It's 2021, and Ben-Hur 1959 retains it's title of "greatest film of all time". It's a complete masterpiece.

Ben-Hur is a classic film. One of the best films ever made.

It's so refreshing to hear someone talk about being a Christian openly, especially when talking about what is considered secular entertainment in my opinion. Yes, there are plenty of Christian KZfaq channels but most who watch those channels are Christian, they dont have to feel like they are going to receive hate and ridicule from their audience, but you definitely took a risk, one im not sure I'd be able to do myself if I had your platform. I enjoyed your Signs review as well for similar reasons, and I was pleasantly surprised how respectful the comments were, that hasn't been my experience in other videos regarding the discussion of God. Thank you, and have a nice day everyone

This version of Ben Hur is without a doubt the quintessential example of what old Hollywood could do. Fantastic movie with so much going on and sequenced so well that the viewer is well aware of all of it. One of the best ever made. Everyone needs to see this movie if for no other reason than to see how the epic is done right. Great review yet again!

I understand where you are coming from about the omission of the resurrection, but I think not depicting the resurrection is very similar to not depicting Christ's face on screen, and I am glad there is no attempt at such a scene. It's impossible to do the resurrection of Christ justice on screen because the event is the whole point and center of reality. I remember seeing the resurrection in the Mel Gibson film and this was appearant to me. Movie magic is about illusion and spectacle, and within this, I think the more "grounded" moments of the christ story can be done tastefully (pushing it though) until the resurrection, and then all bets are off in my mind. It's the sort of same wrongness as when the invisible God is depicted as a white-bearded man. There are things that are so sacred that they shouldn't be seen, that what is behind the altar and inside the holy of holies. Anyway, HUGE, engaging, and in depth review, a great watch.

I was 9 years old in December of 1959 and my Mother Mary called my 4th grade school teacher and told them that I was sick and would not be coming in. I was not sick but my mother told me to dress up in my Sunday Best suit and hat as we were going on a daytime date together. We rode the public transit bus into downtown Augusta, Maine and my Mother was dressed to the nines and I was so pleased to be her "date". Our first stop was Kressgee's Department Store for some Christmas time window shopping then at Noon we stopped at the very large lunch counter and I was told I could get whatever my heart desired. We both got fried chicken in a basket with French fries and coleslaw and boy was it delicious! To top off the meal we each pulled down a helium-filled balloon, mine was red and mom's was green; inside was a number from one penny to 99 cents and that was our cost of the HOT FUDGE SUNDAE dessert. Wow this beats the hell out of school! But this was all a prelude as we walked down Main Street and into the Colonial Theater to watch a matinee performance of the years' most-acclaimed MOTION PICTURE, aka BEN HUR. As one of 9 children I had never been in a movie 'HOUSE' before so this was a very new experience and I remember that the curtail had to be pulled back even wider than for other ordinary movies as Ben Hur was filmed in wide-screen CINAMASCOPE and of course in DELUXE COLOR. I was transfixed and even though the length was almost 4 hours, it seemed to fly by in 15 minutes. I would become a professional movie critic years later but my ambition was never to be an actor, but that I could one day DIRECT SUCH A MASTERPIECE. I loved my mother so as she was the most beautiful girl in the world and on that day I was her leading man. God I adored my Mother Mary and would do anything for her! How luck was I?

The powerful music by Miklos Rozsa as the charioteers parade around the track stays with me decades after I first viewed "Ben-Hur." This film is inspirational -- absolutely stellar.

A absolute and genuine Classic of Cinema. This was one my parents' favorite films and I have them to thank for introducing me to this version. I really fell in love with everything about this film and, to this day, still regard as one of my favorites amongst the other classics you mentioned. The acting is superb - Charlton Heston and Stephen Boyd were magnificent and did indeed drive this movie with their broken, bitter (even hateful) relationship. Wonderful review Jerome. I do enjoy sitting down and watching this......all 4 hours if possible. 😊

What can be said about this incredible classic that you haven't covered here already? The chariot race is beyond words. The movie as a whole is amazing. Besides the chariot scene, it's the moment when The Savior gives Judah a drink of life giving water, and the reactions by both Judah "and" the Centurion, which speaks volumes as to the "man's" true identity. If I had to toss away my entire movie/ DVD collection, with the exception of keeping only 10 films, then 1959's "Ben-Hur" definitely would be one of those ten movies. As far as the latest re-make is concerned, I never had, nor ever will, feel the desire to waste my time seeing it. There are some "classics" that need not be remade. And '59's "Ben-Hur" is certainly one of them. Your review was both intelligent & enlightening. And lastly, as a Christian man, I too appreciate the fact that Christ's face was not shown in this film. Now, suddenly, I feel a strong impulse to pull out this movie and watch yet again. See what you did?🙂 Anyway, keep up the great work, and God Bless.

