BORDER

Think it’s time for a bloody bill mascot

Until mu left for the sec. Now they don't play each other anymore

​@@bl18ce99who are you?

I'm here to say F KU

The institution of slavery was not the cause of the war. The tariff, a tax on imported goods, was the sole cause of the war. Northern manufacturers, who had gained political control in northern states, wanted the government to lay heavy taxes on foreign commerce to "protect" their domestic business. The South, however, was dependent on foreign commerce for its prosperity and wanted low tariffs. Political and business leaders on both sides realized that further argument was useless, that the tariff rate depended on the balance of power in Congress between the northern and southern states.

Wow. Round of applause for Billy boy over here! “mY cOuNtY fOuGhT fEr dUh uNioN!!” Wooly bully for you. Pin a rose on your nose. I guess now that you’ve boasted that from the hilltops, maybe they’ll go easy on you, huh? You know, you’ll be “one of the good ones” to the average drug-addled city-dwelling leftist turd and his Third World pets. And now that I think of it…did you just say that your county “seceded” from the Confederacy? But wait…I thought all you liberals hated secession? Isn’t that what you’ve all been whining about these last sixty plus years, how “secession” flags have no place in our “beautiful melting pot” society? So, tell me, which is it? I guess secession is okay when it’s your side of the fence doing it, huh? How very progressive.

@@PreacherLevi Don’t bother trying to talk sense to all the virtue-signalling leftists. They don’t care. They hate us either way.

Not true

@@PreacherLevi I'm a history prof, bro; this is nonsense. If you take even a MOMENT to read the state secession resolutions of 1860-61, you'll see that preserving (& expanding) slavery is front & center among the stated reasons. Probe a little deeper: in the SC debate over secession, delegates discussed using tariffs as a secession issue & rejected it.

L

Suuuuurrrrreeeeee he was.

similar story in my family of a man who survived but then was Abel to be father.

Thanx 4 sharin, surely he rotted in hell for the privilege to own another man....

I had one in the Union army too.Died of disease in New Orleans.Now he never got beyond private.

It's super cool you know your family's history like that. I'm a distant relative of Gen. James MacPherson from the union.

Bands of civilians fighting over the future of one state within the union is not the same war as 11 states leaving the union, forming armies, and fighting to remain separate from the union, while the remaining states fight to keep the union together. They may be born of the same loins, but they are not the same war.

@@ALRIGHTYTHEN. It was the same war for the same reasons.

@@buzzcrushtrendkill Bleeding Kansas was fought to make Kansas a slave state. The Civil War was fought to preserve the union. Not the same war, nor the same reason. Some people say that John Browns attack on Harper's Ferry was the beginning of the Civil War, but that's not true either. That was a treasonous act against the government that puts him in the same boat as secessionists.

@@ALRIGHTYTHEN. The underlying issues were all there in the lead up. Many people from northern states came to Kansas because it was pivotal to what was going on at the time, southern succesionism and slavery, as well as those from Missouri. I can see where you are coming from and you have good points. But I see these as all the same sentiments and raising the levels of hostilities that lead to the Civil War.

@@buzzcrushtrendkill Underlying issues aren't causes, they're facilitators. While the war of 1861-1865 wouldn't have happened without slavery, slavery could have kept existing without the war, and could have even existed with a Lincoln presidency. There was one reason the Civil War happened. The southern states wanted to leave the union and Lincoln wanted to preserve it. Bleeding Kansas had nothing to do with that.

And they all died by the " sword ' for how they have lived

@@stoppotsstabbats But they killed many more than their own number, so count it a win.

@@stoppotsstabbats Frank survived into Old age .

@@jtalmighty947 In the end, it was for not. A mouse, is still a mouse....for all that! Hurrah for our Northern Heros, who Concored Evil! 🇺🇸

@@heathenraider5259 And he was the only one.👍 🤡💩 🇺🇸

Not all historians are correct. Don’t jump to conclusions.😊

im from unionville mo

​@@hhhhhh-xg9rkI use to hunt up there.

