No video
BetaFPV ExpressLRS - 2.4Ghz Vs. 915MHz
Рет қаралды 63,380
Күн бұрын► BetaFPV ExpressLRS TX: bit.ly/46Lzu3t
- AE: s.click.aliexp...
► ExpressLRS Nano RX: bit.ly/3SdOsLq || bit.ly/BetaFPV... || bit.ly/BetaFPV...
► TBS Tango 2: s.click.aliexp...
► DJI Mavic Air 2: bit.ly/Mavic-Air2
🎵 Music: bit.ly/AUDIIO
* About the test: • Radio Multi-Protocol R...
* Both Radio TXs were set to 100mw and mounted on the Tango 2
- ExpressLRS Version - 1.1.0
- Pkt Rate - 200Hz / 250Hz
- TLM Ratio: 1:64
- 🐜 Antenna: betafpv.com/pr...
╔════╡My Gear╞═════════════════════╡
║ ► Goggles - FatShark HDO2 - bit.ly/HDO-2
║ ► RX Module - bit.ly/rapidFIRE
║ ► Radio Controller - Radiomaster TX16S: bit.ly/TX16S-MAX
║ ► Battery Charger - Hobbymate D6 Duo Pro: bit.ly/D6-Duo
║ ►Lipo Batteries: bit.ly/CNHL-BG
╚════════════════════════════════╡
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣ → bit.ly/subscrib...
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣ I Really Appreciate Your Support!
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
Find Me On Facebook:
► / kremerfpv
Instagram:
► / kremerfpv
Please consider supporting my channel by using my affiliated links:
* Banggood: bit.ly/BG-Kreme...
* HobbyCool: bit.ly/hobbycool
* RDQ: www.racedayquad...?aff=26
* Rotor Riot: store.rotorriot...?aff=10
It doesn't add any extra cost to you and will help me to grow my channel and bring you high quality updated content.
Thanks in advance!
#ExpressLRS #BetaFPV #LongRange
@KremerFPV 2 жыл бұрын
I've tried to make sure that the test was properly done by flying at the same path, using the same TX settings (and also verifying that the output power was very similar), placing the RX and TX antennas and the same orientation and restricting the Mavic Air 2 to 5.8GHz frequency. My only explanation for these results I can think of (unless the 915MHz equipment was faulty) is that the Minimortal Style 915MHz antenna that I used wasn't tuned correctly or just didn't perform as good as a proper sized one. I am going to run the same test again using an Immortal T antenna soon.
@EnglishTurbines 2 жыл бұрын
Yep, I'd say that's a pretty good reason. It's a Dipole and needs to be set vertically, not horizontal as well. The difference in performance is very significant.
@Siamect 2 жыл бұрын
Ok... mini-mortal antennas are not fantastic... Here is what TBS is saying: "This specific variation is designed to be small, light, and easy to use. You CANNOT expect full range from this antenna." And they repeat this statement over and over until your ears are falling off. My take on it is that you probably lose 18dB compared to a full-size tuned dipole. According to signal budget calculators you should have something like 8.4 dB better signal from a 915MHz than from a 2.4 GHz because of the larger antennas of the 915MHz system.
@EnglishTurbines 2 жыл бұрын
@@Siamect Yes, this... exactly.... TBS covering themselves with an alternate, smaller more convenient antenna...for 915mhz...🤔
@R.B_B 2 жыл бұрын
Do you use the DJI TX for fly de mini 2 or use the Expresslrs and the 915Mhz system for fly the drone?
@KremerFPV 2 жыл бұрын
@@R.B_B DJI TX (Mavic Air 2).
@sircrashalotfpv144 2 жыл бұрын
this is great, we are so lucky to have all this fantastic systems in our hobby.
@friendlynomad9840 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for attempting the test. You are a great resource in the FPV community.
@KremerFPV 2 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated!
@maciekgwozdz3136 2 жыл бұрын
maybe a penetration test 2,4 vs 900?
@NatanRufino Жыл бұрын
up
@sthightech860 2 жыл бұрын
How abought 2.4ghz vs 900mhz penetration of elrs for fpv
@lubosschejbal9258 Ай бұрын
@@sthightech860 llower frequency have better penetration thru the objects.
