hey RaM so why had those ramsies been kicked out from the moon-loon?

That's because they weren't in any danger.

@Hayden O'Neil I just commented on what you noticed today 1.2.19 not realizing you wrote a similar comment a month earlier. It also gave me "goosebumps". Unfortunately, I do not see the U.S. in today's political climate allocating the money necessary to go back. Back in the 60s, the biggest disagreement was the Viet Nam war. Now we seem to disagree about almost everything.

@@daffidavit I agree... We live in such a sad social media time. Facts aren't important anymore. Weve mass hysteria, spending billions while we should spend that money on research and technological development... America is as devided as it can be... I dont see it change very soon either.

Very good comment. Unfortunately, it's not much different with Germany.

I agree I was born in December 62 I remember the same things and I thought our country was great nobody lied now pornographic telephones and computers and children were being raised right outside playing ball I remember seeing glad Ford going across the sky and my parents standing there with me showing me with my brothers and sisters and California I remember great things being accomplished and I feel the same way I stuck in a different world I don't even know who I am anymore or where I'm at and I look at my young daughter and sometimes I feel like crying because I brought her end of this world and I'm afraid of what her future might be like now since we have a ball secret government and all these psychopath running are country to and greedy rich people the rock child's and the burger masters in the Rockefellers there disgusting even bill Gates's on their side the demons of got ahold of them. Help us

Wow! I seemed to have stumbled onto this thread by coincidence. I too was born in 1963 I'm from southern California, raised on a missle test base and I blindly assumed the US would always be at the forefront of technology. We should be on Mars by now...this is sad, we owe an apology to the people that accomplished these things, it's sad too that England, and Germany are going down the same road, was kinda hoping you guys would show us where we went wrong...sucks being in the same boat, I'm afraid we're just switching seats on the Titanic these days.

The Artemis mission is scheduled to put humans back on the moon by 2024. Search for ‘Artemis moon nasa’ and it will come right up. They are going to stay this time. It was named for the twin of Apollo, Artemis, Goddess of the moon.

Forget it! You are watching another version of the fall of Rome!

Pretty much available. Ebay.

My favorite astronaut

I'm reading his "Last Man on the Moon" now. Great read. Entertaining and informative.

I want to be him

He never went to the moon. Those landings are myths, unable to be recreated in today's times.

@@neilarmstrongsson795 we are landing on the moon again in 3 years with Elon Musks Starship, he will proof you and the other brainless idiots wrong.

They have invested years into this endeavor, at this point it must of been second nature.

they laugh because its a joke..the whole thing is one giant joke on you and i.

Aremis Somar They laugh because it’s a giant conspiracy headed up by a secret government of demonic reptilians who love to mock us and make us feel tiny and alone in the universe? It that what you’re saying? Hmm, that sounds a little far fetched. Got any proof?

Moon landing was filmed in side the LEM simulator. No videos of the astroNOTS inside the LEM during ascent or descent because they could not fake that part of the hoax.

Sue Kennedy That proves nothing. There’s no video of you being born, so you must be A.I.

He was a better actor than my father. With hindsight he should've been on apollo 11.

@@neilarmstrongsson795, get a life.

@@neilarmstrongsson795 You wouldn't know who your biological father was

I somewhat agree with you. However, just look at the amazing things Musk is doing. I think we will get our "footing" again, just with a longer than necessary lapse,

@@cedarshoals529Yes, I do agree re Musk and the amazing Falcon flights. And landings!! Incredible. But just think if we'd kept upgrading and modifying our majestic mighty Saturn V who'd proved herself so worthy, so many times!? I get goosebumples thinking what it would be capable of by today, and maybe with the Orion or Starliner or even the Dragon sitting atop!? Hmmm... Just sayin. 🤔

Yes I have always thought this. Very sad and now all we're left with is a generation that relentlessly claim it to all of been one big hoax. Devastated.

J Read yea that’s just plain stupid kids think this was faked. This country used to stand for something. Now it’s just a watered down politically correct non alcoholic light beer of a country. Kids think now making a big sacrifice is going without WiFi for 2 days

The smarter of us millennials just find it strange we never went back. We also find it strange NASA claims to not know how to get over some of the hurdles now. Idk no big deal. These astronauts are great. They rode rockets regardless.