Kentucky Confederate units were called orphan units as they had no state to support them.

@@jollyjohnthepirate3168 That I think also applied to many, if not all of the units that formed and served the side not recognized by their respective state legislatures.

Deo Vindici

The next Civil War will be over freedom for all men and women and will go far beyond race, religion, culture, or, to some degree, class/wealth.

The American Civil War, soldiers had a 1 in 4 chance of living, which was NOT a very high chance...

And just a few short generations ago!

I thought it was the city of Bleeding, but I'm not from there & could've misheard it.

I think the people who migrated to Kansas were believed to be from Boston they were attacking people in Missouri they were called red legs like the red sox I figure not sure what the truth is but in the movie Ride with the Devil one man says that Kansas people in Lawrence built schools and all thought the same, which made me think indoctrination was a strange thing to people then.

In Southern Kansas near Oklahoma and not far from Joplin Missouri' is Labette Co. They renamed the County sone years after the War from Van Dorn County. Which is named for Confederate General Earl Van Dorn.

It was devastating

There is a book about this called bleeding Kansas, talked about the under ground railroad, bought on by the Topeka Boys which it formed, talked about Kansas Red legs, John Brown

you was there and saw it

The sacking of Lawrence happened twice,yes once before the firing at Ft. Sumter and then in August of '63. The James boy you refer to spelt his name Jesse Woodson James. But he didn't have a part in either sacking, although he rode with "Bloody"Bill Anderson for about a year or more until Anderson bought the farm after the Centralia Massacre in September 27,1864. James tried to surrender at the end of fighting, and was shot for his trouble.

Jesse

You left out the part about the Missouri Rangers women folk that had all been kidnapped and held prisoner by the US Army. The Army guards sabotaged the multi storied structure the women were held in. It collapsed killing./maiming most of the women. Lawerance was base of terrorist operations aimed at Missouri. Why it was the target of the Missouri Rangers rage. Kidnap and kill somebodies mom, wife, or sister? WTF do you think the dudes going to do let it go?

They hid in Colorado.

Grant’s wife, Julia, and he owned slaves at their Whitehaven Plantation. She inherited them from her family. They didn’t free the slaves until Missouri amended the 13th Amendment, after the war.

@@mechcavandy986 Thanks for the info. I remembered Grant was once given a slave as a gift in the 1850s from his father-in-law who he freed and I just looked it up on the internet. His name was William Jones and he was freed in 1859. I remembered this from the Grant national park museum I visited. Being married myself for almost 50 years, I am sure she had influence on the inherited slaves you mention. It's quite a story how he came from an abolitionist Ohio family and how through his army buddy meeting his family in the St. Louis area met his sister and married in to a slave owning family.

Our State hwy Historical marker in Grant City(named after "the great gen")Missouri, IS not Historically True. Imagine that,The more Ya Know..... Learn the True history of Missori's Government leading up to the war and you'll find nearly a play book for how and Why the war happened. If you can find the TRUTH.I've Lived here over 50 yrs and I'm still learning.Very little of which is recorded correctly in books.

@@Mr.Guild1971 I like viewing some of the stories on PBS and KZfaq and books from the library that give so much more than what happened in the condensed history books we had in school. Missouri pretty much had it all from both sides.

Thanks for this. I live near STL now and I wanna see some if this stuff. Been through Jefferson Barracks quite a bit.

Well I sure hope its not devisive anymore...! Sèè my above take on this being "Top-Down" unGodly greed and control of the Southern slave based economic society...!

22:11 the Contrails are a nice touch. Must've emigrated so fast that they went in the future.

J😊uu Not really hu

Subject you and your family to slavery and see if you feel it is divisive? I think you would come to see it as evil incarnate and horror. Have your children sold, your achilles tendons cut if you were a flight risk from your horror. To listen to owners of humans pretend to be human is a freakn nightmare.

@@2ezee2011 Look jackass, as a Native, thousands our ancestors were enslaved by the colonizers. It's just not as publicized. How do you think the majority of those catholic missions were built? Divine intervention? Coming down on me about my word choice is ridiculous when you don't know shit about me.

I'm sure you refer to your Ancestors.

Many don't

This is not history - just white-right propaganda. Nazi

@@SN-xk2rl Typical left-wing fascist. You're on the wrong side of history.

Bloody oath..

Could you please explain your words " many many parallels ". Many " parallels " in your mind means what ?

😲😲😲 🤡

You're supposed to feel guilt for the deeds of others.😏🤣

especially about the civil war because its controversial even today, especially in the south

@@hopper1189 because many southerners are working very hard to reinstate the Confederacy.

@@sionnachmacbradaigh1010 yes, we are and this time we will fight side by side with men and women of all races, creeds, and both sexes to retain our freedom.

@@sionnachmacbradaigh1010 "Many"? How do you know such?

About to repete itself!

These are tragic times as well! Soon comes the time we Patriots eradicate the leftist and socialist parasites from our country!

@@raymondjones7130 thats a rather broad statement. Whit that statement . Your talking about our parents and grandparents as well as the disabled people. Someone thats worked for 40 yrs and put in his taxes deserves the SS for life. I do agree to an extent about the lefts crazy ideas of socialism. I feel even if they cant find work and receive food stamps they should have to go on the streets with a broom for at least 4 hrs a month and sweep. At least it shows a willingness to do some form of work. It just might get them a real job Someone needing a worker may see him out there all the time and snatch him up for a jod.....

@@henrybadiukiewicz8812 I have no problem with seniors and the disabled getting monthly checks, hell I think they should get more than what they're currently receiving. My problem comes with able bodied people playing the system. Women having multiple children by multiple men getting section 8, foodstamps, tax returns and the like, when they should be working. As you said, if they can't find work, they can perform community service of some sorts. That may lead to a break in the cycle that welfare leads to. I'm not saying I want children struggling to eat, I just want them to see their parents trying to better themselves! As far as these socialists and liberals masquerading as Democrats, I say they should face firing squads!

@@raymondjones7130 agreed!

Wrong video..

@@michaellovetere8033 My opinion not yours. My words do reflect much concerning the confederacy and have historical connections If you don't like it.. Pound sand. Don't remember requesting your approval or opinion. Like or dislike, I don't care either way. Have a nice day.

What did he say about slavery?

@@hopper1189 Spoke of how wrong it is and it's one of the most evil things a person can do to another person. You can find it on the internet.

@@robertcole9391 I was not even aware Thomas Paine addressed the issue of slavery, thank you for brining this to my attention I will definitely look at it myself

It's showing nationwide students have slept through history class.

Stick around. There’s about to be more History made directly.

Unfortunately ​@@ralphtaylor787 is right.

Wat are you talking about

For real lol. I think a lot of people /want/ this war to not be over slavery because a lot of people, especially in the south, had family fight for the confederacy.

Well of course not. Wouldn’t do any good most people can’t figure out the bs they shovel out in public schools. Your taught the north freed the slaves out of the goodness of their heart and then moved on to free the plains from the reign of Indian terror. If the whole story is slavery and their heart was good? What happened to that heart of gold when it went genocide on the plains tribes?

Really🙄 🇺🇸

@@OldHeathen1963 Hang out in Liberty or Harrisonville.(Where they still celebrate "Younger Days")

This is the absolute truth. Leaving kansas behind and entering Missouri or GODS COUNTRY.

I have always heard that University of Missouri basketball coach Norm Stewart would never spend a dime in Kansas. The team would stay in the KC area and then get bused to Lawrence, KS then straight back to Missouri. They wouldn’t stop for fuel or meals. Not sure if true but it’s a good story.

