*Did we miss any other models out there that deserve to be on this list? Which other fuel-saving aircraft would you recommend buying? To see more amazing aircraft videos, check these out:* Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Turboprop Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kMqJepee173HaYU.html Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Private Jets 2022-2023 | Price & Specs kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g6qmZNSeyc_DgH0.html Top 5 Hybrid-Electric Aircraft 2021-2022 | New Technologies & Features kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qbuHa9mi05ypgoU.html
@patshes1951 Жыл бұрын
Abselutly massive price differences.
@renardinosrenard9581 Жыл бұрын
Today you forgot a beautiful plane .... Pipistrel Panthera
@williamkennedy2069 Жыл бұрын
The girl talking sounds cute, you should put her picture so we can see who is talking
@FasterLower Жыл бұрын
What happened to the Pipistrel Panthera? Faster with less fuel consumption that the Cirrus and (even though its not Certified yet) there are more of them flying that the Evolution Piston
@kresimirmilisa5560 Жыл бұрын
cirrus sr22 is good turboprop aircraft always nice videos.
@AC-jk8wq Жыл бұрын
This post supports the false pretenses… Congrats on responding to your own videos! This aircraft was never powered by a turboprop. 😃
@clarencehopkins7832 Жыл бұрын
Excellent stuff bro
@user-vd8xs6zd5w Жыл бұрын
유익한 유튜브 채널 입니다
@cageordie Жыл бұрын
These numbers don't add up. SR22 has 92 gallon capacity and burns 18 gallons at cruise and yet we hear it has two hour duration, which is hard to square with the 1,049nm range the manufacturers claim at a cruise speed of 213 knots that would take nearly 5 hours. So where does the 2-3 come from? Since the first one is so far off why waste time listening to the rest?
@87camillo87 Жыл бұрын
What about Tecnam P2010 170HP TDI?
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
You really can't go wrong with most Tecnam in terms of fuel efficiency, in fact, we featured them on a separate video. Please check it out!
@6862ptc Жыл бұрын
The Evolution aircraft shown is Turbine Powered!
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
You're absolutely right! The Evolution aircraft is indeed turbine powered, offering impressive performance and capabilities.
@6862ptc Жыл бұрын
@Aviation Federation But your video says both on the screen title and narration that the Evolution aircraft is PISTON-POWERED, yet shows a turbine-powered Evolution. You titled that section: the "Evolution Piston" on your video, you ONLY discuss the piston version yet show a Turbine powered aircraft.
@YG-wn7rk Жыл бұрын
Forgot Cessna TTX
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
We considered it but the economic cruising speed seems too slow compared to the rest of the aircraft featured here.
@deanwells2859 Жыл бұрын
It would sure be helpful to have had a narrator who knew how to pronounce English words correctly. I realize you may be using AI but you still have a long way to go. The number 3 and 4 airplanes don’t burn 80 gallons an hour of fuel, which is one of the problems. It can only stay in the air “for a little over 2 hours”? Somebody really messed up with this data. Part of the information included was not accurate and this video should not have been released.
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! We're continuously improving upon our editorial and presentations.
@kevinmcquown Жыл бұрын
I'm not sure where you are getting your retail pricing? For example, you state that the Diamond DA-42 has a base price of $462,000. That is way off. The actual base price is $979,000.
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
These are original MSRPs and still do not include local taxes and other fees. Inflation is also not factored in yet. But thanks for pointing that out.
@justNvlog Жыл бұрын
Doesn't really seam lime a fuel efficient list
@russelbaird33426 ай бұрын
I know range is somewhat subjective, but it would be really nice if you mentioned it more often or at all .
@AviationFederation5 ай бұрын
Absolutely! Range is an important consideration, especially for those planning longer flights. Is there a specific aircraft's range you'd like more details on?
@brycecampbell48458 ай бұрын
Cessna 182 RG Turbo pretty good
@AviationFederation8 ай бұрын
Indeed, the Cessna 182 RG Turbo is a solid choice. What particularly stands out to you about this aircraft?
@Jyotishsr1982 Жыл бұрын
it would have been better if you used SI.
@AC-jk8wq Жыл бұрын
Lots of confusion between normally aspirated, turbo, and turbine… If the author doesn’t understand these… they don’t understand efficiency of aircraft. One of the most efficient four seat planes ever is the Mooney line of aircraft… Note… when you see a pair of large exhaust pipes exiting at the front of the engine, that’s a turbine! None of the data seems to be factual…. Why let facts get in the way.
@cozyflyinggirl Жыл бұрын
My 4 seat Cozy can fly 1000 miles at 15,000 feet on 5.5 gallons per hour (all be it at “only” 190 mph) and at ~< $100k.
@brycecampbell48458 ай бұрын
Cozy?
@pdeltoro Жыл бұрын
All the prices are wrong !
@Santu1939 Жыл бұрын
That evolution piston is such an ugly airplane.
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
We love those strong opinions! Feedback on the aesthetics of an aircraft can vary, and beauty is subjective. While you may find the Evolution Piston airplane unattractive, others may have different preferences. Ultimately, the design and appearance of an aircraft are influenced by factors such as functionality, performance, and aerodynamics.