I love the process you use of making 3d elements in the computer to come up with a composition and then painting it in the real world. I also can't tell you how much I wish I could just paint all day and see what I could come up with, given time to focus on my own work. You are gifted and blessed.

WOW!!! I love her work, and I really enjoyed this episode. =)

great work she does!

Fabulous. Go Avery Go!

this is fantastic, big ups from sacramento

This is well made, beautiful

You make awesome art awesome episode. To Avery

She is one of my Idol.

these are amazing

Hands born to make fine art.

Wow this was so inspiring 😍😍😍

Wow somebody is actually doing something original ,love the form and solidity ,the colour and space need to be upped ,fantastic paintings .

I love solitude too, good message

Great work of art originality nyc talent keep making art💜🎨👏🏻

Oh my god I really like her!

Can you show us more of her work and process? Very unique work.

Lost in her work, awesome - skies the limit

How did she get into Hauser and Wirth at what 30 years of age???? Someone owed someone favors or were buddy buddy. So many great artists a lot older, don't even get their work looked at by this gallery.

love

Love her concept. I want to know how young artists afford such spacious work studios, huge canvases and volumous supplies of paint and medium. Are their works selling so well? Are there grants out there to just keep and artist in supplies?

genius

Avery Day^^

what kind of jacket is she wearing? its awesome

All you critics out there, she's young - she'll find her way. Were you born with the ability to walk, talk, feed, clothe, educate and house yourself? Process. She's doing it. Oh, and EVERYTHING is derivative today. EVERYTHING. So focus your little green eyes on yourselves before you go throwing stones at others. I think she's really interesting and she's putting herself out there. She'll be just fine, methinks.

PLEASE ! someone knows the airbrush she's using ? Iwata ?

But what does it mean?

bae

I was really excited about her work when I saw some pics online. What was actually intimidating was her mastery of 3-D space, modeling, lighting and shading. Then, watching the video, I discovered in the first minute that the computer is responsible for this, and that she essentially copies it large scale. Note: I'm a digital artist, so not against using the computer. When she says that she get's basic line and detail work from the computer, she leaves out the incredible and most difficult part, which is the perspective and shading. Consider the immense sophistication of the projected shadows she uses, all of which are performed by the AI. She'd have to be a mathematical genius (as was Escher) do compute the necessary calculations in her own head. The issue here is that what impressed me was actually the calculations executed by the computer. To give an analogy, it's like someone sharing a piano sonata, and what really impresses us is the speed and dexterity of the playing. However, it turns out, that was all done by the computer. So, there is a question of what the computer is doing and what the artists is doing, and which part is the more impressive. With the piano sonata, if the composition, harmonies, and so on are what impresses, the computer can be irrelevant. That said, her commitment to reproducing these computer-made images is itself impressive, and the results are fantastic. She is also responsible for the compositions, which are excellent. In this case I credit her with manipulation of the program, and execution of the physical painting. But, Escher did it without the computer. I wonder if she could make similar images without relying on a 3D program to do all the difficult math. A difference here is when I first saw them I was shocked, even intimidated by her visual intelligence. But now that I know she used Sketchup, well, with a little practice, I could do something similar. It wouldn't be easy, because she has a very fine aesthetic, but it's gone from beyond my capacity to, "Oh, well, she does that very well, but now I can see how it's manageable", and to be clear, this is only important because it was initially the beyond-my-ability element of it that so impressed me. THAT part was generated by the computer. Nevertheless, I really love the painting of the two figures at a table. It's a really fine achievement. I'll withhold judgement, and wait to see how she develops. But I am no longer blown away. Well, on second thought, her manipulation of the program(s) in question seems very impressive and individual, and the execution and scale are also very sophisticated. So, might still be blown away, but not completely. Again, I wonder what would happen if she didn't use the program. Might be worth doing some experiments. My art and blog: artofericwayne.com/

Everyone uses golden for non oil paint

Very edgy art..her work speaks to me...odd she only uses golden paint..

ill marry you. "soon to be" millionaire

I'm a better artist than Avery Singer is

"because i dont want to reproduce other peoples paintings, i want to make my own", interesting selection of words for someone who has completely ripped her aesthetic from naum gabos figurative sculptures, and dropped into a surrealistic/cubist like 'dhali-esque' scape. Not such originality here.