She's already saved now. So i'll just say..god bless and keep her in eternity.

❤❤❤

And thanks to KZfaq, we have tons of videos to view any time we want! But I totally get what you are saying, though. She's not here but will always be in our hearts. I miss her terribly, too. I can't seem to get used to King Charles being head of the Monarchy. I just keep viewing all of these documentaries of Queen Elizabeth, lol.

Well technical her son can and more than likely will replace her in time... Not that he will have anything on HRH.. She's in a class of her own

Really?? Must have been busy when that happened. Not! My comment was clearly a year ago when she was still living. 👍

She served loyally, and fought fiercely. We shall never see her like again. And now, her watch has ended. God rest the queen!

​@@scottdoyle9109He is her Son..

@@iriscollins7583 didn't say he wasnt

Ki

Exactly.

Hear hear!

She served loyally, and fought fiercely. We shall never see her like again. And now, her watch has ended. God rest the queen!

Kandy Kandy I do agree Brighton is lovely. I was referring to the specific area HM Queen visited.

@Kandy Kandy WHO FORGOT TO TURN YOUR CAPS LOCK OFF, OLD LADY?

@@mism847were you born an insufferable, annoying twat or do you have to practice?

Thank you so much we are proud of our Monarch x

Italy's last Monarch of substance was HRH Umberto 1

Laugh a little, you’ll live longer!!! RIP with God, Prince Phillip.

@@lauralutz4538 He was famously blunt with others. Yelling at a photographer was a classic moment.

surrounded by flunkies and arse lickers 😐

@@forgive7449 Not all of them are. Do your research before you prove yourself an idiot.

@Kandy Kandy Describe hard work?

@Kandy Kandy ignoratn ? 😉 lol

@@piusx8317 Describe yourself at 95....

Sanjeev Bhaskar's character claimed the Royal Family is Indian!

Indeed or Linda from Gimme Gimme Gimme

Yes I agree but she is really creepy

exactly my thoughts

agreed some mums are all about them and their wants

Easy to be that busy with a huge staff

@@piusx8317 no it isn't there is only one Queen

Trump is barely worthy of comment

Hear hear!

@@baronedipiemonte3990your mother says the same thing about you, you pathetic waste of life

@fullswing You are aware we are in the middle of a global pandemic?

@@johnking5174 Then you know they have done even less this year and cost most.

@Kandy Kandy Public address via TV and an audience ONCE a week with ONE man. Get a grip woman!!!

Excuse me our Queen works 7days a week before the pandemic an after though maybe not travel so much she getting on in age I think she is amazing

@@theresalewis6301 Her watch has ended. God bless her and keep her in eternity.

I'd be phoning security on her, over 500 hundred times seeing the Queen. Then carrying on because children that have never seen the Queen wanted to go to the front. She is just rude, horrible person.

And this Julia woman is VERY PUSHY and RUDE. Getting upset because children were to have a good position for seeing the Queen - selfish. Stalker freak.

Thank you for your service.

🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️ Seriously

That's really up to the prime minister, not the queen.

It's a little complicated really, as the Queen surrenders all income gained from the Crown Estate each year to the Government (about £400 million), and the Royal Family's "wage" is set at 25% of the money the Queen hands over to the Government (plus their own private incomes as some of them have other private businesses - but she/they pay tax on that), meaning that the people/the Government actually gain a yearly profit from the Queen. So by putting some money into her state activities, it is (sort of potentially) enabling her to do her "job" and thereby in turn helping the country earn money from the Crown Estate. It might sound a little long winded, but it's not as bad as simply throwing money at the Royal Family as a lot of people assume is happening. Still, that doesn't excuse why they can't find the funds to do important local stuff, I agree.

@@kmarch6630 I didn't suggest it was up to the Queen, I know it isn't.