@ClareFPV 2 жыл бұрын
Wow I'm impressed with the 2.4ghz link. Very consistent and fantastic rssi throughout the test. Great video Gal. Stay safe out there.
@jackoneill8585 2 жыл бұрын
did you notice the rssi though 75 where 89 for 900
@Michael-nu6fb Жыл бұрын
So, in short, what should one use?
@stratos7755 8 ай бұрын
@@Michael-nu6fb Depends. Lower frequency will always have better penetration (and thus range), but you can't send the same amount of data per time frame. Although ELRS 2.4GHz should work just fine for about anyone, anywhere for almost any range.
@TheRealWhiteDillard 3 ай бұрын
Stay safe out there... that's the covid propaganda still going strong going strong 😵💫
@jcfpv3454 2 жыл бұрын
Hey guys I wish you all the very best sending my love to all the fpv pilots my life has been ruined by an employer and I worry that I will die with nothing I can do to save my life it's really Breaking Me Down and if you would keep me in your thoughts and your prayers and may all your builds fly high
@kandredfpv 2 жыл бұрын
Hang in there bro. As long as you have life you have hope! You'll overcome this.
@AndreyYeltsov Жыл бұрын
For these expected low-freq ELRS to perform better over long range: the 915Mhz version only has slightly better penetration, while the 2.4Ghz has much wider bandwidth.
@MCsCreations 2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic flying and testing, Gal! 😃 Really impressive system!!! Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@FelipeCristancho 7 ай бұрын
I conducted tests with T20S, T20G, Radiomaster Ranger (all at 2.4 GHz and Dipole), and R9m Lite (915 MHz+Moxon) and obtained similar results, experiencing a decrease of around 10 to 12 dB when operating at 915 MHz, just like you mentioned
@CarbonGlassMan Жыл бұрын
I'm still confused. When I got into this hobby all of the good pilots were using Crossfire 915mhz control links because of the reliability and penetration. Now those same pilots are switching to 2.4ghz. Why? 2.4 still can't penetrate as well as 915 or 868 in Europe. It's my understanding that 2.4 is a faster link, so maybe for racing it's a good link. For penetrating walls it's better than 5.8ghz but not as good as 915. For penetrating water like trees, especially trees with water on the leaves 915 or 868 are better. Am I wrong with this? Something caused pilots to go from the old standard 2.4ghz to the newer more reliable 915/868.
@playmore6699 Жыл бұрын
I have the same questions.
@thirtythreeeyes8624 Жыл бұрын
LoRa it's that simple, with it you can have a 2.4ghz link that still outperforms your video and that's always been the golden rule in FPV, control link just needs to outperform video. Then with 2.4ghz you have the faster packet rate and smaller antenna which is nice. If you're planning on flying 10 miles out up a mountain behind some trees with a 2.5watt VTX then I would still recommend 915mhz but, for 99% of people 2.4 is more than enough with LoRa Wezley Varty flew 2.4 ELRS out 100km.
@CarbonGlassMan Жыл бұрын
@@thirtythreeeyes8624 I remember outperforming the 5.8 analog video link wasn't that hard to do most of the time. Then DJI came on the scene and their 5.8 digital video link had some crazy penetrating abilities and suddenly Frsky rxsr receivers weren't cutting it. Has elrs 2.4 really gotten so good that it can last longer than a DJI 5.8 video link?
@AlexeyGrishutin Жыл бұрын
Fantastic flying and testing, Gal! Really impressive system!
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@alex97349 2 жыл бұрын
How is apparently 2.4Gz better than 900Mz, same power? This does not make sense. Any idea why?
@YOYO-vl6xr 2 жыл бұрын
it's freak programing magic
@lucalive1302 2 жыл бұрын
2,4 is better than 900 in long range and penetration, tested on elrs and ghost not sure about tbs also it depends a lot where you fly. if there is a lot of antennas and interference 2,4 performance is way ahed and better than 900.
@TheAnhydrite 2 жыл бұрын
He was using a poor antenna for the 900mhz test.
@Hutch_Davenport 4 ай бұрын
@@lucalive1302 Lower freq is better for long/penetration. Your 2.4ghz wifi goes further than your 5.8ghz even thought the 5.8 is faster for data transfers at close range.
@user-xb7hd2jz3o 2 жыл бұрын
Good afternoon! Thanks for the test. It is very good to carry out the test in industrial areas and residential areas. Where 2.4 GHz is used
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your feedback. I will try to provide you with better range tests soon :-)
@puneethff4927 2 жыл бұрын
Loved this test brother Amazing
@dilbertmcfly5986 2 жыл бұрын
ExpressLRS is not magic, but sometimes it does feel like it. Receiver 915Mhz antenna pops off.. you still fly around the park 200-300m.. unaware. Normally with FrSky, Spectrum, or FlySky, going behind bunch of leafy trees is no-no.. now RSSI barely drops. But ofcourse, as soon as you go over a hilltop, out of sight, you lose the signal.
@Siamect 2 жыл бұрын
You start with 20dB worse on the 900... Must be something completely wrong. The 900 has bigger antenna and should have better signal from the beginning. If not, something is wrong and it needs to be fixed before testing.
@kaikart123 2 жыл бұрын
Yep, considering the record of ELRS is about 40km on 10mW 915MHz, there is something wrong with his antenna
@ChriFux 2 жыл бұрын
900 MHz physically requires a bigger antenna :) it usually is something with a quarter wavelength, so only considering that a 900 MHz antenna would be ~ 2.7 times bigger
@ramus9 Жыл бұрын
@@ChriFux I got the BetaFPV 900 Nano Rx and the small T antenna that comes with it performs very poorly. I swapped it for a CRSF Immortal T 900 Rx antenna and performance was day and night difference compared to the compact “900” little T that comes with the BetaFPV 900 Nano Rx.
@stickboyfpv4742 Жыл бұрын
It has TOO much power when that close😆 similar to when you fly close to your transmitter and you lose signal because the tx and rx are TOO close to each other😬
@thirtythreeeyes8624 Жыл бұрын
@@stickboyfpv4742 No he was using a mini antenna which is barely an antenna really. They have 10+ db of loss compared to a normal antenna meaning 10% the range.
@travaresaytch 2 жыл бұрын
Why does the osd say 700 for link quality one of my drones say that also but others got a number then 100
@cchance 2 жыл бұрын
you can see somethings wrong from the start when the 900mhz starts at 20db worse than the 2.4ghz you got something faulty.
@KremerFPV 2 жыл бұрын
Please check my pinned comment.
@dmitrykurdyukov2197 2 жыл бұрын
Как всегда отличный сравнительный тест, все честно и предельно наглядно! Thanks Gal!!!
@artifixprime 2 жыл бұрын
Could you explain the top and bottom "signal indicators" please? It looks like there isn't much practical difference out to 4km?
@Walto86 2 жыл бұрын
RSSi, LQ and dB
@thirtythreeeyes8624 2 жыл бұрын
RSSI is kind of useless with ELRS, LQ is how much of the data is being heard and db is how loud it is.
@AvallonYo 2 жыл бұрын
Really tough to tell which one is “better” they both seem to work great!
@thirtythreeeyes8624 2 жыл бұрын
2.4g is the way to go unless you want to fly to the moon. Better latency antenna size and this video looks like 2.4 maintains packets better as well.
@AvallonYo 2 жыл бұрын
@@thirtythreeeyes8624 plus 900 tends to interfere with GPS.
@jackoneill8585 2 жыл бұрын
wait wait did you slap a receiver on a mavic or dji drone and fly iut out? no fpv drone uses dji apps lol seems 900 is the best one for long range
@gmivisualsjason3729 2 жыл бұрын
Very impressed with both….
@edpinel1291 8 ай бұрын
I just get q geprc moz7 with elrs 2.4, I have a radiomaster boxer with internal elrs I havent failsafe but my rssi dbm isnt as good as this one, everytime I go past probably 200 to 300 meters my rssi dbm goes to -100, its not the more open area in the world but I dont feel it should be this bad. Do you think q new antena for my controller would help? Or is probably a bad receiver
@neilfpv 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Gal. Amazing video. I have a quick question. What could be valid reasons why I should switch from tbs crossfire to expresslrs? I just found out about express lrs today.
