Battle of Sahara (1898) - United Kingdom & Egypt vs Sudan

Рет қаралды 853,321

6 жыл бұрын

With your donations I can get more time to create and upload new videos.
paypal.me/YTmustbefunny
Please support my channel and subscribe. Thanks. :)
Cut from British movie "The Four Feathers" 1939.

Пікірлер: 279

@mustbefunny1007 5 жыл бұрын

With your donations I can get more time to create and upload new videos. paypal.me/YTmustbefunny

@natalieg90 2 жыл бұрын

Can we just appreciate all those people are real there were no green screens back then

@johneaton25 Жыл бұрын

Yes that’s a phenomenal truth to remember 👍

@RRStout Жыл бұрын

1939 version of The Four Feathers directed by Alexander Korda. One of the best movies ever made.

@Waechter_im_All Жыл бұрын

I agree! I was completely flashed when I watched it as a boy. How many times did I replay this scene with my little airfix-soldiers, some sheets of paper folded as tents an some cotton wool forming the zeriba!

@chriscann7627 Жыл бұрын

The Korda Four Feathers is one of the greatest British films. Astonishingly, many of the Sudanese extras, especially the Beja and Hadendowa (the famous "fuzzy-wuzzies" of Kipling and Corporal Jones) were the sons and grandsons of the originals who fought at Omdurman forty years earlier.

@thonbrocket2512 Жыл бұрын

Which demonstrates the great advantages of British imperialism. 1898: get shot by the British. 1939: get paid for pretending to be shot by the British. Progress, y'see?

@user-lt4rf1kn3g 25 күн бұрын

on transmet la guerre à ses petits enfants....comme une belle histoire....alors que c'est le côté animal de l'homme qui ressort...le coté mammifère...mais les grands parents pensent bien faire....car ils pensent plus jamais ça....

@user-di2ez6xs5s 16 күн бұрын

RULE. BRITANNIA. 🤗

@partygoersonlevelfun4485 5 жыл бұрын

💖 your 📼! Keep up the good work

@coinneachreid8971 2 жыл бұрын

The Korda version is certainly the best and a joy to see Sir Ralph at such a young age (37 I believe )

@gaborandrejszki2553 6 жыл бұрын

Nice video my friend! 👌🙂

@galolito 2 жыл бұрын

It's so wonderful that Britons use to be able to disguise themselves so well. Probably the introduction of eyeglasses to the colonies put an end to that.

@elizabethfarrell9650 5 жыл бұрын

excellent. Thanks. :D

@dennisneuman9380 Жыл бұрын

That was a great sound system playing the music. Was that mounted on a camel?

@mombaassa 2 жыл бұрын

9:42 Unrealistic. They wouldn't have just stroled away, leaving corpses on the battlefield. The victors, would have at least, buried their own comrads.

@24goons 2 жыл бұрын

What bury their Fucking comrades? Nah bro that takes hours.

@Taiko-THC349 2 жыл бұрын

@@24goons The Muslim Madhists would have buried the dead.

@24goons 2 жыл бұрын

@@Taiko-THC349 Yes. But by that i mean its gonna take hours for them to bury them since alot of them died then the Brits.

@formwiz7096 Жыл бұрын

Apparently, they didn't. The several epic fights of the Gordon Relief Expedition saw the fuzzies, gutsy as they were, walk off and leave their dead.

@ankursingh4878 Жыл бұрын

In modern times pakistan army does it.

@EdHenriqueProjeto 6 жыл бұрын

Nice video friend👍

@rashd1398 2 жыл бұрын

المسلمون لايتركون جثث اصحابهم ملقاه هكذا بل يكرمونهم بدالدفن بملابسهم لكي يقابلو الله بهيئتهم اللتي استشهدو بها وحتى المشركون يتم دفنهم في قليب واحد كما فعل رسول الرحمه بقتلى قريش في بدر

@marcoliverbaum4073 6 жыл бұрын

Great video my friend 9

@pushprajsuthar6177 6 жыл бұрын

Nice video

@caderly123 6 жыл бұрын

"They don't like it it up 'em, no Sir they do not!"

