Wayne Couzens didn't like being filmed. If police respect people's right to film them nobody will watch "audit" videos. It's that simple. As it is there are dozens of instances in the UK where "auditors" have recorded criminal behaviour by police.

The best way to deal with an auditor is to get your phone out and start playing music as they will get a copy right claim put on them by KZfaq or Facebook.

Like the police say: if you’re not doing anything wrong there’s nothing to fear. Let them film.

Why wouldn't you want people to see what a great job you do?

Inspector Dean Gittoes at Merthyr Tydfil arrested a 16 year old "for terrorism" because he was filming the outside of the station. He then went on to brag to his colleagues that he was fed up of being filmed and being made to look like an idiot so he arrested him for terrorism. Little did he know the phone he grabbed off the kid was still recording... Auditing Wales I think the kid was called. Flagrant abuses of power like this are sometimes caught and I personally think that makes the auditors a valuable "public" service. That being said, I also think the majority of Bobbys are just there to do their job and don't deserve to be goaded.

I'd like Ben to respond to some of the many videos that show the police behaving in not such a thoughtful way.

Professional police have nothing to fear

Police frequently invade our privacy, I am happy with the fact that these auditors return the favour to the police.

Auditing developed as a consequence of photographers/journalists being abused by the police (mainly S44 TACT which resulted in the act being repealed) to some extent the police created the problem. There are good and bad auditors, understandably you are focussing on the bad ones who in my opinion are not really auditors and I agree with most of your sentiments. What "real auditors" want is no reaction and minimal interaction and an end for the need to “audit”. I’d like to hear your views on the genuinely civil rights motivated people such as “Focus Pocus”. As an aside the NPCC guidance is clear on how to deal with auditors but, for whatever reason many officers ignore it or have not read it.

If the police want to go around enforcing petty laws, like hurt feelings on twitter. Then the police can't complain when the public hold the police to the same petty standards 😛 The police don't like to be recorded... Guess what, the public don't like to be recorded. You really should practice what you preach 😉

The more eyes on the police the better.

What if we went to have a look around the station to see if there are any faults / health and safety concerns and provide a virtual tour experience to the viewers who genuinely find police stations interesting. I have full respect when visiting and love having a good nosey around. I did enjoy your take on it though and yes filming constable + personal car is a big no no. I ask if it’s unmarked or personal so I can edit it out 👍

They're not breaking any laws filming you. If you're not doing anything wrong there's nothing to worry about.

This is exactly why we need auditors. Look how sensitive he is, his ego is so huge and he believes that that his job makes him the most important person in the world. Its unbelively cringey 🤣🤣 Auditors highlight these narcissist nearly every single day and expose them to the public. Imagine genuinely needing the police just for this ego maniac hard man to come along. With any luck an auditor will highlight people like this early doors, so that we don't have a repeat of Wayne couzens who was left to his own devices and continously displayed sickening behaviour.

True say but doesn’t change the fact you’ll see plenty of coppers in these videos breaking the law….

I wish they would come so quick & have so much backup when it comes to predators. A guy with a camera filming a government employee is their kryptonite.

Check This Guys Hard drive

No problem with them provided they do not break the law.

If the police are doing nothing wrong and act professional then nothing to be bothered about you think too much

I have mixed reviews on this. For at first I had the same views as most people in these comments, that it’s a 🔔 with a camera. But after seeing a lot of these videos posted on KZfaq, it has changed my views massively! Watching police officers using unnecessary force, abusing laws which are meant to keep us safe. Countless times I have seen PO’s using the terrorism search law, which was a law designed for something totally different. It’s exposed the shear lack of training within the police force, police training now is built around learning ethics and inclusive workplace, instead of learning the laws of the U.K.

I wish the police came to my house when someone tried to brake into it. They just gave me a crime number.

If a cop knows his or her bread and butter laws there shouldn't be a problem being filmed. However, having watched some auditors it's apparent that many cops either don't know these laws, or choose to abuse the law. The Terrorism Act, PACE and Public Order Act seem to be the most abused Acts. So Ben, if you know the basics of the law, you shouldn't have a problem. Just be respectful and if you see the auditor isn't breaking the law, move on and leave them to their filming.

I don't like most auditors approach, but there are some I think that do a genuinely good job and that stay respectful, unfortunately the police aren't always the same

Auditors are testing the law, to ensure that our rights are maintained. Cameras are useful for holding the police to account. Ben says the police don’t cover stuff up. The data suggests quite the opposite.

