No video

Back-Focus 101: Celestron SCT wIth Celestron f/6.3 Reducer/Corrector

  Рет қаралды 61,953

AstroBlender

AstroBlender

Күн бұрын

Getting the proper back-focus for your imaging camera is a vital step in getting the best data possible out of your telescope imaging/research rig. This is a quick tutorial on how to achieve back focus using a deep-sky object CCD or CMOS camera. The Celestron f/6.3 focal reducer/corrector requires a backfocus distance of 105mm from the end of the reducer to the imaging sensor on your camera. The example camera in this video is a ZWO ASI 294MC Pro, but this will apply to all deep sky cameras as long as you get your focal distance to 105mm. The easiest way to do this is to get to 55mm of back-focus on your camera, and then add a 50mm SCT T-adapter, adding up to the required 105mm of back-focus.
Please consider making your astronomy purchases from my AgenaAstro affiliate link below. This helps me fund the channel and allows me to produce my tutorials and unbiased reviews that you can trust.
My link: bit.ly/3o5ltbm
AFFILIATE LINKS:
This description contains AgenaAstro affiliate links. If you choose to purchase after clicking a link, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps me significantly in funding the channel and astronomy purchases, allowing me to produce tutorials and unbiased reviews that you can trust. If you enjoyed the information presented and/or found it helpful, please support my channel by making your astronomy purchases through my AgenaAstro link above. Thank you!

Пікірлер: 221
@FuRyZee
@FuRyZee 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, saved me heaps of time researching and measuring all my spacers to achieve proper back focus on my AS294MC.
@dr.joeluciani1482
@dr.joeluciani1482 3 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I was looking for! Love your videos!
@IgnazioPillitteri
@IgnazioPillitteri Жыл бұрын
I got a RC6 + reducer, thanks to this video I figured out how to attach it in the optical train between camera and focuser, thanks a lot
@bradsnell7676
@bradsnell7676 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this. Just bought my first dedicated Astro cam and the focal reducer for my Nextstar 6 SE.. I needed this information to guide my setup! Just have to resolve a few issues with. R Pi and StellarMate and I will be good to go hopefully this weekend! Clear skies all..
@didiersylvie4216
@didiersylvie4216 4 ай бұрын
A big thank you for your video which helped me with the backfocus of my C11, a clear and precise video, hello from France
@TheUrbanAstronomer
@TheUrbanAstronomer 4 жыл бұрын
Cool image of the Sombrero... nice informative video 👍
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
The Urban Astronomer Thanks glad you enjoyed it.
@richardpeterson7201
@richardpeterson7201 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the informative video. It was a great help.
@davepastern
@davepastern 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this excellent video. Back focus and polar alignment are the 2 things that intimidate me about this hobby.
@luckykel2030
@luckykel2030 3 жыл бұрын
You needn't be intimidated about backfocus. You only need to worry about that when using a focal reducer. And it is straight forward as every focal reducer declares it own backfocus. Just get tubes and put the distance between the reducer and camera. Simple. For polar alignment, I used to be intimidated before until I found easier methods. Polar alignment is no longer as hard as it used to because of technology.
@davepastern
@davepastern 3 жыл бұрын
@@luckykel2030 still for the newbie, it is very intimidating. Different flange diameters, different spacer widths, having to potentially interconnect differing m sized flanges to each other with step up/down joiners etc...
@monkeypuzzlefarm
@monkeypuzzlefarm Жыл бұрын
Get an iPolar for your mount. Takes a minute to polar align.
@davepastern
@davepastern Жыл бұрын
@@monkeypuzzlefarm I already have a Polemaster!
@steppen57
@steppen57 3 жыл бұрын
I can't remember if I commented on this video already. I keep coming back when I am ready to image with my C8 Edge HD. It has been very useful for me. Thank you!
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 3 жыл бұрын
No problem. Just remember the C8 EdgeHD backfocus is only 105mm if you’re using the Celestron .7x reducer lens.
@MrGChuff
@MrGChuff 4 жыл бұрын
yeah nice one, just got a zwo1600 plus filter wheel, currently using on a redcat51but I also have a SCT and focal reducer setup i've yet to use it on, found your vlog very useful and you've gained another sub
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you enjoyed it! I envy you, I'd love a SpaceCat51. Thanks!
@AmatureAstronomer
@AmatureAstronomer 6 ай бұрын
Just got a 6" Schmidt Cassegrain optical tube off a Celestron 6se to use with my equatorial go to mount and bought the T-adapter you showed in the video, assembled everything the way you showed and can barely wait for the rain to stop so I can test it on small, bright targets. Still waiting for my HyperStar 6 v4 to come, so I can test it on large, faint targets. Have only used Newtonian reflectors and small refractors up till now. Thanks a lot!