I loved the epic 1959 film version more then the 2016 remake that I highly consider "Ben-Hur" is one of my all time favorite Charlton Heston movies along with his other movies I love "Ten Commandments" and the original "Planet Of The Apes".

By far, this version is one of my favorite motion pictures of all time. I dug the 1925 version as well. I'm glad you spoke about the other biblical epics of that era. I've written and spoke about the films mentioned in my book and series. Thank you for reviewing this!

I’m a Christian too, and I wonder if my not minding the way the movie ended came from my already knowing what comes next. I know you’ve addressed this in your responses to other comments already. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen it, and I’ve only seen it once, but I remember that I was watching it with a non-Christian friend, and now I wonder if I had to explain anything after it was over. I can’t remember. I do remember being extremely impressed with it, enough to buy the original novel to compare, but I have yet to read it. I don’t usually like epics, because I feel like they tend to be bloated and overlong just to give you more of a sense that it really is an epic you’re watching, but this was an exception. Still need to see *The Ten Commandments,* but from the way you talked about it, I get the impression it would fit more into my typical epic expectations.

You are adorable. Another great review. thanks!

Wonderful review of a truly magnificent film. They really don't make 'em like this anymore! There's a lot one could say about this titanic epic, but I'll just let it go by saying it is one of my favorite movies and that for my money the amazing chariot race ties with the attack on the Death Star from Star Wars for the title of single most exciting sequence in movie history. Charlton Heston is one of the actors I most admire, and as you so rightly point out his dramatic powers are perhaps at their height in this role. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and insights with us once again. Blessings!

Thank you for the great review and all the personal insights and reactions. When the movie is 4 hours long, it should get double the accolades of any comparable great two hour movie because you have 120 additional minutes to become the bad part of the movie. When you have a movie made this well, it becomes a yardstick from that point forward used to compare all other movies. You have so many potential scenes to demonstrate where Ben-Hur was successful and other movies come up lacking. Also, you pointed out all of the rich detail which is totally required if you want to impress people with a spectacle. People will enjoy the story with their hearts and minds but the spectacle is enjoyed with the entire sensory machinery of our bodies focused on the totality of the dramatic details pouring into our eyes and pounding the drums in our ears. I look forward to your reviews and want you to know they are greatly appreciated.

I am enormously grateful for your sensitive and inspiring review, Jerome. My favorite image from the film (oddly) is when the two reuniting friends throw spears at a cross beam over a walkway. This is a "guy thing," and it has stayed with me all my life. A stunt like that works wonders in male relationships. I, too, have long been uncomfortable with any dramatic(facial) portrayals of Christ. Thus, my freedom to enjoy this film. Mom told me Jefferey Hunter insisted on few close-ups when he played "King of Kings", yet Wiki says the producer casted Hunter because of his memorable eyes. Go figure. There was lots of happy talk about "believing" at the end of BH, but no Resurrection was dramatized. We have to fill it in ourselves, I suppose, with the follow-on miracles. Oh yes, until tonight, I though BH was a DeMille job! JW enlightens the masses again! Meanwhile, I'm still binging on Ozu films, thanks to you.

I'm currently reading the Lew Wallace novel and it's just incredible the amount of detail he goes into to place the reader in 1st century Judea. I've always loved the 1959 version of Ben Hur, possibly my favorite movie ever. Truly epic in every sense of the word, even the scene where Jesus stands and stops the Roman centurion in his tracks is so memorable. The acting with facial expressions alone on the part of the Roman is incredible. The music....one of the greatest movie scores of all time! The ending...emotional and spiritually uplifting beyond words. Great review!

I grew up on Ben Hur even tho' it came out decades before I was born, and still treasure Mum's souvenir guide of the 1959 movie when it was released in Australia. I've heard (urban legend, perhaps) that the phrase 'Bigger than Ben Hur' was coined in Australia and that Charlton Heston had never heard of it before he visited Oz, but happy to be corrected on the record! The phrase may predate the 1959 movie, but it does fit the movie's epic proportions. 'And I felt him take the sword out of my hand' - what a phrase to live by. What a movie.

This is my favorite movie of all time! And I've also wondered why this movie isn't shown and the ten commandments is on Easter. I think it should be the other way around. Anyway, thanks for your awesome review!

Thanks for your review and willingness to speak about your commitment to your faith.

You're a very fine, fair and thorough reviewer.