Remember people fought wars to protect these rights, and if you don't like it then don't be a police officer.

Film,CCTV,bodycams but police want privacy,,,o piss off we all don't like being filmed,,, welcome to the UK !

They don't go looking for a reaction, they go looking for corruption, police not knowing the law and police twisting it. Photography is not a crime!

You should watch one auditor vid from the US. He's in the police car park filming, and the stereotype sheriff walks out, big hat, gun, tache and all. Sheriff says good morning and asks him if he's filming cars. Auditor says yes. Sheriff asks if he'd like to come around the back to see their new cars, and has a conversation. Gets a good idea of what the guy is doing without out once being a poundshop Judge Dredd. Sheriff suggests couple of nice places to eat in his town and wishes him well. Auditor leaves. Sheriff gets far more from that interaction than all the 'I am the law' dickwads commonly shown.

I was expecting someone a bit more balanced and professional, hard to believe this guy was an Inspector or maybe it isn't in the light of recent events.

The real reason police don't like to be filmed is because the police forces up and down the country are failing the public. Its never about being a nuisance you serve the public and should be happy to engage with them. Typical copper stereotyping people again by assuming auditors all don't work. There are ex police officers now going out auditing so what does that say. I have a police background in my family and its never about being anti police If you ever want a reasonable discussion you can find my email on my banner ✌🏼💯

if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear, isn't that what the police tell you.

Ben you are a top man but…. I feel better knowing there are people out there unofficially policing the police, because asking the police to police themselves is a bit like asking a morbid obese person to run a donut stall

Ben “saw an video online of an auditor asking a police officer for his” Yeah, because the police have a policy to identify themselves 🤔

don’t agree sorry they are not breaking the law and wen police are on camera they behave very different yes they are annoying

As far as I am aware, I've not come across an auditor who sits in their car waiting for a copper to come along. Most of whom I have seen are walking on foot doing their audit. In any case cops have had it too good for too long, beating and murdering members of the public and beating detained people in the cells In my City in the 70's a prisoner was murdered in police cells with a plastic bag placed over his head at Little Park Street Police Station Coventry. Coventry Police were also racist in the 70's and 80's Coventry had their share of corrupt Detectives also. All of the afore mentioned topics were before the days of P.A.C.E. It's now the public's turn to the turn tables on the Police and make then more accountable for their past illegal actions. The worst Police commissioner ever was Cressida Dick and her London Metropolitan Police Force. In my view the police have a long way way to go to repair the eroded line between the public and the Police....... Keep writing your books and I'm certain you will earn some extra coppers from Your Tube, But I'll never buy a book that you may have written nor will I subscribe or like your channel

The fact police have an issue being filmed tells you all you need to know about the police. Criminal to the core!! ALWAYS RECORD THE COPS!

Your wrong they are making sure you know the rules and clearly none of you dont

I’ve watched auditing videos for several years, initially just American ones (and not in my dressing gown! 😉) I find them interesting because they juxtapose public authorities with the public’s rights. There are such a variety of auditors with equally varied motives. I personally prefer the passive, responsible auditors that seem to have rights and freedoms as their motivation. There are others that are in it for the drama, notoriety, and money - but they become obvious. It’s a shame officers like this chap don’t see the other side of auditing and have simply concluded that their only motivation is to ‘wind up coppers’. This is an unfair generalisation of the varied auditing community. There is another consideration he misses: police are a public service that we all pay for with no way of holding them accountable for poor behaviours and performance. Police are always going to be a focus on the very nature that they personify the governmental “authority”. Auditors have exposed some very poor policing behaviours in the past: a little public accountability to keep the authorities in check isn’t any harm at all. The shoe is very often on the other end of the foot with police recording the public and intruding on their privacy - they have to expect a similar response. The example the officer gave of someone following him home was chilling, but completely unrelated to auditing at all. The funny thing is, even though auditing has been a thing for so long, the penny still hasn’t dropped. If they ignored auditors, and didn’t engage - there would be really boring content, and people would stop watching. They have the power to stop it, but often individual officers ego won’t let them. 🤷‍♂️

Some auditors are making a lot of money from their channels £90,000 plus pa. Some choose to give big chunks of that cash away to homeless people. There are plenty dodgy police like there are plenty dodgy auditors, that is people. AB or Auditing Britain is very fair and very polite, it is about freedom, the right to film anything in public without a permission givers ok, it is a human right. The people who followed you are nothing to do with photography or bra sections of catalogs they are someone you have had dealings with or have pissed off.

