+Rhys Owen And then I write something that sounds about like a cat in heat :/ XD

Amazing isn't it?

He used a device, I can't quite remember what it was called, but it was this mouth piece that connected to the instrument. The vibrations would transfer to his jaw and simulate the sounds even without the use of his ears.

Bone conducter mighy it be? Hmmm

Lavender Ink Its called a pencil he used a pencil and he also sat on the wood floor

How about all three?

@@rockfrolic6249 that works too

searched because i like head remove

@@cowfarts why do you come up with head remove?

@@Nikojira remove kaworu head

get an add-blocker. I heard no interruption.

I agree

Amen

so youre getting ads? *an adblock user*

This is why the good lord gave us add blocker

True.

The most amazing musical achievement in history ❤️✔️

He's a legend and he knows it

true

Yes.

Just to add to your soundtrack of fucked up Shitaka ultraviolnce

aja

+Mr_Diddles Rip'n Tear

+Mr_Diddles always niuce after the bit ol in out

the lines from this movie are epic. The script writer was creative and funny eh?

Best part is @8:58 When the chorus comes in

Some people really dont like him.

Jeff Lindeman, well said. I think he changed the way symphonic music was composed--using more and more instruments, going higher, lower, louder, softer, silent...it's all there. Simple two note themes with all these variations. I saw it tonight and I felt scared, lullabied, sexy, holy, surrounded by the angelic, punched in the stomach, whispered to kindly and purely---it took me everywhere. Crying when the first vocal is heard. I also agree about the 2nd movement...pure genius..makes you cry and gets you stirred up at the same time. So many emotions. It is truly glorious.

​​@@GenghisKhanBruseySkyz With exceptions, there are two main kinds of Beethoven detractors: 1. The ones who just don't know classical music or any system of tonal theory at all. Unlikely that they play an instrument/ have vocal training or have a musical ear regardless, and think it just all sounds like noise. No intuition for chord progressions, modulations, transpositions, etc... let alone knowledge of them. To be clear, not all people who lack music experience or knowledge (either theoretically or intuitively) dislike classical. Often people with just good imagination and visualization skills, or just an appreciation of skill itself, can enjoy some kind of classical on some level. 2. Actual classical musicians who are elitist/purist and don't appreciate Beethoven's deviation from perfect symmetrical structures, even though he had every ability to write perfect mathematical harmonies. These people will say his music has poor architecture compared to Mozart or Bach. They likely don't like any composer who was inspired by Beethoven like Brahms, Liszt, Schumann, etc... They don't appreciate Beethoven's ability to develop a simple motif like a building block into a broad structure. I've even seen advanced music theory students shun Beethoven because he never used advanced chords typical of contemporary classical or Jazz. Overall, those who find problems with Beethoven are missing the point of his music in some way. It's about development of motifs and themes and the drive to resolve in the face of overwhelming adversity, not perfect math. His music has touched people around the world and is a musical household name. Beethoven challenged harmony and inspired the Romantic era of Western tonal music, he's a legend.

@@alhfgsp holy crap this was really well written and surprisingly informative great job dude :D

Sir, for such an amazing comment I'm going to award you with the highest honor I can bestow to someone I don't know from the internet, I will give you my like, take a screenshot and show it to everyone I know and explain to them how good this comment is. Thank you.

haha

Few know

I came here just for this comment.

I love that movie.

@@astarteswillum5259 Great movie

Sadly, the older you get, the less frecuencies you listen. Kind of a shitty deal if you ask me

​@A-G-F- the differences in pitch at those frequencies generally only affect the octaves on the furthest ends of the sound spectrum. People aren't interested in distinguishing between pitch at those ranges anyways. Only kids like to play in those ranges, to play sounds the teacher can't hear in class...

👍

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Hit em with the ol’ in and out, in and out...

Even knowing the words it's hard to sing along! xD

Its a sin!!!!

Vivaldi was the heavy metal.

And you are the idiot of this time.

Paganini was the black metal.

Bach Power Metal

@@josyfalcon5442 stfu bitch.

