Axel Geller (Stanford) vs Keegan Smith (UCLA)

Рет қаралды 65,537

J10S

4 жыл бұрын

#1 Singles.
Subscribe: goo.gl/dNz6Sz
Twitter: / j10is
Final Result:
Axel Geller won 5-7, 6-2, 6-2.

Пікірлер: 62

@jamesj5565 4 жыл бұрын

Axel Geller matches just aren't the same without YES YES guy

@marcileiseth1500 4 жыл бұрын

Say hello to ALL DAY guy..

@krishnasaichalasani4492 4 жыл бұрын

He's there 31:12

@seanstewart7314 2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@stjamm 4 жыл бұрын

The quality of tennis in that 1st set was outrageous! Thanks for the upload.

@ronmorgan8214 4 жыл бұрын

yes, and nice steady camera work... thanks for posting

@Vikingnartists 4 жыл бұрын

This is a real quality line one actually, respect to both players! Very high level hands down / Former NCAA player

@micahdornbusch3555 4 жыл бұрын

0:31 like hell that was out

@10slover62 4 жыл бұрын

Wow! BIG hitting by both of these guys. Impressive!

@BradMason2014 4 жыл бұрын

Smith relied on that big serve, but against a guy that gets a lot of balls back in play; it just isn't as effective. Clearly when Geller forced him to rally he didn't like that. Smith is used to being able to hit through guys and doesn't handle the short balls or off speeds as well. Great spot serving by Geller too. Great match.

@LeightonGRose 4 жыл бұрын

What was this recorded with/in? It's super crystal...

@Radnally 4 жыл бұрын

Watched smith play a while back. He was great. Looks like these last two sets....something went south

@raderT90 4 жыл бұрын

Probably mental strength. You can see little signs of mental frustration and rushed gameplay near the end. Regardless his serve is awesome and worth studying.

@leemelvin6514 4 жыл бұрын

please tell me you recorded the geller vs holt match? lol

@jonathannguyen6264 4 жыл бұрын

Has USC played Stanford yet?

@FireMatHawk 4 жыл бұрын

Yeah they played Stanford then played Cal afterwards.

@SharkSigma772 4 жыл бұрын

Very good

@babacool1630 4 жыл бұрын

nobody can beat geller this year!

@FireMatHawk 4 жыл бұрын

except holt who already did :)

@tejukanaparthy 3 жыл бұрын

covid did

@ragulnavaneethan5194 2 жыл бұрын

wow he came back hard!

@therealkylekelly 4 жыл бұрын

0:30 out

@pelkhoury 4 жыл бұрын

CLEARLY IN DUMMY

@Amanda-ut7gx 3 жыл бұрын

Nicked the line

@elicauthorn7878 Ай бұрын

what racquet is geller using?

@Coolkids_9 Жыл бұрын

@cd9759 4 жыл бұрын

Do they not play let in america

@ronmorgan8214 4 жыл бұрын

USA men's college tennis play netcord lets---too many receivers used to call lets when the serve was an ace so the rule was made to eliminate such calls

@cleanplasticchild 4 жыл бұрын

:30 ball was out and ump did not have the visual perspective to overrule

@unathleticremi 4 жыл бұрын

cleanplasticchild so what shots do the umps have the perspective to overrule?

@cleanplasticchild 4 жыл бұрын

Remi Barron The judge doesn’t have the visual angle is what I mean. That was an emotional overrule.

@unathleticremi 4 жыл бұрын

@@cleanplasticchild Right, but do you think the judge has the visual angle to overrule anything? This was right on the baseline and in clear sight. What lines can he call?

@cleanplasticchild 4 жыл бұрын

Remi Barron Yeah, I think some more than others. ...but I see your point. People make mistakes.

@jaserogers997 3 жыл бұрын

COME ON AAAXXXXXXXXEELLLL

@jonathannguyen6264 4 жыл бұрын

Looks like Geller is playing with an older racket than the Vcore he had last season.

@weiranjiang2874 4 жыл бұрын

yes hes back to the ezone he used in his junior grand slams and beginning of his ncaa time

@katomiler843 4 жыл бұрын

cool post

@TheGoodGreeff 3 жыл бұрын

Red shirt has a very similar forehand to tiafoe

@hyman3339 4 жыл бұрын

9:43 the ball was clearly in...

@blankword4565 4 жыл бұрын

please try and record the baylor no 1. He's beaten byderch and is a freshman with the highest utr in the country.

@jonathannguyen6264 4 жыл бұрын

That guy's the real deal.

@young3.14 4 жыл бұрын

9:44 in

@mithuntm 4 жыл бұрын

Outrageous call 😂

@LegolasD 4 жыл бұрын

what is the point of a chair umpire if you aren't going to overrule that

@mrvg1234 4 жыл бұрын

at 0.25 speed it looks out

@awateilrahc 4 жыл бұрын

Legolas Dixon they don’t overrule, have to be asked by player if it is in or not for an overrule to occur

@JohnSmith-xn3yf 4 жыл бұрын

You're blind. Slow it down in 0.25 speed, very clearly out. So many people don't understand that the camera angle which is right behind the players is the WORST angle for seeing whether a ball is in or out. Add on to that the fact that this is 30 or 60 fps only. The ball was clearly out. If you had taped yourself playing tennis before, you'd understand.

@camilablanco3414 4 жыл бұрын

In 21:31 they should have repeated the surf because it touched the net but they didn’t so now I am just confused lol😂🤨

@jonathanlai1658 4 жыл бұрын

Camila Blanco they play lets in college

@armonm2689 4 жыл бұрын

Camila Blanco in D1 men’s they play let’s

@dlinsanity 4 жыл бұрын

@@jonathanlai1658 only in D1 men's tennis

@alligatorsarefire 2 жыл бұрын

I'm sorry but axels fans need to calm down a little. it's fine when he hits a winner, but when his opponent makes a mistake? that's just not okay. poor behavior from adults.

@loriharrington5258 4 жыл бұрын

Second shot was definitely out

@calvinfong8888 4 жыл бұрын

Hella in

@williamh7 4 жыл бұрын

It most likely touched the blue. Well in.

@GrantTDM 4 жыл бұрын

Was inside the line on the blue. Glad she overruled it. Most umps in college too scared, encourages the cheating like at Wake Forest.

@JohnSmith-xn3yf 4 жыл бұрын

Horrible umpire. Ball at 0:30 was quite clearly out(and I'm a Stanford fan, so I'm unbiased). Should not have overruled the call, it was out, not a cheat.

@Nick-mu2ee 4 жыл бұрын

you’re blind buddy

@NPC-rq9tp 4 жыл бұрын

Lol you know theres a playback speed option on youtube right? ball was inside the line.

@MrFunkywhale 2 жыл бұрын

@@NPC-rq9tp I know this is a year later, but with playback speed, you can see the ball out or, MAYBE BUT DOUBT, it caught like a cm of the outside of the line. How you can see it inside the line is beyond me.