As a retired officer I can concur with Ben. On one occasion whilst sitting in a police van during a busy Saturday we had a so called auditor come up to us sticking his camera right up against the window. I tried talking to him and all he did was be rude with comments like "why are you doing nothing, were paying you wages", we were not doing nothing we were awaiting instructions from VL regarding an on-going domestic event and were told to go 18 (on standby to respond). But this guy was not interested in hearing anything we were prepared to say, he just wanted to start an altercation/reaction. Most of these guys are people that probably have had issues with police for whatever reason previously and see this as a way to have a poke. In my 30+ years most police officers were very professional and were very committed to their jobs, not the tyrants these idiots like to portray.

One thing I've noticed is that most Police are over weight

A lot of Police don’t like being filmed because they are being held accountable. Plus their massive ego takes a hit when they are being filmed. The auditor does a valuable service to the public. I actually like your videos but I have to disagree with you on this one. There are rouge officers in every county and know this because I used to do the job myself.

Best way to deal with them is just try and stay calm realise what they’re there to do and try and send them on there way. No section 43 or public order offence. Just one member of public to the other

Lost respect for this man

However there’s 2 sides to every story and he fails to mention the other side. These Auditors are only fishing for a reaction and unfortunately there’s some police officers out there who’s ego makes the police look bad, those bad police officers just can’t let it go and always have to get the last word in or they go off on a power trip. Usually these auditors are doing it because they’ve had a bad experience with some police officers. The best thing the police could do is not talk to these auditors and then the auditor wouldn’t have any footage. If there really is a security risk (because when was the last time there was a terrorist attack on a police station) then they wouldn’t make these police stations easily accessible and easily viewed. They’d be a big wall around those police stations. The car that followed him home doesn’t need to film him to follow him. Anyone can stand outside a police station WITHOUT a camera and watch who comes in and out, having a camera is irrelevant. And some people make a lot of money from KZfaq.

An auditor is simply an interactive CCTV. It is always the police's choice to offer a reaction, or not. The police should realise they are the ones who promoted CCTV culture in the first place.

Please tell the truth. At Kidderminster the AB auditor channel recorded policewomen who arrested a man who was just walking on public access land and incarcerated him for five hours. The reasons the officers gave, were 1) causing alarm and distress - FALSE, 2) suspicion under the Terrorism act - FALSE, and 3) breaking the "RRR Policing Laws - NO SUCH LAW. Inside they gave him an out of date copy of PACE - BREACH IF HIS RIGHTS. Later, another member of the public wanted to make a counter complaint and was refused - AGAINST IOPC ADVICE. In the process the police appear to have committed the criminal and other offences of: denial of two rights, assault, battery, breach of GDPR and unlawful detention. Those are four or five crimes by more than one officer which create a legitimate suspicion in the minds of the public that the police there are lawless. This means anyone now has a lawful reason to treat police from there as suspect and to film every interaction for their own safety. The result, Kidderminster became a magnet for auditors and public complaints which increased the likelihood of police being followed and all the things that you are not happy about!. West Mercia issued an apology and the Chief Superintendent spoke in public about it. And the result of this auditing: police at Kidderminster are more polite, more respectful and have ceased abusing the public's rights around the station. Proof positive the auditors provide a public service and you are talking absolute nonsense.

You have some really good points in this video but there's a but coming. It works the same when police ask for your name. You're not entitled to know someone's name just because you are police officer but you always ask for it alongside details. I don't want my face being monitored while I go to a football match and the police are going around with cameras " For our own safety ". I don't want to be filmed but the law, which you are using at this point is, you have no right to privacy while in public. I do agree that some auditors are going to get a rise from you but on the flipside some are showing how the police are breaking policing policies and are a law on to themselves. To summarise, I think this auditors are helping the situation here because they are showing the police hierarchy flaws in there training and why the public are not onside with them. If they actually take notice of what's going on then maybe the relationships can be made better and the public have more faith in the system.

That often IS their job . Possibly earning more than the officers from social media or claims from officers who behave badly

Why do you, as a former police officer, spend 10 minutes complaining about people carrying out lawful activities?