Guess shinji had a crush on kaworu

No plis it’s sad T^T they couldn’t be together

literally sad and only a few people can understand

no stop please i'm crying

I found someone where i didn't thought i could.

TheBrowser259 thank you.

And very ending of song as well

Charles Origin my personal fave.

Charles Origin exactly I was looking for, thanks

Thank you o my brother :)

Anime is the worst thing to ever exist.

@@PubicGore boi STFU

@@PubicGore stop being mean pls it's not nice

@@elie2133 Duh. That's what the definition is, and I am simply being truthful. If you discovered this through anime you don't deserve to listen to it, you are unworthy. You are not welcome here.

@@PubicGore I personnaly discovered this from just looking for beethoven's composition cause i love his music and started listening to classical for the last weeks. But realy, it's such a great song why should anyone not be able to appreciate it, regardless of how they found it? Heck if they found it in a porn video(I watched a porn video which had classical music in it the other day just to say) it's just as great. Most people discovered it because it's the european's hymn though. Anyway, if you legitemately think a whole form of story telling, be it books, anime or films is degenerate you're completely retarded. But you probably don't think that do you.

Yes; thank you for something thoughful.

Michael Amodei Yes. Common misconception is that Beethoven wrote the lyrics. Ode to Joy is actually from another poet, but Beethoven used the words from the poem to make the musical arrangement. But Beethoven DID in fact add a few more lyrics, but he was NOT the original writer of the words. And yes, the point or theme of the poem was for humankind to come together in joy and peace. Something useful especially during these times of unrest and division and disagreement.

@@MrTylerNicole1 common misconception..but not my misconception

Michael Amodei Yes. I know. Not trying to blame you for it.

💜🦋💜🦋💜🦋

Viddy well, lil sister, viddy well.

Deliverygirl I know that pic

i think that the artist is locon,

Deliverygirl check out Beethoven’s sextet with 2 horns and Beethoven’s sextet with 2 bassoons 2 clarinets and 2 horns both final movements are crazy good

Ludwig Van? I am sure there have many many by that name. You demonstrate your lack of knowledge for crediting through names, believeing you need not include the most significant part of any name: the last name.

Thanks, I was looking for this piece, since it was mention in A Orange Clockwork

Why a french word ? French is actually a very poor language I believe. We don't even have a word for "big" or for "warm"

@@chauffeurdebusdu9344 "gros" and "tiede" ...

Agreed!

Do you mean "formidabl"?

do you like head remove? it is beautiful scene

And Misato will let us do the old in and out with her when we’re finished

La little bit of Ludwig van

Michelle Otis, interesting....a great anthem of brotherhood. Thanks. I well up too.

So did Alex Delarge.

@@dukecraig2402 🤣

@@michelleotis8584 You got that one did ya.

@@michelleotis8584 "I was cured alright!!!"

+Azku Shang every single part of this 4th movement shows the man was touched by God.. This is not music, i dont know what it is

+simo slaou ;) I know, the greatest composition ever it's pure trascendence.

god doesnt exist lol

@@redmenace3786 Prove that.