@mattestabrook
@mattestabrook 4 ай бұрын
Just what I needed--thank you!
@RaysAstrophotography
@RaysAstrophotography 4 жыл бұрын
Slymin, awesome topic! very well presented too. Back focus is crucial on SCTs than refractors!
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
Ray's Astrophotography Thabk you sir!!
@RaysAstrophotography
@RaysAstrophotography 4 жыл бұрын
@@AstroBlender Cool!
@bobbeanbags
@bobbeanbags 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I needed this!
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 3 жыл бұрын
Robert Bean No problem!
@1fastbunny
@1fastbunny Жыл бұрын
Thanks dude that was a big help
@shawnharvPhotography
@shawnharvPhotography 4 жыл бұрын
When I started this video, I was HOPING you would say 105mm of backfocus haha. I've seen so many different answers on the cloudy nights forum. Glad you're using the same backfocus as I am. Keep up the awesome work!
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
Celestial Photography Yes, 105mm works great. At f/6.3 and depending on the chip size you could probably get away with +- 5mm. With smaller imaging chips it doesn’t have to be as precise at this focal ratio since you aren’t capturing as much of the edges.
@shawnharvPhotography
@shawnharvPhotography 4 жыл бұрын
@@AstroBlender Exactly! I use the Starizona filter tray in replacement of the 11mm ring, so im slightly over 105mm.
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a great fit!
@tomwall8403
@tomwall8403 4 жыл бұрын
I have an ASI camera and the two spacers. However, I have a standard sct visual back. Do you know if that gives me the same back focus distance? Thanks.
@durranaik
@durranaik 3 жыл бұрын
Great video, absolutely saved heaps of time., thanks. I do wonder with 105mm back focus, is it worth leaving the imaging train assembled when storing the scope or best to disassemble it. Personally, I'd rather leave the imaging train intact, as less risk of dust bunnies getting in and potential of re-using flats. A worry however, long tubing with 1/2 a kilo of camera weight might introduce a slight bend in the train overtime.
@cmas-astronomy4715
@cmas-astronomy4715 4 жыл бұрын
I had the same question about three weeks ago and posted a thread on CN. I got all my stuff and got the 294 threaded onto the back of my 9.25, but was surprised at how much vignetting I was getting. Flats definitely helped but I was a little annoyed by having to use them for EAA.
@jcims
@jcims 2 жыл бұрын
Man this is exactly what i needed. Just fired up my asi462mc last night on a c11 and the stars looked like cotton balls. I have factory 12.5mm of backfocus lol. Off to buy some metal tubes! :)
@henri-julienchartrand3387
@henri-julienchartrand3387 3 жыл бұрын
excellent and to the point.
@truckernige
@truckernige 2 жыл бұрын
lol, i just fiddled around with my spacers ‘til it focussed… haha.. nice vid, as usual, well done.
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 2 жыл бұрын
Haha well that works too!
@kenn7915
@kenn7915 4 жыл бұрын
Could you do a simple test with and without back focus from your backyard to a distant terrestrial object I.e. tall building or power line pole. Curious to see with and without scenario.
@okeania
@okeania 3 жыл бұрын
Why none of your videos mentions about adding 2" filters etc?
@jonnyreverb
@jonnyreverb 4 ай бұрын
@0:25 105mm That's what I needed. That number was harder to find than it should have been. For anyone who just wants to know how far away you need the sensor to be from the focal reducer, you need to have 105mm between the focal reducer and the sensor. Thank you!
@dannyfurdon
@dannyfurdon Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this info I’m a newbie and I just ordered the ZWOASI183 non cooled. I’ll be using it with a Celestron 9.25 OTA. I have 6/3 focal reducer already and the and the T42 I’m just trying to determine all the other pieces I need to get to 105mm in looking at what comes with the ZWO I’m just not sure what additional items I need. FYI I should receive the camera later this week. Thanks!
@ACEOFSPACE2000
@ACEOFSPACE2000 4 жыл бұрын
Very nice thanks for the info
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@marvhalsey7544
@marvhalsey7544 5 ай бұрын
Could you do an instructional video on Backfocus with a planetary camera? Some of us newbies have just started. I have Celestron C8, a Nexstar 6SE, and a ZWO asi224mc camera. What is the backfocus requirement to achieve? Bonus points: Add a Celestron SCT 6.3 reducer. What's the backfocus requirements now? Same distance for both scopes, but what is it and how to achieve? Your content is very well explained in plain English, as well as well documented. Thank you for taking the time!