As a professional film maker I’ve seen auditing videos and have mixed views on the subject. I think it’s right that auditors are challenged outside police stations. Auditors when challenged should be open and engaging about what they are doing and that they are not showing private vehicle plates etc . One the other side I’ve seen footage where auditors have shown memos regarding auditing from the Association of chief police officers to concerned officers and making it quite clear of their purpose filming . These officers have then escalated the interaction using anti terror laws and public order for no valid reason . Some common sense on both sides would be appreciated. I would also recommend both the public and police video all interactions for mutual protection.

Your car registration plates are not personal as they belong to the DVLA .

Best way to deal with them is to leave em to it. When they provoke you they are getting the content that they want

'regardless of what you say' goes on to suggest channel 5 arent going to protect their filming contract with the police. tedious. lacking critical thinking.

Some are better intentioned than others mate but at the end of the day…”if you are doing nothing wrong you have nothing to worry about do you?” That’s your argument for CCTV and data collection etc.

They go to stations claiming its a matter of public interest but then proceed to not film any part of the station but instead purposely film people's vehicles whether they are parked or moving. I thought it was the station that was a matter of public interest? Why the registrations? Oh wait its because they know they will get a rise and a reaction.

Time for the police to start showing respect for the public. The police are getting better, but there are still some idiots who think they can bully and assault the public for not bowing to their self perceived authority, when their actual authority is not permitted to be used.

Unfortunately this is a deliberate misconception that the police and ignorant individuals like to portray to everyone. It's not true. In the hundreds if not thousands of auditor videos that are on KZfaq alone, every single one shows the auditor is approached by the police. The police chose to approach and interact. That is the point, the auditor knows the rules, and the legislation surrounding public photography, and filming in a public place, the issue has arisen from, and stems from as a result, decades of photographers been harassed, by police, illegally detained, illegally searched, and alot of the time illegally arrested, whilst having their details illegally gain by officers through the manipulation of the laws and legislations entrusted to them to Ironically enforce and protect the general public. Auditors don't just audit police stations either, they go around filming industrial sites, shopping centres, towns, cities, military bases, police stations, post offices, etc Whilst standing in a public place, they can legally film anything and anyone they like, and can see from that public place. The issue isn't the auditors, the issue is the people who do not understand the legal right to film and take pictures in public. This is also a very common practice now, and it is about time the police and others were educated. Father memos were sent to every police force in the country basically forbidding them to approach public photographers or people filming, they still insist on going against that, and harassing people.

Genuine question Ben - if coppers are so worried about people seeing their private cars at the station (often behind see through gates/fences), why do they park there? Why not park else where and walk to the station? Or cycle? 🤷🏻‍♂️ And you said halfway through that you’re not bothered about being filmed….but you’ve made a whole video literally about being bothered about being filmed 🤷🏻‍♂️ which is it?

guess if some police people didn't break the law, these people with cameras wouldn't be out there filming you

Who the hell on God's earth would want to be a police officer? Can't do it for the money! They do it for the power trip.

They might be in a dressing gown but alot of them are making a shed ton of money while they do

I'm not a fan-boy who writes blank cheques for the fuzz. I could write a book about my bad experiences of bad policing. Even so, 'auditors' are self-important nerdy knobheads and probably not the sort of people with whom most of us would enjoy hanging out. Sad cases.

I don't like sticking up for the police but they are human beings at their job, and someone's dad or mom or daughter or son, and for someone to walk up to them with a camera on their face live on Facebook with a bullying and hateful vibe , demanding their name for everyone to see on Facebook and then insulting them and saying stuff like you are dismissed, they are bullies and the people who like them are the kind of people who like seeing people being treated badly, I watched one today and he went to an office block security team and started calling one of the female workers fat and ugly with his camera pointing at her, and then some passers-by punched him, and then he started screaming for the police, I wasn't surprised, all bullies are weak really

Wish I could work just 8 hours a week. Sounds like this guy doesn't like his own company tactics when there used against him. Boo hoo

You mentioned at the end words to the effect of "if you see a bobby getting had by a few lads, help them out". What exactly do you mean by this? If Joe public were to get involved in a fight, restraining etc what would be the legal repercussions? For example, if I saw somebody with a weapon pointed at a bobby, or a bobby getting stomped on by three guys and I sneaked up behind them and put them in a choke hold or hit them round the head, what would happen to me?

There’s one particular auditor called DJ Audits who started off polite and lately is becoming rude and aggressive. He says he can see his drone at 500 metres, I very much doubt it. About time the police shut this guy down. Comes from Leicestershire and is called Nigel Roy Dicks. You can tell by his attitude that something ain’t quite right upstairs. If that’s the case is he medically unfit to be in charge of a drone?

