I like when she says "we" like I've contributed something simply because I'm part of our human family. I'll go ahead and accept the benefits of being part genius by default. Thanks also to my ancestors and all the hard workers that paved the way for my life to be so awesome.
@Cr-gf3gn5 жыл бұрын
Narrator is so ridiculously talented.. gorgeous, beautiful voice, and a mathematician. Be still my heart
@Ben_D.4 жыл бұрын
Seriously. That fluid voice. If I could change Siri to sound like anyone, I would pick Hannah Fry. Like butter.
@douggale59625 жыл бұрын
What made the hammer and feather demonstration on the moon so entertaining was the fact that a total and utter mastery of the laws of motion was required just to get to the moon with a reasonable amount of fuel in the first place.
@pulaski15 жыл бұрын
Fifty minutes in and I am sad that this video is almost over and that there is only one more episode in the series. I wish it could go on for ever. :(
@imadearisantojonathan95494 жыл бұрын
The way she told us that the room 1 is gonna be hers. Something so adorable and magical abt her presentation.
@ericpmoss5 жыл бұрын
The one girl's description of infinity was so cute: "it's the biggest number that you could possibly need". I also liked how Hannah seemed relieved when the psychiatrist said that obsession with math wouldn't cause mental illness.
@sodium99205 жыл бұрын
Just brilliant. Haven't worked my head so hard since school. 40 years ago.
@jerichogonzales12905 жыл бұрын
Tried to calculate her mass from the force in Neutons. I feel the same.
@MrArukimasu3 жыл бұрын
This sort of excellent programming is exactly why we should NOT defund the BBC
@knutthompson78794 жыл бұрын
The material is pretty basic, but Dr. Fry is just so charming and adorable. Hard not to enjoy this series.
@Rafael-co5wy5 жыл бұрын
loved this episode, very interesting stuff
@perfectallycromulent4 жыл бұрын
you could ask everyone at the Infinity Hotel to move down a room so you could have the first one, but it would take forever.
@dadgonewild3814 жыл бұрын
Whoa! Your comment touches on the cutting edge argument articulated by those who argue that the infinity concept is fundamentally flawed. Work on it....the Noble prize is $1,000,000 I think. Curious about your academic level, btw.
@frials47574 жыл бұрын
@@dadgonewild381 dude is just parroting other people
@bratwurstmitbiryani3 жыл бұрын
@@frials4757 lol
@dr.wisdom79173 жыл бұрын
I don’t actually quite understand the Infinity Hotel portion lol
@rhysjones92593 жыл бұрын
How can an infinity hotel be full in the first place 🤣🤣🤣
@Gruemoth4 жыл бұрын
*Legend has it,* when Hannah was in 4th Grade, her mathematics teacher once asked: _Which numbers between 1 and 10 can be divided by 2?_ _All,_ replied the little Hannah.
@mastercheif19895 жыл бұрын
Holy hell... that voice.... I learned more than my 25 years of schooling!
@dylanparker1305 жыл бұрын
love those drawings of the scientists made out of their famous equations!
@spideywhiplash3 жыл бұрын
I noticed that too. Pretty cool!
@billmaghan4 жыл бұрын
Where is that wonderful garden? Also, captions are perfect, needed, and appreciated. Nice filming.
@davieturner3393 жыл бұрын
Bill Maghan : Jupiter Artland outside Edinburgh
@helenchelmicka30283 жыл бұрын
"It's not just infinity that's got curves" woah woah woah, steady on Hannah! 🤣🤣
@rishabhsharma19273 жыл бұрын
If we go by the story of Ramanujan, we would be able to conclude that mathematics is the language that existed way before we came into existence.
@iangrant96755 жыл бұрын
5:28 I fell into a trap when my friend, who was a skydiver, told me that after he had spent a month in hospital, that he had lost so much weight that when he went skydiving with his team he had to put weights onto his belt to keep up. You need to read Aristotle's Meteorology to understand his physics.
@EvilDaveCanada4 жыл бұрын
Nothing against your Dad but She Has Got To look Better Than Him!
@MrKotBonifacy4 жыл бұрын
Your skydiving friend is a real physical object, with a certain mass and area of his physique, falling through a certain fluid (gases are fluids too), and his maximum "falling speed" is the balance between gravity pulling a certain mass, and the aerodynamic resistance the air is exerting on the AREA of the falling object. When your friend lost some weight he hasn't lost, I presume, much of his "area" - thus the balance has shifted. Aristotle's error was basically "jumping to conclusions" approach, also called "seeeking answers", or "need for [cognitive] closure" (as opposed to "asking questions").
