👍😎

🙏🙏

Agree partially, but do you not feel from a value point of view Cayenne is better? With the Macan aging I cant help but feel its expensive for an older tech car??

@@Montcoffer what do u mean?

😎

=)

is it floaty over pumbs or stiff ?

@@user-ci1yn8or2h stable. Not floaty not bumpy.

thanks my friend =)

👌😉

Yes, €115k for a reclothed, sporty Audi Q5 is a bit nuts.

LoL yes.... Its just ugly and looks cheap. And thats why i wont buy it... Not that i dont have the money 🙄

I’m sure there’s an expensive option to get it painted body color.

That could be

😅 what a list!

🤔

Cheers 🙏

Middle class??? Please explain.

@@wisejustice7742Macan is middle class level SUV, not big, not little, not fake Cross over, expecially in US market. The right size for a sporty SUV.

@@elios.503 I am strongly considering a GV70 Genesis rather that this. I'm guessing you are not a fan. 0-60mph in 4.9 seconds. 391 torque. $65,000 full options in USA. 10 year warranty, 3 year maintenance service paid for.

You can eliminate all the plastic with options so idk about that objection

way to go !

If you dont need the rear space of the Cayenne, the Macan GTS is really a great car! Drives much more agile than the Cayenne... Facelift of Cayenne has been postponed to 2023 by the way.

No gear change is possible in this version of Macan only paddle shifters

@@typiod88 Thanks! Such a bad news anyway...

Keyless Entry is an option.

@@BF1GUN I am building my Porsche in USA and don’t see that option in the S or the GTS? I have seen several reviews and some say they come with keyless entry and some say they come without so I am very confused. If you can please clarify?

@@tthi9 depends on which market

In Australia keyless entry standard

Damn. I wish Porsche did that too.

😂👌

Tbh the space feel depends of the color ;)

maybe its the same engine

Cheers m8!

😁

Yes it has gotten old.

There is no Audi version of this car. The Macan shared a platform with the Q5 but Porsche engineers changed 85% of the vehicle.

Indeed

30k more and still missing lots of options

I was grappling with this. But my local Porsche dealer will sell for straight MSRP with no markup. My BMW dealership will not go less than MSRP. So the delta between the two was $10k. I went with the GTS. The M3 was awesome, but it doesn’t drive as comfortable as the GTS and it won’t depreciate as much in value. They’re both great cars.

Disagree. Maybe just this spec.

The GTS isn't 2L.

But this thing is a 2.9L V6 though, so I don't know what you're on about

@@SimonDrysdale 02:28 2,9 l V6 440 hp engine

@@zeerevs Yeah, 2.9 is not really the same as 2L though is it?

Thanks for caring 👍👍

Keeping speed limit while others exceed it and risk losing their license is not called getting smoked

@@autogefuehl Fair enough, though it looked like you were accelerating lol.

X3m doesn’t handle as well

@@981_pdk3 till you drive one, thats an assumption 🤷🏽‍♂️

@@supremeetnel7707 mate I have already seen how they handle and they are very twitchy

Confirming the macan gts is vastly superior to the x3m.

Some people dont like the idea of being surrounded by the skin of dead animals... I personally dont like the sounds and feeling of leather seats , also the fact that it gets really cold in the winter and hot i the summer 😑 Ps : im a sucker for porsches tartan seats 😅

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. Please tune in to what the animal leather industry tried to do here with our channel: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pLaPdtl90ceqnH0.html In general, depending on the animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat would be the reason no.1 in other cases, the hide remains one of the most profitable body parts. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you accept it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and destroys the environment, you make them more profitable. Also, if you turn the argument around "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize how biased the argument is. After all, would you care for which exact body part you would be murdered? Or imagine someone robs you on the street and beats you to death - would it matter to you if it was for your Smartphone or for your purse? The animal agriculture industry occupies 2/3 of all farm land on this planet which cannot be used for direct human nutrition then. That is extremely inefficient. The no.1 cause for deforestation is the animal industry. It is also one of the biggest contributor to climate change. The amount of land, resources, energy and water being used is beyond imagination. If you are interested in how the animals are being treated and transported in the global leather industry, watch this footage: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qtGadqSe1pfDaHk.html Note that the footage is genuine and was recorded by a highly decorated investigative journalist in Germany I know myself personally. For the alternative, you can either use artificial fabrics which can be made from recyclables (we have already shown a lot of vehicles that use great fabric seats from PET-bottles etc.) or more and more also from plant-based materials (like Pinatex). And even if you would create a seat completely with petroleum without a recycling share, the amount of oil being used for that is nothing in comparing just to once fueling up your car. In practical reasons, fabric or microfibre seats are just more useful. You do not sweat in summer and it is not cold in winter. And if you want the slick look or something to wipe clean easier, that is possible with animal free leatherette. And there are also new leatherette materials available which are superior in every aspect: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q59kjLt7nJi5hHU.html Using animal skin on seats is a major issue of animal rights, human rights - and after all it is just common sense what is better both for the environment and just more practical and more luxurious for the customer. We cannot change what we have bought in the past (that also counts for ourselves of course!), but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.

And Microfiber leads to Microplastic .... also the vegan alternatives have sometimes severe disadvantages. Genetically engineered soy, avocados that fly around the world, etc. It's very difficult for consumers to assess the total impact of a product on the entire environment (climate, water, animals, people). In the end, with a rapidly growing population, now above 7 billion, the global economy simply cannot be sustainable. As a side note, according to a friend that works at BMW, the most expensive leather available as an exclusive custom trim, is made from whale penis. Probably not merely a side product?

Microfibre from 100 % recyclables - or from natural materials. All already there or coming. Have u checked this? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q59kjLt7nJi5hHU.html

Leather is the way to go.

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. As a start, please tune in to what the animal leather industry tried to do here with our channel: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pLaPdtl90ceqnH0.html In general, depending on the animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat would be the reason no.1 in other cases, the hide remains one of the most profitable body parts. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you accept it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and destroys the environment, you make them more profitable. Also, if you turn the argument around "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize how biased the argument is. After all, would you care for which body part you would murdered? Or imagine someone robs you on the street and beats you to death - would it matter to you if it was for your Smartphone or for your purse? The animal agriculture industry occupies 2/3 of all farm land on this planet which cannot be used for direct human nutrition then. That is extremely inefficient. The no.1 cause for deforestation is the animal industry. It is also one of the biggest contributor to climate change. The amount of land, resources, energy and water being used is beyond imagination. If you are interested in how the animals are being treated and transported in the global leather industry, watch this footage: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qtGadqSe1pfDaHk.html Note that the footage is genuine and was recorded by a highly decorated investigative journalist in Germany I know myself personally. For the alternative, you can either use artificial fabrics which can be made from recyclables (we have already shown a lot of vehicles that use great fabric seats from PET-bottles etc.) or more and more also from plant-based materials (like Pinatex). And even if you would create a seat completely with petroleum without a recycling share, the amount of oil being used for that is nothing in comparing just to once fueling up your car. In practical reasons, fabric or microfibre seats are just more useful. You do not sweat in summer and it is not cold in winter. And there are also new leatherette materials available which are superior in every aspect: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q59kjLt7nJi5hHU.html Using animal skin on seats is a major issue of animal rights, human rights - and after all just of common sense what is better both for the environment and just more practical and more luxurious for the customer. We cannot change what we have bought in the past (that also counts for ourselves of course!), but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.