underrated comment

I can make a german accent and tell you a bunch of nonsense

Is this also the only video you have watched this year?

@@nahCmeR your comment is bad and you should feel bad

It's a normal title. Maybe you need to find better channels lol.

9Lives have you tried valorant?

@@OnlyMeBeingMe your comment is worse and you should feel worse

I am not surprised tbh. I like Apex, but server structure is not good. Laggy and unresponsive. To be fair, everything we got online these days is amazing. But some things more than others.

hyperscape is super dead

Apex is the best though.

EA sucks nothing new it'd be too expensive for them to justify the effort of even matching pubg which has 60 tic

Probably as bad as apex lol. 20hz server😂

Would love a tarkov one that game is a fuckin’ enigma

He did a video about tarkov like 1-2 years ago revealing such shit netcode that the devs wanted to copystrike his vid to take it down. It probably improved since then but its still shit

What, people are still playing Aimbotland/lag2death? Interesting...

Long story short: nothing changed since his original video for Tarkov. (TL;DR: Tarkov netcode is crap, borderline clientside authoritive and delay values are in their 200-500)

@@Dizintegrator This is absolutely false. Compared to his original EFT video, the netcode has been massively improved. It's still shit, but way way better.

fr

Yeah. We've gotten used to update / command rate being the tick-rate. Maybe because CS:GO matches those values to the server tick rate automatically. It was quite common back in CS 1.6 days for community servers to run at a tick/sim rate of 1000hz even though max update/cmd rates were capped at 100. I'm quite surprised valorant's update and cmd rates are not 128.

Lul

Or Respawn

Competitive game vs casual game. It isn't in their interest nor it's the goal of the game. Valorant is almost exclusively aimed towards competitive. Besides 128tick servers are costly to maintain.

@@hugopfeffer4175 And they literally make billions of dollars from this one title.

@@hugopfeffer4175 Shooting first, dying first, is COD. Which is why I don't play on those Chinese spyware servers

There are netduma routers that you can set to only connect you to low ping servers. Maybe that is the reason.

Sounds like the Warzone servers use different datacenters than the normal multiplayer modes. Hence your ping is much higher in Warzone, which runs on servers much further away. That is the only explanation I have for this. O.o

@@BattleNonSense warzone servers connect me n my frens in same squad to servers with different ping when we have the same ISP and country haha

@@BattleNonSense Could there be a routing issue that happens with Warzone servers to cause such high lag though? Gigabit Connection straight into an SB8200 doesn't improve it. I jump into Blackout and I'm greeted by a 40-50ms match instantly. Even those servers were kind of weird compared to their multiplayer servers.

My issue with Warzone is the packet loss, that I don't seem to get in any other game. According to the monitor in game I get losses of about 15%-20% very often and sometimes spikes of 70%-100%. Again, I don't have this in any other multiplayer game I play like EFT, Valorant, or Overwatch.

100% Hunt has the problem he mentioned after the 10min mark in his 101 video, their servers aren't completing the necessary calculations in the allotted time frame. Anecdotal evidence: Rubber-banding teleportation, being thrown into the air randomly. etc. I've literally been teleported into a building while walking alongside it before, right into that room on the West wing of Fort's North boss lair that has a window that can't be vaulted from outside North and a barricaded door South. Both were closed, unfortunately I didn't have my recording software enabled for that moment, was hilarious. Of course I make this statement as a nobody with no intimate experience in computer networking.

I tested Star Citizen ages ago - sadly since then the networking has hardly changed. They keep delaying the big updates.

+1

Stable frame times feels smoother and easier to control your character

Not really.

@Way Better thats why I include the subtitles. 😉

@@parahodika I find him easy to understand. But I am German, so I am used to the accent.

@@BattleNonSenseI am non native english speaker and i find your accent very clear and easier to understand than a native english speaker. Thank you.

@@parahodika What? He speaks so well and clearly, I don't think it's BN that's the problem lol

For developers? :-) If you are asking about players - how could they fix it!

It is still true and the main reason why both AMD and Nvidia came up with their "Ultra Low Latency" modes to combat the input lag increase which comes from when the GPU is maxed out.

@@BattleNonSense Thank you for the answer! But isn't ULL bad for gsync? Blurbuster says you should leave this setting off or on (old "1') but not Ultra. (Pretty sure in one of your videos you tested this mode and proved that latency is indeed higher)

@@BattleNonSense Speaking of updates: Is the 'G-Sync compatible monitors have higher input lag with G-Sync turned off on Nvidia cards' thing still true?

@@pzogel why would anyone turn it off? everything just looks better with vsync, and gsync is the only way to use it without input lag...

@@sker1213 There are various reasons for disabling G-Sync, e.g. when there is no way to limit FPS, lag will increase whenever the range is exceeded, only disabling G-Sync can prevent that from happening. Added lag with G-Sync disabled is clearly unintended behaviour and should be fixed accordingly.

it also makes you lag it's not really good I have it on because my internet is really limited but holy crap it makes things worse most of the times because sometimes you might fail jumps or stutter behind or land at the same place twice or something it's really bad but also I have to leave it on to maintain 160+ FPS or otherwise I have to decrease my FPS to less than 96 FPS so the stupid server doesn't take up my whole bandwidth

I had set it to medium thinking it would help lag spikes

Additionally I tested the ingame frame time metric which increases when activating the ingame limiter (x2 for me), so this suggests no limit is better. Also the frame time remains quite stable with uncapped fps leading me to believe the frame time variance is acceptable, but all depends offcourse on how good/ accurate this metric is ingame.

Also interested in this question

Yes. But you FPS must be not only high but also STABLE