Dylan Thompson one program can be run in 1000s of machines, and making them can be automated too. Designing and programming doesn't require too many guys. A few guys can do it. Force example one good radiology software can replace all the radiologists in the world. Software can be "copied and pasted" and is no here near as expensive or time-consuming as training a radiologist. And this copied program will have the same "experience" and effectiveness as the original one unlike a newly trained radiologist.

MilitantPotato You are absolutely right. Future jobs will require more brain power, and need far less in positions. We see this right now with retail dying. 20 retail shops will close down and we'll get one warehouse for something like Amazon. That will then only require a few people and more and more robots.

@@Megadeth4242 you should look up generative design. It will take less people to engineer things

Yes they are all talking about how that hand cutter will not have to do his job because of the automatisation and how it is much better for a machine do do his job because its safer and in that regards it is going to be better... but what is that guy (hand cutter) going to do then,what is his next ocupation,how is he gonna make money?I fear that in the future there will be a lot of unemployed people and that will lead to more crime and big economic problems because the automatisation is moving so fast it is destroying a lot more jobs than it is creating.this video hasnt answered the question of how are we gonna avoid this

@@teosenecic3141 as jobs are replaced by machines, that means productivity per capita will go up massively. This causes wages to rise in the jobs that are still available which causes more demand for goods, causing more jobs for those that lost their job. Those textile workers eventually got a much better standard of living than they would have if they kept their productivity and therefore wages low, and imagaine how much clothes would cost if they had frozen the automation of textiles there.

That’s why we need Andrew Yang in office, he gets it and has solutions #Yang2020

Andrew Yang will advance our economy and society forward

John Gonzalez not so fast John we still have to destroy the robots first

@@jobokidd UBI is supposed to happen through heavy taxation, which will lose sense since companies won't be needing society for work (and therefore will not need to contribute to it through taxes) Automation will make companies more independent, no intertwined with society

But who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless ? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal. @@gabrielflaubert5881

Maybe we'll get lucky and get a real cyberpunk dystopia with their heads frying in their luxury bullet train cars.

Lol best comment

epSos.de best comment so far, but don’t generalize, there are good guys and bad guys

They can't teach machine that much greed.

probably they will. A deep learning AI would be a much much better minister.

That's why they should tell us the real composition of theses tools,because if you really are helping me then show us how really the softwares are working don't keep it hidden for so long !!! We wanna advance so please don't hold us and don't keep secrets from us,and that is a principe that people all over the world should be adopting,else,you know we're on the wrong path

What I don’t understand is this: if business gets rid of workers, who consumes the output? The few robot owners can’t possibly consume enough to run an advanced economy.

@@suzieBirdoSum009 That is still a longterm problem for the business owners. For the business owners themselves if they don't automate then they will lose their business as their competition automates and offers lower prices. It's a race to the end with nobody winning.

@@brantkim well one this is certain we are heading toward a world with basic income otherwise you will have a lot of good for nothing people who got nothing to do so their mind will wonder toward bad stuff , and frustration toward government , society which made them worthless in that highly automated world

If a buisness gets rid of 95% of employees and increases their productivity, it means higher profit or lower cost. Those employees would be able to afford more goods which will create a higher demand for more goods. Eventually those jobs will be created again due to higher demand and productivity and they will have much higher wages due to increased automation. What people fail to realise is that people spend their money on goods and services and that creates more jobs. More automation=higher productivity=higher standard of living=More demand=More jobs. Yes, there will be slightly higher unemployment in the meantime but since the start of history, and especially the last 100 or so years this cycle has been going on and, while it faces resistance along the way it always wins. If we didn't have this cycle then all those hunter gatherer jobs, plowing jobs, knitting jobs, weaving jobs and factory jobs that have been replaced by innovation would still be here, be dangerous and have extremely low wages in comparison to what we see today.

This is why Andrew Yang wanted to get basic income in position, for the near future ....

So, we make another machine to decompress it. What's your point?

ja687 They are not going to do that. Business is not about, in most cases saving something, it's about making as much money with as least effort ad possible. As a tradesman I can tell you this is not going to happen without passing it off to the client at the highest price possible.

A quick example, what happens to all the wildlife living in the trees? Are they hand carried to the ground? Nope. Not a tree hugger but he definatly has a point to consider.