Well said! I'm not crying, I got moon dust in my eye.

RIP Gene Cernan and Ron Evans 😥

@ 26:38 Gene Cernan invents the moonwalk

You're kidding Right? You do know that these guys were never on the moon?

Varuzh Shakbazyan Go back to your third world shithole and get off of our American KZfaq.

He is a very talented person

Neither of them went to the moon, it remains difficult to reach even today.

@@neilarmstrongsson795 Incorrect, correct.

When you take him to see the Lem make sure you tell him that little rocket motor was not what got us on to the moon or back with Apollo 20 and 21 the secret missions. It was the alien anti graviton drive that was used in its place. The foil they picked up also at Roswell shielded radiation so it lined the walls and space suits to go through the Van Allen belts. But by the time comes that should all be public next year. Aliens 👽 it’s always aliens it’s how your cell phone works that’s alien circuitry it’s not the same as the computer in your car or microwave or tv it’s a boost we got now considered to be a dual edge sword and many aliens now think while we got smarter younger we got disconnected from each other and nature y a dual edge.

@@AboxofMonsters lol

Next mission krypton…

Allow your son watch the apollo 11 'return' press conference. And then let him make up his mind as to whether we _really_ went.

genuinely

Me too :)

styleemusic there is a newer one out called Apollo 11,highly recommend it,lots of unseen footage,really top notch

It was the final launch of the Saturn V in the Apollo program however, which is what the text says.

@Григорий Апокалипсис try and learn some proper English, if you attempt to make a point, flat- earther.

Should have been another, with Skylab B in the 1975/1976 timeframe, but alas, funding was not available for utilizing $1 billion in hardware left available.

@Григорий Апокалипсис For dumb comments like that, no, the person doesn't need to learn Russian to provide a response.

@Григорий Апокалипсис Please read carefully. The post was about the content of the dumb comment you chose to put out there. So, how were launches of a 100 meter plus high structure, weighing almost 3 million kgs faked in front of live audiences of 100s of thousands of people (it could be seen from miles around), including a night launch? Otherwise, don't believe in radar, or radio telescopes? Think there is some conspiracy in civil aviation to pretend radar exists (or the tracking of Skylab from 1973 to 1979)? I could go on to demonstrate that the content above was stupid. Not saying anything ad hominem since I don't know you.

@Thomas Pickering One minute silence for you 💩🌹

@Thomas Pickering you're an idiot.

you're being serious ha?

Amen to that man. Almost brought tears to my eyes. It’s incredible to see those great men having the time of their lives, part of the Apollo missions, the single most epic and crazy thing that humans have ever done. This film should be mandatory viewing in all US schools. Such as shame that today’s role models are rappers who throw money at women in bikinis. What must the great men of this film think of today’s America?

@World Coming Down 5779 Why the hate? You don't like achievements ?

World Coming Down 5780 We thank our US allies from Australia.

Remember, you have no evidence they actually landed, you just take their word for it.

@@neilarmstrongsson795 shame on you

All I want to know is Boba Fett out there ?

Jemppu he was saying grey tape.( basically duct tape)

By this stage they were taking the p out of anyone who believed it.

It was a great time

with $5 lawn chairs as seats

This was the third/final time, it first went up on Apollo 15 and then 16.

Yep... Now weve Grets Thunberg telling us how the world works.

Played golf, ran around like rabbits with no care for the immediate danger should they damage their spacesuits.

no i think they drove 8 kilometres away from the lunar module, which are 5 miles i think

Looks like a reflection off the antenna on the top of the pack to me....

32:29 - It's lens flare off a part of his life support.

Thank you buddy. I co-directed this, so that means a great deal! Best.

Zander Weaver cheers mate. Jack Schmitt actually has a lake cabin in Minnesota one lake over from me. I’d love to run into him some time in the Summer buying gas for the boat, “that one runs a little slower than your last ship eh Jack?”

Oh imagine that! I'd love that too. Would love to meet some of these incredible men in person. Sad to hear of Gene Cernan's passing recently.

Yep. I remember him providing commentary during early shuttle launches.