I think, at least, resurrection is implied by Ben-Hur's mother and sister being completely cured. Like you, I have yet to read Lew Wallace's novel. It's been on my reading list for years and I think it would satisfy many questions the movie left to ambiguity. It's one of my all time favorite movies and compels me to weep; which I am not prone to. My favorite line: "We keep you alive to serve this ship." Always love your reviews!

Another great review! Classic classic movie!

I read the book a few years back. Have to say this is one of the rare occasions where the movie was better.

This is another very impressive review; one of your best. You always set a high standard, not only among reviewers online, but I think better than most film reviews by professional critics in traditional media as far as depth of analysis, insightful interpretation, archeology of the film being reviewed as well as that of cinema in general, and the invaluable extra dimension you add by sharing the meaning of the film within the context of your own experience. In short, I heartily agree, “Ben-Hur” is a panoramic epic and a powerful personal story, marvelously realized for the big screen; a prime example of what classic Hollywood could do when all the elements required to make a film, large and small, came together to blend into inspired perfection. Regarding your own personal disappointment about the film’s only vaguely alluding to the Resurrection, I surmise that since William Wyler and several others involved in the film’s making were Jewish, a literal depiction of the Resurrection would have certainly been problematic from their point-of-view. Suggesting that this event so crucial to Christian faith may (or may not) have happened is probably the best you can hope for. Suggestion, after all, can be a very powerful dramatic device, sometimes more so than explicitness. By the way, you’ve probably heard that Wyler is said to have quipped: “It took a Jew to make a great movie about Christ.” I am not a Christian, nor religious in any way. But I did grow up in a Christian home; a PK, son of an Episcopal minister. My dad loved movies (musicals being his favorite). He introduced me to many of the classics, inspiring my own appreciation of these films, and film in general. While he enjoyed “Ben-Hur” as dazzling entertainment and grand storytelling, he was generally leery of Hollywood’s biblical or overtly religious works, and felt they seldom reflected his understanding of Christianity accurately or thoughtfully. He cited secular films like “The Grapes of Wrath”, “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre”, and “The Hustler” for having themes that examined moral issues he could relate more directly to his faith than most “religious” films. One movie that drew his particular opprobrium was “The Ten Commandments”. When it came out, he and other “men of the cloth” were invited to a preview screening, no doubt in the hope it would generate support of the film from leaders of the local religious community. When the film concluded and written comments gathered up, he turned in a response excoriating the movie as little more than lurid and exploitative Hollywood melodrama wrapped in biblical garb. A few days later, he received a curt letter from the theater manager, informing him that his was the only negative response, questioning whether my dad was truly a “man of faith”, and seriously doubting his ability to lead others in faith. He ended by stating that my dad had abused the courtesy of his being invited in the first place, and assured my father that he would never be invited to screenings of any future biblical epics. That suited my dad just fine.

This a great movie. I loved these epic movies. I agree it does leave that sense of longing to see the Resurrection, but we know what the movie doesn't show. I appreciate your personal and sincere opinion, it's refreshing. You're good people you are.

Awesome review. Bless your soul Jerome.

Thank you for your in depth review of Ben-Hur, it was both interesting and informative. You make a great point that no actor can truly capture Christ. Ben-Hur does an excellent job of being reverent and respectful to the Lord. I appreciated that your review included your own perspective as a Christian. Your comment that a crucifixion without the resurrection is only half the Gospel was very true. The resurrection is the single most important event in Christianity and is the epicenter of our faith. Your positive and uplifting reviews of classic movies are very much appreciated. Thank you for all your work!

Just discovered your channel. Can I just say its fantastic that you cover really classic movies. Every other reviewer/reactor does the same stuff. Its nice to see someone reviewing the oldies for us oldies. I can name so many movies I would love to see covered. I really did love your review of Ben Hur, but I would disagree with you about the ending. I actually think that ending it at the Crucifixion was really powerful.

The ending is always emotional for me.

Thank you for that excellent review. I think that Ben-Hur is among a handful of films which can legitimately claim to be arguably the greatest movie of all-time. The musical score is also a strong candidate for greatest movie soundtrack of all-time.

Yes, that chariot scene, that chariot scene! Even in this day of digital effects, it has not been surpassed. I have it on vhs tape, dvd, blu-ray, and have watched it, studied it at least 40 times, and it still makes me gasp in astonishment every time. I've heard William Wyler didn't even really direct it, that the main stunt people actually handled all the logistics and direction themselves. In any case, it stands on its own as one of the most poetic, thrilling action sequences in ALL of cinema!!! Thanks for the awesome review!