Rick makes games Ai and robotics will probably bring small mobile machines more similar to a human logger than a giant machine

Apemanwithcalculator What's wrong with using the word tree hugger? It describes a group and a set parameters of principals for that culture. Holy shit are people triggered over anything nowadays...

look into venus project and how technology will actually help us free from mundane work. new economic system is needed to work with changes coming

I disagree, when did we engineers left you guys behind? You can search all over the inernet to learn what we do and also do it.

​@@chaoticlife311Why should we? Some of us prefer different kinds of work, for some working in a supermarket is enough for them, from leavin school till retirement. Why should they have that opportunity taken away in countries that claim to be based on liberty? AI and robots are being forced upon us, any kind of criticism is met with the learn to code line. Meaning in a bid to make it so humans don't have to do the jobs they don't like...and some jobs people do like...a few will benefit from profits due to not paying staff, while the majority will remain miserable and lacking in purpose, while also making their lives harder to live because the only answer people have to the "what happens to humans if their jobs are taken" is universal basic income... meaning the majority of a countries population would be totally reliant on the state to live, meaning the state could easily force you to submit to their wishes...on force of your uni being stopped. Lastly why are zoos banning people from using their phones near primates because people were showing them videos ect, because technology is bad for primates health and wellbeing...yet the most intelligent of all primates, us, are supp to just accept said technology and by the idea it isn't harming us. It can't be harmful to primates but not us. Its not possible. We're the same species. To prove the point one zoo had you ger chimpanzee who was getting addicted to watching videos peop would show him on their phones through the glass, his attention was so absorbed by the phones and videos that he didn't see nor hear a larger chimpanzee approaching him to attack him. That's no different to human who are so engrossed in their phones they cross roads without looking and don't have cars coming at them, then they get run over. So again why is technology bad for our primate cousins but not us? Please don't say we're evolved enough to use it, we're not.

Exactly. And who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.

That sounds beautiful!

#YangGang He is the only one talking about solutions to massive job automation

Ah yes, a fellow cultured yang ganger... salutations brother

It sounds like Communism 😂

@@huyifan83 I mean not communism per se but more of distribution of wealth

Young people are f*cked. I have 15 years to work to get my pension. I will be saved in the last moments. The future is gloomy. Glad I don't have children., I made the right choice.

Scout Dog It that or the majority revolt and start destroying the robots to send a messege. Should they go ignored, they will start attacking the humans making the robots.

UBI = Universal Basic Income by taxing the automation involving

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.

Kind of how I see it going.

So restrict technological development to maintain the capitalist status quo?

Exactly

Have you read the World Set Free by H.G. Wells his solution is a mix of your option 2 and 3 and seems like a pretty decent solution

i sense the third option is likely to happen

Steal, sale drugs, hacking, clone credit cards, creating prostitution networks - you name it, young people with no choice will do it. Crime will explode in the near future if not already. And states can't put everyone in jails. So, let's see what happens.

Finance is getting automated really soon. Tech will self-improve eventually. 3rd option may be the best lol

@@andresalizaga1 What's the difference between "self-improving" tech and life?

@@TheVirIngens real AI will eventually self-improve, eliminating the need for AI engineering

@@andresalizaga1 Queue robots who are so far beyond our and their predecessors understanding that most if not all jobs are replacable. Guess we can pull a star trek at that point in our history maybe? If we have the natural resources atleast.

...Or the oldest sector in Humanity's history: PROSTITUTION. :)

Eddie N, some times it's best to look at the past.

Eddie N Should read: Don't be the government that refuses to look to at the future. Big changes are coming, and we will probably need some serious intervention.

Look at the future, stop it before it happens, got it Don't and you will be as useful as horses in a car world with similar life expectation. Hey, can you make glue out of humans ?

Don't be the guy who refuses to change, I think would be the most apt.

@Bess cool Yes we don't learn from the past. We should be doing great things for humanity and the worlds existence. Instead we will make a buck on selling anything whether its bad for man or environment. Technology got ahead of its self and we have extinguished our resources on earth, plants, and animal life. Technology has left more people without a job and starving. They are killing off the little people and only the few rich will survive. In the end they will see what their wickedness has brought them.

