JazakAllah. Please keep these lectures coming non stop InshaAllah.

Thank you.

May allaah protect and preserve you ustadh for your efforts ameen

Selamün Aleykum Greetings from the turks and blessings of Allah for you and youre ancestors

@@rssid1280 Veer ji, can you please point to the very minute of the video where I actually called the ninth Guru a "thief". Perhaps you have misconstrued the word rebel for thief. A rebel is not a thief. Rebellions can be caused by valid grievances. No historian, Sikh or otherwise, disputes the fact that the last two Sikh Gurus (and their later followers) had launched devastating rebellions against the Mughal state. The Mughals fought back with ferocity. Many Mughals as well as Sikh leaders were killed. Hundreds of thousands of innocent peasants suffered as a result. These rebellions were very bloody and often constituted destruction and pillaging. Burning and pillaging was used as a weapon of war, as was the case with most conflicts at the time. Banda Singh had followed the same method. This only escalated the decline of the Mughal Empire and the consequence was the rise of the East India Company. Aurangzeb did not kill anyone personally, his governors and soldiers did. He probably didn't even know what was going on in the Punjab, as he was too busy fighting wars in the south. Please do read his history more carefully. As for the sources, I strongly recommend two sources for you to understand the dynamics of the time: - The Darbar of the Sikh Gurus by Louis E. Fenech. - When Sparrows Became Hawks by Purnima Dhavan. Both of these works will give you enough insight into the Sikh sources and the activities of the gurus. There is no offense intended towards the gurus in this lecture. This was a plain telling of history as I understand it. You are very welcome to disagree with me. Best wishes and Rabb Raakha... :)

Like sladeen had relationship with Richard Aurangzeb had too with chatrapati.

❤️

Indeed he was.

Even you are amazing ALHAMDULILA

regarding Sahaba ikram , you can watch 'Lives of the Sahaba' series by Shaykh Yasir Qadhi

Goru

Extremely mytical and extremely exaggerated that is what your books and stories are there is no other parallel history to verify your fairytales. All other consecutive histories at the time tell us otherwise. Your books are full of looted Sufi poetry which the muslims them self dont take as sacred. There were over a million Sufi "saints" around the muslim word we dont take them as anymore thenngood humans at most.

India was never united as one entity. It happened during the Mughal period and then the British united it. Please look more carefully at our history.

@@MrAdnanRashid what do you have to say about the Maurya empire then. And even later there were many overlaying cultures and traditions in the Indian society but the underlying fabric of the Sanatan dharma was one and the same.

@@MrAdnanRashid you keep saying united... with all due respect it appears it was more of an expansion. Not the same thing by any means.

India is like a continent at that time .

Shree ...Eaton lists 80 incidents and each of these incidents involved destroying scores of temples ...Check it out

@@dharmsingh8055 Does he also record the Hindu temples desecrated by other Hindu kings in pre Islamic India?

Why do hindus always talk about Pakistan? He listed his sources from western academics anyways

Facts are facts, Pakistani or Indian....And Adnan has a background in history from a University in the UK.

Ur history is highly influenced by hindu minded writers. Adnan is quoting muslim sources. Google a book called sikh history from persian sources. U will easily find the pdf

B M what nonsense

Google book" sikh history from persian sources". U will easily find pdf to download. Its edited by js grewal and irfan habib

Total nonsense. Search Google and they will so much kindness of Islam too .

Well thats exactly what you learn from heresay and whatsapp university. Kudos to you. Little knowledge does make one numbskull :)

I think we have to hear from both sources 🤷‍♂️

@@emrehassan2308 john f. Richards and Audrey T? With all due respect, though they may be historians, my point still stands. I am certain there is historical literature out there that absolutely demonizes islamic invaders like the mughuls and those before them. Look at the arab islamic invasion in north africa. The narrative by non muslim africans is extemely negative towards muslims as I imagine would be the narrative palestinians have of Israelis. Listening to adnan speak on history of another nation that had been conqueref by islamic empires is silly because he will find ways to dismiss or justify atrocities by islamic empires. Islamic apologists and uneducated muslims love his talks because adnan paints islam and many muslims (as controversial as they may be) as being much better and peaceful then depicted. In india, one of the more talked about and generally seen as more inclusive as a mughul was J.M. Akbar. And adnan, a pakistani islamic supramicist, goes on the say that Akbar was not even muslim. I dont get it, so aruengzab was the only true pious muslim therefore adnan must change the narrative of how evil may have been ? But oh "akbar wasnt even muslim so we as muslims can dismiss anything he did as it wasnt islamic"

@@seekmoreof8204 hey do you have sources to back your claim regarding "non Muslim north african" sentiments towards the Islamic or umayyad expansion in North Africa?

Look at his debates against Shias in Hyde Park London. He finishes them. Shias dont stand a chance when it comes to debates with Sunnis.

Please provide undisputed evidence for everything you mentioned then we can have an academic discussion. Otherwise everything you mentioned is not true.

2 months have passed Kapoor saab you must be digging deep for the evidence keep digging I dont believe you will ever find it

Hindu kings beheaded Buddhists and implemented caste system

@Zayed Haroon 1 whole year now

12 months passed now. Still not ready?