@deepavk80873 жыл бұрын
Skydiving or Ocean deep dives aren't they both the same and affected by buoyancy of the object in question. Hence may not be the same as free falling in vacuum.
@paxwallacejazz5 жыл бұрын
I learned early ,while skipping class to study Relativity, that, at least in the 70s, there was this widely accepted distinction: Mathematics is an edifice that only has to satisfy it's own internal logic (in the form of proofs) all of this is based on logical axioms i.e. self evident propositions. This is called an "a priori". Now Physics, on the other hand, must answer to a completely different criterion that being Empirical i.e. experimental evidence. The language of Physics however, is Mathematics. The thing is, is that; mathematics itself seems to predict truth in Physics like how Einstein's fascination with non-Euclidean Geometry and topology i.e. (mathematicians Reiman and Henri Poincarè) allowed his formation of General Relativity. I doubt that Henri Poincarè would've ever imagined that his work would somehow lead to a deeper revolutionary topological understanding of Gravity!
@patrickfitzgerald28614 жыл бұрын
The UK has Hannah Frye and Alice Roberts. We have Donald Trump and 150 million flat-earthers. Very sad.
@homebrew010homebrew33 жыл бұрын
And Tara Shears.
@rhysjones92593 жыл бұрын
“Infinity is a slippery beast” 🤔
@monodonmonoceros33213 жыл бұрын
It is hard to imagine a person so ignorant as to not know this stuff, but to be knowledgeable enough to be interested.
@TomDestry3 жыл бұрын
It's hard to imagine a person who finds it hard to imagine my mum.
@stevenhernandez89664 жыл бұрын
Love these videos. R2 D2's schizophrenic twin, R2 R0 likes them too.
@SteveGouldinSpain4 жыл бұрын
I discovered Hannah Fry, of that I'm sure.
@GirGir1835 жыл бұрын
This idea of walking forward with the camera behind you, and every 3 seconds you look backward at the camera is SO contrived. She can't see us. What is she looking back at? Slow motion. Drums banging in the background. The series "Coast" used to do a lot of this. Drove me mad.
@gravityhypernova5 жыл бұрын
@@ms16molly Choices made by the series producer, director, DOP etc do not make the presenter a narcissist. Do you believe filmmaking is entirely done by the actors?
@briantw5 жыл бұрын
God forbid someone presenting for the camera looks at the camera. I mean, after all, new anchors can't see me. What's with the staring?
@SouravBiswas-hw1om5 жыл бұрын
Never knew Madhuri Dixit is a Mathematician, wow 😍😍😍😍
@agimasoschandir3 жыл бұрын
Hans Christian Ørsted was the first to notice a link between magnetism and electricity
@LambdaJack4 жыл бұрын
Heavier objects also have a stronger gravitational field so they do fall faster. Or the lighter object is accelerating away. I always forget.
@soundmachinesid3 жыл бұрын
I love math. I am more in love with math now. Moving on to three.
@ufafgd Жыл бұрын
At the "Infinity Hotel", there is no full status. There's always a room available. Always.
@boomzacrypto74965 жыл бұрын
18:37 For a second there I thought Richard Branson on another one of his fun hobbies.
@nonddd92224 жыл бұрын
32:15 Strolling around an Iron Cross - "Nothing controversial here......."
@0623kaboom4 жыл бұрын
x marks the spot ... more correctly but yes that was an iron cross
@eloujtimereaver45044 жыл бұрын
Yes, it is not controversial. It is still used as a symbol of merit in almost every country.
@duskhorizon47913 жыл бұрын
Book suggestion: What Is Mathematics?: The Greatest Detective Story Never Told (The Truth Series Book 17) by Dr Thomas Stark
@adamsackfield5893 жыл бұрын
Another book suggestion: Hannah Fry - Hello World.
@simonrandall54715 жыл бұрын
Her producer probably told her not to move the copper coil up and down instead of right left for appearances.
@craigsmith14435 жыл бұрын
Why can't boys get their heads out of their hormones?
@abdelouahidzakriti93373 жыл бұрын
Maths are the voice of reality. Trust maths blindly and move. For me maths is just discovered, but for sure we invented the symbols to describe it. I can say that full reality math is toward the infinity while our findings are just around very few digits if not yet less than 1.
