not bad Graphics are useless if the Game itself are shit^^

I agree!

I agree

Most definitely !

Yeah

Its what they should've done in the beginning

True that it’s like their signature.

Tbf, it would be unwise for them to change their formula on such a big IP like Avatar.

Thats why im waiting until this game is under 30$ maybe 20$

this look's different and amazing stop complaining

@@TzsNatureWithJameelFarkey word LOOKS, but it is not

the musics in these games are so cool ! i cant wait to listen to the full soundtrack

@@baguettebestfood1971I know!!! The main game theme even has hints of the movie theme too. I can’t wait for the 8th

Shit got me emotional lol damn

Lol idk bout emotional but the music was nice

But still had third person

@@BeSleight9 yeah but this close fr

Had a game on ps3 and that’s third person

@rootlessbwoy6141 I know that but it don't look good like this one

Yeah nature is beautiful but technology is needed as well

@@Viilap yeah

​@@Viilapnot really

@@Viilapit’s not a necessity clearly

Stop crying. Go play Century of ashes.

​@@nightstepstation7189Yeah explain how a small developer team made better flying mechanics and better looking dragons with better movements and animations than a multi billion dollar company

​@nightstepstation7189 we can cry all we want its our money we spend on it this is a multi billion dollar company. Stop settling.

tbf the ikrans are not necessarily "heavy". They are incredibly nimble creatures

Agreed. Clearing territory to obtain the resources that could be the solution to humanities power crisis could be a good story line. The planet is rich with resources for humans to use, and possibly fix many issues plaguing humanity.

@@natebit8130 colonizer mindset

@@plaguedsystem3233 Glory to the God Emperor of Mankind!

@@plaguedsystem3233 waaa

I bet there'll be such option as DLC

My exact thoughts 😂

i think it’s the flying that’s throwing me off, but i think the world is gonna be beautiful and p fun to explore let’s hope lol

the skybox is bland and doesnt reflect well down on the trees. hence the disconnected look. I also thought the graphics esp when flying, look like from 2016. on foot it seems good. Also thanks to ubisoft's janky animations. There seems to be a lack of global illumination from the skybox. seems like they wanted to look like Horizon Forbidden West and stopped developing midway.

graphics esp when flying look like a significant downgrade. Maybe its the lighting but it looks like a 2016 game.

but the gameplay is horrible^^

You can but I don’t think you can have a black one

@@crazylazylee892 sad, but I don't think a black ikran would look good in any case.

No one stopping you

@@jayjr I was just saying. I don't care what people say. I'm trying it for my own experience

quote

Please what do you mean by BGM?

⁠@@idehenebenezer802background music

As usual. Ubi never slouches on their OSTs

This looks a cut above the rest of their stuff, but I'll reserve judgement until it's out.

there are outposts even in this game so shit :D

Ever hear of patch updates from developers?

@@TheChubbyGhost I guess you’re okay with developers setting the bar low on launch

ever heard of quality? Guess not.@@TheChubbyGhost

Same here, bro. It killed my interest in the game.

It's not going to have third person?

cope

@MustardSkaven Unfortunately not and i hate FP games with a passion.

@@MustardSkaven no, man 😞 such a bummer.

its going to be released on pc, PS5, and Xbox series S/X

It hasn’t come out yet broddie

@@Jared_ehn How does he play then?

Cool?

​@@strikerbowls791don't comment then...

better you still dont know the game^^

I'm ok with that. I love Farcry. 🥰

SPECSAVERS 🤓

Nope

Who knows, maybe if this version sales a lot of copies, then they update it with an vr update for about 30 €

😂😂😂😂

I don't like Far Cry. I hate the Ubi formula in general but I am interested in this game since its Avatar.

A gameplay more like horizon zero dawn would have been more fitting

@@lm4585 That’s fair you like what you like I guess, fair to say Ubisoft has made some terrible games in the past but they did create in my opinion one of the best story’s in the gaming industry and that’s assassins creed I am a die hard fan of assassins creed although the past few games have been terrible and a disappointment knowing the potential that Ubisoft has but at the end of it all the developers are one great game away from gaining back fans and trust

@@Oznerol1234 Buddy absolutely I’m not denying that other developers and engines could have done things differently and definitely improved on a lot for this game but it falls back to the same stuff guerrilla game correct me if I’m wrong are owned by Sony and if they made avatar with their engine then it would be a PS5 exclusive which would suck

Third person is not important **to you** but it is to some people. First person is more immersive *to you** but it is NOT to some people. The peripheral view of third feels more correct to the square window you get in first. First person here also loses a sense of scale. This just seems like a regular size human with blue hands.

The open world concept is cool but after a few minutes of exploring it will get boring no?

@@TannerMcCoyOfficial”no?” Are you asking someone to validate what you said? What’s the point of saying it? No feelings of your own

@@TheTruth-13 I’m confused by your reply.