@@itsrobm8 It such a lie that the royal family bring in more than they take out. It comes from the idea that tourists come to visit the queen. In reality they come to see the palaces, it's a very minute chance you will catch a glimpse of the queen. France, whom got rid of their monarchy 200 years ago is the number 1 tourist destination in Europe. No they cost us a fortune in security, upkeep and lost revenue from the 2 duchies. It keep rising at staggering amounts, tax cost alone, not including costs to local councils who bare a massive percentage, has risen from 32.4 million in 2012 to 69.4 million in 2020. The income from the duchies or lancaster and cornwall, just a portion of the land the royal family took from the nation goes directly to the royal family. I have no problem with having a royal family, I like the Queen, but they should use their vast wealth to fund themselves entirely, especially as millions of families struggle to make ends meet.

@@Zwia. the Royal family costs less than two pounds per taxpayer they're ridiculously cheep compared to the US or French presidency as for people visiting France how many of those visit Paris and how many do so to see where the French president lives I will bet on very few do you think as many would go to Buckingham Palace if we didn't have a Monarchy?

The fuck is this?

theyd probably shoot you if you tried to hurt her

You can best believe that there's real Bodyguards and Security that you don't see/recognize as such. Plain clothes from the Met Special Operations, Military Officers, SAS, etc....

Thats because we are a woke joke now... everything is offensive to the snowflakes

Because god forbid adults look at other adults they find attractive.

She does now. When this programme was made Ms was fairly new and quite a few organisations wouldn't accept it. There used to be a lot of fun made about the use of Ms.

This was filmed during 2006. Royal protocol changed around 2011 after the marriage of Prince William and Catherine.

It's to cover up her cleavage on getting out of cars, and also it helps to hold it across the front of her dress in certain circumstances.

I’ve read somewhere she carried a pair of glasses, compact mirror, lipstick, and dog treats. Miss her

in his defence I reckon without him we would not have the Notting Hill Carnival.At the time when the Carnival was marred by trouble and many in government and the police wanted to see it banned his was almost a lone voice supporting it.

Rinoa Menna: So does any American President, don't they have environmental issues?

Helicopters dont give off much more emissions than a standard sedan

You know helicopters are actually better for the environment over cars? I know you want a cool comment and all, but daang atleast think before you type zzz

Charles cares deeply for the environment no doubt about that he's always been genuine on that subject.

Quite often the organisation that the people are representing will ask if they can be presented to The Queen. It isn't really random. The 66 pence per person quoted is an accounting figure, just to give an idea of what the monarchy costs. In reality the monarchy doesn't cost the taxpayers anything. That's because the Sovereign Grant, which replaced the civil list, is from the income of the private crown estate. The total income is passed to the government which gives her about 15% and the Treasury keeps the balance. Last year that was £320 million. We have the only self funded head of state who pays the taxpayers. Just think that Air Force 1 alone costs the American taxpayers over 100 million dollars a year.

Well, if a BBC camera crew is following one, the chance of being selected improves....

@@briandfallon74 stupid, there are 100s of hours of footage that aren't shown, programmes are edited

@@mscott3918 Organisations don't ask, that would be playing favouritism and people aren't invited to a garden because of the organisations, they are there because of what they have done and yes it is random and our taxes pay for royal protection, so the money quoted is meant to be for that. but there are so many people who have no idea that the Sovereign Grant (civil list) is a percentage of the profits from the crown estates, its nice to see someone who knows

Aurelia S The ushers go round the garden parties, chatting to people and select people they think HM would like to meet. I saw it myself once.

I was sick in my mouth when I read ur comment. It's a tad pathetic

Not really. Diana's influence is very overestimated. The Queen was doing things like this years ago. Her Majesty has been quietly and discreetly modernising the monarchy since the 1960s really. Diana was just better at publicity. For instance, the London Lighthouse that Diana was so involved with actually existed because of the involvement of Princess Margaret. She helped provide funds and was visiting the people there quite a few years before Diana arrived to lay on hands.