@toxicwaste1022 2 жыл бұрын
new, smaller, lighter
@ottosun12 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing this. I’m just getting into ELRS with my new Radiomaster Boxer (with the built-in ELRS). I’m also in the process of buying an iFlight 😢Nazgul 5 V2. But in terms of the receiver protocol, I have a choice for an ELRS or ELRS 915mHZ. PLEASE advice and/or guide me in making the right selection. the right Thanks again!
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
My pleasure. I would go with ELRS 2.4ghx RX / TX simply as it’s more popular than the 915mhz version.
@clazy9222 2 жыл бұрын
I have a problem, my range is so bad with my r9 2019 900mhz. 400 meters and failsafe. A new reciever and antenna are helping nothing ( other reciever placement too). I flasht both new? My lq is most of the time high but the rssidb is so low i have after 300meters -90 at 50 mw ???? Can someone help me
@EnglishTurbines 2 жыл бұрын
That DJI drone won't even begin to stretch the range of either band. It can't fly far enough...🤔😳🇬🇧
@fpvdvteam 2 жыл бұрын
your drone have CE signal power limitation, if you need a more power then you need to use FCC hack or Fake GPS to switch on FCC mode
@EnglishTurbines 2 жыл бұрын
@@fpvdvteam 13 Kms is a hard limit for DJI drones...Still nowhere near far enough...🤔🤔😳
@ali3n24 2 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishTurbines hard limit is 17.9km with stock antenna/remote controller (only FCC + Boost?)
@ali3n24 2 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishTurbines kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oddhe9lzypjZe4E.html
@EnglishTurbines 2 жыл бұрын
@@ali3n24 Whatever, it's still nowhere near far enough for these long range systems....🤔😳😀🇬🇧
@achefpv6521 2 жыл бұрын
What frequency is better for freestyle in big field areas?
@johnwalter6410 6 ай бұрын
Any. If you are in an open field doesn’t really matter. 5.6 has the least latency.
@crdias Жыл бұрын
What abaout penetration? Would you expect similar results for 915MHz and 2.4GHz?
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
915Mhz should be better as far as I know.
@jamesmichaelcabrera9613 Жыл бұрын
I get great connection with the Zorro around town flying low. I at least get a 1/2 mile of range i never flew it to his limits Don't want to go looking
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
👌
@micsherwood4930 Жыл бұрын
what this tells me is one is not better than the other. they just give different numbers. it doesn't seem like comparing apples to apples, since you dont show the type or placement of antennas.
@devinmichaelpruett2791 Жыл бұрын
I’m having trouble binding my jumper t-lite v2 to my expresslrs 915 MH? Is it because my jumper is a 2.4? Do I have to get a different module to bind them?
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
Yes - you need to use the same frequency.
@SAMETELMACI 2 жыл бұрын
how could be 2.4 more reliable than 915
@thirtythreeeyes8624 2 жыл бұрын
Interference maybe, 2.4 devices are all digital frequency hopping. I think most things on the 900 band are analog and I think 900 is more susceptible to spurious emissions from other things as well because of the lower frequency.
@geometerfpv2804 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, 915 band is very narrow. I think it's more susceptible to interference.
@f0xvibes 2 жыл бұрын
hi what do you think about the happymodel ES24Tx PRO? It has 1000mw... do you think it is worth double the power, for losing the lcd? i like to upgrade my fs i6x, with an elrs 2.4 module, but im unsure which to choose..
@AlexRCaerobatic 2 жыл бұрын
It all depends on what tasks you plan to use! 1W is a lot for 2.4GHz, then it's easier to pay attention to 900MHz. 250-500mW is more than enough for 2.4GHz.
@onclefly8450 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Gal for this test BRO But low battery 4km no good
@marcgutierrez6600 11 ай бұрын
What drone ?
@900creed 2 жыл бұрын
So I'm trying to decide between 2.4ghz and 900mhz... I'm about to start my long range journey... Which should I choose? 🤔
@shawnzfpv 2 жыл бұрын
Choose physics, and your noise floor.
@maldjab6248 2 жыл бұрын
can you explain which value is important and why? thanks for al the non pro
@KremerFPV 2 жыл бұрын
dBi value is probably the most important one on ExplressLRS.