The 1959 film Ben Hur is a monumental and irreplaceable work even though new variants emerged several decades later

I wish they would show movies like this on the big screen again

Thank you for uploading this on Lew Wallace's birthday!

Thanks for another, wonderful insightful review! Of all the epic films of that era, "Ben Hur" and "Spartacus" are my favorites. Unlike some others, including the great "Lawrence of Arabia" they don't lag in the second part of the film. I always try to watch "Ben Hur" around Easter time. I agree with you that "The Ten Commandmants", while a wonderful film, just doesn't seem to come up to it. The casting was superb. Heston was at his best. One of my favorites was Jack Hawkins. He was one of the great character actors of that time and did wonders with the relatively small role. I, too, remember as a child being terribly frightened by the leprosy theme. And you are so right that in underplaying it, a la Val Lewton, they made it all the more horrifying. I like to think that leaving out the Resurrection did not detract from the overall message, which was still one of hope for the future. In 1959, the nation was predominantly Christian and, on the whole, probably much more religious. Perhaps Judah Ben Hur's 'salvation' could be read as a metaphor for the salvation of the masses?

Found your channel a few days back and been watching many of your reviews. I find both your insight and opinions on these films to be really informative. It is nice to hear someone addressing the cinematic virtues inherent in so many of these awesome classic films. I’m in my very early forties, and I always find it a great mystery why so few of my friends and family will never watch anything older than themselves. They are missing out on so many great movies. And while I cannot speak to this film from a religious perspective (I’m an Atheist - hopefully that doesn’t offend you - many apologies if so, I’m also Canadian … so we apologize for everything), I do find it to be an amazing and wondrous film. And one I do watch yearly around Easter (along with the Ten Commandments). Great acting, cinematography that really is unrivalled, and a score that stays with you for days after. And a story that is both powerful and cathartic, which I think resonates with anyone willing to take the time to view it. Thanks so much for doing these videos. Your hard work does not go unnoticed and is very much appreciated! All the best!

Boy, they sure don't make 'em like they used to! Ben 'Huge' Hur along with The Ten Commandments are my personal favourites of this epic period of Hollywood movie making, although I do have a soft spot for the flawed Spartacus.....is it a bona fide Kubrick movie or not? 🤔 Your videos and movie reviews are always so well researched, well informed, insightful and intelligent, so thank you. I feel like my movie journey is enhanced by your analysis and assessment. Cheers Jerome!

Hi Girl! I just stumbled through this video of yours as I was looking for reviews on the chariot race. You see, I'm from Costa Rica. Ben Hur is shown in national television here every year on Easter since I've got memory. Of course, this isn't a movie for kids; and especially if, as a kid, you see it every year it grows old too fast. However, it's been like two decades since I last saw it, so I did that yesterday... and bloody hell is it gorgeous!!! The acting is impeccable, the music is of the like that isn't done any more, the story is engaging, if a tad slow. But goodness me, the sets, the scenes, the costumes!!! And as you pointed out, one piece I missed: the colors. The attention to detail. The doors at Judah's house have the Star of David engraved behind the doorknobs. When the Consul and Judah are rescued, the raft floats away in the water. When the guards are going into the dungeon they first soak the torches in oil and then light them, before heading down. Damn! The Sheik's tent decoration is breathtaking. The way kids run in front of the roman parade. The way so much information is conveyed by the actor's body language. Then, as a good American from the Latin side of the continent, I'm Catholic. And I agree with you about the resurrection. Sort of. It's important to our faith and would have been a good addition to the movie, but the leper act already drags quite long and as much as my religious self would've liked to see it shown, as a viewer I feel the closure was far too long. As for the Chariot race, please do go and read a bit about it. I did so today and it payed off. The size of the set, the time and resources it took to build. The training of the horses and stuntmen. The sheer quantity of extras. Then you see those horses running at full speed, head to head, and you realize no horses had done that in around some 1900 years... And these absolute maniacs managed to get it done!!! It's a true portrait of a long gone past. And it would be impossible to shoot a scene like that today. In some ways, CGI has made movies quite a bit duller. Anyway, Ben Hur is true art. There's no going around it. Cheers and thanks for your review!

