me, i will step up and win.

lmao if only twice the cobra did in fact equal cobra kai - that bloody got me good.

All I hear is “KRITICHESKIY UGOL ATAKI”

You said to me "Ride it like you stole it" and damn right that's how it is so you're not bad teacher rly

late to the video but one thing about the Flanker vs the F-15 i've noticed is that in realistic battles the Su-27 will get rolled everytime, but when you take an Su-27 into simulator battles and it's spaded vs spaded, it becomes a lot more even, when you can control your pull a lot more gradually and have more control over your aircraft without the instructor or the jerky movements of the aircraft that comes with mouse and keyboard some planes are allowed to show just how good they can be. one aircraft i noticed this most on a bit ago was the F-86K, in realistic it's an incredibly mediocre aircraft, but in sim it's actually quite good and can tangle with most things at the br it faces, same can be said for the F-4 Phantom, the F-4C, E, J, and S become a lot more competitive against things at it's immediate br range (10.7-11.3 for the Phantom 2 9.7-10.7 for the F-4C) when taken into sim. the biggest surprise i had with an aircraft though was the Tornado, it is absolutely useless in a dogfight in realistic, but when you take it into sim you find that it isn't a 100% losing battle, if you manage to play your cards perfectly you can win some dogfights against certain aircraft if the enemy pilot isn't as skilled, whereas in realistic if the skill difference is the same the Tornado is still likely to lose to highly low skilled pilots. another thing i'd recommend checking out just as a showcase of the difference between sim and realistic controls is to go into a custom match and have the same aircraft face off against each other, one in sim controls, the other using the regular mouse aim that you'd use in realistic, the difference it makes can sometimes be astounding depending on the aircraft

The f15 over performs by 1 degree in the ssutained turn rate, I posted it on the forums, but you have to do a video on the f20 tigershark you have no idea how broken it is and I posted about it on the forums as well. The f20 irl is supposed to have 21 to 22 degrees of sustained ed turn rate at its min fuel with no payload at the deck sustaining 400 knots (IAS). In the game it has the highest sustained turn rate in the game for top tier jets, with 26° degrees, this means little Timmy with his mom's credit card can have the best sustained turn rate fighter in the game, for 75 dollars, this is a massive issue. Its over performing by 4 whole degrees and it needs to be nerfed as soon as possible.

EAGLE ON TOP RAHHHH

From my point of view, duels is the wrong way to use just about any aircraft. But out of this match, I would expect the F-15 to outperform the Su-27 more than nine out of ten times regardless of the sim. The FM differences seem to correspond fairly well to the physical characteristics of each plane, so the FM isn't perhaps the best place to focus on when talking about why the plane has trouble in the game as it's normally played: In SB EC, the Su-27 is still at a disadvantage compared to planes like F-16C, F-15A, or JAS-39 Gripen, or Mirage 2000 or Mirage 4000 or MiG-29G or just about any other top tier jet. This is because the advantages that the Su-27 is *supposed* to have, are rendered mostly irrelevant in the game. So, instead of trying to figure out if the FM is fundamentally wrong (which I don't believe it is), I would rather focus on the current issues with BVR and VWR missiles. The general issue with BVR is that SARH missiles are rendered almost irrelevant by current implementation of multipathing. You basically only get SARH kills against people who are inattentive, inexperienced, or just accidentally happen to fly too high and the missile can track properly. Possible solution would be to adjust multipathing - for example, I have heard that multipathing doesn't work quite the same (or at all) over large bodies of water. This alone could make SARH missiles a much more credible threat on certain areas of certain maps, like Sinai and most of all Denmark. It would mean that the missiles would be a genuine threat and would have to be defeated in some other ways if you're flying over water. Secondly, the best short range missile of the Su-27 (R-73) is, in the balance of things, less effective than the current implementation of AIM-9M. This, I believe, could be fixed by addressing an issue with the AIM-9M that makes it the superior weapon. Namely, I believe the current implementation of AIM-9M with no visible trail at all is fundamentally incorrect. Yes, the rocket motor is labeled as "smokeless" but that is really a relative term. The exhaust still contains large amounts of water vapor, which means the missile should still produce a visible vapour trail almost at any altitude. Essentially, water vapour *is* the "smoke" in most cases, so that's something you can't really get around. There are some AIM-9M launches that can be found on KZfaq, and they certainly produce a very visible trail. Fixing this could address the main issue of what makes the AIM-9M so terrifying - namely, the fact that you can't see those bloody things launched so it's very hard to defend against them. If the SARH missiles were made relevant (or, relevant enough that you'd need to actually evade them rather than just fly in a straight line at low altitude while spamming your own missiles at the enemy in a head-on), then the Su-27 would have *basically* the largest amount of the best SARH missiles of any platform in the game. And, if the AIM-9M was made visible, then I would say the R-73 and the AIM-9M would be more or less equal, with the R-73 being better with off-boresight launches and the AIM-9M having perhaps the edge with IRCCM in most circumstances. In that situation the Su-27 would have the BVR advantage, while NATO fighters would have some other advantages.

