Please do a video on his interview with Sai Deepak

good journalism, oh sorry content😅😅

You do not make 1hr long video and expect people to stick until the end

Can you please bring back sansaad watch. I think it's the most important show.

@@sportsdude9172it seems Sai Deepak gave lot of pain to you..😂😂😂😂😂

@@JeevanMR Abhijit Chavda. Perfect example of dunning kruger effect.

Epic

@@ZAIN9858 his imagination is even beyond modi

Social science(sociology, geopoliticals, political science, economics) isn't a hard science like bacteriology. Nice try though.

​@@rutvikrsit is a science nevertheless which has a large scale of learning. Bad excuse, infact horrible excuse though

Thank you good sir! And I think these might potentially get longer haha

@meghnerd i will offer a small nitpick though. I will replace the word proof with the word evidence. Because proof is 100% truth. And evidence can be less. And in this case the latter works better than the former

Fair point. Will keep that in mind for the future.

​@@meghnerd sir my humble request you that please do proper research on abhijit chavda's history claims on India and Mahatma Gandhi. In simple one line I can say that he is spreading so much fake news on Nehru, Gandhi,history of india and national movement. millions of youth followed him by words and spreding fake news. There is no proper videos which can counter his claims. I know you are the right person who can counter his claims with proper evidence and facts so that our youths will know real history and stop spreding fake news. sir there are so many videos in youtube . Once you search their name you can watch so many proganga videos. j sai deepak, keerthi history, praveen mohan and anuj dhar also claiming like abhijit chavda and spreading fake history. Make a detailed research videos on that topics and save our youths from fake historians . They all have millions of subscribers to spread their wrong facts. Please respond to it sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Hello from a fellow Science Dope Head!

Nailed it.

You're moving from one cult to another pick which makes you happy, this guy has his bias too, i am centrist, I like to watch this monkeys dance and pick which one is not the worst

​​@@shashithej582he's 100 times less biased than beer biceps

​@@alimohammadkhan6367beer biceps has no biases. He's a slef professed "fence sitter". He doesn't know what he's talking about. Most of that is done by his team. He's just an opportunist.

This Echochamber just doesn't exist within the Right Wing Ecosystem, I have seen the same Paranoid Behavior when people within the Left-Wing Echochamber respond when they are presented an alternate world-view. In 21st Century Politics the Victimization effort translates to more Clout and both the camps do it extremely well with their set of Media. For example Caravan and The Wire have specific Reader Base which is largely Left Wing to Far-Left. Meanwhile Sites like OpIndia and Swarajya Cater to a Specific Audience that is Right Wing to Far-Right. Some Media Houses like The Print, allows people with both Worldviews to present their stuff. Now Social Media Algorithms make it necessary to push you in either of the camp because when you are fixated on these camps the content they show you get maximum engagement which increases the user base for these apps. But the more you read authentic and authoritative texts regarding issues be it on History, Local Politics or Religion, the less you will be susceptible to Narrative based Journal pieces and more into Academic based Journal pieces, because the latter puts more emphasis on understanding the grievances of both the camps.

Hahaha same here !

People of India got to know about Soros after this govt came in power. So gandu's like u wouldn't deep dive in any matter but cherry pick & do slug fest..

सत्य

Ohhh dear clown. Didn't George Soros give the statement against India? Why Rahul Gandhi went to USA trip of 7 days after his statement. And then Manipur violence and Nuh riots are screaming and proving George Soros's direct involvement in these incidents.

Btw George Soros is no saint either

Abe madarchod why would anybody attack a foreign minister who promotes Indian interest.

Thank you so much and glad you enjoyed this "content" 😅

@@meghnerdloved the “content”😅

Stop disrespecting the PM please. It is the entire political science degree. He did not leave anything behind and he was the only one in his class capable of pulling something like this.