@HollomanUFOLanding
@HollomanUFOLanding 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for thios great video. I have a couple of questions please: How did you find out about 105mm being the specifric amount of back focus? Will the 105mm of back focus also apply to Edge HD focal reducers (for 8" SCT) or will they have a different back focus value? Thanks
@maciejmilczanowski4272
@maciejmilczanowski4272 3 жыл бұрын
Thank very useful video!!
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 3 жыл бұрын
Glad you think so!
@robertn7007
@robertn7007 4 жыл бұрын
Great video Slymin. I have a celestron f6.3 focal reducer and I am about to buy a ZWO colour camera. I didn't realise the importance of backfocus so this will be very helpful.
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
Robert N You’re welcome!
@bb108
@bb108 4 жыл бұрын
HI Slymin - how can we achieve a back focus on a SCT when not using the focal reducer? Unfortunately, I am unable to find the T-adapter as all retailers are out of stock. Thanks!
@JodysGotYourCadillac
@JodysGotYourCadillac Жыл бұрын
FYI the information in this video - as well as ZWO's documentation - is not correct. Please see the comment by Chandrasekhar below (posted 2 years ago). The problem lies with the M42-to-M48 adapter ring. As it's only 4mm thick, it sinks ~ 5mm into the 9mm-deep female threads of the 16.5mm long spacer. So with everything screwed together snug, you're at ~100mm back-focus from reducer to sensor, give or take... NOT 105. The easiest solution I found was to replace both the 21mm spacer and the 16.5mm spacer/adapter with a single 37.5mm spacer (M42 on both ends, so no adapter ring required. Blue Fireball makes one, not sure if anyone else does). Another option is to stack another identical adapter ring on top of the first, which when inserted into the 16.5mm pretty much comes up flush (any variance could be made up with shims if desired). Or (ugly hack) you could use some sort of adhesive to permanently seat the adapter ring right at the top of the threads of the 16.5mm spacer, but then they're married for life. Or... a whole bunch of other ways I didn't both exploring since the 37.5mm spacer made things easy! ALL THIS TO SAY: We LOVE your channel! You've been an amazing source of information for us and we greatly appreciate your efforts. I wanted to put the praise before the correction, but I was afraid you wouldn't see it if I did. So thanks for everything - truly - but you really need to update this video ;)
@Nabby13
@Nabby13 Жыл бұрын
You can simply reverse the order of M42-M42 and M42-M48 extenders and use the M42-M48 adapter ring in between them to solve this issue.
@danjensen9425
@danjensen9425 3 жыл бұрын
Just what I needed to know . Where would I put my optolong L pro filter . And in you autoguiding scope video you have a dovetail for you C8 . Where did you get it I can’t find the right size . You make very helpful videos thank you . Oh I just bought the 394 mc pro for my C8 and spacecat. Time to learn Nina.
@sugardaddynr1
@sugardaddynr1 3 жыл бұрын
Hi and thanks for all the good advice you give. I have a question. Can I use this setup on Celestron NextGen 6 with ZWO 224?
@fermingomezc
@fermingomezc Жыл бұрын
Excellent video very helpful, one question if I want to introduce 2” filter where can I place it and what accessory I need. Thanks for your help.
@polaco_cosmico
@polaco_cosmico 2 жыл бұрын
Hola, saludos desde chile, gracias por tu video, esta muy bien explicado , pero tengo una duda como sería la configuración de si pones la misma cámara pero con un porta filtro?, ojalá me ayudes
@johnnyredfireastroimaging5266
@johnnyredfireastroimaging5266 4 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. So with DSLR or mirror less, you only need the SCT adapter right? What if I want to add a 2” filter to this?
@LaNa1174
@LaNa1174 11 ай бұрын
hi!, nice video!!! only one question please: where does the pollution filter go ???
@stabbiemchobo
@stabbiemchobo 3 жыл бұрын
You saved me from not being able to use my camera when it got here. 93633-A should beat the camera by a couple days.
@arshadwm
@arshadwm 2 жыл бұрын
Thank You. I will attach filter slider means I can remove 21 mm adapter but I don’t have focal reducer so will it work and what about Starizona hyperstar ?
@VikramHarinath
@VikramHarinath 9 ай бұрын
Thank you for your videos! I was wondering - what would you use as the back focus without a Celestron f/6.3 Reducer/Corrector? i.e. So only the C8 SCT (non-Edge) with the ASI294MC Pro camera?