Does anyone know what this music is? It's just wonderful.

The music is just like the music in the film "The Truman Show".

Annother good evidence. Bravo. Or brava.

there's a part two :)

@@zanderweaver9222 can you send the link for it

@@liam_7564 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y9yTpbyqrdCoj2w.html

So do i jennifer. 👍

Would have been better if it was background music, instead of foreground music (i.e. music quieter than the speech that you sometimes had to strain to hear)

The dichotomy of that and the tension in the faces at mission control just before touch down on the moon is fascinating [ 22:33 - 24:40 ].

Agreed. To Apollo 20, and then do Skylab and Skylab B to 1977/1978. Much would have been achieved in science.

I suppose it was inevitable that money and public interest would dry up. Don't forget that the Americans had been fighting a long, futile and expensive war at the time as well. The legacy Apollo created was the true valuable outcome and there are serious conversations about returning to the moon and going to Mars. I think there's genuine cause for optimism. I just hope I'm here to see it!

@@Lunarfacia Also, Apollo created helped create success that in certain ways undermined support for manned flight, notably with micro-electronics, integrated circuits, semis. Along with the Minuteman program, Apollo was instrumental in accelerating technologies that made unmanned missions more feasible (like with spy satellites). What is surprising was the willingness to just drop all the capability/infrastructure that took so much money to develop - about $1 billion in Apollo hardware remained unused in the mid-70s and ended up expensive museum artifacts. Important considering the time and effort required with developing the space shuttle, and that no heavy lift capacity was available for concepts like SDI in the 1980s.

Very good point. According to a bit of research, the vibrations are being picked up by the microphone and voice comm's in the suit. However it sure sounds clear to me. You can hear the chipping of the rock. I was also under the impression that external sounds could not be heard.

External sounds can't be heard due to the vacuum. But the sound is travelling through the hammer handle and through the suit. It's just that we are used to thinking of the medium of sound as being predominately air. Whereas higher density materials are superior sound conductors. Note the deadness of the sound due to a total absence of echo.

The vibration from the hammer traveled through the glove into his suit and got picked up on microphone

+Tom Richnafsky You don't say...

I'm wondering why they come back on their tracks before they arrive at their destination at 48:27..... That makes you wonder.

Nice comment!

What he means is that the site is more difficult to get to, from an orbital mechanics point of view, than the other sites. If you look at all the landing sites you will notice that most are close to the equatorial region, which was easier to get to.

He meant remote area of the desert.

@@leobakkerflightandspace6655 and to think, they could have attempted a mission to Tycho Crater, they were seriously considering it, until Jim Mcdivitt(By 1970, the Apollo Program Manager)I think it was him looked at the Surveyor photos and the photos from other Apollo missions of the proposed landing area and said, "Over my dead body!" That would have been the ultimate test of man and machine landing there .spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2016/11/an-apollo-landing-near-great-ray-crater.html?m=1

Look at their feet when they're walking around, look at how they kick up soil. When Cernan first steps off and starts walking around, at one point he kicks soil further away than his height in feet with just a flick of his heel. You can't do that on Earth! On another video of the same mission he scuffs the regolith with his foot and sends soil hurtling a good 12 feet away from him, impossible in Earth gravity and in an atmosphere with air resistance. It's the best visual evidence that it was not faked. Notice also that there is never any dust cloud of any kind as would be expected in a VACUUM.

+ Jared Freeman It's too bad that Ridley Scott decided not to bother modeling 3/8G for 'The Martian'. Seeing that 1/6G in vacuum was so convincingly faked decades ago, I'm sure he would've figured out their tricks, if he could have. It seems that low gravity/low atmospheric conditions can only be explicitly depicted on location.

@World Coming Down 5779 You're a hopeless idiot.

@@johnmellor932 AABSOLUTELY the most solid and convincing evidence we went to the Moon.

@@johnmellor932 hi, you are perfectly right.

Never go anywhere without it!

I would certainly buy a copy. Go on timeline put out a bluray or HD disc. I have a lot of the official apollo 17 footage on disc. Bought that from "spacecraft films",well worth buying.