@Dudleymiddleton5 жыл бұрын
7:35 this, to me, proves that men did land on the moon, I'm fairly certain there was no massive vacuum facility like the one in a Brian cox programme to stage this experiment
@Dudleymiddleton5 жыл бұрын
Physics is a great seer of the truth out there! @Topher TheTenth
@keithlillis79624 жыл бұрын
I totally believe that men landed on the moon and also thought that the experiment done by Apollo 15 might prove the naysayers wrong, but they would just say that the feather was secretly weighted and the experiment was a con. If someone has an unshakeable belief, it is almost impossible to change their minds and not worth the effort to try.
@AvNotasian5 жыл бұрын
The answer is because maths is language composed of proofs and theorems, we choose to use it to describe the world when we use it to describe the world we can now manipulate out description using these rules.
@dougg10754 жыл бұрын
What is cool to me is scientists finding things in reality ( particles) with math only.
@RUBBER_BULLET5 жыл бұрын
I didn't know that Harry Shearer was a mathematician.
@thuantruong8556 Жыл бұрын
😍 Thanks #hanna Fry for adding CC to VID, it gives me happiness in the endless source of human knowledge Thank you very much ❤️❤️❤️
@ProperLogicalDebate5 жыл бұрын
49:21 Not having the time I would still like to see a table where Infinity is added, subtracted (from & something subtracted from), multiplied, divided, & all other operations & permutations with normal, large, extremely large (infinity minus one which might be labeled with a backwards "L"), imaginary, another infinity & any other which I don't know of.
@jessran705 жыл бұрын
Newton & Einstein get all the credit. Maxwell should be right there with them.
@williamvanness26254 жыл бұрын
/agree
@MitzvosGolem14 жыл бұрын
John Bell... another Irishman.
@pnvgordinho3 жыл бұрын
So according to physics , objects do not actually fall at the same time. If an object has more mass, it falls faster. We don't see it but it does. Aristoteles was right.
@ufafgd Жыл бұрын
But, objects fall equally in a vacuum. That Apollo mission proved it. Mass has no bearing on gravity under a vacuum. Only air resistance changes that.
@pnvgordinho Жыл бұрын
@@ufafgd I don't think there's a vacuum. Theres Aether .
@Les5375 жыл бұрын
Nanagon infinity opens the door.
@PROWLER21034 жыл бұрын
legend has it that many school students silently curse newton every day before sleep
@Raz.C5 жыл бұрын
Yes, I do love Hannah. Of course I do! But I think she got something wrong. Her calculations at ~ 13:30 didn't take into account that she wasn't in freefall. She was travelling down what I'd estimate to be a 30' incline. Furthermore, we don't have the static and sliding coefficients of the friction of her sliding line. Without that, we can't calculate an accurate measure of the actual forces acting on her. Still, I suspect she knows all this, but she wanted to make it simpler for people unfamiliar with maths and/ or physics to understand.
@craigsmith14435 жыл бұрын
Yes, she's a mathematician, not a physicist. The equation probably should have been more like F= g sin θ. this ignores friction and air resistance, so it's a little more complicated than the 'skeleton' equation, but that's closer to what we'd need to calculate speed down an incline.
@rhysjones92593 жыл бұрын
I’m pretty sure a Dr of mathematics is aware of the mechanics 🤣
@bencrossley6475 жыл бұрын
Whether mathematics is discovered or invented comes down to your definition of mathematics. I define mathematics to be the propagation of truth, that is, define some axioms and find inherent truths of this system. In this regard, those truths were always there to be found, and those systems were always there to be explored. It's all discovered in my opinion.
@waperboy4 жыл бұрын
13:23 : About infinity and that there's no real actual infinity: - except for universe, which is physical, and might very well be infinite...
@syedadeelhussain26914 жыл бұрын
Should have covered some areas in mathematical economics, such as the role of GAME THEORY.
@valmarsiglia4 жыл бұрын
22:34 - Yeah, and I bet I know just how Faraday came up with that idea.
@kirkdoray33934 жыл бұрын
22:06 *oersted's* experiment
@boris26054 жыл бұрын
beautiful
@Paul-sj5db3 жыл бұрын
"nothing controversial here" - she says as she walks around an Iron Cross. 😉
@markusschulz43135 жыл бұрын
does anyone know where I can find the portraits of the mathematicians?
