I returned the Phopik because the Joilcan was more robust but I really prefer the QD legs on the Phopik. Thanks for the comment. Please subscribe and share.
@stromatic42 жыл бұрын
great video thank you
@MoondogReviews2 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Be sure to subscribe.
@quartzimaging3 жыл бұрын
These two are so similar, it is likely they come from the same factory. The Joilcan claims to have 25 mm diameter legs and 38 mm aluminum ball. A large ball is especially valuable, imo. Does the Phopik have those features? If not, it is a major plus for the Joilcan .
@Moondog2A3 жыл бұрын
The ball size was the same or close enough that I didn't notice. But the components of the Phopik plate clamp included polymer, while the Joilcan was all aluminum. Thanks for the comment. Please subscribe and share.
@mr_jonathantaylor Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this review. Would you say the Joilcan is able to withstand a vertical hold of a Canon 5D Mark IV with CANON EF 70-200 2.8L IS III LENS??
@MoondogReviews Жыл бұрын
Easily. Mine held up my camera and telephoto rig which is about 7.8lbs together and with the video monitor and battery attached too, holds about 10lbs or gear.