Totally agree. Feel cheated that I never saw this first time round and watching this after 47 years has made me realise the sheer magnitude of the appollo missions which should never be underestimated.

lol 😂😂😂😂

The text says it was the Apollo program's final launch of a Saturn V. Not the final launch of a Saturn V fullstop.

Steven McGuinness they did but the rockets were not used. They just took the lem to the moon. Took off at night from an AFB. They used the anti gravity drive and foil to line suits and walls of the space craft from Roswell wreckage. Bringing Russia was the right thing to do. In fact it’s how they landed the Lem-mon on the moon all along even with a car attached to the side. Ain’t alien stuff amazing ? They could not get the lem to fly safely With a ground team of engineers on the ground on our own planet. Way more cool stuff coming next year as long as Trump wins. If he does not it will be Chaos which may happen as the Henoch prophecy marches on and Democrats getting in would certainly inflame Russia which is how our future ended. one govt ship left floating dead in oceans colored black giving orders to soldiers that are not there.

Yep very sad. 1 of the biggest letdowns of the US democratic system. Basicly short term projects and things like Apollo need long term vision.

John Smith Yeah it’s barely in space; actually, technically it isn’t and is still flying in the earths mesosphere.

And yet people still buy that this actually happened.

I think if they were _really_ on the moon they would've taken it a bit more seriously.

It was the final launch of the Saturn V in the Apollo program however, which is what the text says.

@@Elliander Thanks for the video!

@Bob Dillahunty I don't think that was really what B Caldwell was trying to communicate. His post was a word play on 'around the entire globe'! Just like FEers are flat out getting around insurmountable difficulties.

good one.

I don't get it. How can a sphere be described as flat? Is a baseball flat? Is a frizbee a sphere? Why do certain people want to be duped? Doesn't Physics, orbital mechanics and calculus pretty much take care of the sphere issue? Or did these people refuse to want to learn more passed geometry while in grade school??? At least they are bold in their ignorance!

@@chinatype2bassrocker809 Dunning-Kruger effect.

Say that again but slowly..

I must admit Joshua i feel the same. Wish they wouldn't do it. It's a great documentary though. 👍😊

Joshua Resnick, . . . and by intrusive and unnecessary music.

@@jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301 Well i don't mind their soundtrack to be fair. But we all have different likes and dislikes.

Gotta pay for the shows somehow!!

Adblock has been invented 15 years ago. Maybe one day you will spend the 3 mouse clicks needed to install it.

I’m no expert but I’ve watched a lot of these things and in the homemade documentary channel they say they are between ten and fifteen thousand feet at that stage and it is because of no atmosphere

Cernan was on apollo 10 & 17, Young was on 10 & 16 and Lovell was on 8 & 13, cant count them twice so 24 seems correct.

Thank you for the clarification! You're absolutely right here I think. It's been so long since I've read about the missions and crew lists. I DID forget some of these guys flew to the Moon twice! I feel worst for Lovell. He really did get a raw deal BUT at least he survived Apollo 13. I think the astronauts killed on the last flight of the shuttle Columbia absolutely suffered horrifically in the breakup. I won't go into the graphic details but my stomach was turned by the descriptions in some of the news articles from back then about what they found of the crew remains. I hope it was over in a split second. The indications for Challenger was that it was a much less violent death for the crew and that they were unconscious when that Shuttle's crew cabin collided with the water. I still think one of NASA's worst decisions was hiding the two shuttle accident debris from the public. There should be some vehicle remains displayed just to remind people that there is a physical cost to these things. There is NOTHING ROUTINE about them and they should be regarded as experimental flight with higher risk. The casual attitudes and malaise that set in are what I believe killed the two Shuttle crews more than the technical issues. The Apollo 1 families AGREED to let NASA display the charred remains of that space capsule in a museum but NASA still hides it. The latest photos of the remains (under a tarp in a warehouse) are from 1998. Granted, you can actually listen to the audio from that accident if you care to. I'm amazed NASA let this happen -- they have a tendency to hide their accidents after the investigations are over as I've noted. They've already had a fatality with one of the public (Virgin effort) efforts to get people into space. I can't imagine that they WON'T get setback a decade or more IF the first public/civilian flight has a fatal accident. We're far too risk averse for spaceflight which besides the $$$ is why we really haven't been back to Moon or sent people further since the early 1970s.

remember very first 2 saturn v's were un manned test shots

@@AvengerII I think Young got the best deal. He orbited alone as the CM pilot in 10 and then walked on the moon on 16.

They had a "walkback limit" in case of a failure. This decreased as their suits where depleted during the EVA.

They would likely have died, which makes someone question this whole moon buggy and moon landing nonsense. Who in their right mind would take these kinds of chances. Everything was untested, the lunar lander, the rover, taking off from the moon, the suits, the plss. They were pretty much winging the whole thing. It's complete nonsense that these guys didn't crash and die.

@@varuzhshakbazyan5732 with your mindset we would still live in caves banging rocks together. All human progression involves taking risks

samik83 Well they could always have put their thumb out and hitchhiked, lol

@@rifham Ignoring the mindless responses from others, this was the key facet. Their circumference of travel was always constrained by how far they could walk back in case of the rover failure. And we should add that they had various means of increasing oxygen supplies: each astronaut had a separate high pressure supply of oxygen (OPS) and mechanisms to share oxygen and cooling. These never had to be used (thankfully), but the rover did not present a single point of failure in the mission. www.workingonthemoon.com/WOTM-BSLSS.html

What? You didnt know..that's why watch the video. Only the U.S.A. flag has been there on the moon.. From Apollo 11,so on ,so forth..Voyager is the one orbiting on the solar system.

I'm sorry if you didnt know...,I'm sorry if your in denial.. But that's the truth.

Hey Mr.,Maybe your the one whose lying here..

@Thomas Pickering are you still around with your BS? You can't just say it never happened and hope that's true. Photos prove you wrong. What evidence do you have, besides your dumb conspiritard parroting?

@Thomas Pickering *_"and I sure do not believe everything I see on a KZfaq video."_* izenmeme.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/i_meter5.gif

Sonido en el vacio? Mmmmm

What is IN the space suit? A vacuum, too?

Vibration travelling through the space suit and into the mic on his head gear. Sound vibration actually travels through material more efficiently than it does through air.

Moon landing was filmed in side the LEM simulator. No videos of the astroNOTS inside the LEM during ascent or descent because they could not fake that part of the hoax.

We do have to wonder why opportunities weren't taken to film any of the 'landings' from other vantage points such as the hubble or orbiter etc

America has been used as shorthand for the United States of America in many media, for many decades now.

Merica

America is the name of the Service Module, that’s why they’re always saying it.

That's because it was done before , it takes a real hero to take that unknown first step and plunge .

AngryTech Not entirely; Armstrong was famous for being taciturn and emotionless. His flights were very formal, and each Apollo crew had their own personality.

The hoaxers make that comment on the Apollo 11 landing. This one is the Apollo 17 mission.

Since it's blocking my reply from being seen, I'll try to divide this up into multiple messages. First of all, learn to control your breathing better. I can routinely last 80-90 minutes on a single tank, even when diving deep.

Secondly, a scuba tank is not a good comparison anyway,

because every

This is ridiculous. It's blocking everything I'm trying to write. I can't even write the next word without it blocking ONE WORD. Ivan, you have absolutely no understanding of this entire topic. And, everything you wrote is wrong.

Rubbish. 260F? Where did you get that temperature from?

That is THE way it's supposed to be spelled in proper standard queens english. Americans changed it over time. Sometimes i wonder why. Sigh. 🙄 No offence intended.

@@spearhead787 No offense taken! Ask Google the proper spelling of neighbor, or, neighbour. Maybe Google needs a session with the Queen? 👑

@@bruce92106 That's cool bruce. Yes indeed it probably does. I'm sure her majesty would oblige. 😊

They really both mean the same thing

Not too social justice warriors fighting the good cause. To me yeah they are the same.

eurosensazion With that attitude you will remain part of the problem, not the solution.

I can't see women building a rocket and fly it to the moon, all by themselves, as fun as that would be. Not because they're too dumb.. they generally seem to be interested in different things.

@@payt01 yes , it was woman who gave these brave souls life ....