In Colorado they still make jokes about Texans losing the Battle of the Glorieta Pass in NM

Vice versa, for a guy from Maine, traveling through MO and OK to CA to visit family. Honestly worse on way back... Went though eastern OK to SC for sight seeing... You'd think I was from Mars...😲✊🇺🇸

@@robertsettle2590 no its the opposite way for me i get jumpy in the great state of misery 🤠lol. i don't really know why but i don't care for that state of mo

They also either were, or were friends with the Ruffians who had attacked the property of Brown's Son's whose land was nearby and who endured regular harrassment and destruction of property as they were known abolitionists and the Pottawatomie Creek community was Pro-Slavery. Portraying Brown as crazy is just propaganda.

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

@@SN-xk2rl nope brown was definitely a psychopath, a bloodthirsty killer.

@@melissaallen6914 ah, another trope. " winners write history" As well. No, Brown was hung for TREASON, the killers in Kansas.... Like Trump!

was a sam or a samuel maxwell price( peg leg sam as a nick name later on in life )/his relatives friends with jonn/him or his family ect.?? if so i don't know how 🤔 i feel about it

The Mormons were first run out of Illinois.

Plus they were a polygamist cult.

The LDS was ran off two decades prior to bleedjng Kansas. Joseph Smith was trying to assassinate the Governor Boggs.

AMEN my BROTHER!

Good Country, Missouri. I spent tome in Stover& Sedalia. I would have fought for the Condederacy!!!!!!!@

We’ll take your word for it

​@Christopher Caetano I'd rather have A Woman;;You don't even know why you say AMEN

​@Christopher Caetano I'd rather have A Woman;;You don't even know why you say AMEN

In the history of the United States, carpetbagger is a largely historical term used by Southerners to describe opportunistic Northerners who came to the Southern states after the American Civil War, who were perceived to be exploiting the local populace for their own financial, political, and/or social gain. BTW, for many decades after, women were basically slaves to their husbands. Not saying that two worn gs make a right, but that women are 50% of the population and everyone has at least one female relative (a mother). History still overlooks this because there wasn't money to be made out of this issue.

No one , I don’t care who it is , a blue blood from the 13 bloodlines descended from the upper cash Anunnaki who eventually became the royal houses of European Aristocracy and who branched into the power families of Europe & became the BANKSTERS and ruling class and who oppressed indigenous peoples all over the earth for hundreds and hundreds of years. Who view anyone not of their families and bloodlines as chattel ( ie cattle ) to be bought and sold at will by them & trafficked and traded in to these present times . People like Epstein and all the rich and wealthy he provided with whatever they wanted ( anything whatsoever) . Slavery is alive and well today and 2020 for the first time ever human trafficking surpassed drug trafficking as the number one “ money” maker in illicit activities worldwide. Truly a tragedy.

Further i think in time ( and not much longer ) the southern states would band slavery as a practice. Very few people had slaves & most could not afford them . A prime male of breeding age was going for $1,000 on the block & females for $500 . The import of slaves had been band as of January 1st of 1808 & the subsequent breeding of slaves had become big business as a result. In 1791 a revolt began on the island of Hispaniola and lasted till 1804 when Haiti 🇭🇹 in the West & the Dominican Republic in the East gained their independence from France who had control of the west side of the island and Spain and England who had control of the east part of the island. There had been revolts going on for over 100 years before Haiti and the Dominican Republic finally gained their freedom from colonial rule .

Many of the people who came to the eastern seaboard of North America came to the colonies as indentured servants ( a “ polite “ term for a slave ) from primarily England to get out of debtors prison. They served the royal families ( the so called & titled Lords ) who had extensive operations in the “ New World “ as indentured servants for periods of 7 to 14 and in some cases as long as 21 years to work off their debt to those families & if they survived their indenture tude ( many of which did not ) then they were granted their freedom & allowed to homestead in the western part of the colonies along the frontier.

racerx -- The issue has been treated dishonestly , it is not that anyone doesn't want slavery to be taught , everyone wants that , it is that people don't want children taught that all white people are inherently racist and even born racist . Unfortunately , many educators want that taught in school to students ...