Denise G-Hill actually going to deprived areas was Charles idea, when he started The Prince's Trust in the 70s there were awful riots going on and Charles wanted to visit those areas and see them as they were and ask the people what he could do to help,so charles was the first, he was also the first to go into prisons because he wanted to help them too, so it was going on before Diana married into the family, Princess Margaret was also the first to be involved with AIDS and Princess Anne spoke about AIDS. and she visited Africa as patron of Save the Children long Diana married into the family, Diana hijacked things and made them her ideas politicians had photos taken holding babies back then, because it was good for their image and that's what Diana did too, very manipulative and she made deals with the press Diana's legacy is the royal rota and other changes the press can no longer do

@@lsmith9249 Great comment. Prince Charles has now helped more than 5 million young people get a decent start in life through The Prince's Trust and other initiatives. Princess Margaret personally put money into the Lighthouse and The Queen quietly gives thousands to charities every year. The difference is that they don't tip the press off every time they do something. For them it's enough to do good without having to be seen to do it. Diana wanted to be seen as the only member of the Royal Family who actually cared about people. In fact she cared mostly about her image. Her ex private secretary tells how she decided that one Christmas she wanted to visit Mother Teresa in India. The team in India didn't want her there and suggested that, if she really wanted to help, she could visit their alcohol rehabilitation centre in South London. They didn't get their visit. All Diana had wanted was publicity whilst the rest of the Royal Family were at Sandringham. I so wish that so many people weren't taken in by the fairy tales of the blonde princess. History will, with the benefit of distance, see her as an interesting person, but in the long term as important as Caroline of Brunswick.

@@mscott3918 l agree, Princess Margaret isnt given enough credit actually, she was the first to be involved with AIDS and when the NSPCC where struggling to find a place to hold a fundraising event, she let them use her home and Diana would cancel many things, and yes l think she will fade as yime goes on Alexandra was an icon and Margaret was too

In French you say "vive" not "vie"!

Its only a hat omg . Since when is it a crime to hold a hat and talk about it in your hand. You sound over the top snobby😂

I kinda see what you mean, she continued to hold her hat a bit while actually speaking with the Queen. But afterwards she took her hand down. A lovely experience though, she was probably just nervous.

😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣

Prince Edward is actually one of the nicest of her children. He has changed a lot since his arrogant days before he married in 1999.

Oh grow up! Men and women have looked each other up for centuries!

@@sedekiman something being done for a long time doesn't mean it's good. People aren't objects to be preyed upon. Have some respect and don't be such a sleaze bag

@@micnmat Yes because we all know if you look at someone you’re instantly a predator preying upon them. Get a grip you lunatic

PC garbage... Snowflakes get so offended... MEN LOOK AT GORGEOUS WOMEN. Get over it.

Those are Korean

It is probably a spammer, just ignore it

😆😆😆😆🤣🤣😂

Certainly is !! She did something extraordinary-- tapped the government for £43 million and a salary of £90,000 a year.

It's a little complicated really, as the Queen surrenders all income gained from the Crown Estate each year to the Government (about £400 million), and the Royal Family's "wage" is set at 25% of the money the Queen hands over to the Government (plus their own private incomes as some of them have other private businesses - but she/they pay tax on that), meaning that the people/the Government actually gain a yearly profit from the Queen. So by putting some money into her state activities, it is (sort of potentially) enabling her to do her "job" and thereby in turn helping the country earn money from the Crown Estate. It might sound a little long winded, but it's not as bad as simply throwing money at the Royal Family as a lot of people assume is happening.

@@itsrobm8 It's very simple - supporting a Royal family is tantamount to laughing in the faces of the poor the homeless the unemployed and the disadvantaged.

@@gordygibson8776 One simple part is: Whether you support them or not, if we got rid of them they would keep their £400 million per year instead of giving it to the Government and we'd actually lose out money, like I said, their wage is 25% of the yearly money they give to the government based on their personally owned lands. They'd actually become much richer if they were no longer duty-bound to hand over their yearly profits.

Too late now