@darkzi1431 4 жыл бұрын

These soldiers didn't like it up then

@paladinsix9285 2 жыл бұрын

The UK had a presence in Egypt to maintain control of the Suez Canal. Technically the leader of Egypt was a vassal of the Ottoman Empire (~Turkey 🇹🇷). Egypt/Ottoman Empire claimed control of Sudan. The Mahdi was a challenge to the (Muslim) Ottoman Empire whose leader was (supposed to be) the Leader of the whole Islamic world. If the Anglo-Egyptian army didn't put down the Mahdi, then it was likely the Ottoman-Turks would send an army. As long as the British kept order (and tarrifs flowing to Istanbul/Ankara) the Turks would tolerate British control over the Suez Canal. The Ottoman Empire had many problems, in particular in the Balkans, and elsewhere with the Russians. Tolerating British control of the Suez Canal benefits the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire control of Constantinople/Istanbul and the Bosphorus (outlet from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean) coveted by Russia, benefits the British.

@mohamedmgady5938 Жыл бұрын

come on bro Egypt take Sudan with Mohamed ali empire Mohamed ali fight ottoman empire and already defeat it so he take Sudan as a gift after war vs ottoman empire your information so low :(

@mombaassa Жыл бұрын

Thank you for your insights. 👍

@omerreyizz8603 6 жыл бұрын

mustbefunny * bro dude nice cool good video #8.like

@maxusalife 6 жыл бұрын

Big battle! Lk 1

@conservativemike3768 2 жыл бұрын

Let’s wander around a hostile desert with a mere company of light infantry, no water, and no supplies. What could possibly go wrong?

@bigglesharrumpher4139 2 жыл бұрын

A stiff upper lip repels all enemies of her Majesties' forces. Stiff. Upper. Lip.

@conservativemike3768 2 жыл бұрын

@@bigglesharrumpher4139 / Jolly good. We may not find the enemy, but we’ll look bloody good doing it!

@bigglesharrumpher4139 2 жыл бұрын

@@conservativemike3768 Chin-chin ol' Chap!

@conservativemike3768 2 жыл бұрын

@@bigglesharrumpher4139 / It’s just a flesh wound!

@formwiz7096 Жыл бұрын

Do some reading. That's exactly what happened on many an occasion.

@neilfrank1726 2 жыл бұрын

From a movie called The Four Feathers made 1939. Other remakes are trash this is the best.

@user-mo5kq1wm1e 2 жыл бұрын

اول متابع عربي 😉😉😉

@patriciaherrera7753 2 жыл бұрын

Me gusta que un ejército tenga coraje esforzados y sean. Disciplinados

@jimcrawford5039 2 жыл бұрын

remade as Storm over the Nile, 1955 using some of the same footage.

@stephanvenner2939 2 жыл бұрын

I saw the black and white Version one Sunday as a Child.The Captain was blinded by the Sun?

@rickyricardo520 6 жыл бұрын

From the movie The Four Feathers I believe.

@adamcheklat7387 5 жыл бұрын

Yep, it is.

@mgt2010fla Жыл бұрын

@@adamcheklat7387 I think it's the second movie of the same name.

@brandenburg2388 6 жыл бұрын

Now where the hell was that Apache attack helicopter?

@davidedbrooke9324 6 жыл бұрын

brandenburg2388 They forgot to pack it.

@georgehystrix6736 6 жыл бұрын

Hidden in Dr.Who's time machine

@jamesquirk4999 10 ай бұрын

British actor Ralph Richardson was in another movie 🎬 about Sudan 🇸🇩 War in movie 🎬 Khartoum which he starred with Charton Heston and Laurance Oliveier.

@c.coleman2979 6 жыл бұрын

The Sudan not the Sahara; the original version of Four Feathers and still the best.

@Porphyrogennetos940 3 жыл бұрын

You have seen the 1915 version?