@AndrewMottershead5 жыл бұрын
Try google image search
@manthasam6793 жыл бұрын
suddenly i want to be a mathematician
@davidgould94315 жыл бұрын
7:00 - it's a bit of a shame we get to see Galileo's "light thing attached to heavy thing" argument for things dropping at the same speed without a single word of explanation. Similarly, later (or maybe next programme), we don't get Cantor's diagonal argument for the greater size of the reals than the integers, just a bit of sort of plausible hand-waving. I've enjoyed the 3 programmes, but they seem to be desperate not to challenge anyone who isn't familiar with the material. At the risk of boring people who are. That said, if I had the first idea how to make a decent TV programme, I'd be making them not commenting on them. Summary: insofar as it went, a good series, but perhaps a bit light on actual mathematics.
@gedlangosz11275 жыл бұрын
I agree with your comments 100%. We don't get many documentaries on maths, so anything is better than nothing. I was hopping mad when I saw the "proof" of uncountable real numbers on the documentary. It is totally incorrect. Cantor's diagonal argument is, in my view, not too hard to present.
@arleneroth3 жыл бұрын
What is wrong with the file? Cannot access it correctly. Episodes 1 and 3 are fine -i it’s epsode two that bugs. Can you please fix it? Thanks!!
@maschwab635 жыл бұрын
Oops. They saw a wave where a stream of matter was departing the sun. That can only occur with a liquid surface. So the sun must be liquid hydrogen metal, with a plasma atmosphere.
@falcychead81983 жыл бұрын
If you're not the highest-paid astrophysicist in the world, you should be. I'm not saying you're some kind of djhbrown or anything, but you're definitely the leader of your field.
@brucemarquardt74223 жыл бұрын
Would it be fair to conclude that the numbers were always there, waiting to be discovered. How they can be manipulated was invented?
@glutinousmaximus5 жыл бұрын
The first person to seriously study infinities was Geog Cantor. Worth looking him up. For instance some infinities are bigger than others :0) Just keep adding all the normal integers: 1+2+3+4 ... _THEN just keep adding even numbers: 2+4+6+8 ... both series can go on forever; BUT one _MUST_ be twice the size of the other!
@glutinousmaximus5 жыл бұрын
AND Hilbert's Hotel with an infinity of rooms solution for a new guest is silly! Okay, you can move everyone up into the next room; BUT you could do that by leaving everyone where they are, and _just use the next available room._
@glutinousmaximus5 жыл бұрын
Oh damn! I just got to the bit where she starts talking about Cantor! It's still worth looking him up - for instance, he invented Set Theory almost accidentally along the way!
@qqqqqqqqqq74885 жыл бұрын
Except, she specifically showed that they are the same. please don't inject stupidity into a perfectly reasonable argument.
@LIBRA883698 ай бұрын
That's a silly concept. I watched Neil Degrass discuss this earlier. Infinity never ends. Finite and infinite are very easy to grasp. Infinity plus 1 only works with a parallel reality as far as I can tell.1.1,1.2,1.3 makes some sense conceptually for me, if you percieve The Universe as a program, or believe in the big crunch and think of the possibility of(decimal places) being finite mass and Energy having an infinite amount of combinations(whole numbers) or something, infinity and a few shy of infinity within those same numbers. or something.. and even then..
@henriknielsen16625 жыл бұрын
Excellent, except that Faraday did not discover the connection between magnetism and electricity. Hans Christian Oersted did: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Christian_%C3%98rsted .
@krytharn5 жыл бұрын
If all our young students would be taught by someone like Hannah Fry, they'd all be geniuses. Either that, or they'd all be reduced to whimpering piles of hormones.
@sheilamorrison19544 жыл бұрын
Lol. So much gravitas
@nafnist4 жыл бұрын
Except the fact that it was Ørsted, and not Farraday, who made the electromagnetic discovery with the wire and the compass. Misinformation here.
@albirdie16304 жыл бұрын
get a life
@acg48795 жыл бұрын
How does Cantor (so) differ from Zeno?
@rashaseden70625 жыл бұрын
Infinity is curious. I imagine that if a circle had an infinite circumference, that circumference would be a straight line.
@qqqqqqqqqq74885 жыл бұрын
I can assure you it could not be.
@adamrspears19815 жыл бұрын
An infinite line has no ending point. Without an ending point, you cannot turn the line back to its starting point. So it could not take the shape of a circle.
@max2008abhi5 жыл бұрын
@@adamrspears1981 a circle has no beginning and no end . So an infinite circle is possible
@adamrspears19815 жыл бұрын
@@max2008abhi It depends upon what your perspective is. Suppose you are looking down at a slinky so that it looks like a circle. The slinky has a starting & an ending point & is not infinite. This example shows that the number of dimensions & our perspective, as conscious observers, matters.