@Maceyee1 Жыл бұрын
why does this say 1year old video, its been 4 years
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
Nope, just over a year :-)
@nikofpv1614 2 жыл бұрын
Please tell me, I took Betafpv elrs 915mhz and 2.4, so on 2.4 through the lua script, you can turn on the power below 100mw, that is, 10,25,50. and on version 915 below 100mw, it does not turn on, i.e. the minimum power is only 100mw. is everyone like this?
@KremerFPV 2 жыл бұрын
It depends on the module. The minimum power of the BetaFPV 915MHz ELRS module is 100mW.
@marcgutierrez6600 11 ай бұрын
What kind of drone
@mishka_medvedb 2 жыл бұрын
Hi, can you tell me where this telemetry comes from?? what kind of software do you use?
@dronedaddyfpv1109 2 жыл бұрын
This is from dji app
@MrMayex 2 жыл бұрын
Does that mean 2.4GHz is more solid?
@smooth_ops2942 2 жыл бұрын
In this comparison at least.
@Igor-eo1kd 2 жыл бұрын
It means that in a reality there is no practical difference.
@fpvdvteam 2 жыл бұрын
In fact, only for line of sight, in conditions of a large number of walls, it is more sensitive to the reflected signal
@jsnlmb42 2 жыл бұрын
Hey gal, Any recommendations on a full size jr module? I can only find the NAMIMNO VOYAGER Thanks
@tonymorgan328 2 жыл бұрын
Happymodel ExpressLRS 2.4Ghz Tranmitter Jr Module
@JP-qq2kn 2 жыл бұрын
I hear the Namimno TX has better build quality.
@SeeFPv-qm6ie 2 жыл бұрын
can you please help me after downloading firmware on my betafpv elrs module it won't turn on
@KremerFPV 2 жыл бұрын
Hi, did you figure it out by now or you still need help?
@AndrewBlanche 2 жыл бұрын
So which is better. It’s a VS video but explain nothing about either just show flight video
@mattiaf1517 11 ай бұрын
Sorry i didnt get why the 900 MHz was the "worst" when the only "weak Signal" error came in the 2.4 GHz, can someone explain? Dont be mad at me, im really new in this hobby thx.
@Hutch_Davenport 4 ай бұрын
Whoever said that is wrong. This really was a faulty test because neither were pushed to their limits. It's like testing a 10km drone vs a 6km drone and only going 4km. This test is almost useless.
@kratzeni 3 ай бұрын
@@Hutch_Davenport its about the rssi dbm reading, not about going to full failsafe
@jackoneill8585 2 жыл бұрын
and your doing this in the open try around homes or lots of cell toweers
@PhillGraaf Жыл бұрын
Hey there, I want to order my first fav drone and I absolutely do not know what is the difference between 2.4g and 915mhz... What are the main points? Thanks in advance!
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
Hi, in general 915MHz will provide you with a better range than 2.4GHz and will have less interference as 2.4GHz is a very common frequency for WIFI.
@PhillGraaf Жыл бұрын
@@KremerFPV thanks for your reply!makes sense! But is there any downside to 915Mhz? And how big is the difference? Like where does 2.4G normally end?
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
@@PhillGraaf np. Mainly regulation issues that can prevent users from using 915MHz.
@Hutch_Davenport 4 ай бұрын
@@PhillGraaf 915 will go a lot further. maybe 1.5 to 2 times further, but there are not many in use as most drones are 2.4 and 3.4 ELRS goes a long way already.
@chrisalexthomas Жыл бұрын
How are you managing to go this far, with my quad I can barely make 150m without it falling out of the sky and crashing. I've got a radiomaster zorro, bumped up the watts to 250mw and 50hz and yup, sure as anything, it'll RXLOSS 100-150m away :(
@thirtythreeeyes8624 Жыл бұрын
Are you using one of the PCB antenna receivers in particular the flat Betafpv ones? They suck but, even with them you should be getting 1-2km+ of range LOS so it sounds like something is wrong if you've tried a different receiver I would contact radiomaster and try to get a replacement TX module.
@chrisalexthomas Жыл бұрын
@@thirtythreeeyes8624 i've got a literadio 3 pro and a zorro, I'm wondering whether better antennas would help, but when using the flat antenna there is nothing to do, so just on the radio. I will maybe contact with radiomaster like you suggested, cause walking 500m to pick up a quad is annoying as hell...