@rogueriderhood1862 Жыл бұрын

Sudan, Sahara, what's the difference, they are both deserts.

@seanford2358 Жыл бұрын

@@rogueriderhood1862 because the Sahara covers most of northern Africa and the British were only in Egypt and Sudan to fight the Madhists!!! The rest of Northern Africa was colonised by France, Italy etc!! Read a history book!!!

@seanford2358 Жыл бұрын

@@zk30 but Britain was only involved in Egypt and its then client state of Sudan not the rest of northern Africa!!

@rogueriderhood1862 Жыл бұрын

@@seanford2358 My post was a joke, you half-wit, get a sense of humour!

@edwardmckenna2328 2 жыл бұрын

Fuzzy Wuzzy charged the square...

@jimharris6311 Жыл бұрын

It’s from a movie, “Four Feathers”

@charlesmoore7349 2 жыл бұрын

this is from THE FOUR FEATHERS

@SuperChuckRaney Жыл бұрын

Men: TODAY GENTS ARE GRAT BATTLE WILL TAKE PLACE Buzzards: FELLAS WE GATHER HERE TODAY TO THANK OUR GOD FOR THIS FEAST

@golden.lights.twinkle2329 2 жыл бұрын

They needed 2 or 3 Gatling guns.

@andrewstackpool4911 2 жыл бұрын

Which would have achieved what? Here we have a company of mixed troops against thousands of the Mahdi's soldiers. Gatlings would have made no difference

@dennisyoung4631 2 жыл бұрын

“… the gattling’s jammed, and the colonel’s dead…”

@Waterford1992 2 жыл бұрын

Gatlings were well out of date by this time and the Maxim machine gun (invented in 1884) was in use by the British army

@deckiedeckie 2 жыл бұрын

Where is that much water in the Sahara?

@rejmons1 2 жыл бұрын

The main advantage of Whites was the organization. Not a breavery (which is very often silly), not a best weapon. The organisation and the discipline of any formation. Soldiers and officers knew exactly what they have doing. And the trust between officers and soldiers whch was stronger as in other civilisation. Excluding Japanese people.

@rejmons1 2 жыл бұрын

@CipiRipi00 That's true. But what means bravery? Very brave was the polish officer Witold Pilecki who let himself be caught by Germans and let them took him to the death camp in Auschwitz to check what Nazi are doing there. But he escaped because he knew, there is the way to escape. But were brave the Dervishes (Mahdi warriors) who with spears were attack the machine guns in the time of Omdurman battle? Or rather they were stupid?

@rachdarastrix5251 2 жыл бұрын

This is the reason instead of getting conquered by European invaders Japan became more developed.

@kakylaid 2 жыл бұрын

Organization, discipline..... And the Maxim gun!

@kakylaid 2 жыл бұрын

@CipiRipi00 May be.. But British army was always organized and disciplined, so why were they defeated at El obeid battle (General Hicks) and in the east against Osman Digna? A new factor was introduced and that was the Maxim

@stephanl1983 2 жыл бұрын

@@kakylaid the Army of Hicks Pasha consist mistly of Egyptian soldiers, which were mite good trained and lacked discipline, as they did during the First Battle of El Teb.

@jamesquirk4999 10 ай бұрын

From great British movie 🎬 Four Feathers about Anglo Sudan 🇸🇩 War of 1898

@jimcrawford5039 2 жыл бұрын

A Korda classic!

@bumpermanthesecond615 2 жыл бұрын

"Movie made in 1939." Only for every extras and actors that 2 years later, they'll be sent into the real war in the desert just like during the film production

@ianwalsh5610 Жыл бұрын

1939 ww2 started unless your american late again like ww1

@schallrd1 2 жыл бұрын

Waiting for Charlton Heston to make a cameo.

@freddy8479 Жыл бұрын

About 30 years later!!!!

