Nope, sorry :(

Its not a dumb question finnish is hard i know

Google "Brunswick Quantum Bias" and you might find the answer.

Yes its quantum....

I think this article describes why women get eight pins per game handicap on the EBT: www.bowlingdigital.com/bowl/node/202

If you think the evolution of equipment puts men and women on an equal playing field, you don't know shit about this game. Find me one, just one woman who has the rev rate and ball speed we saw from any of the players on the Oklahoma Open show. You won't find one, and if you think equipment fills the gap in the physical aspect of this game, you're clueless - and don't even talk about Daria Pajak. She bowled in that event, how'd that turn out?

@@Slimzyjoe easy Mr. Triggered...did you miss Tan' s 256 beat down on ole boy who I am sure out rev'd her 450+ to 200? This isn't 1980s anymore where you had to grip a urethane or rubber ball for dear life to produce half the ball movement of today...stats don't lie...womens averages have risen higher and higher thru the years...time to have them compete on even playing fields across the globe, not just USA

@@gccorbitt2 you're kidding me right? Averages have risen ACROSS THE BOARD. Not JUST women. That's an absurd statement, it's actually down right ridiculous to even suggest something so dumb. Tan bowled an outstanding game. 1 example does not justify anything. If that were the case, Liz would have 10 titles on the mens tour. On no planet does the equipment put them on a level playing field. They are playing entirely different games. Women as a whole cannot strike as much, and cannot compete at the same level. That's not sexist, it's just a fact. It's the differences in anatomy. I agree that women shouldn't get pins, but I'm also not dumb enough to suggest they compete to the same level. Because that is an unequivocally false statement.

Glenn Corbitt then you agree with men competing in women’s tournaments?