Just came here to ask this! Thanks

@@caltube glad I addressed then! Sorry for confusion!

Thanks!

I know! Out of the box you really can't say it tracks nightly HRV, at least not in any worthwhile fashion. Thanks for commenting!

Currently if one performs a Mindfulness app session on waking Athlytic will use the HRV from that session for calculations. So no manual data pruning is required.

@@Dggb2345yeah and also no need to use afib.

Thank you so much for the kind words! Yes it somewhat is, although I don't think I could live without a couple of minor pieces from some of the others!

Hey! Happy to help. I am more focused on value from Watch when it comes to training and recovery, and feel like there's no competition: Garmin is by far the best. Even with the combination of apple watches I shared about I don't feel like they in any way Provide the comprehensive holistic summary of information. There are only two areas that Garmin has less accuracy. Sleep stages and workout tracking heart rate, which I have found to be about 90% accurate so feel it is sufficient. What inaccuracies are you finding? As in that I think it comes down to your primary use for the watch. If it is for the myriad of smart watch functions possible than the Apple Watch is superior, if it is for in-depth training and recovery details with some smart watch functions, then Garmin all the way.

@@fitgearhunter Thank yo so much Fit Gear Hunter. I really appreciate your time and effort. When I watch your videos you convince me to go with the epix 2 and when I watch this video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mqqkp5xpzLDOoo0.html he convinces me to go with Apple Watch ultra 😵‍💫. Pretty confusing right! At the same time sleep tracking and Heart rate accuracy affect the in-depth training and recovery also. I hope that Garmin will fix sleep tracking and heart rate accuracy with a software update. Do you have any updates about those bugs been fixed? A tons of thanks sir

That's great news! Thank you so much for sharing!

which one is more accurate athlytic or Training Today?

@@yamin2000 they both are relatively reliable, but each to look at different aspects of the data they are pulling from the Apple Watch. That's the universal aspect, they are both pulling the same data from the Apple Watch

@highlanderes where did you get this bit of info regarding the removal of outliers? So with training today you don’t have to go and remove them yourself in Apple health?

@@JamesTicehurst Traning today followed Garmin better. Installing Athlytic, Training today and HRV tracker, it became clear that when Athlytic is overly positive (often) compared to Training today, I can see the outliers clearly in HRV tracker. If Training today ignore or smooth out outliers I don’t know, but it works. Athlytic I use for excertion, and it now has a stress parameter fairly similar to Garmin, that I find very useful, especially sleep values.

Yes yes yes - 1,000%. You have to go multiple places to get partially what Garmin provides all in one place. Great comment!

@@fitgearhunter ive bought and returned the ultra 2 times, I wear a fenix7X since launch and i was hoping it could do it, but Garmin is just better. The only miss I have with garmin is enabling my 2FA for DUO on my garmin, it would make everything better. but that one thing lacking... it really is the best options for people doing serious training

but it is Not Accurate better use a polar h10 chest strap or your data will be wrong then all of its wrong!

Yessss. I wish the watches would arrive - still in waiting for even shipment notification - unfortunately I have to purchase like everyone else!

Happy to help! I'm actually reviewing multiple apps again over the next couple of weeks so stay tuned for more!

Dude, thanks so much! That really means a lot

Hey! Thanks for asking. Because from what I've found there's still a normal Mean or Range - 300-400% of Mean measurements are off and reveal that significant outliers should be taken out, in my opinion.

Thank you again!

Great question and I wish I put it in the original video! I'll try to research and add to the pinned comment!

Thanks so much! Yes - the AW isn't competitive in the sports space - at all in my opinion. Maybe someday!

I think the path they’re on is where they’ll mostly stick to. They’ll keep adding metrics they collect and letting third party apps do the dirty work with it

Great question! The AW takes HR measurements between 1-10 minutes, so not really often enough. I think you should only consider an AW if you were dependent on the smartwatch features! The HRV is only 2-3 hours out of the box unless you activate the afib setting as well. I think it's not worth it versus Garmin's options!

@@fitgearhunter What you say is true, my intention is to use it to see my daily HRV for workouts and training load so as not to overload myself. I am in doubt because of how beautiful the apple watch ultra is, but Garmin has many benefits and a lot more battery life.

@@francobellomo9979 yes I would look at the 965/265 to get the better amoled screens then - has a similar screen beauty to the AWU

@@fitgearhunter I didn't know that the 265 has already come out, do you think it's much better against the 255?

@@francobellomo9979 255 doesn’t have training readiness or amoled display so it’s better to go with the 265

Well that would have been a really good piece to add to my review wouldn't it?! Did not think of it initially unfortunately, and will have to look up and add to description details - thank you for asking and pointing out!

Great question! HRV is different person to person from what I've seen, and can't be completely categorized into values - but I will say at the time of this video I was significantly run down. I think the most important is the trend line for your personal numbers. Thanks for asking!

Yes completely - nor does the fitness app built in offer training load tracking or exertion evaluations to determine relative difficulty of the workout on your cardiovascular system

Great! And no - but best practice is just to review the HRV in health and remove the excessively high measurements

@@fitgearhunter Cheers for the quick reply. Your videos are awesome, mate. I definitely smashed the like button and subscribed. Keep up the phenomenal content 👊🏽

@@MrSalnaq thanks so much!

Ohhhhh - lord I should have remembered and asked about that w the developer - if it's available everywhere to everyone. Let me find out

@@fitgearhunter thank you! Great video!

@@rodp7803 thank you!

@@fitgearhunter thanks

@@martinseitlinger2649 yes!

Sure thing - that is actually the point! They are all 3rd party small teams making guesstimates on what their algorithm would define as 'recoverd' or 'strained' etc - so non are validate-able - so none are that easy to say they are reliable

Bevel App

Ha! Good call!

Mr. manly, I could not be more frustrated about that very question! I ordered on opening day at release and the 265 said it had 1-3 days to ship and then the 965 had 5-8 weeks. I was fine with that because they usually ship them in parts, but I still have nothing!

@@fitgearhunter Ah. I see. We will wait patiently then!

@@johnmanley4528 265 on Thursday!

@@fitgearhunter Nice!

Ugh I'm so sorry! Yes hopefully so!

HRV readings through the day are useless. Just stick to nightly or just 1 reading right after waking up

Yes sorry about that, I noted in the top pinned comment that the stress update will be arriving to current users next week!

@@fitgearhunter got it

1,000%. Every day there will be values like 300% of the baseline that will skew the numbers if not deleted.

Not untrue! Haha. I should meditate more haha

Yes saw your FB post too. What are your Garmin nightly average values?

Wait - saw you said 40-60 w Garmin. Tomorrow morning do a breathing exercise on the AW before getting up and see what value it produces

@@fitgearhunter ANywhere from 40 through 75.

@@allanrube5184 yes that would make the AW seem wildly erroneous. I haven't seen others w values that high, although I guess it's now impossible it's certainly unlikely! No other ideas for how to fix though unfortunately. What AW series are you using? (Although not sure that affects things too much)

@@fitgearhunter Same results with Series 7 and Ultra.