How do you know.

@@peterm1826 They don't know any if it. Nobody even knew who the father was because she'd had sex with so many dudes at her blackmail orjees. Sharon was into the same sick sh_t Polanski and Sebring were but they fantasize and project and try to make her into a fairy tale character.

Only to the gullible public.

What in God's name did Sharon ever see in that little puke. She could've had any man on Earth.

"Poor Sharon" 🙄 Exactly how do you call that innocent? You think she didn't know about the sn_ff film, Sebring and Frykowski kidnapping, tying up, whipping and sexually assaulting the boys and filming it? She didn't know what they did to Billy Doyle on her front lawn?! She was engaging in drugs and the orgies with Victor Lownes in London before she ever met Polanski and let him film her having sex with dogs. She was participating in EVERYthing at that house. She was making blackmail tapes of her friends. She had VD so severe she couldnt wear shoes. They didnt know whose kid it was. They all said she was st00pid as a stump and acted like a mannequin. Nobody said innocent. She looked good. So does the 👹 Somehow only her life matters cuz she had a good photograher with good filters and airbrushing. The Manson girls, Squeaky, Leslie, Sandra, were idealistic, noble AND innocent. What good thing, what good altruistic intention did she ever exhibit???????

Onset of HIV/AIDS 😦

Exactly what I thought❗🤔

Not all gay people are happy about it.

No it wasn't

@@nonyabiz550. yes it was. Dave McGowan Nickolas Schreck Tom O'Neill The puzzle is solved Bugliosi, Melcher scum All these people knew each other. Druggies burning other druggies. 🤺💐

⁠@@nonyabiz550yes, Watson went there to burn frykowski, frykowsi was about to get a MDA drop off of drugs.

@@lenwelch2195 No, that's the narrative being pushed by all the Johnny Come Lately cointel podcasters.

@@lenwelch2195 They don't know that. You realize everything that was going on there and what the "victims" were up to? How can they say it had nothing to do with what Sebring and Frytowski did to those young men and somebody didn't want revenge or to stop them? That it had nothing to do with the one they killed? That there was no occult motive? That nobody they were blackmailing decided to fight back?They won't talk about any of that, but they've all acknowledged it was happening. Tom O'neill confirmed it all. Cher and Dennis Hopper have talked about what they were up to. It was all over Hollywood. A lot of it did make it into the papers back then. Then you have to consider the very sus behavior of Paul Tate. But they want to distract and focus everybody on nothing but the drugs and lead everybody out in the weeds because they're still trying to finish the psyop. None of it's organic. They just sprung up out of nowhere and all of them happen to push the same theory and lead the audience away from the infinite other possibilities. Nothing to see here, Folks, just your garden variety drug hit. Move along now. It's preposterous and so obvious what they're doing. Think for yourself

Yes, imagine letting a guest tell his story without interrupting every two seconds.

Not at all. He's most credible and so was his brother who suffered terribly from what he saw at Cielo.

Interviewer: didn’t you want to ask direct detailed questions?