​@@michaelweber5702Are you intentionally setting up a straw man, or do you actually not know the history well enough to understand it?

Wrong, they are wanting history taught, and the other side is claiming that teaching our history is teaching "white people are inherently racist." There's literally been no plan or incident of "white people are bad" being taught. But Fox News believes that anything that isn't American exceptionalism is bad.@@michaelweber5702

What County was Strawberry Plains in during The War Between the States?

SO YOU WERE GOOD SLAVE OWNERS. LIES. MY ANCESTORS WERE SLAVES AND THEY SAY BOYS WERE RAPED. FAMILIES SEPARATED. BEATINGS. TORTURE. GOD MADE HELL FOR THEM.

You said: He said they weren't fighting over slavery, but to be kept separate from the north. I say: This is what is being said enough and what angered most poor white southerners who never owned slaves. Slavery was a bit like cheap illegal immigrant labor - it lowers the wages of the locals. So, people are brainwashed to think the entire south was pro-slavery. they were far more ANTI-northerners and their monopolies.

Guys, you heard it here. You can't be racist if you don't own slaves

@@dagak1180 you can't be racist if you aren't white, too - same logic. and, of course, blacks would never be racist and are all good christians who turn the other cheek and forgive everybody and don't lie, steal, or commit adultery

Weirdo

Harrison Sucked! It was the beginning of the Nader.

those 20 should have been court-martialled with dishonourable discharge papers ect. thats sick 🤮ect.

Disarmed ?

Of all people, Hillary? Wow!

statehood for DC? that would make DC far less objective and I thought it was against the law. DC Needs to be neutral as possible to keep any semblance of fairness.

They cared about the seats because of slavery, dude. It was slave states vs non-slave states

@@dagak1180 And?? It's literally what this video is all about.

@@dagak1180 you memorized your history books so well. too bad the rest of history isn't allowed to be taught to school kids. He who owns the gold makes the rules.

@@genkiferal7178 The only thing that isn't allowed to be taught to school kids is CRT, genius. We live in the age of information, you can study anything you want.

(Gen 9:25-27, MT) He said, “Cursed be Canaan; lowest of slaves shall he be to his brothers”. He also said, “Blessed by the Lord my God be Shem; and let Canaan be his slave. May God make space for Japheth, and let him live in the tents of Shem; and let Canaan be his slave”. It's right there, in the Book that is Good, because a Good Book knows it's Good. (Apologies to Tim Minchin) :P

sir, sen charles sumner was anti slavery as was brown, and brown wouldve therefore been greatly perturbed by the caning by brooks.

In the history of the United States, carpetbagger is a largely historical term used by Southerners to describe opportunistic Northerners who came to the Southern states after the American Civil War, who were perceived to be exploiting the local populace for their own financial, political, and/or social gain.

⁠@@genkiferal7178 yes ! they called them Carpetbaggers because they were in such a hurry to head south to exploit the opportunities from Reconstruction that they just rolled some items they would need in a carpet and headed south. P.S. Hillary Clinton was accused by some , to be a carpetbagger for running for congress in NY when she was from Arkansas originally . i love names for people or groups like, Red Neck, Bushwhacker, Border Ruffians, Black Jack etc. Very colorful descriptive words. 🤭

I always thought it was unrealistic that they somehow convinced the Northerner's to potentially die themselves, and come down to free the black slaves. Why would they risk their lives for people they thought that they were better than, and potentially hated?? Massive racism still exists in the north today, as most of the race issues, and riots are in northern cities. I always think that every conflict in the history of man is about wealth, resources, and power... any other reason is just a bunch of BS in my opinion. I just don't believe the narrative.. I think the South was becoming too powerful, wealthy, with mass immigration of people leaving the harsh winters of the North.. and this was the time to strike and destroy the economy of the South. The economy of the South was destroyed for decades, and I think that was their motivation... not to free the slaves. So, I agree with you.. it has been rewritten in opinion as well.