There are a couple of times that I wished I had a camera with me when dealing with the Police and PCSO.. The first was a PCSO cycling along an allyway that had a NO CYCLING sign either end, I stopped her and pointed out that the youngsters see her doing it and think sod it she can do it... She told me she was allowed to ignore the signs if it was safe to do so and asked for my name, DOB and address, a tactic I feel was aimed at intimidating me, I declined unless she was planning to send me a birthday card.. I went straight to the nearby Police Station and reported the lass. Must have worked as they now push their bikes through the alleys... The other time was when my wife whilst driving witnessed a messy RTC, she phoned me all upset and said she felt she could not drive any further that day due to shock, I walked about a mile to the scene to find her, to be met with a shouting copper telling people to go away - which I can understand, but when I tried to tell him I was looking for my wife who was quite upset after witnessing the RTC he told me he was not there to help people and to go away, then when he noticed I was looking for his shoulder number he pushed his shoulders back to make it difficult to get the numbers.. A passer by asked if I was looking for the lady in the blue Renault and if so she was in a nearby house.. I thought about what had happened and phoned the force Professional Standards dept, they had the area Traffic Inspector phone me to arrange a meeting. He wanted me to travel 20 odd miles to a Police Station although I live 150yds from a main Police Station, so I declined and said I would contact their Professional Standards again... He then said my local station would be fine.. At the meeting the Inspector said that he had been at the RTC scene and what I was telling him was a load of rubbish... I told him he was not there - only the stroppy copper. He then admitted he was not there but was testing my story.. I had a letter from Profession Standards a month or so later to say my complaint had been dealt with and the officer disciplined..

I’ve got a question. Let’s say a normal member of the public is getting followed by an unknown car while they are driving home. Are they allowed to go through red lights and speed as long as they call 999 and explain the situation? Or if you did and a speed or red light camera caught you and you explained the situation. Would you be let off or not?

What really gets me is when people video ambulance crews with an injured or vulnerable person. It's just wrong, especially when their in a life-threatening situation. Imagine your mum or dad was trapped in a mangled car wreck with firefighters and paramedics trying to get them out and a bunch of bystanders were videoing what is likely the worst day of that patient's life, just for views on Facebook or TikTok. People need to show some decency.

Reminds me of being in class and you and your friend are trying so hard not to hit the giggles 😂😂😂😂😂

I've been filmed doing my job and it really affected me. I'm a doorman, I was on a venue one weekend, few lads left having a few heated words then this lad went running over to this guy half his size, I tried to run to stop him but he connected with him just as I got there. Restrained this lad on the floor and next thing is some random member of the public came over filming screaming how I was bullying a young lad. Nobody had filmed this lad decking a guy half his size or me running down the street to try and stop it (which we're not meant to do, we're not covered if we are off the premises). Video goes viral in my local area (I've never looked at it since it passed about 20k views) The main thing that got to me was the comments saying how I need shooting, I was high on drugs, lets arrange a load of boys to go and sort him out.. all for trying to do the best I'm my job. There was cctv showing the full incident that would of shown the truth but obviously it can't be released. Even had to help the police arrest the guy later on yet that one video almost made me quit. I got into the job to help people and was a real kick in the teeth to be portrayed in that light due to half a video.

I try not to watch these auditor channels. They inflame me to the limit. Most of them behave like they have some God given right to 'audit'. Usually their ramblings just reinforce my feelings that they don't know the meaning of the word. They are a waste of space usually. The best answer for officers would be to just ignore them. They would eventually go away when they realise they have no audience . But it has to be said that some of the officers don't fully know their Police Powers. Get that right and auditors can't rile you! If you don't react to them, they don't need to know who you are, above the number on you shoulder. Let them read. If you ignore them you won't pick up tuppenny-ha'penny complaints.

I was harassed by my local police force. The same Two police officers were always the culprits after a family issue with the police (wasnt criminal related) and i wish I had recorded it to get something done about it. I think a lot of citizen journalism has helped prove wrong doings. But there should be rules In Place where the person recording should state they’re recording, not get in the way unless (particularly in america) someone is in danger and they should at least remain respectful so long as the police do. If your pals getting locked up for having a boot load of green, don’t record and post on Facebook saying the police are arresting him for no reason. Plus context often gets missed out, where police may use force but the part where the offender attacked an officer is missed out. It’s easy to manipulate on both sides. Recording is totally fine as long as you don’t act like a twatwagon getting all bbc reporter with your iPhone

I’ve never seen auditors sitting outside police stations. Waiting outside is better.