@@ZiomZiomCreeper there’s no way to prove to me that there is a god. Not if we are talking about God, of the sort worshipped by billions nowadays. You’ve heard of this God: entirely supernatural, infinitely powerful, perfectly intelligent, etc. That God is impossible to prove. To anyone. It’s not just my own personal problem. I’ve already explained why “Not even God could make Me Religious.” But my problem with God is everyone’s problem. It’s actually impossible to prove to anyone that this God exists. Here’s why: It is possible to ‘convince’ lots of people that there’s a God. Religions have been accomplishing that for millennia. But I’m not talking about establishing psychological certitude. Persuading someone of something is hardly the same thing as proving it. People staunchly believe all sorts of things for poor reasons or no reasons at all. Also note that the actual existence of God, if God really does exist, is not proof that there is a God. A proof of X is a sufficiently rational demonstration of X that can be understood by people and hence believed by people. Proof in God Heavenly Light by Jeff P / CC BY 2.0 A proof is a relationship between the thing to be proven and a person offered that proof. Look at it this way: water has always been composed of one oxygen atom and two hydrogen atoms, but there was no proof of that until the nineteenth century. Until modern chemistry’s demonstrations, no one could know this natural fact. Where is the demonstrable proof for God? The basic issue is whether a human being of ordinary perceptual and cognitive powers could ever be supplied a proof that God exists. I deny that possibility, forever. It’s not just a temporary obstacle. It’s not like waiting for science to get there eventually. Not only won’t science ever supply a proof of God, no other rational method will either. Mystics and existential theologians have been saying this for a long time, and they seem satisfied with just abnormal states of awareness or profound emotions to draw them nearer to what they call God. They abandoned reason long ago, and everyone else needs to similarly realize that reason won’t ever reach God. Here’s the basic argument showing why there’s no proof for God (as defined above). 1. Humans will never have the cognitive capacity to directly understand anything with infinite powers or qualities. 2. Humans will never have intellectual reasons to indirectly demonstrate the existence of anything with infinite powers or qualities. 3. There are only two kinds of proofs for God: direct understanding or indirect demonstration. Conclusion: Humans will never have any proofs for God. On the first premise, it is common enough for theologians to deny this, instead claiming that some people have had direct experiences with the Almighty. The issue is whether any of those people actually experienced some infinite properties or qualities of God, or only thought they did. Could they understand what is really happening to them? Mystical experiences are frequently described as involving losing all sense of embodiment or finitude, so that one’s consciousness seems to inflate beyond all bounds, or disappears altogether into something inexpressibly vaster. This psychological phenomenon happens to some people, sure. But these experiences can easily be induced by meditation, isolation, drugs, falling asleep, or blows to the head. Naturally, theologians claim that people of the ‘right’ religion do encounter God. But this is just a bluff: they could not possibly know this. No human has the cognitive capacity to understandably distinguish some genuine encounter with God from a pseudo-encounter. The mystical experience itself can’t display the difference between a genuine encounter with God from some impressive psychological phenomenon. By definition, mystical experiences don’t come pre-labeled with some God’s name on it - if they have anything in common, they are just infinitely mysterious. That’s why mystics end up disagreeing over which God they experience, or (more wisely) they just agree that nothing can be proven. Theologians are aware of these obstacles. One typical trick is to claim that God endows special people with unnatural powers to know divine matters. Such tricks beg the question, requiring the prior assumption that God exists, so no proof is possible in this manner either. On the second premise, theology has busily offered all sorts of indirect “proofs” for God. They are all failures, and their inadequacies will never be remedied, which illustrates my earlier point that clearly speaking, God’s existence is impossible. As my book, The God Debates explains, evidence now available to us can’t justify belief in God. This is a permanent situation. No matter how far we are driven to rationally admit that something extraordinary requires a very special explanation, a sufficient explanation always falls far short of any God. Miracles can never be good evidence for God; at most we might have to say that something very powerful is interfering with known laws of nature (it’s probably just a newly discovered natural force anyways). The origin of the universe can never be good evidence for a God; if a creator is really ever needed (which it won’t be, since the simpler hypothesis is just more Nature behind the big bang) then this creator only need be slightly more powerful than the universe’s own total energy and much smarter than us. You see how this works: no matter what indirect demonstration is offered by theology, simply ask, “Is an Almighty Supernaturally Infinite God really necessary to do any explaining here?” and then supply the answer yourself: “Not at all.” Not at all. That’s the appropriate response to the question, “Is God needed to explain anything?” In fact, and this is a point for another time, I doubt whether invoking God is even an explanation at all, much less a dubious explanation. Should atheists or agnostics ever have to say, “Well, you could prove to me that God exists, if…”? Nope, not at all. And no one else should, either. centerforinquiry.org/blog/proving_gods_existence_is_impossible/

Yes,agree 100 %

Oh,yeah.

Maybe.

I cannot come up with one that is to this level.

Yes it's great! But my favorite part is 11:11 The great orchestra fugue.

Leo Rossi Finally, someone who shares my opinion!!! :D

+Alan Diaz 15:32 is mine

+Leo Rossi 11:11 is just pure magic. and that ending from 21:52!

+Alan Diaz Epic.

It is undebatable. Though i'd say Bach is the greatest overall.