💯

First time I ever heard actual facts that only a real civil war descendant would know!

Wow, this is an amazing and factual comment.

I very much agree. If people were to read the transcripts from the Lincoln/Douglas debate, they would see how the real Lincoln was. Lincoln agreed to allow both Missouri and Kentucky to be neutral. Shortly after his agreeing to Missouris neutrality, federal troops were killing St. Louis civilians. I got into it with a supervisor at Wilson's Creek Battlefield next to Springfield, Mo. over how they are changing history. He claimed that Mo. was never a confederate state. I informed him of the real history. Lincoln sent troops to take over the Mo. state capital after invading St Louis. The governor and top elected officials escaped. The governor ended up in SW MO at Neosho where he requested to join the confederacy due to Lincoln lying about allowing Mo. to be neutral and CSA president Davis welcomed Missouri. Mo was the 12th star on the confederate flag and Kentucky was the 13th. The supervisor at the Battlefield got really irked when I mentioned that a new Mo. government appointed by Lincoln was a false government since they were not elected by the people (quite a few people were there listening). I'm surprised that they haven't changed the victory of that battle at wilsons creek from the confederates to the union. Other than a very few with rich soil next to the Missouri River, most Missourians never owned slaves nor knew anybody who did. It takes 2 or more governments fighting over the takeover of the country for a civil war. The confederates didn't want to rule the country, but only to succeed as the constitution allowed and be on their own due to tyranny. The war was actually The War of Northern Aggression. Slavery was already decreasing due to new farming machinery at that time. Lincoln didn't have a slave but his wife Mary brought her own personal family slave with her when occupying the white house. Hell, the natives made slaves out of other tribe members prior to the Europeans ever setting foot in America. Blacks brought other blacks as slaves to put on the slave ships. Blacks owned blacks in the U.S. Then of course there was all the Caucasian slaves.

You are correct to a certain extent, but it does not excuse those who bought human beings and those who used human beings shamefully. This is the very reason why History classes should tell the complete story in our Public Schools.

That was also the case with some Jewish guards in the Nazi death camps. They had their own survival to worry about. But there's also something about mistreating someone that makes you begin to hate them. The people who hate the most are those who have done wrong to the hated, so it's not always about survival, but self-justification. Another thing few modern people seem to notice about supposed historical accounts that show someone killing a slave is that such an act would be like shooting one of your prize Arabian horses, or several of your most valuable cattle. Slaves were not only expensive [otherwise they wouldn't have been worth hauling on ships from Africa to the new world], but required a hefty investment of feeding and care, A weak, sick, starving, and miserable slave cannot do much work. Then you'd have a problem with potential suicide. If a slave's life sucks enough, they would no longer care to live. You'd have to maintain some kind of balance in their quality of life, so I can't buy the idea of slave owners constantly killing or maiming their valuable property. You'd have to be such an idiot that your plantation or farm would fail anyway, to be stupid enough to do serious damage to any of your slaves. Logically speaking, at least, you'd also be better off letting a slave run than shooting him, because if he's dead, you just lost a very large investment, permanently. If you let him run, there's at least a chance of catching him later. Again, any slave owner who would just shoot a guy who runs would have to be an idiot who doesn't value his own assets/investments, and such a person would be too stupid to succeed at farming anyway. Then of course, there's the myth of "working for free". Once again, you can't have slaves without furnishing their food, housing and medical needs, not to mention enough social and emotional needs to keep a will to live. How many people today have jobs that don't really pay all their food, housing, medical/survival, transportation needs, so they can live another day to make it to work? A slave was "paid" at least that, which many of the Earths population today barely acquire, and many white kids who worked in factories later, did not even make enough to live on, AND had to work many more hours per day than a typical slave. But people today - because of Leftist indoctrination - are so high on their concocted indignation, for the sake of virtue signaling, that they can't concede any of those facts.