@@aman34165 I want that degree too. at least it'll guarantee me a high political position

@@adityamishra1567 we are puny little human beings. Can’t be compared to the honourable PM of the “world” and so we are out of our depths with entire political science degree. I think we should open a pakoda shop and help our country grow to become the superpower.

dont bother using sarcastic comments on my VISHWAGURU... (I live near CBI branch of pune)

the subject of AI has existed since the 1930s at least alan turing was the first AI scientist of the world the turing test was an AI test

Yess J sai makes lot of things sound true and we audience can’t even dissect/ proof read the things he claims.

Yesssssss neeeeed

​@@sumitsp01no most of the things he says are true

​​​​@@oooo-ui1mlI think that he provides a distorted image of history (and we all know that distortions are not completely true) due to his emphasis on specific aspects of the past. In a way, this is similar to how some left-wing intellectuals may make it seem as if Islam doesn't have any violent tendencies and the destruction of temples was only because of economic reasons. Mr Deepak, in his video on hatred against Brahmins, doesn't mention the fact that the "guilt literature" he is criticising is not teaching people about mere illusions. Discrimination did occur and it continues to occur. Should Muslim students not be taught about the invasions after a particular point of time? This is just not the Indic approach to life. We have to reject ignorance wherever we see it and adopt the good wherever it exists. Similarly, he talks about the partition and the mindset of a certain community, but he fails to explore the role of people like Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan. If you continuously portray some people in a negative way, you are going to end up misleading people, even if you don't intend to do so. In a video, I saw Mr Deepak arguing that Mahatma Gandhi needed "professional help" at some point because he was allegedly asking Hindus to simply give up and allow themselves to be slaughtered. I believe that he was referring to the words from 'Prarthana-Pravachan' (Part 1, pp. 29-32). What is surprising that a person who has done enough research to be nearing the completion of a massive trilogy did not care to dive deeper into the actual meaning of the words and the relevant context. I had written the following comment somewhere else in response to this charge, and I think that it would be helpful here as well: 'That quotation from Mahatma Gandhi is often shared without an adequate understanding. The first thing we need to understand is that he wanted people to "face" the harms bravely and not to meekly accept them. Secondly, it had a broader point to make about violence and our reaction to it. I wrote about this elsewhere: "Many instances of oppression, slavery, and discrimination were also perpetuated in the name of common sense in the past. Even today, the temptation of revenge and violence continues to tear apart communities as people fail to see the vicious cycle for what it is. Mahatma Gandhi's point was not exactly a literal one. Instead, it was a form of spiritual/metaphorical idea that wanted to inspire confidence in those who were facing grave injustice. The point was that in the hypothetical scenario in which no option was left other than certain annihilation, there was greater value in standing firm rather than letting some forces cause terror, anger, and misery. None of this means that he was fine with what was happening. The context also matters. In that very paragraph, he is focusing on the fear of death and how to overcome it. Whether or not someone believes it, there is a significant difference in our emotional response to death if we are accepting it bravely. If one bravely sees it as destruction of a vessel that cannot harm the eternal Atman, then that kind of death has a higher dignity than one in which there is a futile hatred. At the same time, there is a deeper realisation of the inner divinity of all that Advaita Vedanta (which Mahatma Gandhi believed in) emphasises. With this understanding, the actions of others are ultimately a result of ignorance. This was the reason why he did not want people to harbour hatred in their hearts for others. Also, considering that this was translated, it is quite possible that by “ushering”, he only meant that even if a terrible tragedy occurred, there will still be a new world in which the good could arise and thrive again (which is an idea that any individual with a belief in a higher power that governs the universe would find compelling). Finally, he is not exactly telling people to give up. If a soldier says that they will “face” their enemies bravely, one would hope that this would not be interpreted as a call to surrender arms. Also, you don't need to "deify" someone to recognise that there aren't many people who would spend days in a riot-hit area (without any weapons) for the sake of establishing peace. Sardar Patel acknowledged the power of Mahatma Gandhi's efforts in his address to the nation in 1948."'

JSD is an expert in hiding his bigotry behind his impeccable English.

Your content source is news laundary. You need to find better sources than shit like news laundary.

😂

😅ravish Kumar ,went from one wing to another, wats the difference

RIP to your brain.