@andrewkozhanov6800
@andrewkozhanov6800 3 жыл бұрын
Not sure if anyone has had this issue - I have Celestron CP 925, same focal reducer (Celestron f/6.3), same camera (ASI294MC Pro) and after building the 105 mm back focus was not able to get into focus. Was in a hurry yesterday when trying to do this, will give it another try today.
@garyantesr
@garyantesr 4 жыл бұрын
Is there a chart somewhere, on all the different cameras? I could not find what my canon m-50 back focus is from the sensor to the outer ring of the body mount.
@robertbennett106
@robertbennett106 Жыл бұрын
OK, I have a SCT 11" and the f/6.3 focal reducer/corrector. I just stuck a crayford focuser on the tube and no problems.
@gunnarjensen5910
@gunnarjensen5910 6 ай бұрын
I tried this same setup on my Mak180 but it seems the adapter ring screws all the way into the tube, (is it supposed to go all the way into the 16,5mm tube?) so I screwed it into an adapter ring and then onto the tube so that it fits snugly on the tube and does not move. Maybe that added another millimeter onto the assembly, but I got the best pictures yet on the moon. First time they have been in crisp focus with my ZWO533, have yet to try my planetary cameras and DSLR´´s.. Great help..
@ply17410
@ply17410 Жыл бұрын
Great info .. how did it work with the larger sensor of the 294MC? Vignetting any issue?
@spr1457
@spr1457 5 ай бұрын
Great video. I have a C8 and want to use an ASI 2600. Would I follow the same back focus and use the same train?
@marcelorsc
@marcelorsc Жыл бұрын
Hi! Thanks for the video!! 🙂 At ZWO's website they mention a 55mm back focus. For what purpose this 55mm backfocus applies? A SCT without FR? For SCTs with the 0.63x focal reducer (C8, C11, etc), the back focus changes to 105mm for every camera? Like the 533MCPro or even uncooled cameras like the 585MC? Thanks!
@fernandomagalhaes4842
@fernandomagalhaes4842 9 ай бұрын
Great vídeo! Maybe a silly question! This back focus number can be used in f/10 mode?
@ainttakenanyshit
@ainttakenanyshit Жыл бұрын
The "magic number" you mentioned was 105mm. IF you/I were to connect an ASI224 camera with the 1.25" eyepiece adapter, WITHOUT the focal reducer, would the standard focus travel eliminate the need for any other extender "add on"? Any suggestions will be welcome. Thanks, Hank P.S. Although the use of the Celestron reducer you use is the "best" way to reduce the FOV, Would an eyepiece screw-in reducer work or do they just not provide the image quality of the Celestron? Thanks again....
@nightsky8585
@nightsky8585 2 жыл бұрын
Loved to know where these numbers come from. 105mm w\6.3 reducer and 127mm without. Is this listed somewhere ? Do these number work for all F/10 ratios ? except for EdgeHD scopes which have a built in reducer.
@explorelearnshare8222
@explorelearnshare8222 3 жыл бұрын
I'm curious if you found something official stating the backfocus for the reducer/corrector? I did a lot of searching for that number and came up empty. Sadly, this video was not yet published at that time! I achieved the 105mm (105.5 actually, which is ok because I have 2mm filters inline which should add 0.667mm if I understand correctly) and the images look much better than what I had previously, which was only working out to be in the 80mm range. There is still a little distortion in the corners, so I wanted to ask -- is that your experience as well? I'm on a C8 going into a micro 4/3 sensor. I'm assuming this is the best this setup can achieve, but I would love to know if you or others are experiencing the same. It is really quite good now that I have it set up properly. Thank you for providing this elusive number!
@kevinquincy4589
@kevinquincy4589 4 жыл бұрын
I have a nexstar 5se. I have the 6.3 focal correcter with a .5 focal reducer and a ZWO 120mc camera. What back focus do I need for this image train?
@kevinquincy4589
@kevinquincy4589 3 жыл бұрын
I followed your instructions to have 105 mm back focus on my 5se with 6.3 focal reducer. However when I balance the telescope I have to move forward the whole telescope to balance and now only one bolt holds the dove tail. Do I need a longer dovetail now and what model do I get. It’s a CG5 dovetail and I have AVX mount.
@jimpoop
@jimpoop 2 жыл бұрын
Slymin, I have the same adapters as you, with the 16.5 overlapping the Celestron T adapter, what adapters are you using to compensate for that? I'm just curious what your set up is.. thanks alot, subbed BTW
@Astrokhels
@Astrokhels 3 жыл бұрын
I have three 1.25 filters moon sky glow, UV-IR and UHC. Do I thread them on top of the 294 or somewhere in the image train. Is the 294 opening able to thread a 1.25 filter. My ZWO is still shipping, just getting ahead of myself. Thanks
@philippefossier7178
@philippefossier7178 2 жыл бұрын
Great video Simon - very useful. Question: would you ever consider attaching the ZWO camera after the star diagonal ? I am using a standard mount with a wedge and don't have a lot of clearance left with the focal reducer and 105mm back focus. Thanks, philippe
@Felldisulfide
@Felldisulfide Жыл бұрын
Hi Philippe, there are many threads on Cloudy Nights on the subject with people falling into two camps: either use a diagonal, or a dovetail extension. Both have their pros and cons. Personally, I use a dovetail extension with a 'counterweight' of sorts. I've been running like this on a wedge with guiding for some time. CS!
@astroverland2367
@astroverland2367 Жыл бұрын
@AstoBlender Hello Slymin, thank you for your informative instructional videos. My Google-Fu has failed me. How does one calculate the effective back focus distance of a diagonal viewer in mm for an application like the one you are presenting here? Obviously the goal is 105-110mm, but not sure how to measure the diagonal to include into that measurement. I have an Celestron 8SE with NexStar mount and it requires me to use an diagonal for clearance reasons.
@djsundayrides4869
@djsundayrides4869 4 жыл бұрын
Slymin with the back focus 105mm with the focal reducer would that be the same with a zwo as1224mc camera too. 105 mm ? With the reducer use with any camera?
@bigbob5603
@bigbob5603 2 жыл бұрын
How /where would you add a 2" IR cut filter in this set up? I can bury a 1.25 inch one ( with adapter) in the 17mm extender, but I am concerned it will impact the corners of the image.
@briankotak403
@briankotak403 2 жыл бұрын
Been meaning to ask how you like your C8 with f6.3 for DSO imaging? I have a f6.3 reducer/corrector in my desk and am thinking about buying a celestron C8. I can’t justify in my mind springing for an Edge 8 plus 0.7x reducer given the cost difference and the fact that I already have the f6.3 reducer/corrector. You happy with your DSO imaging with your C8, f6.3 rig? Dr B from Manitoba, Canada 🇨🇦
@marcosaureliodosanto
@marcosaureliodosanto 4 жыл бұрын
Friend, I'm a new subscriber to the channel and I like your videos, congratulations on the channel !! I realized that there are videos on the channel with the celestron c8 telescope, I just purchased one and I would like to know if there is a camera for the astronomy market attach to 2-inch eyepieces? I have a 2-inch 31mm tele vue and I would like to attach a camera directly to this eyepiece is that possible?
@jasonmathias5343
@jasonmathias5343 2 жыл бұрын
I have a question. To shoot without the focal reducer, do you still need the T-ring adaptor? Basically just removing the focal reducer, then attaching the T-ring adaptor to the telescope? Seems longer than 55mm focal length since the T-adaptor is 55mm and the 16mm and 21mm are 55mm?
@stecal12
@stecal12 11 ай бұрын
The adapter - your mileage may vary, but the thread direction (stepping up/down, as one way to look at it) needs to be looked at closer (i.e., it's not just any M42 to M48 adapter). Using an ASI224, whose back focus is 12.5, necessitating an additional 5mm if using the 16.5 and 21mm spacers if all just threaded together as is, the adapter is "M48X0.75 Male/M42X1 Female to M42X0.75 Male Telescope Adapter" (for search purposes). And it's actually pretty close if just using the adapter and the two M48-sized spacers because (at least on mine) the adapter doesn't thread on all the way. Maybe it does, I just didn't want to force it based on some product reviews of the rings being stuck together forever if threaded too tightly/or the fit is off of a bit. A common one advertised that has "M42-M48" labeling on the ring is not the correct adapter. This is based on using the same Celestron T-adapter, focal reducer, and 16.5/21mm spacers as shown here. A "Plan B" setup can be achieved using the same narrower spacers (all M42). The SVBONY 5/10/15/20 kit (M42 both sides), plus a 24-35mm extender (it screws in and out, use some tape to keep the barrel from rotating once the width is set) that is set to account for the .5mm difference to get to 55 works. Precision calipers can be used to get the 27.5 on the extender when using 15mm worth of spacers. (12.5 camera, 27.5 extender, 15 in spacer rings, for a total of 55). But, this video definitely got me close to the approved solution for replicating this setup. Thank you.
@doco6186
@doco6186 4 жыл бұрын
Hi there Really learn a lot from your videos. How important is it to have the exact back focus? Suppose it is off be up to a few mm, in what ways and how much will the image be degraded? Thanks
@mauriziorvt
@mauriziorvt 4 жыл бұрын
Hi docO. I'm using a C8 with an ASI533MC. Eventually the BF distance I'm using is 135mm from the F:6.3 Celestron reducer. This results in a faster F:5.6 ratio (1140mm Focal length) and in shorter exposures. There is a little vignetting in the corners but it's easily corrected by flat field. Stars are pin point and in focus almost to the edge where there is some (very little) coma. The IMX 533 sensor dimensions are: 11.31x11.31 mm (16 mm diag.). My experience is that you can exceed the nominal distance up to 20 mm, if the sensor is not very large as an APS-C, still having a good picture quality. The field of view in this configuration is pretty large, 34'x34', so you can frame the whole Moon or Sun.
@davidfayolle4432
@davidfayolle4432 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Slymin, nice video and beautiful M104. I have a Question for you... What about the Barlow lens Luminos ? I mean , do you know what the backfocus is when you use the barlow ? Thank you
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
David Fayolle Not sure on that. It shouldn’t matter as much though since you’re increasing the focal length and narrowing the field of view. The edges won’t matter as much.
@anata5127
@anata5127 2 жыл бұрын
Do you need to use focus motor to get sharp stars? Or does 105mm fd train make them sharp right away? Thanks
@mohammedgalaxy9131
@mohammedgalaxy9131 2 жыл бұрын
Hello I have celestron nexstar 127slt mak scope. What are the accessories I needed to attached focal reducer and my astrophotography zwo 462mc please 🙏
@dansirman6509
@dansirman6509 2 жыл бұрын
Question: I have a Nexstar 8SE. I just bought a ZWO Asi224mc. Do I need any spacers to get proper back focus with or without the celestron focal reducer?
@jr10
@jr10 3 жыл бұрын
I Love this channel. I just got my first telescope which is a Celestetron 5SE. I've been practising taking photos with my DSL on Jupiter and Saturn, and making pretty decent progress. I also picked up an ASI120MC Camera to try. I've seen both 55 mm, and 105 mm referenced for back focusing this camera. Does the focal reducer dictate the use of the 105 mm distance as opposed to the 55 mm spacing? It is still quite confusing for me and any help would be appreciated.
@luciennone6757
@luciennone6757 11 ай бұрын
In the setup wich you show in the movie, where do i place the zwo oag (21mm) ?
@monteroder2708
@monteroder2708 Жыл бұрын
Slymin...do you screw the adapter ring all the way in as far as it will go and then screw in the T adapter? In your videoI couldn;t tell how far in the ring goes.
@GaryMCurran
@GaryMCurran 3 жыл бұрын
So, here's a question for you. We know from your video that the 6.3 reducer requires 105mm of back focus. You also said that a DSLR usually requires 55 mm. But, how do you determmine what the back focus requirements for other cameras/telescope/imaging trains requires?
@reidchandler6486
@reidchandler6486 5 ай бұрын
most cameras, as you now probably know but for those who are still new typically are 55mm and offer advice on adapters needed or how to put together the image train and adapters as needed. ZWO does a great job with photos and spacers in diagrams for your camera/s depending on what you use.
@GaryMCurran
@GaryMCurran 5 ай бұрын
@@reidchandler6486Thank you.
@sabikiss
@sabikiss 4 жыл бұрын
Great video Slymin. Very informative. Great job. What would you do if no reducer in the setup? C 8SE with ZWO ASI183MC. Many thanks and keep the videos coming.
@figzastro-photography
@figzastro-photography 3 жыл бұрын
@Sabi Kiss did you ever get the answer to your question?
@sabikiss
@sabikiss 2 жыл бұрын
@@figzastro-photography nah .. still waiting lol
@wadelerow8633
@wadelerow8633 2 жыл бұрын
i 'think' it's 127 mm. Celestron says 5 inches
@mostafametwally1
@mostafametwally1 4 жыл бұрын
Than you. Can you explain why we need to set the camera at the exact backfocus point when we can just turn the focus knob or move the draw tube until we reach focus. What is the difference between focusing by moving the mirror/ draw tube and having the camera attached at the exact back focus distance.
@todddunnavant5984
@todddunnavant5984 Жыл бұрын
The proper back focus gives you a flatter image on the sensor. Your stars will be rounder across the entire sensor image.
@glennchaffin8446
@glennchaffin8446 4 жыл бұрын
I have a ZWO ASI290MC camera with a Celestron Evolution 6 and the 6.3 reducer. What am i suppose to use with that to connect it to the scope and get proper back focus? I also have a GSO Crayford focuser i would like to use. Anyone have any ideas how i can set this up? Thanks
@rodericogarcia
@rodericogarcia 3 ай бұрын
Hi there, will this work the same for SVbony sv205 camera? I guess the sensor depth should be pretty much the same.....
@slzckboy
@slzckboy 3 жыл бұрын
great vid thanks. If you reverse the order of the 16.5 and 21 mm spacer you dont need the m42-m48 ring.What guide scope you using at full focal length btw? Look like a beast
@chrislee8886
@chrislee8886 3 жыл бұрын
Sadly this does not work. If you swap them round the supplied 16.5 42M-48F does not then attach to the T-SC adapter.
@Nabby13
@Nabby13 Жыл бұрын
He made a mistake. The ZWO M42-M48 adapter ring is designed to connect the ZWO 21 mm M42-M42 extender and the ZWO 16.5 mm M48-M42 extender. If you use the ZWO M42-M48 adapter ring with the Celestron T-adapter for SCT, you will get a back focus that is smaller than 105 mm because the Celestron T-adapter for SCT flange is too narrow to make contact with the M48 flange of the ZWO 16.5 mm M48-M42 extender. So the correct order of connection is: Celestron T-adapter for SCT --- ZWO 21 mm M42-M42 extender --- ZWO M42-M48 adapter ring --- ZWO 16.5 mm M48-M42 extender --- camera.
@ash20500
@ash20500 3 жыл бұрын
Why do you need the focal reducer? Just to get a wider angle for imaging?
@eaojnr
@eaojnr Жыл бұрын
what happes if i use a diagonal? Wont the diagonal consume focus length as well?
@rcaballeron
@rcaballeron 4 жыл бұрын
Great video and easy to understand the back focus concept. Well done! I've a question about the SCT primary mirror. As you know, when you're focusing the image this mirror is moved up & down which implies a modification of the f-ratio. My question is, does it have any impact in the back focus distance where the primary mirror is located or on the contrary it is advised to pull it down as much as possible?
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
Yes the primary does move, but the focal reducer sets the back-focus requirement when it is installed. The shift in focal length isn't too large, so at f/6.3 and 105mm of back-focus it doesn't need to be be absolutely perfect, there definitely can be some give. For best focusing results, I would say to make your last adjustment against gravity, not with it.
@rcaballeron
@rcaballeron 4 жыл бұрын
@@AstroBlender Thanks a lot for your feedback. Would it be different is we don't have in place the FR and therefore we have a f/10?
@stephanebourque490
@stephanebourque490 4 жыл бұрын
Wow! Thanks! You just saved me a lot of frustration. If you do not use the reducer, would you still calculate 105mm of back focus? Is there a mathematical formula to calculate the back-focus? Keep up the great content!
@lancewilliams8732
@lancewilliams8732 3 жыл бұрын
I want this info as well
@wadelerow8633
@wadelerow8633 2 жыл бұрын
i think it's 127mm
@MrGuilletv
@MrGuilletv Жыл бұрын
what abourt using DSLR + reducer 0.63 + AOG celestron ?? can i make 105 mm back focus with this set up ?
@clearskiesastro1028
@clearskiesastro1028 Жыл бұрын
Curious if you've ever done a plate solve with the 0.63x on your non-Edge SCT? I have a C9.25 and when I plate solve with my backfocus set to 105mm I get a focal length of ~ 1320mm (160mm off the theoretical 1480mm which I would get if I was getting the 0.63x redcution). So I'm getting 0.56x reduction which I've read others seeing on CN forums. Can you explain why this is? My backfocus is off by a max of 1mm if at all, I'musing 50mm T-adapter, 16.5mm extension, ZWO filter drawer (21mm), and my asi2600mc (17.5).
@michaellkovacs
@michaellkovacs Жыл бұрын
I'm putting this exact setup to the test tonight. I'll let you know how it goes.
@robinbarmore549
@robinbarmore549 6 ай бұрын
How would I incorporate an Optolong l pro filter into this setup?
@luciennone6757
@luciennone6757 11 ай бұрын
Hi, in this setup, where do i place the 21mm zwo oag ?
@gaminguser4968
@gaminguser4968 3 жыл бұрын
friend I have a celestron nexstar 8se and I would like to put that adapter and an extra telescope what is that type of adapter called
@cosmicbackyard_denmarkrene3273
@cosmicbackyard_denmarkrene3273 3 жыл бұрын
Is it the same lenght for a Meade sct lx90 10” telescope? 🇩🇰
@bobmcmahon
@bobmcmahon 3 жыл бұрын
what if you're using the ZWO filter wheel?
