Absolutely correct! The greatest voice singing today! Michael is simply astounding!

Siii es muy genial lo que logra Spyres!!!

è un tenore, con quel grado di compressione che si sente solo nelle voci tenorili.. magari capace di andare più in giù ... ma non è certo un baritono divenuto tenore...

ma sempre un tenore - I subscribe. Che vuol dire "non gira le vocali" ( "squillo" reminds me of German "Triller" in the sound, and Italian is less harsh.) Non gira le vocali means "does not turn the vowels" - I understand the following: "bartitonali" are no tenors as they do not - because they cannot - turn the vowels. So what is "girare le vocali"? To me it is more than belting which may be a very good way to be strong while not "shouting" - so shouting is not even trying to turn around the vowels and risk the squillo - in English: ringing. "Only the strong survive", like Springsteen. Put simply, my understanding that "belting" in Rock music is non girare but doing the tenor range nonetheless. I think it's endurance - vincero is not to let yourself be "killed", you got to "kill it". Its more supporto than being assertive (shout at somebody), it's belting. There is not much virtuosity to it in the colloaratura of "jumping" the intervals, at is sheer performance of a high not you are able to do at all. This seems in line with your explanaton of "baritonali" - they only avoid virtuosity, they "non girano" - this definition of baritonali does not exclude just doing it right, to hit a high note and hold on to it. As this is endurance -- you haven't got much left "to jump", then. Vincero, I will survive and I'm doing it, "staying alive". Conversely, an only tenor you say, "sempre sempre" stay what he is defined: a higher male voice, what you say is that he is lacking the virtuosity in the baritone range? You do not say so explicitely. You do not say a "tenor sine" lacks strength or endurance in the lower range. Let me just extrapolate: an only tenor does not do gira le vocali che sono di range baritone. There is some squillo in the baritone for the tenor - squillo reminds me of to squeeze which might look like force, but in a squeeze out there is not much resistance or endurance "on the other side" of ambiguity. The low down: the baritenor are simply the best. You didn't say that either. Take my many excuses and many thanks! Cheers! Si vuole parlate italiano, in caso.

"Talking about war" - "or so" suits me fine in my theorizing, trying to. Reminds me - I hear the ending now - of "Vincero", famous ending of Nessun Dorma. How about "Nessun Dorma". It's tenure and tenacity in the ending, so maybe the that is war in sort of defending yourself to the teeth, to preserve your reservoir being lyrical "all the time"? You get my point? To be crystal clear, I guess that's what a tenor by nature is able to do. Interesting you speak of "kind of parody". I have been looking for a word that differentiates "satire" from "irony". Irony often "doesn't work", sure it doesn't in war, between opponent - some interesting bridge now is the audience, kind of of a "war theatre". That forbids somehow in some goodness taking each other not serious, sorry for talking my was, as it now occurs, the thin red line I see in the audience in war being basically some reservoir you pick your partner of alliance from. It's everyone against everyone and the ambivalence is none. As this refers to understanding each other in some lyricism of ambivalence. If you say some kind of war: it's the final count - how long will that "so clear" hit high not be tenured... With your comment, in my opinion the baritenore is able to be lyrical and thinking to himself loud but not shoutingly in the tenor range which because of his being low by nature - just baritone - is in a range of excitement. It's "thinking out loud" then, in times of war, at least he could take good care of himself by himself and endure that last note, where it's tomorrow, Vincero, just a plan. Next day it will dramatically get crystal clear who succumbs and - if the perseverance lacks in the ende - even sucks, they say. I am fond of Ed Sheeran I got the quote from. I'll see to that: is Ed Sheeran a baritone at times of Ukrainian Rennaissance? If you know do reply. Thanks, in advanc and in case, for having me at you place. "I owe you" (sorry, I find that amusing, as I once was not told but spoken to with the following: "I know you". That's might have been what you meant by "is that kind of parody", again thank you for tolerating what I'd like to call lyricism in a parro - mood). Edit: I did not edit as the content matters that much too me. The first sentences are all right in typo, if you find any interest I am sure you will not mind me being "confusing".

For a baritone to be ranked tenor it probably takes a lot of excercise, maybe this is to the expense of the baritone range virtuosity. Just another idea. Anyway, what Spyres seems to have "achieved" is the tenor range, he was a basic baritone in my understanding. Why practice what you think you can do. As it occurs: I think Frank Sinatra did that: he was baritone and he exercised to become a better one. Interestingly, my guess is that singing a lot in a baritone range, for a male: "at all", singing at all..., will enable the voice to do bass notes. Whereas expansion from baritone to tenor is much more adventurous. Wide jump is different from marathone.