problem with the SU27 is that the instructor pulls on the manual controls SO much that it bleeds. in SIM it is way more manageable, since you can just not pull that hard. i've flown against a SU27 pilot, which i could only sometimes get guns on target with the gripen and GR7. mirage 2000, F16A, F15 were all struggling. i have no idea how he was flying. it was a pilotage mission on customs and he was so slippery. The flightmodel of the SU27 is okay. the F15 is artificially buffed, so is the F16A. F16C idk. a way it could work better is if SAS mode was added ontop of instructor in RB, limiting the SU27's AOA, making it retain more energy.

I think in this video it's the guy flying it because I've came across good Su27 pilots

stupid question but whats the "cobra button"?

I play the flanker ALOT. The flanker in the rate fight at around 850kph is good BUT everything you fight holds energy much better lol. I hope the FM is revised / buffed at least in terms of its slow speed maneuverability. The flanker should really be used for those high off boresight r73’s which does carry the plane. Guns only fight you’re at a significant disadvantage.

how do I invade your discord?

Could you make a new discord link?

ARU TA TA! BE DE BE DE UNABORE! PREJEMA BETTY BUSHKA! PREJEMA UGOL ATAKI!

11:20 - Beyblade

im so shit at sim

Well no shit, Su-27 is severely underperforming in the game due to balancing reasons, cos it has "OP" missiles

Dont lie. You like doing it. Lol. Thanks for the kind words. I've learned every toxic thing i know from you ❤ EAGLE ON TOP

if fox 2's were used in these, the flanker wins. in guns only, yea its at a big disadvantage because the early flankers have really bad energy retention, plus gayjin nerfed the FM, but the later engine/airframe upgrades changes this drastically. my pimax crystal and new hotas should be coming in next month, id be interested in doing sim duel with you. most my duels are in dcs, so itll be interesting to see how WT sim compares.

the flanker wins in only the first turn after that the F15 can maintain higher speed and rate and slowly win the fight and the 27 cant do anything about it if you want a better rate fighter the 16C can hold rate and speed better than the 15A rn

The su27s flight model is artificially nerfed, on the dev server it was miles better than it is now. Once we get ARH missiles I believe they may buff it. Hopefully a long with the mig29 as well, cause it's kinda sad. Also, the su27 is so bad at dog fighting a mig29 can beat it. (In arb I'm not a sim player)

5:20 to be fair the su27 irl has a very shitty energy retention, like its worse than the 29, and the 29 has decent energy retention but its bad compered to the 16 or 15, either way the point is still there.

Su-27 vs. F-15 F-15: -Sustained turn rate -Energy retention -Control surface authority/responsiveness -Thrust to weight ratio Su-27: -Angle of attack -Instant pull at VERY slow speeds In real fights, the Su-27 only really has the Cobra + HMD R-73 to bank on. If it fails, you're dead. If you don't use it and you're opponent has competence and speed, you're eventually fucked.

When an American main gets good "Russian bias" stops to exist.

ok but BIG SUKA SUKHOI