Better late than never as they say, but kudos to you for reviewing Ben-Hur (1959) around Easter. Current reactors/reviewers do not go back and watch films made much earlier than the latter 70's (one did review "Lawrence of Arabia" (1962) about a week ago). As a child I remember seeing the large billboard poster on the side of the local theater and the soundtrack LP in stores. I didn't actually see the movie until it's network broadcast premiere in 1971 on CBS (pan and scan format). It is one of many films from the latter 50's, 60's, 70's that was filmed in technically superior widescreen format (70mm film stock) and multiple track stereophonic sound. I'm sure the best way to experience it currently is on Blu-ray or 4K (when it becomes available) on a large flat panel or projector with multiple speakers. For me, some evocative scenes are the main titles, the nativity, the presentation of Christ, the spear contest, the galley scenes, the Sheik and his "children", yes, the burping scene, treatment of lepers, the chariot race (of course), Messala's end, the trial, crucifixion, death of Christ and miracle. I do like the film. You are right in pointing out that while it does present the death of Christ, the burial and resurrection are not. Again, kudos to you for your review and for your telling of the good news.

I had to watch this movie twice in order to appreciate it. My first viewing I found it kind if boring, but by the 2nd watch I was more invested. I always loved how Jesus's face is never shown and the score is also lovely. Its definitely a nice watch on a sunday or even for Easter 🥰✝️ Btw the actress who played Ben Hur's mom is also moses biological mom in The Ten Commandments 😁

"Ramming Speed!"

I enjoyed this review. I haven't seen the movie beyond a few clips here and there, and the chariot race. But I appreciated this overview. It was clear that you had strong feelings about this movie, and we got some insight into why. As someone who has recently committed to reading through the Bible for the first time in my life, I'm finding myself drawn to these old biblical movies (also for the first time in my life) both from an intellectual curiosity point of view as well as a cinema point of view. And I never thought about the issue of associating a certain actor with a character or personage from the Bible like you mentioned, but now that I think of it...it certainly could happen because it's happened when I read novels after seeing the movie versions. I might actually see this. Not only because I enjoy putting myself mentally into different times and places (which I'm attempting to do as I read the Bible now) but also because quite simply we are never going to see movies like this again. They're too big, they took too much to make, and the cultural landscape has changed so much that a biblical epic is no longer a big ticket attraction like it was 60-70 years ago. I doubt even the upcoming Cleopatra movie with Gal Gadot is going to be anywhere close production wise to the original. Watching this would probably take me two or three different sittings myself, but I'll certainly give it a try. Thanks again. :)

What a thorough and spiritual review of the movie! I have still not seen this...only bits and pieces. My dad did watch this on Good Friday but I had already popped my The Ten Commandments DVD. I make it a tradition to watch that on Good Friday and I watch The Greatest Story Ever Told on Easter. Funny I watch it every year and I keep forgetting Claude Rains is in it! I know you are a Claude Rains fan. Charlton Heston is also in that as John the Baptist. On Saturday, I had watched Planet of the Apes...not an Easter tradition but it was a Heston weekend lol At first, that surprised me that you stay away from watching Biblical movies but I understand your reason. Good point. Funny enough I never visualize Jesus as any actor from any portrayal I have seen. I hope you had a wonderful Easter last week. God Bless my friend.🙏

One of those classics I haven't seen. I've never been drawn to historical epics so that's probably why I guess. Enjoyed hearing your review nevertheless. Thanks as always.

Miss Weiselberry, you've provided a fine review. Thanks. I like your casual and honest approach. It is my desire to see youth today tap into one of Hollywood's grandest productions as well as it being an excelling story of forgiveness, love, revenge and loyalty. One of my hobbies is telling history stories that I have developed, about 25 of them. My favorite is "The Ben-Hur Saga". Please allow me to share a few things about the novel and the 1959 movie. 1-The novel doesn't cover the Resurrection outright. My estimation is that author Gen. Lew Wallace wanted the widest appeal to his future readers, including Jew and Muslim. 2-The novel is the result of a conversation between Lew Wallace, a nominal Christian, and agnostic Robert Ingersoll. Ingersoll ridiculed the Christian faith to Wallace. Wallace was humiliated and began research to learn about the historical Christ. His years-long study made him a true Believer in Christ and His divinity. 3-The novel expresses the parallel growing faith of Judah Ben-Hur and Lew Wallace. Wallace "is" Ben-Hur. The novel becomes the vehicle for Wallace to express his newly found Faith. 4-William Wyler, director of the 1959 movie, grew up in a Jewish family. To be true to his own religion, and true to the novel, and wanting wide audience appeal, it's understandable there would be no Resurrection (though some think it is implied by the healing of the women). However, 5-author Wallace's novel shows his genius regarding the Resurrection. He has his main character, Judah Ben-Hur, while actually witnessing Christ being crucified right in front of him, remember that Jesus had said/taught "I am the Resurrection and the Life". 6-When a friend wrote Wallace a letter asking him for the "diamond [key] sentence" from the novel, Wallace wrote back that it was when Judah recalls Jesus saying "I am the Resurrection and the Life." Moving on, like the movie, the novel is a bit long, but very profound. It's quite ironic that one of the most loved and grandest movies ever made, was born from an agnostic trying to embarrass another man about his so-called Faith. Well, thanks for your time; I hope it helps. I'm grateful you highlighted this spectacular, cinematic event/movie, and expressed your personal Faith as well. -Ken

Another very insightful review!