@martintomlins125 жыл бұрын
But then try a circle of infinite radius - its circumference would be a straight line, and infinity = 2 x pi x infinity
@MitzvosGolem14 жыл бұрын
Dr Richard Feynman " new ideas needed".
@contemplatico5 жыл бұрын
Chuck Norris counted to Infinity... Twice!
@bogdanmaster36034 жыл бұрын
I have counted only a half of infinity...
@treslineas28265 жыл бұрын
Everytime you say math I understand mass
@JulianFischerJulesBarner4 жыл бұрын
Not about the video, but 3 adverds one after the other before the video even starts? What happened to youtube?
@aphiwemagaya32795 жыл бұрын
i'm crazy about mathematics
@gmotionedc54123 жыл бұрын
Pretty and smart!! Wow🤩😁
@stephenfowler41153 жыл бұрын
You forgot the resistance of air.😱
@iangrant96755 жыл бұрын
9:36 So Newton _never_ said "I frame no hypothesis"?
@pennieschirz60543 жыл бұрын
Legend has it, when Hannah was in 4th Grade, her mathematics teacher once asked: Which numbers between 1 and 10 can be divided by 2? All, replied the little Hannah.
@mamoladk5 жыл бұрын
The hamer and the feather fall with the same speed in a vacuum here on earth and on the moon. Or on Mars for that matter. Or on any planet or moon or even on a comet. If you have a cylindrical vacuum container big enough for that experiment and you place it in outer space, then what will the hammer and the feather do when you let go of them? I theorize that they will stay where you let go of them ... if you can let go of them without giving them the slightest push?
@GraemeMarkNI3 жыл бұрын
12:30 Thought Hannah was going to tell us how much she weighs ;)
@akeman13373 жыл бұрын
She weighs 75 kg. (735.777018 * 6371000^2) / (6.67430e-11 * 5.972e24) = 74.9265793363
@valmarsiglia4 жыл бұрын
Wait, there's an infinite hotel in London? I'll be damned.
@ckorz72915 жыл бұрын
Existence, existence again, existence again again, existence again again again...
@909sickle5 жыл бұрын
If the hotel is booked up... then it doesn't have infinite rooms. Why are you moving everyone by one room? That makes no sense. Especially when Hannah can just share my room. So stupid.
@andreasabel76195 жыл бұрын
45:27 The argument of the uncountability of reals is misrepresented. By the argument Hannah Fry presents here, the rational numbers would be uncountable, too. But they are countable.
@jasondmyterko57805 жыл бұрын
I get network error while trying to download is there a problem at your end.
@rbmnewton5 жыл бұрын
I too have the same problem... Able to download part 1 and 3...part 2 download speed is kind off slowing down infinitely.
@innocentpaul5135 жыл бұрын
Without thought process human kind would be like nothing. Sitting by the beach either you can enjoy the horizon or imagine what's beyond that. Infinity is the realization whatever knowledge or mass that we have amounted or acquired or quantified is not to the extent of one hundred percent. Infinity can be assessed by placing yourself ideally within a circle as a point and thereafter when you reach either side of the circumference you realize that there is larger circle beyond from where you stand.
@email97315 жыл бұрын
45:30 The sketched "proof" of Cantor's theorem that [0,1] is uncountable, is totally wrong. The argument given would apply to the set of rationals, which is countable.
5 жыл бұрын
You're just a dumb fuck.
@adamrspears19815 жыл бұрын
Would you agree with this statement? "There are a finite number of times that something can be divided." Yes, or No?
@email97315 жыл бұрын
@@adamrspears1981 Regarding intervals [a, b] where a < b, in the pure mathematical sense, I'd say that you can divide (for example in halves) infinitely often.
@adamrspears19815 жыл бұрын
@@email9731 Just give an answer if either 'yes' or 'no', please.
@email97315 жыл бұрын
@@adamrspears1981 No. (But as I mentioned, I'm talking there about certain kinds of mathematical objects. In the case of physical objects, I don't know.) (And I'm understanding the statement as "There are _only_ a finite number of times that something can be divided".)
@sunroad72285 жыл бұрын
"No energy system can produce sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it" (The Fifth Law).
@bogdanmaster36034 жыл бұрын
did you never see perpetum mobile?
@cawfeedawg4 жыл бұрын
41:31 because im really 12 at heart.