@jf2siliconev278 2 жыл бұрын

Every major war happens or involves Egypt/ Sudan eyes on Egypt always

@sonnykay3594 2 жыл бұрын

That's always the destiny for the great country like Egypt, that can flip the table anytime on the head of the most powerful countries in the world, basically when it comes to their land or their beliefs, Egyptians don't give a hoot who is the invaders... God bless Egypt and the Egyptians...

@timspooner59 2 жыл бұрын

As Lance corporal Jones would say " fuzzy wuzzies"

@oktayozan4821 Жыл бұрын

Muhteşem.

@marcoholzel8294 2 жыл бұрын

Taktische Meisterleistung ....sein Lager mit Reisig zu umgeben...

@xyalbo5892 2 жыл бұрын

Who is transporting the water for all these solidiers and animals

@donmarlon5924 3 жыл бұрын

This appears to be a portion of an early movie version of the fictional novel 'The Four Feathers.' The presentation is realistically done, with the seeming participation of genuine Sudanese to portray the Mahdi's soldiers. But I don't think any actual historical battle resembles this one. Although an Egyptian column commanded by British General Hicks early on suffered this sort of destruction, I think that no force of British soldiers like this one was overrun and defeated in this manner.

@joebloggs5318 2 жыл бұрын

I actually looked into this before commenting and didn't find any losses like this on the British/Egyptian side during the Mahdist war. Maybe the film maker knows something history doesn't? I mean obviously the siege of Khartoum was a huge defeat for the British but this battle shown here is far smaller. Khartoum lasted almost a year.

@adrianburchell8075 2 жыл бұрын

This film (and the others) were based on the 1902 novel The Four Feathers by A E W Mason, in which the British square is briefly broken but recovers. It appears that in all the film adaptations the square is destroyed except for 1924 silent version, in which Faversham and the Egyptian garrison of a fort rescues a Highlander square.

@mohamedon8k 2 жыл бұрын

That's true Go educate you self

@manuelgimenezbatista546 2 жыл бұрын

Esta escena corresponde a las cuatro plumas versión de mil novecientos treinta y nueve no confundí con tempestad en el Nilo del mismo director firmada en mil novecientos cincuenta y cinco ya que el director aprovecho metraje de la primera

@joebloggs5318 2 жыл бұрын

@@mohamedon8k Yeah it's always good to look things up instead of saying God knows what.

@bobbyb.6644 2 жыл бұрын

What was the English Interest in Egypt or even stranger “ Sudan” ?

@user-dj2nk2rp4n 2 жыл бұрын

Ask your mom

@steveosborne2297 2 жыл бұрын

At the time a main thing of British strategy was to keep control of the Suez Canal to have easy access from the UK to India . This was the same strategy that just over 50 years later got the UK and France involved in the “Suez crisis”

@shamshulanuar7718 2 жыл бұрын

Sudan was then an Ottoman vassal state

@NubiansNapata 2 жыл бұрын

Pillaging

@paladinsix9285 2 жыл бұрын

@waltw4537 2 жыл бұрын

Sir Ralph Richardson!!

6 жыл бұрын

good video like

@andrewwilde3389 2 жыл бұрын

United Kingdom?

@peterneijs387 3 жыл бұрын

why did the camera man not tell them of the creeping enemy ?

@moisesromero6490 2 жыл бұрын

Cause he is not a snitch!🤣😂

@peterneijs387 2 жыл бұрын

@@moisesromero6490 Lol

@joseduranperez6936 2 жыл бұрын

Él mundo no ha sido si no eso Guerras y Guerras.que desgracia.

@CarlAfadier-cb8xx Жыл бұрын

Interesting War to repeat . 200 hundred years later, Sudan is still searching on how to continue itself as "Sudan" . Even to be a single nation-state with or without Foreign interference(s) into its internal, domestic affairs. now a seller of raw materials now in use of arms manufacturing

@rachdarastrix5251 2 жыл бұрын

Not often I get to hear about what goes on in the lives of troops over there that aren't from the USA.