@user-cc3xq5eq4z
@user-cc3xq5eq4z 3 жыл бұрын
Hello, I have a black Celestron cpc1100 tLX GPS, can I install a Reducer Lens .7x - cpc 1100 hD
@angelo327able
@angelo327able 3 ай бұрын
Hello Simon: You don't say which telescope you're using in this video. The OTA tube is BLACK in color but I've seen you using an OTA Carbon Fiber EdgeHD and the standard C8" OTA in your video's.. .... So which witch is which?
@terrydufek9635
@terrydufek9635 4 жыл бұрын
Hello, Do you need this extension if you are not using the focal reducer? I just ordered the Zwo ASI294 for my Celestron 8 in evolution and am curious. Thank you
@TheMalbroughs
@TheMalbroughs 3 жыл бұрын
Would love to know this also...
@matthilton8959
@matthilton8959 3 жыл бұрын
Coming off the reducer are the fittings M48?
@rohitastrofpv7975
@rohitastrofpv7975 Жыл бұрын
Use the 42mm-48mm adapter between 21mm and 16.5mm spacers and then T adapter - it will give you exact 87.5mm
@Muesli711
@Muesli711 2 жыл бұрын
Hi, exellent video. @4:23, are you using your piggybacked refractor as a guide scope?
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, but I have since switched to off-axis guiding. It’s much better!
@denodan
@denodan 3 жыл бұрын
Have had my QHY163C working fine with 1.25" diagonal and camera, why useca diagonal you ask? As its an alt alz mount the camera sticking out, you on can get the 63 degrees before the mount hits the mount. Have even used the 2" diagonal and focuses also and tried both options in the day
@timpearce2281
@timpearce2281 2 жыл бұрын
I have the same problem and I have yet to find a solution.
@fletch591
@fletch591 2 жыл бұрын
Great video, thank you. Quick question, please? When you use the 42mm-48mm adapter it goes some distance into the adapter (by at least 5mm!) so how does this not compromise the whole 105mm measurement?
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 2 жыл бұрын
It does, you should compensate for it. I failed to do so in the video.
@eduardobrandao4307
@eduardobrandao4307 2 жыл бұрын
@@AstroBlender , I had the same question and almost missed the answer. You have the obligation to correct this fail somehow for future watchers that will increase your income from KZfaq...
@rohitastrofpv7975
@rohitastrofpv7975 Жыл бұрын
@@eduardobrandao4307 use the 42mm-48mm adapter between 21mm and 16.5mm spacers and then T adapter - it will give you exact 87.5mm
@robairifly
@robairifly 4 жыл бұрын
Hi, this is going to sound absolutely stupid I guess. I am into EAO and use a Celestron C6 SCT with an Atik Infinity camera. So far I have simply inserted my Atik onto my C6 using a Baader Click Lock and just focussed. Just like I do when I go visual and use eyepieces. Now I learn about this 'backfocus' and wonder what have I missed all this time. I found out meanwhile that the backfocus of my Atik infinity is 13mm. If I use extensions to get to this 105mm (because I also use a Celestron focal reducer 0,63) will I see a difference? What's the purpose of the focusknob then? I'm confused. Sorry.
@3rdshifter642
@3rdshifter642 4 жыл бұрын
Hey Slymin, I finally got my Celestron Evo 8. Bought a Rebel T6 to get started in astrophotography. In order to connect my camera to my telescope are the only things that I need are T adapter and a T ring?
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender 4 жыл бұрын
Shawn Lee Yep, you’ll want a t-ring and SC T-adapter. DSLR version of this video is coming soon!
@axford696969
@axford696969 Жыл бұрын
How is the back focus affected if you add in a filter, would you add a few 1mm spacers? Great video though!
@AstroBlender
@AstroBlender Жыл бұрын
Yes filters affect back focus. Check out my ‘How Filters Affect Back-Focus’ if you want to see the calculation necessary.
НЫСАНА КОНЦЕРТ 2024
2:26:34
Нысана театры
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Son ❤️ #shorts by Leisi Show
00:41
Leisi Show
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
UNO!
00:18
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
Back-Focus 101: Celestron 8" EdgeHD SCT (no reducer)
14:34
AstroBlender
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Should you buy Hyperstar or RASA?
12:07
Dylan O'Donnell
Рет қаралды 16 М.
I Filmed Plants For 15 years | Time-lapse Compilation
30:40
Boxlapse
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Telescope Back Focus: The Ultimate Guide [TAIC Short]
18:45
The Astro Imaging Channel
Рет қаралды 22 М.
The Clever Way to Count Tanks - Numberphile
16:45
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 785 М.
What can you see through a $10k telescope?
11:05
Astrobiscuit
Рет қаралды 917 М.
НЫСАНА КОНЦЕРТ 2024
2:26:34
Нысана театры
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН