Hello Bac :) I am an applicationss specialist. I wanted to tell you that your explanations are very clear and your videos are really interesting. Usually I will do a combination of both. It depends on the radiologists preferences regarding gap. 😊
@Nguyen_MRI3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for kindly words and your input. 😊
@dt67253 жыл бұрын
Hello Justine, For which machine (GE, siemens...) are you app specialist? Thanks.
@TAHA-TOUABA-RADIOGRAPHER Жыл бұрын
Please Do video like bac
@nuphan24223 жыл бұрын
I usually use a combination of both! Thank you again for such an informative video.
@AnasNajjar2 жыл бұрын
Thank you from Dubai
@user-ur1xh5ml5y3 жыл бұрын
Goooooood🤗
@sarfarazrahman23843 жыл бұрын
Sir please make a video about DTI and perfusion pre nd post processing....
@TAHA-TOUABA-RADIOGRAPHER Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much pro
@alwinswiss3 жыл бұрын
Hi bro can you please make video of F MRI scan and post processing.
@WesWilliamsonPage3 жыл бұрын
Not something I’ve given a lot of consideration because we gap most of our exams. I like the idea of achieving a similar result with concats to reduce gap. I do wonder if this resembles cross excitation more vs cross talk. I usually think of multiple axial slabs overlapping in the spine producing crosstalk??
@Nguyen_MRI3 жыл бұрын
using two concats and interleaved slices will not give crosstalk artifact. however, it reduces your coverage and more slices are often needed to cover a larger area. reading in books as you mention regarding multiple spine axial, they talking about cross excitation. can be very confusing
@dt67253 жыл бұрын
What are the ranges of TR & TE for T1, T2, STIR...for 1.5T & 3T? Anybody' s response is appreciated. Thank you 🙏
Isn't there also an option for the scanner to exite slices in intervalls? Such as Slice 1, then 3, 5, 7 ,9 and then 2, 4, 6, 8 so you can image without distance factor without cross talk?
@Nguyen_MRI3 жыл бұрын
Yes. Concatenations. Use two or more to avoid crosstalk whenever having 0 % distance factor
@Lethmyr_3 жыл бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI ah okay, thanks!
@dt67253 жыл бұрын
Anyone who has done MRCP on patient with ascites (excess fluid in the abdomen)? How did the MRCP come out? Thanks.
@Nguyen_MRI3 жыл бұрын
Came out good. Should be on 1.5T and not 3T. Difficult on 3T
@dt67253 жыл бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI we did on both 1.5T & 3T. In both ascitic patients we couldn't see ANY gall bladder, biliary tree or pancreatic duct. Did you do any protocol modifications for ascetic patient? Thank you.
@Nguyen_MRI3 жыл бұрын
No didn’t. It’s very difficult itself due to ascites. But those cases I had turned out ok for diagnostic answer