@@pkjh49 thanks 🙏

That's quite a compliment. Thanks for watching!

Would love to see more on how you investigate and debunk what they openly claim to be an expert on despite the reality hiding under the nuance.😊😊

Its not selling the soul for money, same for godi media, they are not "sold outs" they are showing people what they want to see, people want their views confirmed and echoed. That's what they do.

​@@MAC-vi7fy that's exactly what selling out means.

@@JeevanMR That’s exactly how a business is run. They need to produce profit at the end of every year. Blame the people not the business. The day people are more interested in hearing out the harsh things is the day media will start showing them.

Criticizing someone is very easy ,

​@@MAC-vi7fypeople are so stupid that they don't even know that news channels and influencers are paid by the similar bussinessmans. Just check who owns the pro government and anti government channels their owners and their stakes and you will find similar or even same people . These bussinessmans want both the pro and anti people to have conflict of interest and give them the TRP and the hype that they want. The public whether it is left wing or right wing always fall for it.

A series

Take out your Romila Aunty JNU bs to counter him 🔥😁

@@WHITE_RAPTOR counter the below with ur Abhijit chawdas ass-trophysics Romila attained a doctorate in Indian history from School of Oriental and African Studies, the University of London in 1958. Thapar is currently Professor Emeritus at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) in New Delhi. Thapar is a visiting professor at Cornell University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the College de France in Paris.

​@@WHITE_RAPTORcan't compare a well respected historian with an amateur like Abhijit Chawda .

@@Abk367 Respected m@rist historian!!! Whose life have been based on lies... just like the famous Peaceful community.

Thank you for watching. Much appreciated! :)

You watch that Crap show NL?😂

At last I finished 😀35:07 I took break there too haha.

Noted. Planning to do some freewheeling livestreams soon. Will talk about Parliament then. :)

Its simple.... He isn't an AI specialist, if he was he would've mentioned it in the umpteen times he has edited his profile. Why would he conveniently "forget" it all these years. This is a very prestigious and lucrative field and very, very immersive and demanding. It's not possible that he committed to this so deeply to wear it as a tag but not mention it all these years and that too as someone who doesn't shy away from cocky self-promotion.

​@@NidzShah-ps6kra balanced critique of both sides: 1. RM was on the business side of things more than research, it is quite likely that he was involved in AI in some form as the large players in computers were spooked by the progress of AI at that time. It was the era of Deep Blue beating Kasparov, something thought to be impossible for a computer at that time. 2. I am deeply disappointed by the quality of critique towards RM in this video, the addition of AI research comes at the backdrop of him releasing a book on AI, not the news cycle of Open AI. It was an easy search that was missed. 3. RM has a streak of Ego and self promotion that I dislike. I am truly interested to hear a critique even though I have followed him for two decades. I was a skeptic turned follower and now I am genuinely interested in understanding where he is right and where he is wrong. Instead of it we always get that Nityananda clip, yes he said that but anyone who watched the video in its full form can tell you he was pandering to him just like he does with his tougher crowds, Mark Tully to some American woman promoting Christian yoga(paraphrased, yoga minus the devil). If this is a valid MO, it's easy to discount Meghnad's journalistic cred and work on the basis of a goofy clip or any factual errors. 4. He has done some serious work, for instance I found his book "Being different" truly compelling as a framework. Not dealing with his book breaking India gave an intellectual voice to Hindutva, so there is precedence for a left/liberal Hindu response to his work.

Bhai jhand logo k saamne sir kyu likh rahe ho. He's a charlatan. There shouldn't be any respect.

😂😂😂

Not entirely true

😂😂

but he exaggerates a fucking lot and sometimes delves into areas where he doesn't have expertise and proliferates conspiracy theories instead of facts

Oh so u r believing that meghnerd has most of the knowledge about Ai 🤔and in so many fields including geopolitics and everything and many of the old CEO of bigtech companies are learning AI ,then why not rajiv 🤔🤡 I know he is not a CEO of leftist exposer 🤡

"REVEALED: RAJIV MALHOTRA SECRETS!"

Cuz it's good for SEO