Eventually? They already do rule the world.

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.

You have to pay to purchase/build a robot though. The question is when is it cheaper. That's the main reason we don't see humanoid robots doing all sorts of jobs. The technology to do it is starting to develop, but it is still cheaper in a lot of cases to use human workers. You have to pay a wage but you have few upfront costs.

robots don't get wages. humans get weekly wages that is drain. @@mattizzle81

We can't all be AC maintenance engineers. That's the problem. What do you do with people who aren't, to put it bluntly, smart enough or suited to such work? Are they just supposed to accept thisassive change they didn't bit9e for? That was forced upon them by rich people who want AI and more automation so they don't have to pay wages....which undermines the idea of universal basic income. If they're going to pay people why not pay them to work when work is good for people's mental well being? Those in positions of power have become obsessed with making life easier... regardless of the long term effects it will have on humans. What happens is we have universal basic income? Will we end up living under tyrants and dictators who can shut off you income with the snap of a finger because you criticised the government? Given such practices are already used on social media it's no a leap to suggest this.

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.@@libertasdemocratiam887

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.

...until they get evicted for non-payment of rent.

safer in a tent....like in Orange County California.....

i see the future and its not pretty. we will be living in cardboard boxes on the street while the capitalists will become trillionaires

thats like saying criminals are safer in prison rather than outside

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.@@steverothmans5908

The costs of the inefficiencies have been largely pushed over onto central government and individual workers in the form of increased income supports and training costs in the lifetime of the average worker. College fees, dole and relocation and longer commutes are the new normal. Also needed are increased family income supplements, increased social housing and healthcare costs all being absorbed by government in all its levels. Then there comes the increased costs of security and policing and insurance for the unrest caused by over rapid change of pace in job structures etc.

Like governments do with slot machines there will probably be a tax on robots, AI and servers and maybe even a tax on internet connections and data usage. The EU already have plans to tax internet traffic in order to cover policing, cyber security and infrastructural costs of such technology in the future. If this sounds fanciful it already happens with bedroom taxes and commercial rates and land taxes for existing sectors in the leisure industries. Many middle european nations already have extensive road tolling to collect revenue for road upkeep from foreign users who would otherwise get to use the roads for free. It seems likely that large corporations will have to bear some of the costs of the impacts of sudden jobs losses with no replacements going forward. This will be painful and difficult to do.

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.@@jgdooley2003

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.

@@dhanyrafael That's the core of the issue. Labor for the sake of labor is a self defeating endeavor.

Medicine can never be automated. Every person is different. It’s not something that can be automated...

i did the math once. THeres a certain amount of land needed to farm to create enough food for the average person. Right now, all things being equal, if the population multiplies 5x, then we'll be in trouble. BUt by then, we will probably also have some advanced in technology that allow us to farm the space more efficiently. One thing you can do is build a building and have many floors of plants. Only thing there is then you need to use electricity for lights.. which may wind up not really being feasible. But maybe we'll figure it out. or grow plants in space. Theres lots of space in space. also im not sure if i did the math explicitly on "farmable land" or on all land. Cause yeah theres places like mountains deserts tundras etc where its harder to farm. But also in a cold place, you no longer would need to use as much electricity cooling an indoor operation lit by lights that produce a lot of heat. And in the desert theres lots of sun and it doesnt get cold so you dont have to worrying about heating (but yeah no nutrients in the soil, but there ARE some videos on youtube talking about people having figured out how to make desert land in to fertile land)

@@ChocolateMilkyYummy Already in London, due to available space underground in disused railway tunnels, warehouses and the like and due to cheap lighting from LED lights, many people are starting vertical hydroponic farming of expensive salad greens and vegetables for the restaurant trade. Transport of such goods from far off lands is expensive and the items themselves are expensive. Many chefs now grow their own herbs and greens on site in roof top gardens, green houses etc. in urban locations to ensure freshness and ready availability at all times.

By "Vet," do you mean veteran? or veterinarian? If veteran, then I suppose it's only possible after a short stint, because robots will be soldiers (drones), as well.

Software can now performe Discovery which is most of what attorneys do now.