It's an understatement to call this a great or classic film, and the chariot scene of course is one of the most electrifying sequences in film history without doubt - especially when viewed within the context of the rest of the film. I've often felt that, to some viewers, this sequence overshadows the rest of the film, which is kind of a shame because the film is awesome in it's entirety. I agree with you that not showing the face of Christ was a successful device, definitely adding a sense of reverence and awe. By the way, I consider this one of your great reviews ever - you fearlessly tackled such a well known classic, epic film and did a splendid job! .

I hope you're back next time, what would KZfaq be without you.

I saw this movie in school, but only up until the moment we find Judah's family since we ran out of time. I think I may need to finish it now. As a fellow Christian, your take on the ending makes sense to me. I had a very similar reaction to Godspell, although in that case, I have seen productions that add the resurrection in at the end.

Great review of this masterpiece of a film.

Easily, one of my top favorite movies can starring one of my top favorite actors, with one of my favourite film scores, and easily one of the very best epic movies ever made, and which is one of the rare few where the remake IS better than the originals. If anyone has not seen this phenomenal masterpiece of a film, it is highly advised.

I watched this for the first time this year and really loved it

Classic review of an epic film! 🙆‍♀️

Very good review! Thanks.

My personal favorite of biblical epics. A truly gripping story and awesome spectical with the chariot race. Charlton Heston gives a well deserved Oscar winning performance and scenes with Jesus are quite moving.

-Ben-Hur- My feelings are in line with yours in regards to how the film leaves you, it does feel incomplete without the resurrection but I still really enjoy it, the chariot race especially, I often wondered was the wheel spike from the hot rod race in Grease an international nod, must be, now I'm imagining Heston's Ben-Hur and Boyd's Messala singing grease lightening. Heston and Boyd are such interesting actors with fascinating stories to their careers and lives, Boyd seems to have led a fascinating but short life and Heston being the mainstream Hollywood epic guy who then became mr science fiction, I'm trying to think if there was another major studio star who made it acceptable to appear in the genre at that point, I'm probably missing lots. I also thought DeMille had directed for years, I guess it's an understandable thing to think. ~ Thank you Ms Weiselberry ~

Yes, this is a great movie. It has a powerful story, spectacular set pieces, great performances and a superb soundtrack. I have never seen a better depiction of Our Lord Jesus on screen. However, I share your reservations about this movie's finale. It is Christ's resurrection, not just His sacrificial death on the cross that gives us hope of eternal life. Also, the script diverged substantially from the novel. The latter was written as a tale of redemption, not revenge. Well done! An excellent, insightful review. Excelsior Miss Weiselberry!

Nice review and what a visual spectacle.Ive often wondered what impact Ben Hur had its 19th century readers.Did Mark Twain comment on it I wonder?Im going to guess MAD magazine lampooned it as I know SCTV alumnus did in the late 1970s when Ben Hur and the other films you sited enjoyed regular rotation on TV .Especially during the Easter season if I remember correctly.Thank you for qualifying your Christian sense on depictions of Jesus.

One of the top five films ever made. Just magnificent. Oh FYI very good review.

I've never seen this movie but have heard a ton about it, and now you have me wanting to check it out! Unrelated, but have you ever thought about reviewing the 1978 Superman film with Christopher Reeve?

I worked with a Marine Colonel in a war zone, who often said: "You are all condemned men, kept alive to serve the ship: Row well and live.".

A very good review. I really enjoyed your view of portraying Christ on film. I think it does allow us to see His impact on others without hearing His voice or seeing His face. As for the resurrection, I do think that tends to get sidelined a lot, but in the 50's it was probably just assumed. I always just assumed it by the view of the empty cross at the end, but that's just me.

Having listened to your excellent review of Ben-Hur, and having enjoyed all of your movie reviews, and your mentioning your being a Christian, may I suggest that you watch the hidden gem of a film, "Strange Cargo," (1940) starring Clark Gable, Joan Crawford (both of whom do some of their best acting here), Peter Lorre and other excellent actors. I am a movie fan and I had never heard of this one. Yet this is such a fantastically well directed, edited, acted and very cinematicaly satisfying. It is a deeply rich spiritual, religious movie with being offensively or patronizingly so. I was deeply touched. And I had to watch it more than once to catch all the substance and meaning in it.