@wewenang5167 2 жыл бұрын

well the world doesn't revolve around just USA :P

@joseduranperez6936 2 жыл бұрын

los grandes ganando galones, y los pobres los cajones. Dios mío hasta cuándo tanta INFAMIA..

@paulalexander2928 6 жыл бұрын

Wheres a Maxim when you need one?

@musabakr 2 жыл бұрын

Kimlerin savaşı ?

@scentsoftravelmeditation Жыл бұрын

Alexander the Great, Romans, British, Ottomans, even the legendary Arab Muslim invaders No one has ever managed to subjugate the Sudan militarily in history

@mombaassa 2 жыл бұрын

I was hoping to see, Lance Corporal Jones.

@harrywilde2178 2 жыл бұрын

"You stupid boy!" ;-)

@mombaassa 2 жыл бұрын

@@harrywilde2178 😂 👍

@wellhungindung 2 жыл бұрын

Dean's Vault.

@suren2313 2 жыл бұрын

Good ending

@chrisholland7367 Жыл бұрын

British troops in the Sudanese Campaign.

@steveschmitt6933 2 жыл бұрын

I guess thats what you get for being in 30 countries at one time

@Taiko-THC349 2 жыл бұрын

I wonder what happened to the rest of the British PWs? They only took away two of them.

@formwiz7096 Жыл бұрын

Presumably officers. The rest were to be sold as slaves. That's what Moslems do.

@roderickreilly9666 Жыл бұрын

Did British still have single shot breech loaders in 1898? Seems that way.

@threegoldmartlets Жыл бұрын

No. The single shot Martini-Henry was phased out in 1888 and replaced by the Lee-Metford .303 magazine rifle. Most of the Lee-Metfords had themselves been replaced by Lee-Enfields by 1899.

@Alh3jj Жыл бұрын

This is a battle that was broken square English and Egyptian

@silasrocco Жыл бұрын

it's fiction ya dummy, no British square was broken🤣

@ggregd Жыл бұрын

Probably shouldn't have used gasoline soaked branches to build their fortifications.

@puddlepirate1 6 жыл бұрын

Fighting the Fuzzy-Wuzzies!

@funnytime5337 2 жыл бұрын

Sudan love me and ph too!

@angloaust1575 2 жыл бұрын

Omdurman gordon avenged 1898 However one year later britain Involved in Boer war 500.000 Troops employed quite a lot for a lesser population Whereas in vietnam 65 years later USA had to introduce the draft to employ the same number With a greater population!

@paladinsix9285 2 жыл бұрын

The Draft was not because of the conflict in Vietnam. Draft was because of the Cold War between the USSR and the NATO nations. More draftees from the USA served in West Germany, or elsewhere in Europe. Of course some draftees served in Vietnam, but the majority of who served in Vietnam were volunteers. I have respect for all who served with honor in Vietnam. From the USA, Australia, South Korea, South Vietnam, the Philippines, New Zealand, and other allies. I am sure those who were drafted and served in Vietnam felt similar to their predecessors who served on Guadalcanal, the Philippines, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, or the Hurtigan Forest.

@angloaust1575 Жыл бұрын

Better if they had have called up the reserves rather than using green troops!

@shelbynamels973 2 жыл бұрын

Watch the first minute and fifteen with the sound off. YOu'll see how boring it is watching an army on the march.

@adamcheklat7387 5 жыл бұрын

4:07: That was close. Had he not sounded the alarm, the Mahdists would have made mincemeat out of the British.

@Jboy19916 4 жыл бұрын

He yelled out alarm lol

@ayoungconservative1051 3 жыл бұрын

you do realise that this battle never actually happened in this way. The force itself, commanded by General Hicks, was made up of Egyptian soldiers with very few British actually there I believe only a few officers were actually from Britain with no actual British regiment present.

@scottgabriel7093 3 жыл бұрын

This is a stupid film the British actually won this battle and the war

@factsbykidd4765 2 жыл бұрын

@@scottgabriel7093 they didn’t win this battle, and actually lost the war when Gordon was killed and the siege of Khartoum ended, only for the British to want to avenge him 2 years later after the al mahdi, returned peace to Sudan.