@GrahamCLester5 жыл бұрын
Where is that amazing sculptured park they keep coming back to?
@GrahamCLester5 жыл бұрын
I found out. It's Jupiter Artland, near Edinburgh: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_Artland
@0623kaboom4 жыл бұрын
@33:28 they just finish talking about how space has many possible variations ... and they happen to be platonic solids ... which all have a common root generic shape ... so the lowest common denominator between all of the platonics is a part of the very first shape primarily ... which is 4 equilateral triangles ... so whatever is making waves in the universe for creation happen uses that pattern to transmit it's basic shape ... from there energy level ( electro magnetic force ) takes over and makes everything from there ... now it's just a matter of figuring out the energy levels and frequencies and poof you can make or replicate anything from a power source using a base substrate of a primary constituent to what you want to make ...
@skynet_cyberdyne_systems5 жыл бұрын
Is not that mathematical description of universe in some ways is just approximation, for example we have perfect point, line, circle in geometry but there is no perfect point, line, circle in the universe other than inside our head.
@its_gutzright88613 жыл бұрын
Why do you need to ask those at room 1 to move to room 2? You can just ask the front desk to add 1 room to infinity for you to stay in. Infinity +1 = still infinity😁
So, as electricity travels along a transmission line, it's the electromagnetic field weakening that causes the loss of electricity over distance? Is that a reaction between the energy and the wire and maybe the planet, or like loss of velocity due to the distance travelled verses initial energy, entropy, thropacy from friction sort of thing .. Electricity losing energy or potential distance travelled due to friction, is that a bizzarre concept??.. So much I want to learn.
@samferrer5 жыл бұрын
Infinity is a constructive idea, I mean you can build mathematics with both finite sets and infinite sets ... the question is when to apply each ... me? ... I would go for finite sets ...
@dmisso424 жыл бұрын
If you lived in Sydney (Australia) and you took 4 consecutive left hand turns you would definitely NOT end up where you started!
@dmisso424 жыл бұрын
@Mr MEMé There's a harbour in the middle. Just Google Maps and check it out
@ProperLogicalDebate5 жыл бұрын
37:40 Use 1 ruler & you get X. Use 2 & you get a number slightly smaller. Using 3 or more do you get the same percentage smaller with each step? Can this be used in determining Pi? I think the word Mantissa as the numbers to the right of a decimal point becomes an approximation of the correct value as in 1/3 becomes 1.33333 & so on. This would go beyond, like headlights, that which you could see with any large numbers of rulers.
@allegato10474 жыл бұрын
You can't determine all the decimals of Pi, because it's an irrational number. I you would eventually found them all, that would mean that Pi is rational, that is, writeable as a division of two numbers. However, there are many demonstrations (and some of them not very complicated) that prove that Pi is irrational.
@Solo-jk8fz3 жыл бұрын
yo mr douge hello 7f children
@babrubahandalabehera29993 жыл бұрын
If you want to understand math, INDIA, is the place, Vedic math and many more, while western civilization were hunting and gathering ,Indians were talking mathematics, in so many ways...
@sayandutta39423 жыл бұрын
The vedios are awesome, but why are the subtitles so poor...
@jamiebennett63544 жыл бұрын
confused, infinite hotel as she described it, shes moves into room 1 who moved into room 2 and so on...how is that applicable in the real world when the last person now has to move into room 1.....bad example? or am I missing something
@proudmark46364 жыл бұрын
What’s the difference between infinity and unlimited
@xianthegaian40604 жыл бұрын
Lotta wisdom in those words
@user-mj4or8sh3g5 жыл бұрын
1:01 and 2:47 Realest answer ever! 🤣
@cawfeedawg4 жыл бұрын
There is no shame in not knowing and Science knows this extremely well.
@adamrspears19815 жыл бұрын
Can you write an equation that doesn't require any calculation, without using numbers?
@jayzo5 жыл бұрын
How about a² = a + a = ((a + a) + (a + a)) / a. No numbers but and you don't have to calculate anything as it's plainly obvious that a = 2. 2² = 4 2 + 2 = 4 ((2 + 2) + (2 + 2)) / 2 = (4 + 4) / 2 = 8 / 2 = 4
@RexxSchneider5 жыл бұрын
@@jayzo Also zero, arguably. 0 * 0 = 0 0 + 0 = 0 ((0 + 0) + (0 + 0)) / 0 = 0 /0 which is indeterminate, so 0 is as good a value as anything else.