Charles Taylor Lecture: Disenchantment and Secularity

  Рет қаралды 48,746

Berkley Center

Berkley Center

11 жыл бұрын

For more on this event, visit: bit.ly/10zPpgs
For more on the Berkley Center, visit: berkleycenter.georgetown.edu
October 22, 2008 | World-renowned philosopher Charles Taylor examined the complex relation between disenchantment and secularity in the West, including the different meanings of "disenchantment," and the implicit meanings behind notions of "re-enchantment." This was the second of the 2008 Berkley Center lectures on the topic "Narratives of Secularity". The lectures surveyed the master narratives which have underpinned secularization, explored more adequate ones, and hazarded a picture of the present predicament of religion and spirituality in the West.
Charles Taylor is one of the world's leading scholars working at the intersection of religion, secularity, and modernity. A philosopher open to other humanities and social science disciplines, he has authored many path-breaking books, including The Sources of the Self (1992), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (1994) and, most recently, A Secular Age (2007). Taylor was for many years Professor for Political Sciences and Philosophy at the McGill University in Montreal, Canada, where he now serves as professor emeritus. He was awarded the Templeton Prize in 2007.

Пікірлер: 20
@sergiosatelite467
@sergiosatelite467 3 жыл бұрын
The tie is tucked in. That says a great deal and leaves many unanswered questions...
@hishamgornass4577
@hishamgornass4577 Жыл бұрын
Keeping that tie indifferentiated.
@adriatic.vineyards
@adriatic.vineyards 2 жыл бұрын
One of the greatest living thinkers
@williambuysse5459
@williambuysse5459 4 ай бұрын
Meandering and sweet in tone. Let him sink in and the insights pop up. A good counter yet supplement to Leo Strauss.
@atmnurulamin1840
@atmnurulamin1840 11 ай бұрын
It is a pity that I have come to know this great man so late in my life. I would think Professor/Philosopher thought can be basis of uniting democratic forces all countries..
@ChrismAIAutomation
@ChrismAIAutomation 9 ай бұрын
It's always the Prots that ruin everything
@luisathought
@luisathought 3 жыл бұрын
Thank You
@imasorryentertainer
@imasorryentertainer 9 жыл бұрын
Ortcutt, what are you talking about? He cites several works on secularism. Watch the whole speech. It's in, I think, three parts.
@ortcutt
@ortcutt 9 жыл бұрын
I watched all three. First, his description of sociological secularization theory is a caricature. Second, he doesn't present any evidence to dispute that theory. It just seems like more wishing away the evidence, which is what real sociologists like Steve Bruce are constantly encountering.
@urbaneplanner
@urbaneplanner 5 жыл бұрын
What a Q&A session! Often the questions are way less interesting than the lecture, but not here
@doctorj7112
@doctorj7112 2 жыл бұрын
It was tough for me to follow him. 30 mins in and I’m lost.
@matthewmayuiers
@matthewmayuiers 2 жыл бұрын
Charles Taylor is extremely subtle. If you don’t have a background in the history of philosophical and theological debates he’s won’t be the easiest to follow.
@matthewmayuiers
@matthewmayuiers 2 жыл бұрын
Listen to it like 2-3 times, trust me, it’s worth it
@balsarmy
@balsarmy 9 ай бұрын
​@matthewmayuiers he doesn't really link to any philosopher. Common populism
@Fesenfull
@Fesenfull 3 жыл бұрын
56:58
@balsarmy
@balsarmy 9 ай бұрын
Didn't like this lecture. I'm sorry but it is pretty about nothing
@ortcutt
@ortcutt 10 жыл бұрын
He completely fails to account for any of the empirical literature on secularization.
@martinknap8466
@martinknap8466 7 жыл бұрын
so what is he missing then?
@evanhadkins5532
@evanhadkins5532 6 жыл бұрын
He provides couter-examples - like India. Which he regards as falsifying the thesis - in the sense that it is meant to apply everywhere.
@joshorourke4985
@joshorourke4985 3 жыл бұрын
What's the best empirical literature on secularization, in your view? Isn't the guy giving the intro, Casanova, a leading figure in this respect? Of course, taking account of the empirical literature is important, which is why I'm curious what your recomendations are. That said, Taylor is not doing empirical sociology here, it's a different sort of project, a kind of quasi-hegelian analysis of various self-conceptions and the subjective dilemmas to which they give rise. It would obviously be a problem if such analysis flew completely off the rails empirically, but it's not clear to me that's the case.
The Inner Self - Charles Taylor (1988)
1:20:54
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 29 М.
Charles Taylor Lecture: Master Narratives of Modernity
1:31:44
Berkley Center
Рет қаралды 86 М.
Chips evolution !! 😔😔
00:23
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
CAN YOU HELP ME? (ROAD TO 100 MLN!) #shorts
00:26
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
ПООСТЕРЕГИСЬ🙊🙊🙊
00:39
Chapitosiki
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Does Anyone Else Feel Like Everything Has Changed?
13:17
Stephen Antonioni
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
The Malaise of Modernity
4:05:16
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Reading Charles Taylor - Introduction chapter
13:38
Joel Wentz
Рет қаралды 970
Chips evolution !! 😔😔
00:23
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН