Then Ares comes down from the heavens but in that instant an Aztec warrior yell “HUITZILOPOCHTLI! DESTROY MY ENEMIES AND THEIR HEARTS AND LIFE IS YOURS! Now we have 2 Gods of War

@@isra-el5745 Honestly, whenever two immortal Gods clash, it’s better to put your differences aside and band together…..the Spartans & Aztecs must unite, or else they will be destroyed.

ZEUS! destroy my enemies and all the women is yours 💀💀💀

Jajaja

This is the intense story that I would gladly to bear witness!

Whoa…

Yeah the majority of the population was most likely peasants who lived in huts tho

@@turkeysandwich1998 lol were you there?

@@jessedeniz4313 I don’t think he had to be 🤪

They had it all just no bronze shields 😮😂

Jaguars were elites of aztecs weren't they? Although I believe that they're basic infantry.

@@ryx1531 They were some of the most elite infantry the Aztecs had available and were given the best weapons and armor. Although they weren't the highest tier of elite fighters. That honor belonged to the Cuachiquah, who were veterans that rejected any promotion just to keep fighting in battle.

@@ryx1531 that would be a group of Aztecs know as the “Shorn Ones” they were completely bald and supposedly the best

Who wants to be a Jag? Eagle knights are the best!

@@ryx1531 All aztec soldiers are infantry. The first horses they saw were the Spanish chargers, which they also sacrificed to their gods.

Where’s your source I would like to read up on this too.

@@dylanplumley280 their usually in the codex's I read one where a battle between two spanish horsemen where killed by a single aztec warrior and they where armed with a Lance

@@skylerarroniz7513 Awesome. Thank you.

@@dylanplumley280 The Spanish had other groups like Tlaxcala that helped them. Tlaxcala helped Spain in New Mexico, Central America, and the Philippines. Cortez also had Malenche who played a key role in the Cholula massacre. The (mexicas) Aztecs could have wiped out the Spanish when Spain ran out of the city and lost the gold they were trying to steal, but then the warriors of Tlaxcala helped them. how important Tlaxcala was to the Spanish. they created a state for themselves that still exist, kept their beliefs, and were allowed to ride horses. How important was Malenche? She spoke the Aztec language, Maya, Tolteca, and Spanish.

I think a fair rebuke would be the people of Carthage and Hannibal who had many great ambush and tactical victories over Rome.

Spartans we’re more organized and disciplined and meant to fight other organized armies, but the Aztecs used guerilla warfare which was mostly aimed at catching slaves. Interesting matchup for sure

This isn’t reality, it wouldn’t even be close, spartans would crush them unless they had way more numbers

@@xSSxTejas what about marches through the jungle? Spartans wouldn’t be able to line up and could easily get demolished

@@hanschitzlinger3676 they wouldn’t follow them into the jungles. They’d attack the cities. If the Aztecs want to flee and live in the jungle, so be it lol

I think Aztecs would stand no chance against Spartans.

Name checks out

It had nothing to do with advancements and everything to do with the resources available. Not many metals in the jungle and plenty of ore in mountainous regions

Mexico and Central America (where the Aztec empire originates) is plenty mountainous. Many times more mountains then in small Greece

The America's was behind in technology to Europe at all times prior to conquest.

@@escoboxinganalysis2237 stick to analyzing boxing

Yea, except the Deadliest warrior had multiple experts and test dummies to see the damage of the arsenals.

Musket ball go brrrr hahah clearly didn't work

@@michaellavaughnrobinson bullets and swords are very different but you right

Yes but it was not built to take on metal tipped spears and metal edged weapons . Also The Spartans armor was not just a bronze chest plate but had Kevlar armor type armor as well that was far more advanced.

@@michaellavaughnrobinson how do you like watching america change? Culture go brrrr

@@dayday3688 Change? America is supposed to be diverse asf

Are you serious? The British used unconventional warfare all the time. You might want to look up people called the SAS.

The Spartan Kryptaea would like to talk to you about Guerrilla warfare considering they where the Spartans Special Forces and Secret Police . Who's job varied from killing Helot leaders to killing enemy army commanders or attempting to. At the Battle of Thermopylae snuck into the Persians camp and missed Xerxes I by a single tent. Before retreating back to their lines. So yeah Sparta had unconventional warfare soldiers whom often acted as recon forces and assassins for the Spartans. The Krypteia are the men who sneak into you guarded palace and slit your throat in your sleep right under the noses of your guards. A right of passage for young Spartan men was to sneak out of the barracks and strangle a local Helot to death at night and sneak back in without being caught. If they got caught they would be beaten severely to near death not for killing a Helot but for getting caught. If a Spartan boy died in training they saw it as he wasn't tough enough or cunning enough to be a Spartan. Yeah Image growing up in a society where your life doesn't matter unless it's sacrificed for the state. And you are severely punished for getting caught doing something like stealing a loaf of bread. For getting caught. Which was to teach you stealth and that getting caught is always going to be punished. Yeah Spartan Hoplites where actually very good at stealth, unconventional warfare and conventional warfare. They also tended to steal from the locals whatever they needed on campaign away from Sparta. The Spartans are the only military in history to consider being on campaign to be easier than their normal daily training.

There is no honor in war, only victory or death. Honor in warfare is a perverse sentiment.

@@joebloggs5318 In World War 2 the british even created the Special Boat Service, it was a military program wich used criminals and gave them the chance of gaining conditional freedom if they suceeded in special operations made all over Europe, it was quite unconventional, but yet extremelly efective.

@@joebloggs5318 The SAS were established long after the British learned the lessons of guerrilla warfare so that example is a moot point

"Access to poison" lol everyone has access to poison wtf

Lol a threshold for pain is not a factor in deciding a battle outcome. The Spartans also had missile weapons. Spartans would win due to armour and better drill. Same as the Spanish.

Maybe if they had metal tips and not stone. Or if the Spartans didn't have galleys, bows, and siege engines. It's not really a fair fight for technological reasons.

@@horstnietzsche1923 even though separated by 2000 years Sparta wins 🏆

Sparta had horses and the wheel..

Don't forget the Aztecs got prep time, while not having to bother with the logistics of supplying the soldiers.

He had to do mental gymnastics because he didnt want a fight in the comment sections. Its kinda pathetic to do that just to appease people. But this is where we are at.

@@matt59fire yeah because he's kind left out a few things to give the aztecs some hope. Right from the beginning he said "a warriors jumped through the sheild wall".... So your implying they left their 8 foot long spears as home? Their was a reason Athens feared Sparta, there is is a reason the term sparing comes from the word Sparta. These guys went centuries undefeated even by the worlds most advanced force for the time Persia. Remember Rome was the first professional army but Persia perfected it untill they lost to Sparta.

The Roman Empire vs the U.S. army

The Roman empire would out number the Aztecs. Combine that with better equipment and tactics and it would be an absolute slaughter.

@@OGMENDOZA661 so your talking about guns, grenades, tanks, planes vs spears and shields? Common even a 2 year old would not to brought this up

@@OGMENDOZA661 Roman empire wins USA hasn't won a war in 77 years

Would the macedonians beat the han dynasty thou?

They did several times historically

@@carlosortegaplol. When. Cite a source

@@MasonMasedaZombieMoshPit1643his name is carlos ofc he’s going to have a bias

América is 1, and the USAIDS isn't even half of it.

Tbh all Native American tribes would win

@@leonardoursua4765 they wouldn’t Spartans would attack there city and wouldn’t follow them in there jungle and while It happened the Spartans will go into position

@@leonardoursua4765 no not really the aztec was the biggest empire in the America's tribes are tribes separated groups not a empire

The aztecs live between more mountains than the spartans

Aztecs were the masters of psychological warfare. Better be dead than taken alive to a whole city to celebrate your death, and in the end your legacy be only a skull on a massive tzompantli.

Aztecs had bronce axes and the tips of their arrows and atlatl darts were also Made of bronce, look for Tlaximaltepoztli on google. Every aztec warrior carries with him a bow or atlatl and a Lot of arrows and darts also a 1.5 meters in diemetre shield Made the way romand used to Made their shields and a heavy wooden club or a bronce axe, the macahuitl or obsidian blade was a ritual and religious weapon reserved to the top Warriors cause being a top Warrior meant being involved in some religious rituals, aztecs had cotton armors able to protec from the bronce and obsidian weapons they had, note that obsidian is sharper than steel ,the Main tactic of the aztecs was attack by distance using rains of arrows and flank with the speed of eagle Warriors. Every aztec warrior was armed with bow arrows and a bronce axe. War was sacred because they understood that life meaning is moving the body, moving the body rightly. Aztecs only lasted 200 years as a Kingdom, they were tribes of nomád hunters and then they migrated from Canadá to México, after their arrival the first 100 years they were slaves/mercenaries of the king of Azcapotzalco the owner of the lake were they put their city Tenochtitlan, aztecs never had natural resources of their own cause their only posesión was a city Made of rock floating on a lake wich waters they culdnt even exploit until they rebeled against Azcapotzalco, aztecs had no Jobs or professions everyone was a warrior. The population of one city was able to conquer a territory full of citys as largue as theirs in only 100 years

True. They would have fallen eventually anyways. But people act like the conquest was even close. Basically a couple hundred Europeans toppled the empire in a year by talking to some people and camping outside a city.

​@Badwolf0683 true but it's wasn't a couple of people Tlaxcalans were close to beating the Spanish themselves but decided hey you want to join forces and beat the Aztecs

I personally think the samurai as their calvary might make up for weaker swordsman.

@@ryx1531 yeah and samurai don’t fear losing their life and see it as an honor to die while fighting for their leader

@@ryx1531: Medieval Europeans had bigger warhorses and better armor than their Japanese counterparts.

Deadliest Warrior had a lot of issues. 14th century Samurai vs 16th century knights wouldn't be an epic clash... it would be a one-sided curbstomp. You realize that 16th century knights had literal "bullet proofed" armor, right? If anything, it would be much fairer to give the Samurai the two century tech advantage, rather than the knights.

i remember deadliest warrior. I miss that show, it was pretty good. 👍👍👍

Not exactly a myth, but probably exaggerated. This was tested on a ballistics gel horse head (which is significantly harder to cut and destroy with most melee style weapons due to the thick stickiness of the material). The Macuahuitl wasn't able to get a clean slice all the way through, but with a follow-up twist motion of force it would rip off easy enough.

@@WritingFighter I saw a video here on yt the showed the obsidian cut almost half way through a goat from the butchers so no I don't think it's an exaggeration

@@skylerarroniz7513 lol so can a basic butchers cleaver lol

@@alejandroblanco7369 imagine thinking you said something smart lol you’re comparing ancestors making weapons with just rocks, bones, and wood to modern made steel blades 😂😂💀🤡

@@WritingFighter yeah but keep in mind that these warriors would have been incredibly strong and trained with these weapons since childhood. I think it is definitely real

Depends where they fight, in the junges of South America, Sparta loses, but in Greece, many states come together against shared enemies.

Hello does anyone here believe in Jesus?

@@connorlancaster7541 Not relevant to the discussion. The Lord Shepherd died before the advent of the Azteca and Sparta served Ares

Dude, you're D riding so hard, the Macahuitl was just a glorified stick with a nail, after couple of blows they will lose the obsidian and become clubs. The aztecs were awesome warriors when you compare them with other stone age, isolated indigenous people fron the America's, that's it. " they were shock troops and masters of assimetric warfare" 😂😂😂😂😂😂, they got their cheeks blasted.

@@osiruchos707 Wow. Quite literally none of what you said is true. I have a macuahuitl of my own, and if constructed properly the wood will break long before the obsidian gives way. But then again you have MAGA in your name so you're not the sharpest knife in the Caesar.

Not particularly. Gunpowder versus bronze is still a gunpowder victory.

@@alistairgrey5089 yes, to a point. With rate of fire of the weapons of that era, and the long supply lines from Spain to Central America, it would have at least been a slightly more level fight than it ended up being. Either way, it’s academic at this point.

While Spartans had bronze armor and a bronze faced shield, their spearhead, arrow heads, sword/dagger were made of iron and or steel.

@@annalorree unless the bronze was made very thick it's too soft to stop most rounds of that time. And even steel had to be specially formed to deflect the bullets. I don't think the bronze would be much of a difference. Now iron, that would make a difference.

@@alistairgrey5089 plus europe and asia has progressed by a large margin from bronze

​@@jaydenrobles2207yeah disease killing 90-95% of true American population wins wars

@@jaydenrobles2207 …nobody said they did?

no one bathed in poo

I got most of them died from common colds and diseases. Maybe they should’ve bathed in Poo.

The greeks did it 2000 years earlier and much better constructed

Germany had many successes when they first invaded the Soviet Union. They lost the war. The Confederacy had many successes against the Union in the beginning of the Civil War. They lost the war. Japan ruled the Pacific early in WW II. They lost the war. Being ahead at the first doesn't count it you're not ahead at the finish line.

Aztecs got their cheeks clapped by the god-emperor Hernan Cortez

They were outnumbered like 1000 to 1

Yes a small invading force in unknown land vs an entire army that knows the land extremely well 😂😂

@@osiruchos707 only cuz they were literally filled with diseases they won of luck not skill and filled with diseases

Because spartans knew what a boat is while Aztecs knew... well... how to swim, so it's more probable that they got to America than Aztecs to Europe. Anyway, if the battlefield was balanced, the video would not pass from the 2 minute mark

@@grim3897 weren't Spartans also known for a bellow average IQ

@@Rottendead22 well, they surely were not launching rockets to space back then, but their society didn't seem idiot to me, they could build, innovate, craft, not only materially, I'm sure they had their philosofers and of course military experts, and the later ones looked quite successful, well, not to mention that they were the first ones to, probably by chance, discover the eugenetics, which is related to evolution theory. They were much more focused into the phisical side of life but calling them "low IQ"... that's a bit "low IQ", even though "IQ" is an already disproven theory

@@grim3897 I might be thinking of another group of people then I'm not sure who but these people used one word sentences and where often underestimating of everything getting a lot of them killed

@@Rottendead22 no.

Yeah. He gave the Aztecs every advantage.

@@charlesfinch4223 they* He is just the narrator, don't give him all the flack for things he didn't write

@@lockkeylive3809 they had many strategic plunders you forgot that they won as much battles as they lost. Which is why their conquests were limited to one third of the Peloponnese.

You should more in tho the history of the Aztec they were beast … matter fact Black Panther is basically based of them …. the Jaguar King

Absolutely right. That 'stealth commando style' fighting here atributed to the Aztecs seems far too streched from reality.

Strength in numbers. Nothing to it really.

Well as much merit as the Spartans have they lost the battle of Thermopylae because of numbers

It's a solid tactic. It's wasteful but it works.

@James Cardwell the spartans would have lost to persia anyways. Sparta alone is not enough to beat persia.

Quality has the price of numerical inferiority. But less is more.

Neat

Erb

I see you watch ERB

@@CalicoClixk it's just too good to not watch especially as History Nerd

I AM THE FIRST TSAR OF ALL OF RUSSIA

Ha. I love ERB.

👍

This would be a much better quote if the Aztecs were fighting Roman legionaries, instead of Greek phalanx.

@@Iulznazi i think they're referring more to the discipline about the Spartan vs the Aztec ambushes

Caesar dropped bars

Even then, Aztecs would stalk like jaguar, and use fear.. imagine that Aztec death whistle before a surprise attack.. would be a crazy battle considering Spartans are pound for pound better individual fighters and even better as a team

​@@lonewanderer1017 if you pit Aztecs east if the Atlantic in 300bc they would be slaughtered 😂

@@kyartick8502 absolutely, Aztecs would be destroyed if that were the case

Aztecs had bronce axes and the tips of their arrows and atlatl darts were also Made of bronce, look for Tlaximaltepoztli on google. Every aztec warrior carries with him a bow or atlatl and a Lot of arrows and darts also a 1.5 meters in diemetre shield Made the way romand used to Made their shields and a heavy wooden club or a bronce axe, the macahuitl or obsidian blade was a ritual and religious weapon reserved to the top Warriors cause being a top Warrior meant being involved in some religious rituals, aztecs had cotton armors able to protec from the bronce and obsidian weapons they had, note that obsidian is sharper than steel ,the Main tactic of the aztecs was attack by distance using rains of arrows and flank with the speed of eagle Warriors. Every aztec warrior was armed with bow arrows and a bronce axe. War was sacred because they understood that life meaning is moving the body, moving the body rightly. Aztecs only lasted 200 years as a Kingdom, they were tribes of nomád hunters and then they migrated from Canadá to México, after their arrival the first 100 years they were slaves/mercenaries of the king of Azcapotzalco the owner of the lake were they put their city Tenochtitlan, aztecs never had natural resources of their own cause their only posesión was a city Made of rock floating on a lake wich waters they culdnt even exploit until they rebeled against Azcapotzalco, aztecs had no Jobs or professions everyone was a warrior. The population of one city was able to conquer a territory full of citys as largue as theirs in only 100 years

​@@heman2052bronze* correction

I plan to learn Tamazight. From a Spaniard in Angkorland.

@@no_name4080you do if you’re trying to invade

With even numbers 100% agree… the Aztecs had a huge army and they have the power in numbers

Having more advanced technology doesn't necessarily guarantee victory. Aztecs fought guerilla style, Spartans were head on fighters for the most part and we've seen throughout history how guerilla fighters almost always outclass fighters

That's nice and all but at their height the Sparta army only had around 30,000 soldiers and only 8,000 of which were actually Spartans. Meanwhile sources suggest at their height the Aztecs had 700,000 warriors. Being outnumbered 23-1 without the advantage of a mountain pass would surely be to much for them to overcome

There is a recorded event of another native group from Mexico who were Aztec enemies and fought against Japanese pirates and defeated them.

1. Vikings win! 2. Vikings win! 3. Romans win! 4. Samurai win! 5. Samurai win! 6. Samurai win! 7. Samurai win! 8. Romans win! 9. Samurai win! 10. Vikings win!

Aztecs had bronce axes and the tips of their arrows and atlatl darts were also Made of bronce, look for Tlaximaltepoztli on google. Every aztec warrior carries with him a bow or atlatl and a Lot of arrows and darts also a 1.5 meters in diemetre shield Made the way romand used to Made their shields and a heavy wooden club or a bronce axe, the macahuitl or obsidian blade was a ritual and religious weapon reserved to the top Warriors cause being a top Warrior meant being involved in some religious rituals, aztecs had cotton armors able to protec from the bronce and obsidian weapons they had, note that obsidian is sharper than steel ,the Main tactic of the aztecs was attack by distance using rains of arrows and flank with the speed of eagle Warriors. Every aztec warrior was armed with bow arrows and a bronce axe. War was sacred because they understood that life meaning is moving the body, moving the body rightly. Aztecs only lasted 200 years as a Kingdom, they were tribes of nomád hunters and then they migrated from Canadá to México, after their arrival the first 100 years they were slaves/mercenaries of the king of Azcapotzalco the owner of the lake were they put their city Tenochtitlan, aztecs never had natural resources of their own cause their only posesión was a city Made of rock floating on a lake wich waters they culdnt even exploit until they rebeled against Azcapotzalco, aztecs had no Jobs or professions everyone was a warrior. The population of one city was able to conquer a territory full of citys as largue as theirs in only 100 years

Unfortunately given the how and why Sparta fell apart, that’s an impossibility of the highest magnitude.

@@MinatoNamikaze-ub4bk yeah and given that my people died of disease and Spanish conquistadors. Sad that such societies colapsed so easily

That's basically what the Romans did for example the Gladius was an Iberian sword. That the Roman's adopted after fighting there,the manipular formation is another example. It was a modified version of Saminite (another Italian people) war tactics.

​@@LanMandragon1720Roman's also had non Roman's fighting in there army's

@@ricardorascon88 Indeed and that's how you became a Roman alot of the time

I love that. And its so true.

knights vs Samurai in general tends to be a curbstomp for the knights. European armor is just THAT much better than the Japanese equivalent.

@@formerhunter2 more like due to superior genetics

@@jmgonzales7701 Correlation isn't causation. Racists have inferior arguments.

The Spanish fought samurais and beat them. See my video: "A conquistador refutes the 'Metatron' on Samurais VS Spaniards." He claimed there weren't samurais beaten by the Spanish in the north of Filipinas, but I proved he lied.

@@scintillam_dei they were pirates arent they. Plus was it just truly Spanish soldiers? like there weren't any enlisted filipino soldiers in the army since the Spanish in the Philippines were very small in number.

Yea, Spartans would have dominated. Even just on a technological basis the Aztecs would have to have between 5-15 men to every 1 Spartan to beat them with sheer numbers. On an even playing field the Spartans would most likely barely lose any soldiers

Yeah nope, aztecs only lost because of gunpowder and disease, a couple swordy boys would be no match..

@@welersoncarvalhodeavila4499 yes and i’m sure your opinion has no bias on your personal standards at all

Nah man, Spartans fought conventionally while Aztecs were stealthy with blitzkrieg attacks. Aztecs would never meet them head on an even field. The Spanish had powder and steel( not bronze) and they would’ve lost theirs wats against the Aztecs anyway if it hadn’t been for disease

@@eldin8910 and yours doesn’t? Aztec army was so much larger there is never a even playing field in war Aztecs win everytime

Yep packed shield wall-spears formation for the win.

Spartans would also win in mountainsides..

I am pretty sure the Greeks and Romans were far smarter for their time, than the people of this time. All we do is multiply our tech from old tech. Not hard. These people actually came up with brand new crazy inventions for both life and warfare.

Knowing there is a trap and predicting a trap are different things. Just because they know there's a trap doesn't mean they know what's about to happen.

@@alistairgrey5089 But they would be more careful about following them

@@wouter-jansen maybe. But by the time they realized something was up it was already too late.

You could say the same about Spartans using their environment to their advantage, aztecs knew alot about traps and wouldn't charge the Spartans in closed areas, aztecs adapted quick to their surroundings, but Spartans on the other hand were on unfamiliar territory were they never had war in.

They would have seen the false rout for what it was and proceeded as if there was a trap.

Also the psychological warfare put on by the Aztecs. Sure the Spartans may not fear mortals but neither did the Aztecs. The Aztecs would constantly torment and break down the minds of the Spartans days before any fighting with their death whistles and other instruments.

Exactly what I thought.

When I think of this I think about the 300

Where are you from?

One on one the Sparties only have their armor advantage

Not at all Aztecs lost to gunpowder and disease, swordy boys would be a easy sacrifice

In a bad situation the Spartans where not above asking for help, the battle of 300 was proof of this as before the final battle the Spartans had some help.

Spartans were born to war....whereas 200,000 Aztecs got slaughtered by a few thousand Spaniards...it's no question here

@@mentalasylumescapee6389 it wasnt just a few thousand Spaniards. many many, the vast majority of the tribes that were controlled by the aztecs rebelled and joined the spanish

@@mentalasylumescapee6389 disease.

@@pandasniper1 we're both wrong "less than 200 Spaniards " ROLMAO R.I.P Aztec Empire.

Gotta disagree "They were bred for warfare" Spartans literally discarded their children if they were not deemed fit enough.

@@youbadatdagame8417 okay, and how does that change the fact that the Aztecs were a warrior society?

Aztec children were separated into schools based on ability. Those who showed talent were given to an academy of war and trained for their entire lives to be warriors. They honed their skills competing in war games against other schools. These games were to the death on certain holidays. Warrior society for sure.

@@youbadatdagame8417 Aztecs we’re also bred for warfare it still doesn’t change that fact

Spartan Cavalry was a thing, but they were of very low quality. In reality, I doubt they would do much against the Aztecs as seen in this video. Without a stirrup or Warhorse training that the Spanish have been producing throughout the medieval time, the Aztecs will make short work of them.

And keep in mind the Spanish had native ally’s

It's a silly blow thingy lol

@@120Stevo I guess you've never heard what that blowy thingy sounds like then

You think that a Spartan would be terrified by a whistle when they were throwing their disable kids to their graves as soon as they born? That's cruel

A didgeridoo?

Nah the Spartans would simply counteract the noise with their own marching bands. The Spartans were considered the most warlike and "musical" of the Greeks for the way they employed music in battle.

So we’re the Aztecs?

Not if the Aztecs sacrifice thousands then they'll get the special racial buffs and can convert Spartans

The Spartans suffered from crippling overspecialization. They only produced heavy infantry. Against an army with cavalry or mobile light infantry, the Spartans' only hope is the enemy attacking from one direction.

Let your bias control your comment, you have no clue about how violent Aztecs were kiddo

You didn’t see the video¿ didn’t you?

And, even though they weren't known for it... The spartans did in fact, have SOME elite cavalry. We all know the absolute psychological and power dynamic this introduced in some of the earlier such uses against the mesoamericans by cavalry charges and the like. They had no real good counters. Would it have been as good as the higher tech, stirrups, etc of the conquistador cav? Probably not. But that small group of cav alone that they would have would be at least the psychological impact of bringing elephants to the romans at first, but probably a good deal worse. And then a pike wall with soldiers so disciplined that one of the key factors the aztecs relied on against their enemies, fear, had very little sway? This seems like a particularly harsh matchup.

​@@adrianbundy3249 Reference for Spartans having elite cavalry? Would you be referring to the Thessalian cavalry the Spartans sometimes hired as mercenaries?

@@jarrodbright5231 They had them, for instance the 1000 strong cavalry force in their loss at Leuctra. Sometimes employed from Thessaly, but not necessarily (but that would also infer that elite status as well, because they were employed just because they WERE better sources of reliable cavalry). Most of the battles the Spartans fought had some elements of it. I wouldn't ever say Sparta was ever a cavalry juggernaut, because they weren't in greece, they were too proud to do it themselves, and even the kings guard with the most resources did not. But they were never so great of fools as to not realize the value in having some of them around. And in the numbers that would certainly have done enough here with the aztecs, where they would not really know how to even effectively deal with them near quick enough.

Aztecs specialized in stealthy and blitzkrieg attacks in order to stun and capture they’re enemies. While Spartans always fought conventionally with head on wars

@@yourmom3790 So it would be a matter of breaking spartans before they reach major settlements.

@@mullerpotgieter Spartans don't have any institutional ability to capture and hold large settlements That is why they only ever conquered one third of the Peloponnese

@@yourmom3790 I assume Aztecs may actually be better at ambushing and individual hand to hand combat (although bronze breastplates and Corinthian helmets could shrug off blows from clubs and obsidian swords), but when it came to open fiend battle they probably would not be able to match the more disciplined Spartans.

Personally I perceive the Aztecs in their warrior culture and style of warfare and individual glory to be more akin to the Celts than the Greek hoplites or Roman legions. I think the Inca army would have posed more of a challenge to the Spartans as they had more disciplined ranks of troops and used bronze weapons.

I thought the muddy terrain is the result of Aztecs burying themselves in the dirt?

Do you really think a spartan will be afraid? They are not afraid to die. Wearing a costume and scream won't make a spartan flinch. You are delusional

They would probably inspire myths of Eagle Men and Lion Men similar to how the Scythians inspired myths of Amazons and centaurs

There were Greek conquistadores serving el Imperio español. Some could have been descendants of the Spartans. Of course, most in Greece today are frauds who WISH they were Greek but are just Slavs.

They wouldn't invade greece or europe the aztec yes were warriors but didn't wanna conquer anything

Yeee

YES, both are fiercly loyal and fight to the end, both fighting Xerxes.. imagine a ninja throwing a nun chuk at xerxes like... *spins in air, hits his pp

@@HisExcellencyx Let's not forget that the Aztecs were also among the most dangerous fighters in history. They were cunning, brutal, and used advanced guerilla tactics as well as psychological and chemical warfare. There are several accounts of Aztec warriors winning massive battles against the Spanish who had plate armor, matchlock rifles, steel swords, and cannons. They were more than capable of going up against a force armed with superior technology