@@TannerMcCoyOfficial exploring looks mid gameplay seems slow this would've been fun if it was a bit more fast paced

Parkour and all would suit avatars theme too (imo)

I love and always prefer third person games but I can understand the decision because it is just more immersive and you see the beautifull open world you just cant see your character.

Yeah it's a lot more immersive than 3rd person perspective, for sure.

Not really but ok

​@Hitman88889 it looks just like far cry

@@natecaballero1687in what way last time ik you can’t fly a animal on far cry

@@yoSevZmaybe not an animal but you do get choppers... just another means of travel but in a new form

You ain't wrong. It really is farcry but just blue. Bluecry

SPECSAVERS 🤓

@Bacon-n-Eggs look at the movement, its literally far cry bro.

Play the game trough, make a judgement, start a comparison. Not the other way round. And if I remember correctly, CP 2077 was a COMPLETE mess on its release date

I googled it it takes around 40-45 hours to comete the story so I dont know why your hating on the game before it even came out....

@@korosibotond4574 40 hours for 100%, 10 hours just for story :)

⁠@@korosibotond4574There was some misinformation spreading about the game recently. Turns out the “10-15 hours to beat it” was actually the Avatar game released back in 2009. Besides, it should be pretty common sense anyway that Ubisoft games take awhile to finish.

​​​@@TheCeraizationwhere do you get your informations from? Do you have a link? Or is it confirmed? Or just a rumor youve heard? This would be pretty bad. 10 hours for a 100 euro game. I just wanted to buy this game but now Im not sure anymore

​@@TheCeraization from what I can see the people say its 10 - 15 hours for story and up 40 h when making side missions etc. this is not confirmed. But still 10 hours main story is nothing for me. Im pretty pissed right now 😣

Ur joking right?

?

Don't take your case for a generality

blame Cameron, avatar 2 was ass

@@geert574 being a biologist, it wasnt, and the money behind and profit pufff, can you really call that an ass?

lol when Baldur’s Gate 3 exists?? No chance

​@@cannibalbunnyfck baldurs gay

It may be in contention for 2024 since they’ve already announced this year’s nominees.

I hope Spiderman 2 wins

@@Salute503 that would be a tough one but it’s not beautiful at night like that scene in the first Avatar movie

I'm gonna buy, cuz it has first person. 👍

This formula perfectly suits avatar tho

Then don't play it. It's cool to dog on Ubisoft these days but while yall are complaining and whining about every lil thing I'm having fun

Bingo.

​@@johnmcfall5723Well that is you. He has a right to his opinion.

The difference is that Xbox will have worse graphics than PC. You could probably play 4k60 on all low on a 30 series. Also, there's no need to play 4k unless you have a rather large screen, I'd say over 30 inches, and at that point you wouldn't be sitting right in front of it so lower settings won't be as noticeable. All in all, if you're not a casual gamer you should get a PC, if you are a casual gamer than you should get an Xbox. It's really as easy as that

RTX3070 adm Ryzen 9 3900 64GB ram here, and dont give a shit about k4, just relax and play they game

@@sisenaoyagi8027 //dont give a shit about k4// That's 4K, not K4. I don't care either. My point was for those who DO care, they're spending too much when they can have amazing resolution and FPS for a fraction of the cost. In my book, that's called stupid!

@@Shovker27 YOU SAY, ''The difference is that Xbox will have worse graphics than PC.'' ME: Consoles have reached a point of such gorgeous visuals now, that whatever ''difference'' you think there is, is meaningless. And PC gamers are spending a fortune to obtain it. That's a sign of stupidity! YOU SAY, ''You could probably play 4k60 on all low on a 30 series.'' ME: An RTX 4080 is hardly ''low end''! And that's the recommended requirement for Avatar. And the MSRP is $1200. Again, that's just for a GPU. Now you need all the other stuff for your rig. Thousands just to say, ''look at my 4K''! Can we say...STUPID? YOU SAY, ''Also, there's no need to play 4k unless you have a rather large screen, I'd say over 30 inches'' ME: Strawman argument. My comment was not about what YOU personally feel is a need. It was aimed at PC gamers who WANT 4K. Pay attention when you read comments. What YOU want is irrelevant. BTW...my flat screen is 65''! YOU SAY, ''and at that point you wouldn't be sitting right in front of it so lower settings won't be as noticeable.'' ME: So now you know where everyone in the entire world sits, in relation to their TV. How do you see inside billions of homes at once? BTW...I sit close to my 65''. YOU SAY, ''All in all, if you're not a casual gamer you should get a PC, if you are a casual gamer than you should get an Xbox. It's really as easy as that'' ME: I am a hardcore gamer. And I got XSX because I get amazing visuals, smooth FPS and a 4K movie player all for $500. Spending thousands on a gaming rig is STUPID. It's really as simple as THAT!

no