@@Iceneos1500 her abilities of holopsicon are simply haxed too much for him.they negate any concept defense she has almost infinite abilities not to mention her power of audience approval where for the any sake of tension she get buffed into fighting any opponent on equal terms if the audience want it while retains all her abilities.she can clone him to a conceptual level she manipulate the laws of cause and effect she can erase him at an information concept level with her birdcage and she can change the exposition and she's immortal and immune to physical conceptual damage and immortality nullification

@@intelhdmaster7141 So She Can Defeat Any Dragon Ball Characters Except Zeno and DBH Characters CC Goku and Xeno Goku?

@@Iceneos1500 she can if not defeat them she can pull any fictional character she wants from any series she can also she can alter fate by breaking and then reconstructing it however she wants also as i said she's high godly immortal immune to any form of erasure and immune to a more advanced versions of her abilities used against her and I'll really recommend watching the anime it's really good kinda slow but good

@@intelhdmaster7141 I see She's must Potential and Re Creators is Must Interest Series Too Bad it's She Not Popular like Goku Saitama Superman and Hulk.

Sorry I dunno a lot about her powers so I just used her most popular movesets

@@intelhdmaster7141 yea she also has resistance to erasure so she cannot die

then anyone who asks for scans with Sakuya's feats supposedly significantly affecting a wide range of entire timelines, and no one will actually be able to send one, because precisely the hyperbolic character doesn't even have the feats to accomplish this delimited feat, wasting more time with pure hyperbole and fallacies and being all arrogant than having concrete feats in itself to indicate its potential. Even for those who know a lot about Touhou's work, they will only see for themselves these fallacies considered without any basis, because no one really tries to really interpret things correctly as they really are in this flattery, in which they keep inventing things in their pretexts. It's not even a question of underestimating the characters of this franchise, as well as the fact that the franchise lives in vague contexts without any fixed points to really emphasize any cohesive narrative point, there is still a whole flawed powerscale behind it without any connection to prove anything. just the fact that you make the claim that this character is a Lunarian, already proves your degree of lack of knowledge of the work, to just stay there spreading these poorly emphasized wanks, and still assert yourself in an arrogant position as if you had a enormous credibility behind it, while you provide nothing to support your superficial arguments, because after all, everyone who read the work would see this objectively in a clear way. the character himself has also never proven to significantly erase a timeline in its entirety, or rather, nor to prove capable of erasing a much larger and denser object from existence, such as at least one solar system from existence, not having some truthful source to support this unjustifiable point, at most it has only been shown to be minimally able to affect a respective timeline in a way, and not a huge amount like you are implying, as nothing has been demonstrated to be accomplished as such, including if it manages to put out an anthill of existence is already too much. and just imagine a character so weak in stamina and physical strength going to create a whole scheme behind his back just to erase someone from existence for not guaranteeing himself in the beating as such? making everything boring for a battle to happen, at least this animation added more variation to her skills, while keeping everything balanced so the opponent can confront her in direct combat, it's not the video owner's fault if the character herself is so vague, which doesn't leave much artistic choice to animate and having to choose minimal elements. As long as you don't provide sources with valid scans, your argument will remain null, at most it's just taking some old ready-made arguments from the internet and replicating them without much congruence, which apparently will be the same form going forward.

@@lOOKthere-hx9ht You didn't have to write and type down an entire paragraph, at all.

@@Sakuyaizayoi1996 in other words, this is proof that you didn't even have the competence to read my argument properly and not be a debater, nor to be a powerscaler properly.