@@jameseverett4976 Wow, that was really well written, thank you for an informed & eloquent comment! Perhaps it's because I'm a real White Anglo-Saxon Protestant, (not the cross burning kind) but the idea of slavery always confounded me. For example, if an African is nothing more than a beast of burden, how could you in conscience (as many identified as Christians), rape the pretty ones & sell the offspring as slaves. Does their moral ambiguity include other livestock as well, where do you draw the line? But these same "white Christians" were bombing Black churches into the 1950's or later. I discovered that one of my ancestors in Lancaster county PA owned a fenian slave by the name of O'Hare before the american revolution. Unsurprisingly he came down with draptomania, & the advert in the paper went something like: "$2.00 reward for the return of unaway slave, (i forget his 1st name) O'Hare from the County Cork, the proof of which is on his tongue & in the redness (or ruddyness) of his cheeks and hair." I don't know if he ever got him back, but i do know back in the day a good black male slave was the equivalent of a Cadillac in the 1950's. Of course O'Hare would've been cheap as chips, the Irish republicans are worthless. Wink. I've heard said "we always hate the ones we've wronged" it certainly seems to be true, one need look no further than your local Native "reservation", or more recently residential schools for native children first run by the pope & then by the national government in order to destroy there tongue, custom and culture. The damage done to those people will likely never be undone because the Canadian gov't doesn't care about a bunch of savages with a child's mind. Personally I always loved the way my own Scottish Celtic (pronounced keltic but you knew that) clan (not klan) culture dovetailed seamlessly with Native American clan culture, 2 warlike savage races with a genetic predisposition to dancing & drumming. Scots married into native tribes & often came hold high office. Don't know where i was going with that, sorry. Anyway you're a good bloke & if i was on facebook I'd definitely hit you up for an intelligent chat or a bit of the craic. Cheers mate, ✌❤ from Canada

@@jameseverett4976 You are only accounting for enslaved people who were considered especially valuable. Look to how they worked enslaved people to death on sugar plantations, so many died that they required a constant supply of new enslaved people to replace the lost laborers. The lot of many enslaved people was to survive on scraps, which is why so many traditionally black dishes in the United States are made from plants and animal parts that were undesirable. Enslaved people who fled were always tortured, sometimes to death, to dissuade others from making the attempt. There was the constant threat of relatives being sold to different owners, either due to lack of concern or as a punishment. The fact that one could be sold to a scientist to be dissected, or experimented on, as was done on numerous occasions. The fact that whomever owned them could do horrible things to them without redress. Edit: While it was the house slaves who were most likely to be violated by their masters, there was also the unending nightmare of slave breeding farms during the era of slavery in the United States.

@@jameseverett4976 Now they just make sure we all have steak, ice cream, a recliner and a big screen and can make payments on time. Annoy the evil ones that hate free speech, click on the avatar.

@@RageTyrannosaurus I knew I would get flak for that, but didn't have time [or space] to write a complete history book, so I wouldn't leave anything out, thus appearing to say things I never said. No one would have read it all anyway. Lesson: never tell a segment of a story, issue or fact in these triggered times. Crowds of pre-offended warriors are waiting with baited breath to nail you over what you MUST be implying.

It's at 21:59 you can actually see it moving across the sky LOL

It was a UFO coming to check on their pyramids.

They had to get around somehow back then 🤷‍♂️

Hard to say, but it might be possible to see if this is viewable renting from the public library nearest you. 😊

lost causers get bent

@@jigglebilly7771 edgy

@@PreacherLevi Why then was none of this mentioned in the Cornerstone Speech by Alexander H. Stephens. All historical documents confirm that the struggle between North and South was about "That Peculiar Institution"..