@susyamarbusujudoblora9926 2 жыл бұрын

Enak buka yang ini ada ceritanya walaupun fiktif bisa menghibur dari pada berita hoak dijejalkan ke nitisen.

@robertphair4285 19 күн бұрын

Easily the best version as authentic warriors and real soldiers.

@dennisyoung4631 2 жыл бұрын

“… they and their Camels…”

@Umbrellamax. 6 жыл бұрын

@ianwalsh5610 Жыл бұрын

now the savages are at it again in sudan fighting the army vs the militia

@derek6579 Жыл бұрын

I thought it was the battle of Omdurman?

@funnytime5337 2 жыл бұрын

Egypt

@mohamedtaher5423 6 жыл бұрын

الله اكبر

@kushdmg 8 ай бұрын

Long live nubia long live sudan 🇸🇩

@dovineerst1421 4 жыл бұрын

why egypt withe UK

@beezybuzyfamily 3 жыл бұрын

Its occupied

@user-dj2nk2rp4n 3 жыл бұрын

Because uk is weak and can't do anything without Egypt 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

@blade5896 2 жыл бұрын

@@user-dj2nk2rp4n largest empire is human history is weak man yeah

@user-dj2nk2rp4n 2 жыл бұрын

@@blade5896 I'm joking 😀

@blade5896 2 жыл бұрын

@@user-dj2nk2rp4n you got me

@DaviesMartinezBeats 2 жыл бұрын

No CGI used on that nonsense...

@Bornwinner0 2 жыл бұрын

Soudan is the sahara!

@IbrahimStanikzai 7 ай бұрын

Long live son of nubians the great sudanease people and Egyptians didn't participate by their own will it was British who forced them by occupation of Egypt

@user-yp5dz1rj5k 2 жыл бұрын

Вот это мне нравится! Бейте англосаксов!

@bubbadavidson6920 2 жыл бұрын

What a waste of good film all darkness

@greatnilemedjaywarrior3155 5 жыл бұрын

Great African Victory that Needs to be shared an Learned about in the World they need to Remake This Great African Battle Victory 👏💪

@haythere5805 2 жыл бұрын

lmao you lost in the end

@blade5896 2 жыл бұрын

Sudan lost this war my man

@Nadirfox 2 жыл бұрын

@@haythere5805 no we didn't

@garymountjoy3817 2 жыл бұрын

The British won the battle with very few injuries.From there they took the rest of the Sudan...read the history books.

@jameslynch7826 2 жыл бұрын

Think you’ll find it’s pure Hollywood

@sid2112 2 жыл бұрын

How one treats prisoners of war is indicative of one's level of civilization.

@factsbykidd4765 2 жыл бұрын

British troops went and finished off the wounded after the battle of Khartoum, it was an absolute massacre, over 10,000 wounded were killed

@user-qv4zu4tu6r Жыл бұрын

لا ادري لماذا دائما نحن أمامهم همج يصورنا للعالم لايوجد عندنا تخطيط وهم أهل العلم والتطور

@losomo22 6 жыл бұрын

wrong title the real is United Kingdom vs Egypt & Sudan

@Kingdomsandbattles 6 жыл бұрын

Egypt was occupied by Brits in 1882 and Egyptian army was just a vassal help the British occupation to suppress El Mahdi revolution in Sudan in 1890s

@m.fadhilahrenda2338 5 жыл бұрын

Yes egypt ask help to britain to defeat mahdi armies from sudan

@anthonylewis5154 5 жыл бұрын

British

@theethiopiannationalist9225 4 жыл бұрын

@Kj_mast_er not any more.

@theethiopiannationalist9225 4 жыл бұрын

@Kj_mast_er where are you from?

