He has SUCH an awful way to say things or deliver a message But, i believe i got the "point" of what he was saying, despite his cold annoying speech, that a human needs and benefits from having a PURPOSE. An occupation. Something that you do everyday, that keeps you alive and SHARP. I hope and believe this is what he was trying to deliver? But no way should he support denying retirement from elderly, and elderly should be supported by any government respectfully. My grandpa worked hard until he was 90 something and it kept him alive.

​​​​​@RandomGirl-ki7wk @1:22 Ben clearly stated, "They are all going bankrupt. Don't fix it, but dismantle it," OK. This is an all math problem. It's an easy fix. Because math is easy. This is where the pin pointed problem is. This is where a not-for-profit banking (socialism) comes into play. Because the math of socialism for everyone's retirement plan does add up. The ideal plan is to fix the problem, not dismantle our government. AKA socialism. Raising the retirement to 67 is unacceptable. And private-sector retirement doesn't work for everyone. Because the private-sector retirement is rewarding savers, thus punishing the borrowers, and this doesn't work for EVERYONE. Thus going in the opposite direction. Now. Who is sabotaging everyone's retirement plans? Who is going in the opposite direction because they don't understand math. Who doesn't understand how to run a government. Who doesn't understand where the "private-sector" can't handle the math of the type of product and services requiring the math of a not-for-profit banking system. AKA socialism. Who is chearleading, the government is bad, and to dismantle it. Because "they are going bankrupt" @1:22 Vs. Trying to come together and get the math right and fit our government.

​@@RandomGirl-ki7wk what job did your grandfather do ? Also you legitimately believe that him working until he was 90 was what kept him alive ? How old are you.

@@jackbutt8774 They're just gaslighting you with their backhanded "agreement"...

@@eternalskeptic gotcha.

😂👍

Permanent retirement. The ultimate retirement

😂😂

or a good person…

If you talk fast you're probably a con man.

I worked 43 years in Underground mines and ended up with a lung desease that gave me no compensation I retired at 60 because I was feeling the effects and conditions where deteriorating this man is just a F##king idiot.

I have been calling him Ben shitpiro, for a while now

Have you heard about ......U and ......S. ?

They've been actively destroying our country for the last 40 years.

Yeah and all throughout that time they constantly passed cut after cut after cut. If they were so confident they shouldn't have felt the need to constantly cut it.

It's not stupid, it's tactical. As in he's waging a war on the very country that gave him the greatest opportunity to thrive. While he annihilates an entire class of working people (most of whom listen to him and adore his every word), while he openly plots their demise. In discussions like this, he sounds very...chosen, if you will.

Yea he put out two videos both an hour each and all he said was “it’s stupid”. And through these videos of yelling “its stupid” he’s going to claim authority over the world and eliminate all that disagree with him. You two have a very “thanos” way of thinking and it’s kinda disturbing

I think he's just an idiot

As can be seen from this video the answer is quite clear .

Love that picture, bro t .

I would hire them,but I like to live dangerously

Exactly

I am 67 and retired. I retired at 64 and, at that time, it was not planned. I wanted to keep on working for at least another few years because I loved my job. But unfortunately changes were made at my job and it became unbearable for me. Perhaps all of that was done on purpose so that the company would have me leave and not deal with unemployment, which that itself hurt me. I felt like I should have handled that ordeal better, but it is all in the past now. I went out looking for work after leaving my job and I noticed a huge difference on how the people were towards me than the last time I went out looking. Their attitudes were not great and I experienced some "age discrimination". I know it's against the law, but they somehow find a way to get away with it. I'm on SS and, fortunately, invested at a good place with my money I got when I sold my condo. The SS and interest provides me enough to live on. If I live in a less expensive area, I could make out pretty well. I usually like Ben with his opinions, but this time I didn't agree with him.

Right but the problem is its really not their money, especially if your low income, its other peoples money. Thats his point. Its a redistributive system based on your income and relies on people who are working to pay for people who are retired.

@@dangli-sac4053 Hmm... did you even watch the video?? People pay into the system for years. Then at retirement age they get money back. That's the deal. How is it not their money? It probably wouldn't be practical nor feasible to calculate to the exact penny how much each and every person pays into the system over the course of a lifetime and then give back only exactly what they put into it. But is that the system you would be in favor of? Anyway, some people may get a little more back and some won't ever come close to getting back all they put into it. And lots of people die before ever hitting retirement age. It's a system that has been working well for over 80 years. The elderly poverty rate dropped significantly when SS was implemented. Would you really want to go back to a time when 38% of the elderly lived in poverty? I don't. Lastly, it's not like SS gives people a luxurious lifestyle. Many people still struggle if their only income is from SS. I just recently went on SS myself after working hard for 42 years, and I have to work part time to supplement my income (so I am actually STILL paying into the system). And it's not because I squandered my money. I actually saved probably more than the average person. And although I'm healthy now, I may encounter lots of medical bills in the years to come. Let's keep the one thing that works and is very popular among Americans.