He's right. These self appointed 'auditors' with their arrogant air of entitlement, are not the brightest buttons in the box, despite yelling that they know their 'wites'. Their sole goal is to provoke arguments with the added hope of an 'assault'. Why are new laws not being introduced to prohibit loitering around police stations, prisons & businesses harassing staff with filming equipment? Anyone confronted by these time wasters should simply play copyrighted music on their mobiles making uploading the clip a waste of time as You Tube would censor the audio making the clip boring to watch. Although the police might not be able to do this, they need to apply whatever laws are available to stop themselves being goaded into the desired situations that these muppets are aiming for.

Rights that are not execrcised regularly are lost

Firstly, I’m no fan of auditors and I’ve nothing against the police. I love the way auditors don’t like it when someone films them. But one thing that the police need to sort out is that just because someone doesn’t have a job it doesn’t make them a bad person or in any way reflect on their personality. The way police regularly ask things like “have you got a job” is unacceptable unconscious bias. It needs to stop.

Why don’t auditors film Delivoo etc cyclists going through red lights and riding on pavements. Why don’t they film Ubers with headlights not working?

Just ignore them .. If someone wanted to get to you after work they could .. They wouldn't try to film it outside the cop shop .. They only exist because you get riled up and abuse stop and search / terrorism law

Guess you don't like filth wrongdoings to be filmed.

There not their to stick their noses in, they are there to defend the public's rights. What you have seen, like 2 audit videos, one of them was not official, it was probably just criminals. It is for the good of the country and the police force. If they cant do simple jobs, like not take away peoples rights, following protocols e.t.c. thrn how are they good at there job when it comes to the big things?

Everything you said at the beginning of the video is also applied to police

He works 8 hours a week?

Swearing be careful you might get beaten and nicked for ‘public order’

I think it's a great way to weed out and expose the corrupt officers such as Dean Gittoes who assaulted a 16 year old just because he wouldn't give his name when asked. It's also nice to see the officers that are carrying out their duty respectfully when engaging with auditors. There is also good and bad auditors as well as cops. Ultimately the police should know how to handle any situation within the boundaries of the law so I feel no sympathy for any officer that gets aggressive, rude and breaks laws to stop anyone auditing, good or bad.

The TV station will edit the footage they have to make sure the Police are portrayed in the best possible light, and that is why we need most of these auditors. They, the Police have no problem filming people, and this just sounds to me like the spoiled whining of the playground. They are public servants operating in public supposedly working for the public. Pathetic. D-minus response.

Police have a choice to approach auditors and engage, which 99% of the time they do and end up making themselves look stupid.

It's cold and heating is expensive so of course I'm wearing a dressing gown at 3pm 😅

You sound upset people like you are being held accountable lmfao

I don't believe your story about getting followed home. If anyone got your address from your reg number, the police can easily find out who has searched for that, whether its another officer or someone who works for an insurance company (as they are the only two professions who can access that info) plus if your info was leaked from a reg number on an auditors channel (as your implying) the force would have definitely prosecuted that auditor and we would have heard about it.

Lets discuss criminality and prosecutions amongst the police force ? I'm guessing you won't !

You're way off the mark here. The more professional auditors highlight certain officers abusing their powers especially the terrorist act. I used to hate them myself but the more officers I see abusing their powers the more I realised this is a necessary exercise. And I for one have a full time job and certainly don't sit at home in my dressing gown. Some of these auditors earn a decent living from the monetisation their content brings. Would you rather them turn to illegal activities like drug dealing?

Whos this guy to judge whether i have better things to do with my time, people spot trains and planes and flipping eddie stobart trucks. This plod needs to ask himself why hes so scared if he does a good job? Leave the auditors alone and they have no show. Police should understand this by now.....

I’m a police officer working 8 hours a week. Wow. Your life seems so hard

There doing the same as police as they have body cams whats the difference the police like to film the public but don't like to be filmed themselves

The best way to deal with 'auditors' is to just ignore them. They're harmless little weirdos who have nothing better to do with their lives than try and get a reaction from police officers. As soon as they know they can't get a reaction they'll get bored and piss off.

The reason they do it is not because they’ve got nothing better to do, it’s because they earn money through posting the videos to KZfaq. Provoking a reaction from officers is what drives their views up; getting arrested even more so. KZfaq should just ban frauditor videos.

so much cope from this guy