And what happens when the military uses robots instead of humans? What happens when someone creates a machine learning pod that does surgeries with 99% accuracy? What happens when unemployment rises as there becomes too many people and not even jobs that you can thrive from?

Exactly. Who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.@@XxBloodSteamxX

Not for the capitalist, he'd still have to pay wages

We can't all become ENGINEERS or PROGRAMMERS - most of us have such a limited brain with low IQ, nature is not giving. Few people have a "math brain" to access such high jobs. I don't have a "math brain". I tried to learn Java, Python, C++ - my brain can't handle the abstract notions. It's overwhelmed and enters a phase of "overvoltage and burn". And I have an university education, but in journalism and psychology./ Imagine people with just 8 classes or even worse than that. Try to reconvert them professionally. It's impossible. And they are billions and they need to eat to survive. So crime will explode if not already. And states can't put all people in prisons. The future is gloomy for the masses. And the rich elite won't need people anymore. The abyss between rich and poor will become absolute.

Employees push themselves out of the economy by refusing to update their skills. As few as 15 credit hours at a State community college, State college, or State University can get them LIFETIME access to the Student Placement Office, where more and more employers place exclusive job listings because they want to avoid job applicants who have never stepped foot on a college campus.

There are a lot of drones like that developing, but someone needs to pay for them. And replanting doesn't pay nearly as good as cutting shit down.

another idea is just scattering seeds from a helicopter.

He has noticed the problem and brought it on the table, but I don't think he's solution is realistic. It's more like a Utopia. I mean think about it, do you contribute $1000 or more to Amazon, Google etc. every month? If not, how can you get $1000 free money comming from nowhere? Who would like to pay for it?

UBI and Skills retraining if you have a safety net wont be that hard. As for the money issue worst case scenario they add more liquidity (print money) and sell more bonds (gov. debt) to finance UBI which after a while will pay for itself. If you pump a community of 50k people with 50M USD every month growth will naturally follow. It basically a stimulus on a bigger scale. P.S I am an MBA (Economics Major) so those are real numbers from our studies.

@@stevestavri321 I'm actually from a socialist country and I can tell you that from my personal experince, that kind of a system doesn't work quite well, yet. You cannot always print money because the CPI will become uncontrollable, there need to be a balance. You earn moeny because you added value accordingly to the society. If there are too many people getting more money than their contribution, then the country will keep losing competitiveness and fortune. The government doesn't even have enough money to give to the homeless people, not to say to the entire population. I mean $100 is more realistic but not $1000. His logic is highly based on his assumptions, which is he belives that by giving people money they will contribute more in the country. But there's no guarantees that it will work. If it doens't, ramifications will be disastrous. He has a good vision though, I guess it will be more feasible maybe 30 years later, when most of our current jobs are replaced by AI. It still sounds a bit like Communism though. Put ideology bias aside, maybe Communism isn't a bad idea at all, but was born in an inappropriate time.

@@huyifan83 The president can't decide everything alone. If Yang's ideas are too utopian, congress will say so.

@@huyifan83 That's a war on big techs, and actually quite a few CEO are happy with this ideas unusually. If you're think about it, they're mining our data for free! Our data has so much values and they take all the benefits. And you can call this idea socialism or whatever, the label you put on is not important, but we're not talking about Mao's, Stalin's regime. If you want to talk about socialism, why don't you also look at Scandinavian countries where the State own everything, also Alaska, or even Macao in your country ? Those cases also needed to be discussed. (but i don't think left wing economic policy would work if the country is not rich enough). People can accept free health care, infrastructure in the city that you don't pay for, but when this free thing is money, they can't accept the idea. We need to know that you can't survive on 1000/month, it's just a safety net but it's more fluid than existing welfare.

But who will buy the products of those companies if 70% of the population will be jobless? I earn only 350$ per month and I don't buy many things, so less profit for companies. Imagine 70% of the population without those 350$ to start with. Most of us will start stealing, killing, etc. Society plunges into anarchy. We have to eat and prison doesn't seem such a bad thing in nordic countries for examples where you can even use a Playstation. So going to prison willingly is a choice I am thinking about. Giving away my freedom for food and shelter. It's a good deal.

@My Nameis japan 🗾 population decreasing what

Robots must take jobs Immediately I was starting to wonder if you had retired.

Exactly!