@plozikou Ай бұрын

À leur habitude, les anglais devaient être derrière les égyptiens... 😆

@sonnykay3594 2 жыл бұрын

Egypt and Sudan were one country for thousands of years, it was the Kingdom of Egypt and Sudan, until the United Kingdom came to the picture in the 19th century and occupied them, for some reason the UK decided to separate the Kingdom and draw a border between the upper country which is Egypt and the lower one which is Sudan,, and UK did so much things in the both countries to never get united again, for the history Egypt never had wars with Sudan,, in the other part of the world... the UK did the separation between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh they still have problems until now,, that is what the UK did in the world....

@user-on8zp8cx9z 2 жыл бұрын

Теперь это продолжают делать США в Украине!

@leonidjoseph5483 2 жыл бұрын

Good thing uk seperated most of the jihadis. Or else it would have been another afganistan

@leonidjoseph5483 2 жыл бұрын

@Plutarch you have no clue about which country I am talking about

@NubiansNapata 2 жыл бұрын

@@leonidjoseph5483 That's same language use today by imperialism... Whenever a man defense his home from an invasion he's a terrorist...

@IbrahimStanikzai 7 ай бұрын

No that was wrong Egyptians at that time didn't participate in this war by their own will it was British at that time first defeated Egyptians and take over Egypt and then mahadist revolts in sudan breakout against British occupation of their country so technically Egypt at that time was British territory

@necefeliyev477 Жыл бұрын

Yaşasın islam ordusu

@volk6019 4 жыл бұрын

Firstly , Egypt was not as really as the "arabs" they had gunpowder and gunpowder guns Always united kingdom showimg their victory without showing their loses,

@ayoungconservative1051 3 жыл бұрын

You do realise that this movie is from a fictional novel, secondly the battle itself was made up of a Egyptian Army, only commanded by the British General Hicks. As such I don't think you can exactly call it a UK loss per say. Infact out of the entire war against the Anglo-Egyptian forces the Mhadist's were only able to win two battles, one against an entirely Egyptian force at the battle of Khartoum and an entirely Egyptian force at the battle of El Obeid. They were never able to gain a victory against an entirely British or even mostly British force.

@blade5896 2 жыл бұрын

“Always United Kingdom showing their victories without showing their loses” What are you on about lmao this video clearly shows a British loss

@puppiesgoarf664 2 жыл бұрын

Never knew Egyptians had afros

@threestepssideways1202 2 жыл бұрын

They wern't the Egyptians, they were the Sudanese, belonging to a movement called the Mahdists. Many of the Mahdists adopted this hairstyle and it became an pejorative term amongst the Empire troops facing them to call them 'Fuzzie Wuzzies' because of that.

@puppiesgoarf664 2 жыл бұрын

@@threestepssideways1202 no kidding that where fuzzy Wazee came from thanks some tribes in Africa were called Mumbo jumbos and oohga boohgas

@musfikinsan3423 Жыл бұрын

@@puppiesgoarf664 Fuzzies live in east sudan.Their actual name is "beja" tribe.

@fianfarel3604 11 ай бұрын

Pubg in real life

@Dragon-Slay3r Жыл бұрын

Whats this? 😂

@muhammadnada9433 2 жыл бұрын

I hoped we the Egyptians and sudani brothers United against our common Enemies (The English)

@NubiansNapata 2 жыл бұрын

Egyptians sided with the enemies of Africa.. a terrible part of Egyptian history

@muhammadnada9433 2 жыл бұрын

@@NubiansNapata I am Egyptian and I hoped my country was powerful enough that time to resist the English occupation .Nothing above Islam ☪️.The Sudanese are our brothers and insha’allah we both unit to face our common enemies .The English

@factsbykidd4765 2 жыл бұрын

@@muhammadnada9433 w

@user-or1rm1ol3q Жыл бұрын

@@muhammadnada9433 do you know that. You sudanese brother. Don't call you Egyptian they call you invader who stole their land?

@muhammadnada9433 Жыл бұрын

@@user-or1rm1ol3q It is not your business.We and then will remain brother for ever .Don’t interfere between us