've known each other for so long Your heart's been aching but you're too shy to say it Inside we both know what's been going on We know the game and we're gonna play it And if you ask me how I'm feeling Don't tell me you're too blind to see Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you No, I'm never gonna give you up No, I'm never gonna let you down No, I'll never run around and hurt you Never, ever desert you We've known each other for so long Your heart's been aching but Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you No, I'm never gonna give you up No, I'm never gonna let you down No, I'll never run around and hurt you I'll never, ever desert you

I love i

Lol I just saw this comment at 1:58

it's satan

Quote of 2021 😂

Lol 🤣

@Kuber Kid hate to break it to you but a scramble like that wouldn’t be approved for actual WCA use. I would recommend using CHAOTimer it gives actually correct scrambles!

@Kuber Kid cool i checked it out the rubiks app has given me a solved cube before

Same here, I never thought about that before.

Lol

😂

XD

you will also reach there some day......

I know its a very hard puzzle, but maybe try the 1x1

@glass of juice that just means original

I have never solved a megaminx before, but I can somehow solve it to the last layer. In the 2 next days, I attempted to solve it using the beginner method and it worked just well

its 1.4M subs

But there’s still false equivocation like odd-layered cubic puzzles, which still resemble parity even if they’re not _technically_ parity.

@@archgirl I am sorry if my question is too obvious, but what do you mean with "false equivocation"?

@@m.reichmann7192 It simply means that you can get cases on odd-layered puzzles which resemble a parity error and are often called a parity error, but are actually not. Think about a 5x5. You’ve solved the centers and edges, but one edge has the outer wings flipped over so they’re opposite to the middle piece. It’s essentially the same as a 4x4 edge flip parity case, but with the hidden middle layer exposed. To solve it, you use the same parity algorithm you use to flip an edge pair on a 4x4, so it’s often called parity, but it isn’t one, technically. Now think about the 4x4. When you’ve got a flipped edge on a 4x4, if you had stickers on the hidden middle layers, it might look just like the 5x5 edge, with the middle edge piece sitting backwards between the flipped outer wings. In practice, we’ll never know, of course, because the hidden middle layers of a 4x4 are fixed in position on some axis, so it doesn’t behave the same. It would be like solving a 5x5 whilst never turning the middle layers at all, which technically isn’t possible. All this just means that there technically isn’t any possible even-layer parity on an odd-layered puzzle like the Gigaminx, but you can still run into cases where you’ll need a parity algorithm, just like on 5x5/7x7 etc. Looks and behaves like parity, but isn’t.

@@archgirl Oh ok, now I understand. Thanks for your detailed explanation :D But still, that special case can not occur on a Gigaminx. You can only exchange three pieces of one kind on any puzzle. (you can combine those "three-cycles" to get bigger cycles, but all of them are made by swapping 3 pieces. Swapping two pieces is impossible.) The cubic puzzles are the big exception: on those you can combine a 3-cycle with a quarter turn, to make it look like only two pieces are swapped. (in reality, that quarter turn has still an effect on the rest of the puzzle. That is the reason, why every time you swap two edges on the 3x3, also two corners are swapped.) The cubic puzzles are special, because with each quarter turn, you move an even number of pieces: 4 edges and 4 corners. only on those puzzles, where you can move an even number of pieces, you can make it look like only two cubies are swapped. on the 4x4 and 5x5 the "flipped edge" is the result of two exchanged edge wings, like you said. in the case of the 4x4 and 5x5 the source of the parity is one deep quarter turn move. Doing this will destroy some of your centers, but the edge-parity is now easily solvable. The parity-alg is just an efficient way to fix those centers in one go, other wise you would need to solve them by hand Now to the Gigaminx: whenever you turn a side, an odd number of pieces are swapped: 5 edges, 5 corners, and a bunch of middle pieces, but 5 of each This means you cant even create something that looks like two pieces are swapped. If you have a Megaminx, you can try to exchange exactly two edges. It wont work, not even if the corners are messed up. (you can also prank your friends that way, its hilarious :P) like the normal turns, the deep turns also only swap an odd number of pieces, thus you cannot make it look like only two edge-wings are swapped and nothing else. Also on things like multi-layered pyraminxes, you cannot swap two edge wings, Because one turn always moves an odd umber of pieces. (On the pyraminx, it is also impossible to have only two edges swapped) there is still a chance, that we define "parity" in slightly different ways, so here is my understanding about it: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e96Gh66qlb6zoqs.html and the part about only swapping three pieces at once: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gptnrNtkm6rZXY0.html [sry for the self-promotion] I hope this explanation was not too long and confusing, if I made any mistakes or you still have questions, please ask : )

@@m.reichmann7192 Strange. I have a Gigaminx and distinctly remember getting that exact case on more than one occasion. Perhaps I’m simply misremembering and confusing Gigaminx solves with Master Kilominx solves.

“tHeN lIkE a MeGaMiNx?????????///????/

Can I,solve an examinx like a megaminx?

@Kuber Kid Hey dude, I sure don't care

@@plseditmynamealready6537 LMAO

*no help atm

@@_dayee2388 I think he was self promoting iirc

everyone has a unofficial WORLD RECORD!!!

lol

UwU Meffert

Best comment of the video

Lol

Ez

@@fluffy2688 wtf? I hope that is a joke, we all know the 1x1 is the hardest puzzle ever, in fact, no one ever solved it

@@farbencut yeah, its very hard to do cause of all the party's

Once I tried to solve a 1x1 for 72 hours straight and hadn't finished it

SAME

Hey dude done with your homework?

@@utkarshsharma9563 not yet

@@jacktophono1 okay then cool

@@utkarshsharma9563 see you in 4 years

Examinx*

i read "gigantamax" for a second

@@1unar_eclipse THIS IS NOT POKEMON SWORD OR SHIELD YOU HEAR ME lol

@@1unar_eclipse same lol, I’ve been playing too much Pokémon

@@Musicube. remember the old days (3 months ago) when we shiny hunted ahhhhh what a fine moment

I didn’t know this Thank you for telling me this

Together, we can stop this

But every minute in Africa,people run out of water

:(

ahahahahah I'm laughing so hard

Your CUT OFF youtube

XD

@Kuber Kid its not even more than 4 moves and you should use cstimer it has real wca scrambles

One word. PAIN

And himself money

@JUST ANOTHER CUBER you can tell he hasn't started youtube for the money and he's not still going just for money. And besides this guy has helped millions of people solve and become better at cubing he has been making content for YEARS. He deserves it, he worked hard for it

@@volcaniccubing6940 Of course! Just let the haters(Like this guy) to be aside.

@@volcaniccubing6940 absolutely agree

What about a yotaminx

@@Thedestroyer-hj8kc solve a yottaminx, he must.

Tingman made a pretty good squan tutorial!

Then the petaminx

examinx :flushed:

Yep XD

it will turn into a bad idea, when people realize that minx means a "flirty young girl"

lol

what

wow