@@ctpaul1261 Many thing you said were incorrect and it’s a little concerning. I get if your an avid tyt viewer that tends to be a common result. The money i pay into the system now goes to people like you, those that are already retired. It doesn’t go into an account with my name on it waiting until i retire. When i retire the people who are working and paying into the system will pay for my SS. See the problem? So if we don’t have enough people working to pay for the retirees what happens? We are going through this exact situation with baby boomers retiring. Secondly, SS is a redistributive system. So if your low income you put in very little money and get way more when you retire. If your middle to upper class, you get back way less than you pay into it. And if you die right after retirement you get nothing. So what your essentially doing is stealing money from people who have it so low income people can retire. Most people would be much better off keeping their own money and investing it they way they want for retirement. So no it’s isn’t a successful system and never has. When it was first created retirees weren’t smart enough to save for retirement so the program was created to give them one, those retirees never paid into the system and just received and we’ve been playing catch up ever since. You can literally put that money in anything else and make a better profit. So to answer your question yes I expect to at least get back exactly what i put but preferably more because i can invest in almost anything and make a profit over time. So the system is clearly a very unfair system that is running out of steam and wont work in the near future. I’m in my early 30s and by the time i retire theres a good chance my ss money is gone by then

@@dangli-sac4053 LOL, no, SS is not "stealing money from people who have it so low income people can retire." That is a gross mischaracterization of the program. Do you also consider car insurance to be "stealing from accident-free people in order to pay for people who were in accidents"?? That's not an exact analogy, but the point is similar. We have programs in which large groups of people pay into with the full understanding that they, or someone else, will not be financially devastated at some point in the future. That's certainly NOT "stealing." And it seems that you are not aware of how SS works. Not everybody gets the same monthly benefit. People who are low income contribute less to the system than people who have higher incomes. And when those low income people retire their benefits are calculated based on their lifetime earnings. Low income people may receive as little as around $1500/month compared to higher earners who may receive anywhere from $3000 to $4000 per month when they retire. How well do you think someone could live on $1500 per month?? Even the high end provides only a modest income. So nobody is getting rich off of SS, that's for sure. And yes, dropping the elderly poverty rate from 38% to just 10-15% is the sign of a successful program. How is that not successful? And who was harmed over the past 80 years by SS?? Nobody ever was financially ruined in this country because we implemented a SS system. It's true that because of an aging population we should be putting more into the SS coffers. But that's very easy to solve. All we need to do is eliminate the cap on people who make over $160k per year. And then the program can continue as is almost indefinitely. The only thing standing in the way of eliminating the cap is Republicans. THEY are the problem - not the program itself. So if your money is gone by the time you retire it will be because of Republicans - not because of anything else. PS - I am gladly paying into the system now with the hope that you and people like you can enjoy your retirement some day. I will fight on your behalf to make sure the money will be there for you. It's the American way.

Exactly. When I was in my early 50s I got laid off during the big “corporate takeover” days, and I can tell you, it was extremely difficult to find ANY work, and especially rewarding (in all iterations of that word) work, and even more so as a woman. I feel really sorry for that woman you mentioned, but that is the unfortunate reality in our capitalist system. She’s probably also getting disability checks, and between that and Wal-Mart, she’s still probably just barely getting by. And they (the politicians) can’t seem to understand why so many people, including elderly people, are living on the streets.

People dont understand that the prices of things are never going back down. This inflation is deeper than we think. Those buying groceries are well aware that the real inflation is much over 10%. The increments dont match our income, yet certain investors still earn over $365,000 in stocks and assets. Wish I could accomplish that.

Very possible! especially at this moment. Profits can be made in many different ways, but such intricate transactions should only be handled by seasoned market professionals.

Having an investment advisor is the best way to go about the stock market right now. I was going solo, but it wasn't working. I've been in touch with an advisor for a while now, and just last year, I made over 80% capital growth minus dividends.

I'm surprised that you just mentioned and recommend Mr Brian Nelson. I met him at a conference in 2018 and we have been working together ever since.

Sounds interesting. I was planning to invest some few £ in some coins, stack them up and leave them for a few years, but seeing this changed my mindset. Thank you very much

Is Ben a self-made man or, like Trump, is he merely the benefactor of his daddy's trust fund? 🤔

No , more like two weeks of looonng days ! A few stories up .

What should be your purpose?

​@@traviselrod7803 Buddy, I work to live. I do NOT live to work. That is my goal/purpose in life.

boy said my parents still work .lol yo he doesnt know how tasteless that sounds lol

@@traviselrod7803family, friends, ENJOYMENT, travelling, helping others, taking time to enjoy life. There has to be more to life than clocking in and clocking out.

@@jaynecobb6711 Can you define what you mean by “live.”

No, his wife carries his balls around with her.

Bone spurs .

Laws for thee, not for me!

Benji should have retired five years ago !

There is literally nothing that could be a worse way of spending money than a 15 year paid vacation for people who just don't feel like working. It's surreal that in a world that's full of people who can't afford food, clean water, shelter, or medical care, that's the one human right you aren't allowed to question. Studies also show Ben is right. Faith, friends, family, and WORK are the four primary keys the happiness. Research confirms this again and again and again.

No ones stopping you from doing that. If you have the money, retire now. Bens point is that you shouldnt be doing it on tax payer dime. Keep your own money you put in SS, that way you can use it whenever you want. You dont have to just wait for SS to kick in. See how much better that is?

so would any politician.

Shapiro doesn't have what it takes to do hard labor. He has no actual skills beyond being a piece of crap punk.

He's the type of asshole that wants YOU to do the type of work he wouldn't ever dream of doing. These rich boys have no clue what 3 decades of manual repetitive labour does to a body, nor do they care.

Our government needs to stop wild spending . How much has Biden sent to Ukraine??????

What job?? Complaining??