I appreciate your take on the lack of the message of the resurrection In the movie! Ben Hur is one of my favorite films.

Hey Jerome, Have you ever seen or read "The Power of Myth" by Joseph Campbell? I think you would find it interesting. Thanks for your honest review.

I actually prefer the 1925 version, but I wonder how much I can be relied upon on this one given that if there's a silent version of something I'm ultimately bound to prefer that.

Fantastic review. Spot on.

Great review!

One of my favourite movies of all time . If you ever get a chance , you must see it on a big screen at the cinema . It’s amazing . And , of course , there’s the fabulous chariot race . One of the greatest scenes of all time . Incidentally , that would make a great theme for one of your videos . It would be interesting to see your choices for what you consider to be the top 10 , or 20 , best movie scenes of all time .

It always blew my mind that the actor who played Pilate, Frank Thring, played The Collector in “Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome”.

I understand that Lew Wallace asked that the face of Jesus not be shown in dramatizations of Ben Hur. You are right on the resurrection. A great movie, though, and very touching.

Yakima Canute I probably spelled it wrong needs mentioning. He was the stunt coordinator of the chariot race and his son did the stunts

I feel the exact same way with your take on Jesus. The way this movie portrayed him was exactly how it should be done.

I've been watching this since I was a kid. Seems like it's on tv all the time. I've caught it a time or two. Seen a lot of pieces.

Thank you for your review.

I love this movie; in part because it's my birthday movie of that year, mostly because it's such a great film overall. Stephen Boyd as Masala really showed his acting chops in this; his descent into madness a huge departure from his mostly bland roles both before and after this movie. That Judah still felt the tragedy of his former childhood friend choices; even through his own desire for revenge, it truly sold the story for me, as did his quiet remembrance of that moment when Jesus on the cross removed the sin of hate from his heart. Judah Ben-Hur: Almost at the moment He died, I heard Him say, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." Esther: Even then. Judah Ben-Hur: Even then. And I felt His voice take the sword out of my hand. ☮❤

Oh, an upload on 11 april, my birthday and for one of my favorite old movies.

As much as i love this movie I have to agree with your observations about the lack of discussion about the Lord's resurrection and the completion of his mission. It was the biggest thing of all time and they missed the chanch of showing it. That was a shame. I certainly respect your very well reasoned lack of desire for not wanting to place the image of an actor's face in place of Jesus's. That said Jeffrey Hunter's portrayal of Jesus in King of Kings, particularly the sermon on the mount motivated me as a young man to pick up the Bible and find what this was all about. So I have a real fondness for that flick. You are wise beyound your years.

If you watched Ben Hur from 1959 you would probably notice the MGM Logo in this film, director William Wyler said that Leo the Lion roaring would ruin the opening nativity scene so he used a logo where Leo is frozen.

I always enjoyed Ben-Hur. it's been a long time since I've seen it, so I might have to do that soon. I also enjoyed The Robe, the movie as well as the book. The book made me cry buckets at the end. Quo Vadis was good too. I've been told the 2016 film Risen, with Joseph Fiennes and Tom Felton, is pretty good, but I haven't seen it yet. Easter would have been perfect but I had no time. It's told from the viewpoint of a tribune investigating the disappearance of Jesus' body.

Came out the year I was born but have not seen it yet. Cleopatra I did see and it was amazing.

I really enjoy vthe swords and sandals era of Hollywood. I really liked the drummer in the Galley.

I just followed for the channel as a self described him historian and the epic my favorite film genre ben her is in my top 20th favorite movies of all time

Do you take requests?

THaank you for reviewing this movie Jerome I never noticed it did not mention the Resurrection. Thank you for pointing that out. Yes I was wondering why the show the 10 commandments over Easter Weekend perhaps because the Passover sometimes coincides with the Crucification of Jesus I loved this movie one of the parts I liked best was when Judah is reunited with his mother’s and sister go back to Jerusalem and witness the crucification and they reach and bless themselves with the flowing Water and Blood of Christ and are healed of Leprosy

I read the book a few years ago and my favorite part was the mystical meeting of the magi at the beginning,then it slipped into melodrama..too much attention to the dark vamp daughter of one of the wise men..made me wonder if Lew Wallace was planning to turn this into a campy 1880s stage play..Christ as a mysterious stranger that keeps turning up in the life of an unbeliever ,is an irresistible concept..I wonder did you ever see Strange Cargo ?..not great ..but a great idea.

