They already did.

Hn.

Already did

South American football is a different ball game it's not on the same level as European football interms of technically but it's much more brutal then European football. You do a no look pass against Argentina they are gonna break your legs.

@@mrpk1719 The difference between South American football and European football is money. The best players in the European leagues are usually from South America or from other countries. The best player in the Premiere is not English, the best player in the Spanish league is not Spanish, the best player in the Italian league is not Italian either. And that has been happening for decades, Europe can buy the best players from other leagues and make their league the best, but not purely for talent. South American football since the first World Cup since 1930 and before. I teach the world how to play soccer European soccer developed athletes, but the talent to PLAY soccer, being South American. Do you know Juan Roman Riqueleme? He did not run but he showed Europe how the ball is faster than any player

@facundomorinigo1495 I know that but if you take the best teams from Europe and play them against the best teams from South America you can see that European teams are more superior when it comes to the technical aspect of the game and South Americans are more Physical then European teams maybe it's the philosophy of the way they play the game but South American football is more rugged and brutal and European is more posh and clean it's also have to do with the conditions and the difference in pitchs. Like Messi has played everywhere and against everyone he has played against the best but he said that playing an away game vs Venezuela is the toughest for him because of the altitude they play is so different then anywhere else

@@mrpk1719 I repeat, the best players in South America are bought by Europe, how many players from Europe play in South America? Before the 1990s, the intercontinental cup was very even between South American and European teams. When they buy your best players, how do you compete? The European market pays more, it takes the best from other continents, it can train them better, but the raw material of the ability and the way of playing soccer is not better. Can you understand that? If the USA is positioned as a good league, it must be because it has money to pay, not because it has had good players since its inception, for example.