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
Yes this is very strange. I assume something is off with your antennas or radio receiver.
@chrisalexthomas Жыл бұрын
@@KremerFPV that's the weird thing, it's a new mmcx to sma cable, the connector isn't damaged, the antenna on the sma is new foxeer stubby and it's set to a 200mw vtx (unlocked). So it's just a huge puzzle. I have no idea what it could be. But I keep trying to find out. But I do like watching your videos and seeing what people can do :)
@divingfalconfpv4602 2 жыл бұрын
That 900mhz must be getting cell phone tower interference
@fpvdvteam 2 жыл бұрын
Different countries use different cellular channels
@divingfalconfpv4602 2 жыл бұрын
@@fpvdvteam doesn't Europe use 900mhz
@yonseimatt 2 жыл бұрын
@@divingfalconfpv4602 915mhz I think, which is why the "900mhz" radio links there are 868mhz
@ramus9 Жыл бұрын
Something is completely wrong with your 900 receiver. If you used the “900” compact T antenna that comes with the BetaFPV 900 Nano Rx then your test is not accurate at all. I got the BetaFPV 900 Nano Rx and the small T antenna that comes with it performs very poorly. I swapped it for a CRSF Immortal T 900 Rx antenna and performance was night and day difference compared to the compact “900” little T that comes with the BetaFPV 900 Nano Rx.
@KremerFPV Жыл бұрын
Sorry but I wasn't aware of any issues with this antenna when testing it...
@daviddominguezpozo4448 2 жыл бұрын
👌
@jackoneill8585 2 жыл бұрын
what we need is like 400mhz stuff ham freq
@jeffparisse4202 2 жыл бұрын
Immersion RC has been selling 433MHz gear for almost 15 years now… There is a discontinued 2W TX module on the market.
@jackoneill8585 2 жыл бұрын
@@jeffparisse4202 i know they have it but how bout 20mhzh 1mhz etc if nasa can talk to voyager on with 20 watts and lowe ham freq we should have super good control but we dont
@filiped7298 2 жыл бұрын
Wait, you placed the modules on a mavic? This doesn’t look very scientific since you are not actually on the sticks
@mikeybroe1 2 жыл бұрын
cry
@thirtythreeeyes8624 2 жыл бұрын
Being on the sticks has no effect on the signal. Now mounting it on a mavic could have caused interference especially on 900mhz because it's more susceptible.
@geometerfpv2804 2 жыл бұрын
What the heck does being on the sticks have to do with it? He's checking the range of a receiver, and its transmitting it's signal quality back. What do you think is missing here? He could walk with it and it would still give the data.
@kon8865 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I saw that little weak signal warning there with the 2.4. If youre testing distance with no interference then both drones with same powered transmitters will go just as far obviously lol, test is useless. Where the 900 would make a big difference is in urban setting transmitting through buildings like I fly my Evo 2 pros. 900 goes through walls better period. But this kind of a test would be illegal because you dont have line of sight and would also make the Mavic 3 look really bad. Again, with same transmitter power, both will go as far without interference, and even there you saw a little weak signal warning, probably some 2.4 local interference passing by. I expect great results with the Evo 2 Pro Enterprise V3 that I just ordered.
@firefly2900 2 ай бұрын
3 minutes of video and not one tank is worthless
@jcfpv3454 2 жыл бұрын
If you all would please say a prayer for me I am terrified I will die from a negligent employer who didn't control silica dust I feel trapped with no way out
@metaldetectingnmore8763 2 жыл бұрын
Were you in the trades concrete. Is cement dust very bad to breath
@LovesM855A1 Жыл бұрын
Yes!! 2.4 FTW!!!!! 😊
@jcfpv3454 2 жыл бұрын
I wish you all the very best my life was taken from me for no reason I had no idea my employer was giving me a fatal disease I wish everyday I would left
Anik FPV
Рет қаралды 45 М.
Хобби - летать.
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Петрокей
Рет қаралды 23 М.
Олег Стельмах
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Joshua Bardwell
Рет қаралды 78 М.
Molecula FPV Россия
Рет қаралды 9 М.