Ah Ben Hur great movie classic 👍! The set was beautifully well done

I saw this film only once (and not in one sitting, I must say) and I didn't enjoyed it, not being a fan of biblical epics. But your review makes me think perhaps I should give it another try. Also, when I decided to watch this version I wanted to compare it with the 1925 version but I was exausted by the end of it and I never got to the earlier version. That means I have a lot of homework to do 😅

You raise a very good point on the absence of a resurrection scene and it’s doubly interesting that it had never occurred to me, though I’ve seen the movie many times. Thinking it through, though, I feel that it would have been wrong for the movie, largely because it would have been inconsistent with the depiction of Christ up to that point and Judah’s story. I wholly agree with you that the depiction of Christ was subtle and respectful, but even more than this it was highly intelligent in enriching without distracting from the core narrative. Because Judah is the movie’s protagonist and the dominant perspective is his we witness Christ only as a peripheral shadow to Judah’s life, but a shadow and spirit that loom larger as Judah’s narrative arc closes his past of bitterness and revenge, converging on the (hitherto) parallel track of Christ’s mercy, forgiveness and sacrifice. Judah’s conversion (which I gather is explicit in the book) doesn’t require witnessing the miracle of resurrection; he has already been converted by Christ’s example. Which is as it should be, I think. The tear-jerker scene for me is always that moment when Judah attempts to repay the debt of succour to Jesus, reversing the two men’s positions at the start of Judah’s enslavement. It’s more than kindness and gratitude, it is true mercy and I think that is the point at which Judah has been transformed. Because Judah’s perspective dominates and the movie (as was the book, I gather) was careful not to insert Judah into the ranks of the apostles and other witnesses to the resurrection I think it serves the movie and Judah’s story for the resurrection not to be shown. I try to imagine it being depicted and can’t help but feel that it would seem forced, jarring and clumsy relative to the subtlety of Christ’s depiction in the rest of the movie. Well done, JW. Yet again you’ve given me pause to reconsider a movie that’s so familiar that I take it for granted.

Hi Jerome, I have been a fan of this move since childhood and in the UK it was always shown at Christmas or Easter. It probably is Heston's crowning work as an actor (though the entire cast operate at a similar level) and I agree that for many William Wyler is strangely under the radar as a top flight director. I especially love Miklos Rozsa's sumptuous music (the 3rd time he had scored a biblical epic) which is majestic, suitably epic and yet so subtle and dignified. On not showing the Resurrection and aftermath I think that was a wise decision. After all, that is a whole story in itself and would take away from the main thrust of the story, which was the entwined destinies of Messala and Judah Ben Hur and the redemption of Judah's wavering and sorely tested faith. Anyway, the miracle of Christ's resurrection and his ascension into glory are referenced within the miraculous healing from leprosy of Judah's sister and mother in the finale of the film. As always your review and considered appreciation of all aspects of the film are a pleasure to listen to and aways food for thought. Thanks for the lavish meal - epic, you could say!

Just caught this on TCM for the first time a few days ago. Really loved the portrayal of Jesus Christ but do have a problem with the ending as well.

The Resurrection is shown at the end of the film with the shot of a shepherd leading a flock of sheep

Great review, I love this film. As a fellow Christian I share your sentiments about not showing Jesus face, and leaving out the resurrection though.

Wish I could click like more than once :)

Thought-provoking review as always, but I think the filmmakers made the right choices when they came to depicting the scenes with Jesus later in the film. The movie is about Ben-Hur, of course - and the story shows the massive impact his two short interactions with Jesus has on his life and his destiny. With this in mind, keeping Jesus as a "supporting character" works effectively - if the story started focusing on the resurrection then the narrative would be changing horses in mid-stream, resulting in an even longer and more diffuse film. (And the real cinematic climax is the chariot race, anyway). Discussing Ben-Hur also allows us to touch on Stephen Boyd's career. He's clearly very effective in his cad-like turn as Messala (the film wouldn't be a classic without an effective villain) but Boyd never came close to those heights again - even becoming derided for 1966's cheesy The Oscar (though he was solid in Fantastic Voyage). And tragically, he died so young, at 45, from a heart attack while playing golf. Finally, there is one other version of Ben-Hur - the SCTV version featuring John Candy in the titular role: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bdBii5R7qJyWo3k.html (A few chuckles but far from their best parody)

In Cambodia I have seen, sat by and touched leprosy sufferers. Details vary but (for want nowadays of 25 cents worth of medicine) the illness and isolation are grim indeed.😢

there is no satisfying way to depict the Resurrection, I think. But, The Chosen is an interesting way to portray all the Biblical characters including Jesus (though I appreciate what you said about not wanting to equate any actor with Jesus). I recommend the Chosen.

Israeli actress Haya Harareet was absolutely stunningly beautiful in this film.

Well told.