She looks like a well used tea bag .🫖

The fact that the public has to remain calm while police officers violate our rights is truly terrifying. When our rights are being violated we should be mad as hell and fight like hell - and those we charge with defending those rights should instantly be held accountable for violating them. It's insane that anybody would think it's on the public to calm down bad policing!

She blew a gasket being a robotic slave of the government.

eloquent 🤣

Very educational video,Tks.enjoyed watching it. Good for Police and Public

😂😂

What is the law on trespass ?.

They don’t know the Law on anything, that’s not their agenda. It’s clear, it’s all about control, total control and the fu@kwits don’t even know why!. That’s how thick/ stupid they are, scum the lot of them.

@@neilgodfrey6578 Unless it’s aggravated (which this isn’t), trespass is a civil matter, which means the police have no power to remove you or interfere. They can observe and they can ask you to leave, but they cannot force you. Case law has repeatedly stipulated that aggravated trespass cannot be applied to those merely engaging in photography or filming. Aggravated trespass requires intentional obstruction of lawful activities or commission of crime. For example, a burglar commits aggravated trespass as they enter private property to commit burglary. Similarly, case law has covered the use of section 43 of the terrorism act (which police often try and use) for those filming; it’s been ruled that such filming must be covert not overt. Thus, many civil claims have been successfully made by auditors against the police for unlawful arrest under this legislation.

A lot of police could not give a flying cat shit about any laws, rules or regulations. They only care about their arrest record and quota.

bobby do you still play the piano?

That’s exactly the persona the hierarchy want to project .they think keep the bastards underfoot we do whatever we want (time and time again)when are we going to wake up to it 🥴🤔

Exactly

A law is someone else's opinion

@@auditnerd8767 section 26 and section 12 they hate used against them 😁

Lol

Your comment is spot on!

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Great point!

But you can if they invite you or lock you in the back of a van and take you onto that property !

Silly comment. You’d then be invited wouldn’t you? 🤦🏽‍♂️

Because all of them are narcissists, and thats a very dangerous animal if you happen to be normal.

It has already. Still more work to go

Nail on head

That's great the work you do. Made me laugh tho. Good on you . brilliant

It would highlight too much incompetence

The irony, he was asked to leave private property, they should have arrested him for aggravated trespass.

I’ll remember that one

😂😂😂 they hated me in the end

@@AY-Audits You're a star I was really impressed with your coolness. 🙏

@@JimJim-kh8rw cheers buddy

If you managed to pull her you could say “ ok , I’ll come quietly “ 😮

Wrong fella,,,,. That was me 🤔😎

Yep they always are filth .....until someone sets your house on fire or robs from it or when their are paedophiles in your area that need to be dealt with or firearms pointed at them or being assaulted by drunken nobheads in towns all over the UK, or when a drunk driver kills a child or any murders or terrorism ....yep they are filth until you need one and it's pricks like you and this wanker doing his "audit" who are always the first to cry for a police officer when they need one and you will need one, get a fucking life you pathetic busy bodies.

@@justinhardwick4047 I smell pork.....

Thanks! Will do!

ego ego ego

It’s the law that an officer can examine an aircraft, so your wrong as a flight can be interrupted to do so.

@@stevematthews444 they can ask you to land but only if they suspect you of committing an offence.

AY did say he'd let that slide.

@@TheSadButMadLad yeh sunglasses got left on fail from auditor

@@axiomcurbcommunity I consider sunglasses, arms in pockets or folded, not wearing the helmet or cap, and other minor transgressions of policy to be only worth mentioning as an addition when they are breaking every other rule. Here, they were just stupid.

@@TheSadButMadLad glasses wasn’t even mentioned lol 😂

Hes got every wright to film they should let him get on with it..I just goes to show the police have nothing to do .

@@nigelhudson3949 I did not say he had no right to film them. Try reading my comment again and posting an appropriate response.

Well said!

@@brianbickle7395 what's your collar number CLINT?

Good grief. It went right over your head. Once implied right to access was revoked he left. Problem sorted. (Your other examples are pathetic ... do they have unmanned, open doors) ?

@@zuluwarrior1648 Suddenly we are worried about masks Haha

There's no such thing as "police private property". Police property is an asset of the County Council which is owned by the ratepayers. There is an implied right of access to ALL public property unless prohibited by sign, gate, door or other barrier which revokes that right or a bylaw which may limit or qualify public access

@@zuluwarrior1648 true, but his argument was about implied right of access. Despite the signs and being told, he chose to ignore that. Whether he's masked or whatever he's wearing, it's private and he was asked to leave, ie no right of access.

Badge holders for cars.

Are you thinking about Banaman? His case was dropped.

Banaman's case was dropped and they had to give him all his police gear back.

The differance being that banaman never said or claimed to be a police officer, only demonstrated that wearing the uniform does not constitute impersonation. To qualify for that offence you have to show intent to deceive or perform the duties of a police officer. So yea bad idea to even jokingly say that you are police

At what cost though? Is it worth it?!

@@stevematthews444 Its about power & control. No one cares how much it costs as long as you understand who owns you.

Thankyou

AWE and Sellafield are both funded by the public. Publicly funded does not mean publicly accessible.

Don't be silly. So you would walk into an NHS A and E theatre, uninvited, just because your tax contributes to its upkeep? Your sense of entitlement is both shocking and disingenuous. Or perhaps you aren't very bright.

@@zuluwarrior1648 he doesnt have to uphold the Crown,matey.

@@zuluwarrior1648 thats racist,you are a homophobe and need cancelled.