@@MS-eb8cf i respect that i have more love and respect for beethoven

Beethoven Forever!!!

+Mr.Blonde I'm happy again..

and drink milk +

@@drstranamore347 moloko

superfragilisticatexpialidoshmur it has something of the Pachelbel’s Canon in D mayor, especially the bass part

you have to realize, he wrote this in early 19th century, with a bit of ink and piece of paper. He couldn`t hear the actual music yet he created a piece which will never cease to amaze thousands of people. One of the most emotional, melodic and harmonical pieces Beethoven ever wrote, no error, not a single false note. Perfection

Power of perfect pitch and love for music

That clearly is the best way to put it

I never realised that Beethoven was playing in that part.

@@chickenflavor9880 Yep, it's also the tune that Kaworu is humming when he met Shinji for the first time. Very fitting to NGE, since the lyrics are about the brotherhood of all humanity (which is the goal of Seele's Human Complementation Plan)

Same :)

Same....

yes

Oh the old moloko plus first will you not say?

the closest you'll ever get to feel that divine spark on those god forsake place

it's not unmanly to cry at perfection

Carlos Mundaca have you heard bohemian rhapsody

Simply EPICNESS!

Quinn Minear really?? The same guy that was Mozart’s “rival” in the movie? That’s very interesting

It's the european anthem. And that's better

if there ever will be a earth anthem - this should be it!

It's the anthem of the European Union. Poor Britains...

instead they recycled the music from a Christian hymn of the 18th Cent, Glorious Things of Thee Are Spoken

@@erikseventfullifeanimalcro8486 Should be a human anthem.

2nd movement is just marvellous

If I had a chance to conduct it I would eliminate the 3rd movement, or severely edit it down.

i here because head robbery

Or you're going down a gigantic elevator shaft riding a giant robot to kill your new boyfriend and avoid the end of humanity.

I’m actually here because of NGE. That scene with Kaworu made me fall in love with this song in a completely new way.

lovely, lovely Ludwig Van

Why?, i love this piece from Ludwig van Beethoven

Niccolò Paganini Bocciardo It's from A Clockwork Orange

?

Niccolò Paganini Bocciardo Well, this is a spoiler, but the main violent, thug gets put in jail and opts to commute his sentence by participating in an experimental "conditioning" program that will make him extremely nauseous at the mere sight of violence. During one of the violent films they make him watch, there was a this Beethoven piece playing. He was very familiar with it and was horrified when he realized he would become incapacitated every time he hears "lovely, lovely, Ludwig, Van" in the future.

He will never get old because he died huh

by now he would be pretty darn old

As a non composer with no musical ability, this is the best music I've ever heard. I mostly listen to house and techno and hip hop When the full chorus comes in @8:58 Wow

First Rock Star, trashed hotel rooms, found drunk in the gutter, had a torrid love affair with some woman who today is still a mystery, and the only reason he wasn't up to his neck in cocaine and strippers is because they hadn't been invented yet, if that's not Rock Star I don't know what is.

Love how Karl from Die Hard (or rather the actor) orchestrates this piece of music in The Money Pit. (Tenuous))link.

Yippee-ki-yay

Welcome to the party, pal

True 600 iq patrician over here.

tfw shut the fuck up nigga this is clockwork territory

@@DeezNuts-vj4ws Righty right right, my little droogie, or soon enough, the horroshow red kroovey starts showing and showing and showing and it will be oh so wonderful. Quite ecstatic.

@@horsthooden4600 my balls itch

get head removed make me ecstatic love make head robbery remove. shiji no longer can have old man hair source

Teach me the ways pls.

How would you know?

Classical tuning....

"A tuning fork that belonged to Ludwig van Beethoven around 1800, now in the British Library, is pitched at A = About this sound 455.4 Hz, well over a half-tone higher." (Wikipedia)

Hahaha u made my day, Ludwig xD

You should be crowned as a king for your wisdom

And critics bashed Blade Runner when it came out. Both are perfect examples of why you should NEVER pay attention to critics.

Hello

Hater

they were probably too busy moshing and crowd surfing

@WILLIAM PUCHOT you stfu instead